Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey

  • 16-10-2010 11:49am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,194 ✭✭✭✭


    Not a cruel late / early April Fools joke thankfully!
    The announcement, made jointly by New Line president and COO Toby Emmerich, Warner Bros. president and COO Alan Horn, and MGM co-CEO Steve Cooper, says the "the two films based on 'The Hobbit' are now greenlit and will begin principal photography in February 2011, under the direction of Peter Jackson."

    The announcement does not mean, however, that the labor issue acting as a hurdle for the production has been resolved. And it's the resolution of that dispute which will determine where the movie will shoot.

    The dispute lies between Jackson and an array of unions, including New Zealand Actors’ Equity and SAG. A “do not work” order is in place on the production, which has refused to recognize union jurisdiction for local actors. Discussions in New Zealand are being facilitated by that country’s government, with little progress reported to date. SAG would not comment on whether it is involved in negotiations.

    If the movie does not shoot in New Zealand, the country where Jackson made his "Lord of the Rings" trilogy, the filmmaker said Warners are looking at five different locales around the world to host the project.
    Tagged:


«13456730

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,134 ✭✭✭✭maquiladora


    Fantastic news.

    I can't believe its 11 years ago to the month that LOTR started principle photography. It doesn't feel that long.

    Not sure how I feel about it being shot on digital 3D cameras. I prefer film to digital but I'm sure they will try to get the look as similar to LOTR as possible.

    I'm sure we will hear casting news very soon.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,200 ✭✭✭Mindkiller


    I'd have preferred to see what Del Toro's interpretation of Middle Earth would have been like.

    Still, I can't wait to see what Peter Jackson will do with the Hobbit.
    I just hope he remembers that The Hobbit is meant to be a little more upbeat than LOTR. No-one wants a grimdark one out of this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,134 ✭✭✭✭maquiladora


    Mindkiller wrote: »
    I'd have preferred to see what Del Toro's interpretation of Middle Earth would have been like.

    Del Toro was one of the writers on the script so there will at least be some part of the films with his stamp on them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 43 Limerick3


    What connection does this have to LOTR? Other then the director obviously..


  • Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 32,387 Mod ✭✭✭✭DeVore


    Bilbo?


    The Ring?

    Gandalf?


    Middle-earth?

    Um.... you have read the book, right? :)


    DeV.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 558 ✭✭✭Kazuma


    It really looks like I'm the only person who isn't so keen on Jackson doing the Hobbit...

    The only thing I saw in LOTR was big ass battles, everything else just seemed like filler...

    So depressing, no doubt the spider scene will turn into an "epic battle", the goblin scene will turn into an "epic battle", etc, etc.

    So while I will reserve a tiny amount of hope that he will get it right (different tone, different pace, different story to LOTR - also, better) I really have a terrible terrible feeling about this :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,134 ✭✭✭✭maquiladora


    Limerick3 wrote: »
    What connection does this have to LOTR? Other then the director obviously..

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hobbit


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,080 ✭✭✭TonyD79


    What connection does this have to LOTR? Other then the director obviously..


    Does the title of the film not give away the connection???:rolleyes:

    Also I dont know how you can anyone can complain about Jackson directing it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    Excellent news indeed :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,134 ✭✭✭✭maquiladora


    Heard James Nesbitt is moving to New Zealand after being offered a major role in this.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I'm reading a book called "Strain" at the moment; it's written by Chuck Hogan with Guillermo del Toro's name attached - on his biography it says "He will direct two films based on The Hobbit, to be produced by Peter Jackson".

    Ha, kinda sickening that it changed probably a few weeks after the book was published.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 497 ✭✭jpm4


    Kazuma wrote: »
    It really looks like I'm the only person who isn't so keen on Jackson doing the Hobbit...

    The only thing I saw in LOTR was big ass battles, everything else just seemed like filler...

    So depressing, no doubt the spider scene will turn into an "epic battle", the goblin scene will turn into an "epic battle", etc, etc.

    So while I will reserve a tiny amount of hope that he will get it right (different tone, different pace, different story to LOTR - also, better) I really have a terrible terrible feeling about this :(

    I see where you're coming from but I think you are being harsh...the films are only Jackson's interpretations of the books at the end of the day. Those films are aimed at the popcorn munching public and not high brow book types so it's no surprise that the battles are going to be emphasised. Anyways, the Spider scene is an "epic battle" :)

    Am really looking forward to this....The Hobbit has a special place in my heart and I think it could actually translate far more easily to the big screen than LOTR. I just hope Smaug is done well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,295 ✭✭✭✭Duggy747


    Nice, I didn't get to appreciate the LOTR films in the cinema so this will be a nice compensation.

    Eurgh, though cue the merchandise overload everywhere!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,072 ✭✭✭PeterIanStaker


    I hope this is done right, I'd also love to hear Christopher Lee voice Smaug!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,339 ✭✭✭me-skywalker


    Limerick3 wrote: »
    What connection does this have to LOTR? Other then the director obviously..

    Oh dear... Oh dear....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,434 ✭✭✭Lamper.sffc


    Great news. ill be counting the days.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,134 ✭✭✭✭maquiladora


    Martin Freeman is in talks to play Bilbo.
    James Nesbitt will be playing Bofur, one of the dwarves.
    Sylvester McCoy is tipped to be Radagast.
    Michael Fassbender and David Tennet are rumored to be up for roles too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,194 ✭✭✭✭Basq


    Martin Freeman is in talks to play Bilbo.
    I'm pretty sure that fell apart, due to committments with the BBC's 'Sherlock'


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,134 ✭✭✭✭maquiladora


    basquille wrote: »
    I'm pretty sure that fell apart, due to committments with the BBC's 'Sherlock'

    Trying to see if they can jig the schedule to fit both The Hobbit and Sherlock I think.

    http://www.metro.co.uk/film/843612-sherlocks-martin-freeman-i-still-want-to-star-in-the-hobbit


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭Jonny7


    Stick to British actors - adds authenticity

    hopefully not some flavour of the month douchebag like that guy from transformers and the hideous indiana jones

    If Jackson stays commited and doesn't produce tooo broad a film (like avatar) then this could be very good

    I never forget reading about Lord of the Rings trilogy being made for the first time and immediately thinking how some douche would screw it up.. but then discovering the amount of detail and thought and depth going into the film.. was great to see them turn out so good


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,976 ✭✭✭✭humanji


    Kazuma wrote: »
    It really looks like I'm the only person who isn't so keen on Jackson doing the Hobbit...

    The only thing I saw in LOTR was big ass battles, everything else just seemed like filler...

    So depressing, no doubt the spider scene will turn into an "epic battle", the goblin scene will turn into an "epic battle", etc, etc.

    So while I will reserve a tiny amount of hope that he will get it right (different tone, different pace, different story to LOTR - also, better) I really have a terrible terrible feeling about this :(
    I'm kind of the same. I honestly don't rate Jackson as that great a director. He has his moments, but I'd have prefered Del Toro to do it.

    Plus, The Hobbit and Lord Of The Rings are fairly different in how they play out. As said above, The Hobbit is more upbeat and LOTR is fairly grim. I'd have thought that two different directors would emphasis that difference a little better.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,209 ✭✭✭maximoose


    have heard that Aidan Turner is lined up to play Fili and Kili


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,200 ✭✭✭Mindkiller


    You have to wonder how the ring will be represented in this film. It's inevitable that it will have a greater significance attached to it now that it did in the book (which came out 2 decades before LOTR).

    I just hope they don't dwell on it too much. I don't remember it being a vital plot piece, just a handy way to accelerate the plot.

    If Jackson tries his best to make this a family-friendly PG film, I think he'll manage to capture the charm and magic of the Hobbit rather well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,194 ✭✭✭✭Basq


    I do think two movies on it is a big excessive.. must be the studios out-in-force ($$$$$$).

    It's a 300 page book for fecks sake.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Sanjuro


    Wasn't David Tennant up for Bilbo too? I like Tennant, but Bilbo must be played by Martin Freeman. He's absolutely perfect for the role. Unfortunately, I'm not holding out much home for it. The second season of Sherlock is due in November 2011, which means the filming will probably take place at the end of spring, start of summer 2011. Probably too much of a clash with The Hobbit for Freeman to do both.

    Never the less, glad it's Jackson. As much as I'd like to see a Del Toro Hobbit film, the continuity of Jackson Hobbit and Rings will be the most important thing. Very interested in seeing what role Michael Fassbender is rumoured for.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 188 ✭✭dmaxontour


    humanji wrote: »
    I'm kind of the same. I honestly don't rate Jackson as that great a director. He has his moments, but I'd have prefered Del Toro to do it.

    I'd be the same, although I just watched The Lovely Bones by Jackson and really enjoyed it. I thought he did a great job.

    For LOTR, there were lots of bits in Jackson's version where I kept thinking how I prefered the scene the way Ralph Bakshi (sp?) did it... like the end of the battle at the end of the Two Towers.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,788 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    Hate to be the bearer of bad news

    http://www.movieweb.com/news/NExDMlYlP6MKBD


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,194 ✭✭✭✭Basq


    Dyflin wrote: »
    Hate to be the bearer of bad news

    http://www.movieweb.com/news/NExDMlYlP6MKBD
    Well... balls!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,134 ✭✭✭✭maquiladora


    basquille wrote: »
    I do think two movies on it is a big excessive.. must be the studios out-in-force ($$$$$$).

    It's a 300 page book for fecks sake.


    By November 2008, he (Del Toro) acknowledged that the book was more detailed and eventful than people may remember.[64] He decided to abandon the "bridge film" concept, feeling that it would be better for the two films to contain only material from The Hobbit:

    "When you lay out [...] the story beats contained within the book (before even considering any apendix [sic] material) the work is enormous and encompasses more than one film. That's why we are thinking of the TWO INSTALLMENTS as parts of a single NARRATIVE. That's why I keep putting down the use of a "bridge" film (posited initially). I think the concept as such is not relevant anymore. I believe that the narrative and characters are rich enough to fit in TWO films.[65]}}


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hobbit_film_project#Structure

    If I remember correctly, its been a few years since I read it, but a lot of stuff that happens in the book is only touched on briefly, like the Battle Of Five Armies where Bilbo gets knocked out and when he wakes up its all over.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,134 ✭✭✭✭maquiladora


    maximoose wrote: »
    have heard that Aidan Turner is lined up to play Fili and Kili

    Interesting, where'd you hear that from?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,209 ✭✭✭maximoose


    Interesting, where'd you hear that from?

    probably not the most reliable source, his cousin! :pac:

    supposedly he madly impressed at auditions and was signed up straight away


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 89,013 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,194 ✭✭✭✭Basq


    I'm all for Freeman and Tennant... but I do think James Nesbitt is one of the most over-rated actors working today.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,134 ✭✭✭✭maquiladora


    JP Liz V1 wrote: »


    hobbitfakeposter.jpg

    :D

    Does sort of look the part alright.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,194 ✭✭✭✭Basq


    hobbitfakeposter.jpg

    :D

    Does sort of look the part alright.
    It's just gonna be 3 hours of Tim... I mean Martin.. disapproving glances to camera..


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,134 ✭✭✭✭maquiladora


    There are rumours going round in New Zeland now that the production of The Hobbit (with a $500 million budget) is moving to Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,434 ✭✭✭Lamper.sffc




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,134 ✭✭✭✭maquiladora



    I feel sorry for the NZ film industry if that happens but it would be some unbelievable boost to the film and tourism industry here if we got it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,976 ✭✭✭✭humanji


    Well they better shoot a hell of a lot of background footage in NZ before they come here. It won't look too good having Bilbo wandering through ghost estates.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,134 ✭✭✭✭maquiladora


    Peter Jackson has confirmed that Warners are flying down to New Zealand next week to make arrangements to move production to another country.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,074 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    There are rumours going round in New Zealand now that the production of The Hobbit (with a $500 million budget) is moving to Ireland.
    I read that here: it has to do with unions. :mad: I disagree with Ireland as a location, though: I think it would be better to shoot in South Africa. Specifically, in the Drakensberg, the original "dragon mountains" of which Tolkien was surely aware, since he was born not far away. I've been there, they're incredibly rugged and beautiful and would make a great setting IMHO.

    You are the type of what the age is searching for, and what it is afraid it has found. I am so glad that you have never done anything, never carved a statue, or painted a picture, or produced anything outside of yourself! Life has been your art. You have set yourself to music. Your days are your sonnets.

    ―Oscar Wilde predicting Social Media, in The Picture of Dorian Gray



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,134 ✭✭✭✭maquiladora


    bnt wrote: »
    I read that here: it has to do with unions. :mad:

    The Union has just now removed the boycott but it might already be too late for New Zealand because countries like Ireland have jumped in to offer Warners special one off incentives to get The Hobbit in their country. Warners will have a tough time turning down those offers now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,862 ✭✭✭mikhail


    I've read eastern Europe as a possible location. Somewhere like Hungary would probably make a lot of sense.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,656 ✭✭✭norrie rugger


    I just do not think that ireland has the mountains, to do this.
    We have hills not mountain ranges


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,134 ✭✭✭✭maquiladora


    Looks like Ireland may be off the list.

    The latest is that Warner Bros are considering moving it to the UK to make use of their own studios where they shot Harry Potter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,434 ✭✭✭Lamper.sffc


    I just do not think that ireland has the mountains, to do this.
    We have hills not mountain ranges

    They could do what they did for Braveheart. As far as I remember they shot all the footage of the high mountain ranges in scotland and the rest in Ireland.

    Personally I hope for the films sake that it remains in New Zealand but as said previous it would be some shot in the arm for Irelands economy and that wouldnt be a bad thing at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,134 ✭✭✭✭maquiladora


    Another rumor going around now that Warner Bros are considering shooting in UK & Ireland making use of their big soundstages in the UK and the Irish countryside.

    Looks like nothing will be decided till some big meetings next week between WB and the New Zealand government.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,208 ✭✭✭✭aidan_walsh


    Freeman confirmed as Bilbo.
    Peter Jackson has, at long last, made an official announcement about who will appear in The Hobbit. He has confirmed Martin Freeman as Bilbo Baggins, taking over the role originated by Ian Holm in The Lord of the Rings. A great many other names were released as well, almost all of whom make up the large company of Dwarves that hires Bilbo to be their ‘burgler’ before setting out to kill the dragon Smaug and recover the dwarven treasure the dragon uses as a bed.

    Complementing Mr. Freeman are:

    Richard Armitage (MI-5, Captain America) as Thorin Oakenshield, leader of the Dwarves, whose grandfather ruled the Lonely Mountain settlement destroyed by Smaug.
    Aidan Turner (Being Human) and Rob Kazinsky (EastEnders) as Kili and Fili, nephews of Thorin.
    Graham McTavish (Secretariat) as Dwalin, blue-bearded, first to arrive at the home of Bilbo Baggins.
    John Callen as Oin, skillful fire-maker. Brother of Gloin.
    Stephen Hunter (All Saints) as Bombur, the fat, sleepy and slow member of Thorin’s company.
    Mark Hadlow (King Kong) as Dori, strongest of the Dwarves, who carries Bilbo on his back at one point.
    Peter Hambleton (The Strip) as Gloin, brother of Oin, initially suspicious of Bilbo’s worth, but eventually convinced. Father of Gimli from The Lord of the Rings.

    More info to come in the coming hours. That’s only eight Dwarves, so we need five more names to make up the film’s company of thirteen.


  • Site Banned Posts: 5,676 ✭✭✭jayteecork


    Kind of hated Martin Freeman till Sherlock where I thought he did a very good job.

    I dunno, I think he seems about right.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭stiffler123


    How is he stretching two movies out of this? I read the book in about an hour.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement