Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

New Masterpiece might be a ROTF Leader Class Repaint!

Comments

  • #2
    Galvasean
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    If that's true it' the laziest thing I've ever heard. A new low for HasTak :(


  • #3
    MarkHall
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,144 ✭✭✭MarkHall


    I find this hard to believe. There is a standard to MP and not one of the movie leaders matches.


  • #4
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    chopperbyrne wrote: »
    Rereleasing a toy from last year as a MP is both lazy and money grabbing.
    (

    They have been doing it for years .


  • #5
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Actually i heard of a masterpiece rodimus at the end of the year .


  • #6
    DualBladez
    Closed Accounts Posts: 54 ✭✭DualBladez


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Actually i heard of a masterpiece rodimus at the end of the year .
    interesting


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    Galvasean
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    not_xanthor wrote: »
    Yes, it does smack of cynicism on the part of Takara, especially when the packaging art circulating shows the tattoos don't look any different from Hasbro's version,

    Not least in that they will charge Masterpiece price for what was supposed to be a Leader class.


  • #8
    Galvasean
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    not_xanthor wrote: »
    That said, it still *feels* like it was originally intended as a mainline mold, there's a sort of 'chunkiness' or 'robustness' to a lot of it that i haven't found in the MP line.

    I'd put that down to the main lines being intended for kids (aswell as collectors) and need to be that bit more durable.


  • #9
    Galvasean
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    not_xanthor wrote: »
    Indeed. I wonder how many five year olds got MP Skywarp for Xmas.... and how many of them are still intact.

    I can only imagine. "Oh look a big Transformer and not too expensive..."


  • #10
    chopperbyrne
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,081 ✭✭✭✭chopperbyrne


    I got MP Skywarp cheap from Argos.

    Still MISB as I'm undecided about keeping it or finishing the set of Seekers.


  • #11
    chopperbyrne
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,081 ✭✭✭✭chopperbyrne


    Not interested in the coneheads. Not even a toy collector at all. MP Skywarp is the only one I have, but it'd be a shame to have Skywarp and not Thundercracker and Starscream.


  • Advertisement
  • #12
    JohnMc1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,987 ✭✭✭JohnMc1


    [QUOTE=not_xanthor;66713504
    but it's still amusing to see people get their panties in a twist because their precious G1-centric line might be 'defiled' by a movie design.[/QUOTE]

    Actually this seems to be a seperate Masterpiece line. Masterpiece Movie Starscream has a different designation than the others [ie. Masterpiece Prime was MP-01, Movie Starscream will be MP-M01]

    I haven't really collected any of the Masterpieces [I have Prime and thats it] so adding Movie Screamer is definitely not my "panties in a twist"


Advertisement