Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest
Google Streetview and shooters
-
30-09-2010 10:19pm#1
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
Mind you, I'm not sure what secret they're protecting here!
It reads - 'The Heart of Shooting in Ireland' - hardly surprising really, given the name of the place as 'Midlands National Shooting Centre of Ireland'.
Just shows ya what a bunch of ****ers the Google Earth editors are.
tac0 -
Advertisement
-
Anything visible on Google Street View is visible from a public place. I don't see the issue. If it were an issue, we'd send recon people out the door ahead of us, guns brought out of gun shops would only be done in the dead of night under the supervision of someone with a thermal imaging camera.
Seriously. Relax, enjoy life 0 -
johngalway wrote: »If it were an issue, we'd send recon people out the door ahead of us
You mean you don't??:eek: 0 -
-
johngalway wrote: »Anything visible on Google Street View is visible from a public place. I don't see the issue. If it were an issue, we'd send recon people out the door ahead of us, guns brought out of gun shops would only be done in the dead of night under the supervision of someone with a thermal imaging camera.
Seriously. Relax, enjoy life
I see an issue John. I think i have the right let alone think i should be asked if someone could display my property or personal belongings or even me for their gain or profit it whatever way it comes.
If i took a pic of you and sold it for lots of dosh then i think you could claim some of it if you hadnt been paid for it (model release)? So i think the minimum is we should be asked and if we say no then that means no for whatever reason.
Google arent spending millions on this for yours and my benefit, unless someone can enlighten me what it is all about.?0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
Mind you, I'm not sure what secret they're protecting here!It reads - 'The Heart of Shooting in Ireland' - hardly surprising really, given the name of the place as 'Midlands National Shooting Centre of Ireland'.
Just shows ya what a bunch of ****ers the Google Earth editors are.
tac
It might not have been done manually.
It's possible that the automatic system recognised the word "SHOOTING" as a mixture of letters and numbers as in a car number plate, if it took the letters O and I as numbers 0 and 1.
The same word in the upper line was not written in capital letters so it would not have looked like a number plate.0 -
Not taxes, social welfare.I'll tell ya what's next, taxes.
Wait until they bring back some form of property tax in Ireland. Then you'll see the gov't weenies using these tools to get yet more dosh out of us.
And in Ireland where satellite imagery showed up dummy sheep used to cheat on EU grants...The town weenies went on google Earth and found everyone in town that had a pool that had somehow forgot to pay their taxes.
How do you think they do it at the moment?Fair points Sparks, however, what I was trying to get at is that they do not need to know anything or go anywhere. They can just get online and find a nice looking soft target at ease.
No, you can see everything that those bushes did not block from the road (the car doesn't go into private areas), 18 months ago or so.Google maps, you can see everything at the back, behind those bushes that block your view from the road.
Besides, if you think you're not on camera now anyway, you're probably wrong - we're not as bad as the UK, but we're trying to be. At least you can declare yourself off-limits to Google Streetview...
...but just think of the positives here for a moment. Want to advertise where your range is to a newbie? Worried they won't recognise the place?
Sorted.0 -
And in Ireland where satellite imagery showed up dummy sheep used to cheat on EU grants...
Link
How do you think they do it at the moment?
Well, on the hills North of the N59, they ordered all farmers to gather all of their stock off the hills on November 3rd 2009. They then sent teams of inspectors, in twos, around to all of those farms. During that time they flew two helicopters and one fixed wing aircraft to inspect the same hills. So there isn't really anywhere to hide anything now, unless North Korea are exporting underground bunker building technicians. But I don't think even the SFP cheque could cover that outlay.0 -
-
-
-
Can't find one; I'm talking about the hullabaloo back in '01 when OLAF found that large herds of sheep were being driven from farm to farm for nefarious purposes relating to EU subsidies. I seem to remember (and no, I'm not mixing it up with Ballykissangel) one farmer having dummy animals in his fields, spotted because of two identical satellite photos a month apart where the 'animals' hadn't moved....johngalway wrote: »Link0 -
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
johngalway wrote: »Link
Actually, thanks to Google it is very easy
;)
From link http://www.audgen.gov.ie/viewdoc.asp?Userlang=GA&DocID=527&StartDate=01+January+2010
Where would we be without it!!:D:D:D
Inspection procedures
Department staff carried out inspections of almost 77,000 applications under the 1997 schemes. Around 15% of cattle scheme applications and 24% of sheep scheme applications were inspected. Around 5% of tillage scheme applications were verified either by means of on-farm inspection or by examination of satellite photography. B the vast majority of the cases inspected, the applications were found to be in order.
Inspectors recontirnended the imposition of penalties in relation to around 3,700 (5%) of the 1997 livestock cases inspected. In over 900 of those cases, including nearly half of the sheep cases, the inspectors concluded that the applicant had been seriously negligent in making the application or had made a fraudulent application. As a result, the inspectors recommended that the applicant be barred from the scheme concerned for one or two years.
Rs,
P.0 -
Advertisement
-
johngalway wrote: »Link
Actually, thanks to Google it is very easy;)
From link http://www.audgen.gov.ie/viewdoc.asp?Userlang=GA&DocID=527&StartDate=01+January+2010
Where would we be without it!!:D:D:D
Inspection procedures
Department staff carried out inspections of almost 77,000 applications under the 1997 schemes. Around 15% of cattle scheme applications and 24% of sheep scheme applications were inspected. Around 5% of tillage scheme applications were verified either by means of on-farm inspection or by examination of satellite photography. B the vast majority of the cases inspected, the applications were found to be in order.
Inspectors recontirnended the imposition of penalties in relation to around 3,700 (5%) of the 1997 livestock cases inspected. In over 900 of those cases, including nearly half of the sheep cases, the inspectors concluded that the applicant had been seriously negligent in making the application or had made a fraudulent application. As a result, the inspectors recommended that the applicant be barred from the scheme concerned for one or two years.
Rs,
P.0 -
-
pedroeibar1 wrote: »Actually, thanks to Google it is very easy;)
From link http://www.audgen.gov.ie/viewdoc.asp?Userlang=GA&DocID=527&StartDate=01+January+2010
Where would we be without it!!:D:D:D
Inspection procedures
Department staff carried out inspections of almost 77,000 applications under the 1997 schemes. Around 15% of cattle scheme applications and 24% of sheep scheme applications were inspected. Around 5% of tillage scheme applications were verified either by means of on-farm inspection or by examination of satellite photography. B the vast majority of the cases inspected, the applications were found to be in order.
Inspectors recontirnended the imposition of penalties in relation to around 3,700 (5%) of the 1997 livestock cases inspected. In over 900 of those cases, including nearly half of the sheep cases, the inspectors concluded that the applicant had been seriously negligent in making the application or had made a fraudulent application. As a result, the inspectors recommended that the applicant be barred from the scheme concerned for one or two years.
Rs,
P.
Cheers P. That's a stupid craic to be at, bound to be caught out now with all the different checks.0 -
-
-
Advertisement
-
Asbestos. Perfectly safe Tack, unless you start cutting it up :eek:Tackleberrywho wrote: »Anybody spot the pyebald down the road from rathdrum !!:D
And is that Galvanize or Asbestos on the roof of RRPC0 -
-
-
Not particularly. We've had quotes to replace the roof, and the removal is a small enough fraction of the cost.Tackleberrywho wrote: »Cost yee a feckin fortune to get rid if you ever want to do up the roof.
Granted if removal was the only thing we were doing, it would be a bit more expensive, but you don't remove a roof without replacing it. :rolleyes:0 -
-
Tackleberrywho wrote: »http://www.citizensinformation.ie/categories/environment/environmental-protection/asbestos_regulations
much cheaper replace regular tin roofs with claddding than asbestos! You can't use asbestos any more, so cost doesn't enter into it.
That'd be great! They'd have to pay for it then, the same way that they have to grant aid retrofitting insulation to current standards.It becomes fiberous over the years of weathering, eventually the Greens will clamp down on it and make everyone remove it. 0 -
You can't use asbestos any more, so cost doesn't enter into it.
That'd be great! They'd have to pay for it then, the same way that they have to grant aid retrofitting insulation to current standards.
I think in a round about way I have proved my point, this street view thingy is bad news.
I can spy on people from miles away.
I have never been in Rathdrum in my life, and yet I can snoop around undetected, looking at all the facilities in the village
Burgulars could do the same, look for weakspots in security etc.
The concept of spying on ones neighbors is in my opinion; is an invasion of privacy.
And if there was no google street view the whole issue of asbestos would never have surfaced.0 -
-
They could also just drive past surely?
Most crims are cout as they were seen in the area prior "casing the joint"
This way they could case the joint without being seen!
If google do this street thing oft5en, you actually get to build up a profile on someone, as all the data is there and you have all the time in the world to take note of things!
Like a Pyebald on the long acre outside rathdrum village 0 -
-
Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement