"The Origin of Specious Nonsense"

J C

pH wrote: »

Posts like this just add to the certainty that you're trolling.

Please look at the videos.

sponsoredwalk

J C wrote: »

Please look at the videos.

I've seen that conversation & it's utterly shocking that you'd mention it as
some sort of evidence of anything This is the best evidence yet that you
are trolling.

J C

sponsoredwalk wrote: »

You're right.

Common ground ... at last.:)

J C

sponsoredwalk wrote: »

I've seen that conversation & it's utterly shocking that you'd mention it as
some sort of evidence of anything This is the best evidence yet that you
are trolling.

Prof Dawkins is a very thoughtful man ... and I could see him thoughtfully considering the many insightful points put to him by Wendy Wright in response to his questions.
They're amazing videos.

J C

sponsoredwalk wrote: »

She's hot in a weird way...

Some of the most beautiful and intelligent women I have ever met are Creationists.

JohnathanM

J C wrote: »

Some of the most beautiful and intelligent women I have ever met are Creationists.

You should get out more.

sponsoredwalk

J C wrote: »

Prof Dawkins is a very thoughtful man ... and I could see him thoughtfully considering the many insightful points put to him by Wendy Wright in response to his questions.
They're amazing videos.

They come from the uncut interviews for The Genius of Charles Darwin.
Here is a list, you could try to find them online or else buy that tape, this
Wendy interview is one of the worst by comparison, the others are so
much more interesting.

J C

J C wrote: »

The entire basis of science ... that our rational faculties are indeed rational ... is premised on our minds not being the product of random mistakes interacting with random environmental selection ... which would result in total chaos.
Science is based on the fact that our rational minds are the product of rational intelligent design!!!

Oh you're so wrong, I'm just going to have debunk your bollocks.

No wait, you're still a troll.
And a sad one at that.

smokingman

Did you know......
The author of this nonsense book used to run a porn mag called "Sin" - so he's not just nuts then, he's a dirty old man as well I hear you say. He doesn't seem to be a christian at all in fact but yet tries to put a book full of wildly troll-like writing on the shelves in the hope that the controversy would fuel sales....and everyone knows there's no such thing as bad publicity...
Then how would he keep the name in google searches in an almost daily active way I wonder.....hmmmm what a dilly...

robindch

J C wrote: »

and here he went to see Wendy Wright ... and she helped to point him in the right direction!!! ... she did so in a very lady-like manner ... and with a beautiful smile!!!!

If I ever woke up next to that woman, I think I would hang myself. She is a vuvuzela in human form.

J C wrote: »

Prof Dawkins is a very thoughtful man ... and I could see him thoughtfully considering the many insightful points put to him by Wendy Wright in response to his questions.

Since you can't read body language, I'm afraid that I have the sad job of pointing out to you that Dawkins isn't "thoughtfully considering" what that woman was lecturing him about.

He was, in fact, attempting to find some means of communicating, some common ground -- any -- with a stupid, petulant and abominably uninformed woman who seems to think that the object of a discussion is to whine louder and longer than anybody else.

I've had more intelligent and worthwhile conversations with a two-year old.

liamw

pH wrote: »

Posts like this just add to the certainty that you're trolling.

I'm now fully convinced on the trolling.

Marcus.Aurelius

I think I'm ready to call troll too.

CiaranMT

J C wrote: »

Guys ... there is no evidence for Materialistic Evolution .

... Prof Dawkins seems to now be going through a 'searching' phase ... and here he went to see Wendy Wright ... and she helped to point him in the right direction!!!
... she did so in a very lady-like manner ... and with a beautiful smile!!!!

... fascinating stuff!!

That woman is the definition of gowl.

Improbable

JC, you missed my point entirely. Go back and read it again. Your main assertion for the past several YEARS as has been pointed out is that even a small protein cannot be "randomly assembled" as YOU call it (displaying a great deal of ignorance about the subject. My post addresses that issue by showing that Proline, a single amino acid, can act as a catalyst for a variety of reactions.

fatmammycat

Absolute troll, don't waste your time.

housetypeb

He behaves like a troll,he has a small rotating pile of standard answers that he posts in reply to any questions.
He would be quite happy to see this thread run for ever.
He's either a troll or possibly needs medical help for an obsessive compulsive disorder.

GO_Bear

J C wrote: »

Shes more fake than my malibou stacey doll

Dades

That loon still reminds me of this guy...

J C

robindch wrote: »

If I ever woke up next to that woman, I think I would hang myself. She is a vuvuzela in human form.Since you can't read body language, I'm afraid that I have the sad job of pointing out to you that Dawkins isn't "thoughtfully considering" what that woman was lecturing him about.

He was, in fact, attempting to find some means of communicating, some common ground -- any -- with a stupid, petulant and abominably uninformed woman who seems to think that the object of a discussion is to whine louder and longer than anybody else.

I've had more intelligent and worthwhile conversations with a two-year old.

Is that 'sour grapes' ... or what?

Suffices to say that any objective observer would conclude that Wendy Wright is a very articulate, capable and intelligent woman ... who pointed out a few 'home truths' to the good Professor.

Come on Robin, try and get over your religious 'hang-ups' ... which undermine your credibility ... ad hominem attacks are the last resort of people with a lost cause!!!!

J C

Improbable wrote: »

JC, you missed my point entirely. Go back and read it again. Your main assertion for the past several YEARS as has been pointed out is that even a small protein cannot be "randomly assembled" as YOU call it (displaying a great deal of ignorance about the subject. My post addresses that issue by showing that Proline, a single amino acid, can act as a catalyst for a variety of reactions.

Enzymes catalyse many biochemical reactions ... but their catalytic functions have no bearing on how they were formed in the first place.
The non-functional 'combinatorial space' is effectively infinite for any specific enzyme ... and thus it requires an initial appliance of intelligence to produce it.

J C

fatmammycat wrote: »

Absolute troll, don't waste your time.

... try to not focus on me ... try instead to provide some evidence, that cannot be completely demolished in five seconds flat, for your favourite theory!!!

J C

housetypeb wrote: »

He's either a troll or possibly needs medical help for an obsessive compulsive disorder.

... perhaps you should try taking the tablets yourself ... they won't help you to do the impossible ... like coming up with evidence for the spontaneous production of CFSI ... but they may help to not feel too bad about not being able to do so!!!!

Aw... looks like some one is getting desperate to troll now.

You're just adorable in a sad way JC.

J C

King Mob wrote: »

Aw... looks like some one is getting desperate to troll now.

... don't do it ... you could get kicked off the boards for trolling!!

King Mob wrote: »

You're just adorable in a sad way JC.

... and I love you too ... in a purely platonic way!!!:)

J C

J C wrote: »

... don't do it ... you could get kicked off the boards for trolling!!

... and I love you too ... in a purely platonic way!!!:)

And now you're trying in another thread because you're failing here.
I don't know if is should be impressed at the persistence or pithy you for being a sad sad troll for 5 years.

smokingman

Did you know......
The author of this nonsense book used to run a porn mag called "Sin" - so he's not just nuts then, he's a dirty old man as well I hear you say. He doesn't seem to be a christian at all in fact but yet tries to put a book full of wildly troll-like writing on the shelves in the hope that the controversy would fuel sales....and everyone knows there's no such thing as bad publicity...
Then how would he keep the name in google searches in an almost daily active way I wonder.....hmmmm what a dilly...

housetypeb

J C wrote: »

... perhaps you should try taking the tablets yourself ... they won't help you to do the impossible ... like coming up with evidence for the spontaneous production of CFSI ... but they may help to not feel too bad about not being able to do so!!!!

Jesus christ.......Even when you reply to a post that mocks you for obsessive behaviour ....... you feel the need to bring up spontaneous production of cfsi.......... If that isn't obsessive behaviour,what is?...............really think now that you're not trolling as such..... but reaching out for contact the only way you know...................

J C

housetypeb wrote: »

Jesus christ.......Even when you reply to a post that mocks you for obsessive behaviour ....... you feel the need to bring up spontaneous production of cfsi.......... If that isn't obsessive behaviour,what is?...............really think now that you're not trolling as such..... but reaching out for contact the only way you know...................

... as a Christian I reach out to everybody in this sin-filled, fallen ... but wonderful and amazing World ... that is but a pale imitation of the World to come!!!!

J C

J C wrote: »

... as a Christian I reach out to everybody in this sin-filled, fallen ... but wonderful and amazing World ... that is but a pale imitation of the World to come!!!!

Except you're not a Christian and no one really believes you are.
So why the act JC?

The Mad Hatter

He's started posting again in the BCP thread in t'other forum too. Hadn't seen much sign of him there for a little while.