Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Is it time for the government to make motor tax rates a little fairer??

  • 16-08-2010 04:44PM
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 959 ✭✭✭


    Hi

    Would it be a good idea to put a bit of pressure on our potiticians to make the motor tax system a little fairer on the less well off in society.

    They could raise the rates for the post 2008 car owners a little (as they will prob be richer anyway) and lower the motor tax rates a little for those of us still driving older cars.


«1

Comments

  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,926 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    No.

    It's only just changed to a greener system with apparently no loss to the exchequer. Older car drivers were already paying the higher rates.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 959 ✭✭✭changes


    No.

    It's only just changed to a greener system with apparently no loss to the exchequer. Older car drivers were already paying the higher rates.


    Those rates were/are far too high imo


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 259 ✭✭frank gooding


    scrap road tax and vrt put 1 or 2 cents on fuel.
    this should be very easy to calculate.

    If you you use your car the gov gets tax.

    If you use a lot or drive a gas guzzler then the gov gets tax.

    No need for motor tax checks or discs or employees the gov saves money.

    There is huge tax creamed off fuel already so no extra dmin costs.

    Foreign registered cars don't matter any more as they pay the tax trhough fuel.

    More new car sales as they will be much cheaper on the forecourt.

    Those of us doing small private mileage can take the hit on the fuel and buy some real nice big barges.

    Someone explain the flaw in my logic....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,908 ✭✭✭✭MetzgerMeister


    scrap road tax and vrt put 1 or 2 cents on fuel.
    this should be very easy to calculate.

    If you you use your car the gov gets tax.

    If you use a lot or drive a gas guzzler then the gov gets tax.

    No need for motor tax checks or discs or employees the gov saves money.

    There is huge tax creamed off fuel already so no extra dmin costs.

    Foreign registered cars don't matter any more as they pay the tax trhough fuel.

    More new car sales as they will be much cheaper on the forecourt.

    Those of us doing small private mileage can take the hit on the fuel and buy some real nice big barges.

    Someone explain the flaw in my logic....

    I too think is an excellent idea. Although!! The way the system is now, cars are sitting on the forecourts with tax. If your idea was in place now, those same cars would be sitting idle (maybe not since you pointed out they'd be cheaper) not making money for the government. Get me??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,236 ✭✭✭Breezer


    What they should do is what I have said all along: allow drivers on the older system to switch to the new system if the CO2 data is available and it is economically advantageous for them to do so.

    Example: I drive a Toyota Aygo first registered in September 2007. I pay €172 pa motor tax. Were I driving the same Toyota Aygo, but it had not been registered until January 2008, a whopping 5 months later, I would pay €104 pa motor tax. The same goes for many people driving pre-08 diesel cars.

    I wrote to John Gormley at the time to point this out and he replied that if cars could be moved onto the new system, it wouldn't be fair on those people with CO2-spewing exhausts who hadn't decided to go greener because there was no associated financial incentive at the time. I wrote again, querying why (as I had said the first time), this couldn't be done solely for those who had thought a bit greener prior it hitting them in the pocket, allowing the gas guzzlers to continue on the same rates as before. I'm still waiting on a reply to that one.

    Of course, the whole thing has nothing to do with environmentalism and a lot to do with money. A bit like the new flat-rate energy levy of €30 that is supposed to magically make us think more about the amount of electricity we use, even though using less will make no difference to this figure.

    And yes, frank gooding's idea is the best one.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,082 ✭✭✭questionmark?


    scrap road tax and vrt put 1 or 2 cents on fuel.
    this should be very easy to calculate.

    If you you use your car the gov gets tax.

    If you use a lot or drive a gas guzzler then the gov gets tax.

    No need for motor tax checks or discs or employees the gov saves money.

    There is huge tax creamed off fuel already so no extra dmin costs.

    Foreign registered cars don't matter any more as they pay the tax trhough fuel.

    More new car sales as they will be much cheaper on the forecourt.

    Those of us doing small private mileage can take the hit on the fuel and buy some real nice big barges.

    Someone explain the flaw in my logic....


    I agree with all of the above.

    The only problem is this country!

    You would think this would be easy wouldn't ya. But if this government brought in the changes tomorrow it would be more like an extra 10cent a litre instead of 1 or 2 cent.

    We would still have to pay for these staff as they would be kept on thus why such a large tax on petrol would be introduced.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,733 ✭✭✭✭R.O.R


    scrap road tax and vrt put 1 or 2 cents on fuel.
    this should be very easy to calculate.

    If you you use your car the gov gets tax.

    If you use a lot or drive a gas guzzler then the gov gets tax.

    No need for motor tax checks or discs or employees the gov saves money.

    There is huge tax creamed off fuel already so no extra dmin costs.

    Foreign registered cars don't matter any more as they pay the tax trhough fuel.

    More new car sales as they will be much cheaper on the forecourt.

    Those of us doing small private mileage can take the hit on the fuel and buy some real nice big barges.

    Someone explain the flaw in my logic....

    There would be no forecourts left for new cars to be sold from, as the huge depreciation that would happen to dealers current stocks when VRT was removed, would kill off those that have weathered the July 2008 storm.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,236 ✭✭✭Breezer


    We would still have to pay for these staff as they would be kept on thus why such a large tax on petrol would be introduced.
    I'd like to rephrase. Frank gooding's idea is the best one, bar this problem. And this problem would only arise after months of protests, inconvenience to the public, and negotiations.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 536 ✭✭✭ahal


    changes wrote: »
    Hi

    Would it be a good idea to put a bit of pressure on our potiticians to make the motor tax system a little fairer on the less well off in society.

    They could raise the rates for the post 2008 car owners a little (as they will prob be better richer anyway) and lower the motor tax rates a little for those of us still driving older cars.

    Short answer "yes"

    Like most things that involve being fair / logic, it's unlikely to happen though, unless we get a bit militant. I don't mean kneecappings but rather the 'Axe tax' style protests of the 1980's. We need to rediscover that thing called anger in this country.

    I'm not sure about using the money from post '08 motorists ... as things stand pre - '08 drivers are subsidizing them as it is. I put it to a senior Green party man that the fairest way of implementing carbon tax would be to do it at source - the NCT - regardless of age.

    He told me that the NCT doesn't test for Co2 emissions, which left me somewhat confused and indeed gobsmacked. I mean wtf? I thought that was a cornerstone of the bloody thing!

    There are so many strands to the current mess it's hard to know where to begin. Bill Cullen went on telly recently to blast the Greens for ruining the secondhand car market. Only problem is, the trade has been lobbying for years in order to all but eliminate the used car market. Can't have it the both ways.

    Regards,

    Tony.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,721 ✭✭✭E39MSport


    Tax the fuel.

    I'm sick of paying thousands every year for road tax when I cover less than 5k miles pa.

    The focker in the so called eco car paying 125 Eur and covering huge miles is the winner.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,544 ✭✭✭✭Alun


    ahal wrote: »
    He told me that the NCT doesn't test for Co2 emissions, which left me somewhat confused and indeed gobsmacked. I mean wtf? I thought that was a cornerstone of the bloody thing!
    They test for CO, not CO2.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 959 ✭✭✭changes


    I'm glad to hear that people are contacting the politicians about this. I emailed john gormley ages ago about it also. If thousands of people got on to them it may have an impact.

    I would love to see the motor tax abolished and put onto fuel. I'm looking at getting a car soon (can't afford 2008 or newer) and if i don't want to pay €450 to €600 a year in motor tax i need to forget about diesel cars and am left with a 1.4 or lower engine size. Its very frustrating.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,724 ✭✭✭flutered


    the greens + tax = fair ? not likely me thinks. as to the op on about co tax of course the rich get richer, since when has the poor being catered for.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,280 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    adding a few cents to fuel is fine for the low mileage user, and while i can understand peoples concerns about road tax etc... the only fair way would be to raise the VAT rate on fuel , this way the commercial sector wouldnt have to feel the pinch for vehicles that are essential to be high mileage. I know that adding 5 cent more to a litre of diesel would be far worse than paying 288 euro a year in tax for commercial van/4x4 drivers, by only changing the VAT rate on fuel it does not impact business, only consumers


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,179 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    adding a few cents to fuel is fine for the low mileage user, and while i can understand peoples concerns about road tax etc... the only fair way would be to raise the VAT rate on fuel , this way the commercial sector wouldnt have to feel the pinch for vehicles that are essential to be high mileage. I know that adding 5 cent more to a litre of diesel would be far worse than paying 288 euro a year in tax for commercial van/4x4 drivers, by only changing the VAT rate on fuel it does not impact business, only consumers

    It's what the government are saying that the polluter pays, if you do huge mileage you are creating more pollution and should pay more.

    It might encourage some "businesses" to go for a smaller carvan/van rather then the big SUV they currently have. It's a perfectly fair method and if businesses have valid usage for the fuel used they could reclaim it some other way.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,549 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    With the green shower in power, the only change to motor tax rates will be an upward one!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,683 ✭✭✭✭Owen


    I've 2 cars. One's got the 320d engine which is clean, loves trees, and makes magical fairys pop out of it's arse wherever it goes. Because it's a 02, I pay 600+ a year for tax, yet someone with an 08 version of my engine pays 156 a year. I'd happily pay 3/400. The other car does about 1500 miles a year. Sometimes less. And I still end up paying 430 odd a year for that. Pain in the arse.

    I'd much rather we keep the VRT as is, but make motor tax an additional charge at the pumps.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 536 ✭✭✭ahal


    Alun wrote: »
    They test for CO, not CO2.

    Well spotted

    *yawn*

    Typo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,171 ✭✭✭af_thefragile


    scrap road tax and vrt put 1 or 2 cents on fuel.
    this should be very easy to calculate.

    If you you use your car the gov gets tax.

    If you use a lot or drive a gas guzzler then the gov gets tax.

    No need for motor tax checks or discs or employees the gov saves money.

    There is huge tax creamed off fuel already so no extra dmin costs.

    Foreign registered cars don't matter any more as they pay the tax trhough fuel.

    More new car sales as they will be much cheaper on the forecourt.

    Those of us doing small private mileage can take the hit on the fuel and buy some real nice big barges.

    Someone explain the flaw in my logic....

    2 Issues.
    Firstly the government isn't going to just add 1 to 2 cents. It'll probably add more like a wollop of 10c or 20c if its to implement this system.

    Secondly this would work great for anyone who owns an old or new car with a big engine paying in excess of 500eur in tax. But the majority drive small hatchbacks or 1-1.4l engines and don't pay more than 300eur in tax. I don't think they'ld be too pleased with the new system.

    And finally as kbannon pointed out, its not going to happen.

    Unless people learn to get out in the streets and protest. And not the type of protest on O'Connell street where after a couple of hour the gards shoo you away but a proper protest people used to do back in the days. Which with Big Brother watching again isn't going to happen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,262 ✭✭✭Vertakill


    I've 2 cars. One's got the 320d engine which is clean, loves trees, and makes magical fairys pop out of it's arse wherever it goes. Because it's a 02, I pay 600+ a year for tax, yet someone with an 08 version of my engine pays 156 a year. I'd happily pay 3/400. The other car does about 1500 miles a year. Sometimes less. And I still end up paying 430 odd a year for that. Pain in the arse.

    I'd much rather we keep the VRT as is, but make motor tax an additional charge at the pumps.

    Agreed. Peoples future car purchases should not be so majorly dictated by the motor tax system. The government may stand to make more money if they were taking in small amounts of money from fuel, rather than taking a lump sum from everyone which practically needs to be pried out of our hands.

    We all begrudge handing over large amounts of money to our government for motor tax because we feel we're being shafted, so we all go out and buy a 2008, 2 litre, German diesel.
    Cutting your nose off to spite your face.

    It annoys me especially because it's a joke when I do about 5k miles p/yr max and pay 1500 for road tax, whereas there's people paying a fraction of my road tax but pumping out way more emissions than me in our so-called 'greener' motor tax system.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,815 ✭✭✭✭Anan1


    ahal wrote: »
    Well spotted

    *yawn*

    Typo.
    You might want to tone down the attitude, it's quite clear from your first post that it wasn't a typo:
    ahal wrote: »
    I put it to a senior Green party man that the fairest way of implementing carbon tax would be to do it at source - the NCT - regardless of age.

    He told me that the NCT doesn't test for Co2 emissions, which left me somewhat confused and indeed gobsmacked. I mean wtf? I thought that was a cornerstone of the bloody thing!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 536 ✭✭✭ahal


    Anan1 wrote: »
    You might want to tone down the attitude

    Does this relate to the present or the last problem I had with you over a year ago? I consider thanking trivial correction low - level trolling. And the point of the thread again was? ....
    Anan1 wrote: »
    it's quite clear from your first post that it wasn't a typo:

    So you're calling me a liar? Say it straight.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    kbannon wrote: »
    With the green shower in power, the only change to motor tax rates will be an upward one!
    They should stick a carbon tax on the Green Party, the amount of nonsense and crap they spout is unnecessarily adding to our CO2 emission levels :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,815 ✭✭✭✭Anan1


    ahal wrote: »
    Does this relate to the present or the last problem I had with you over a year ago? I consider thanking trivial correction low - level trolling. And the point of the thread again was? ....



    So you're calling me a liar? Say it straight.
    Banned for a week for arguing about moderation on-thread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,160 ✭✭✭bmw535d


    scrap road tax and vrt put 1 or 2 cents on fuel.
    this should be very easy to calculate.

    If you you use your car the gov gets tax.

    If you use a lot or drive a gas guzzler then the gov gets tax.

    No need for motor tax checks or discs or employees the gov saves money.

    There is huge tax creamed off fuel already so no extra dmin costs.

    Foreign registered cars don't matter any more as they pay the tax trhough fuel.

    More new car sales as they will be much cheaper on the forecourt.

    Those of us doing small private mileage can take the hit on the fuel and buy some real nice big barges.

    Someone explain the flaw in my logic....

    that would cost a haulage company an extra 22000 a year in fuel bills. where are they supposed to get that in this day and age?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,445 ✭✭✭Absurdum


    kbannon wrote: »
    With the green shower in power, the only change to motor tax rates will be an upward one!

    has any party ever pledged to actually reduce motor tax rates?

    didn't think so


    I'm no fan of the Greens nor the current rates, but the CO2 system is fairer than the old cc system.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 259 ✭✭frank gooding


    Motorist is a cash cow with no lobby.

    Lets face they won't even have the courtesy to buy you a drink before you get screwed.

    So we just accept it and assume the position.

    Pay your tax and think of Ireland.

    As for hauliers on diesel stick on vat or just stick it on petrol.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,374 ✭✭✭Saab Ed



    Those of us doing small private mileage can take the hit on the fuel and buy some real nice big barges.

    Someone explain the flaw in my logic....

    We'll run out of barges :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,880 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    GDY151


    What's happened with car sales in this country is the same as what happened with the houses, we relied on a system of sales and transfers of vehicles too long and not taxed the actual use of the vehicles in the same way that a property tax would help the tax now missing from little or no homesales. Polluter pays is the way to go, a car doesn't pollute until it's driven from A to B.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,880 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    GDY151



    Pay your tax and think of Ireland. Anglo.

    Fixed that for ya ;)


Advertisement