Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

If Germany won WW II ...............

  • 26-06-2010 12:14AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 420 ✭✭


    What do you think the world would be like today? I have always wondered this. Would there be Chavs? Would we all be speaking German? What other races would Hitler have tried to rid of?


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,263 ✭✭✭✭ejmaztec


    What do you think the world would be like today? I have always wondered this. Would there be Chavs? Would we all be speaking German? What other races would Hitler have tried to rid of?

    Military conscription would probably have nipped potential chavs in the bud.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,968 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Threads asking if Germany won ww2 would be banned! :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,255 ✭✭✭getz


    in german archives from the last war,stated hitler was intending to split europe into different zones,hitler himself intended to have direct control of both britain and ireland


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭Artur.PL


    mike65 wrote: »
    Threads asking if Germany won ww2 would be banned! :mad:
    this is alternative history, very popular. Threads like this one(i.e.) should be banned.

    One thing is for sure. Slavs would be annihilated.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 420 ✭✭NoseyMike2010


    Yes. Surely you must have wondered what the World would be like if he had won. Would the euro even exist? Would the Deutsch mark be the biggest currency in the world. Would we all even be speaking German!!! :confused::confused:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,778 ✭✭✭Pauleta


    We wouldnt be speaking German although im sure we would all have a good grasp of the language how we could understand what Der Fuhrer is telling us from the capital in Berlin.

    Would there be chavs? Not freaking hope :D

    All in all Hitler was mental and Germany could never win the war for the reason that Hitler would of wanted to invade everywhere until the whole world was his. If Hitler was assassinated, i think it could of been a different story.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 169 ✭✭mr j tayto


    Our buses and trains would all run on time.!:D:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,943 ✭✭✭smcgiff


    We'd all have parents embarrassed about their photos sporting the one time popular Hitler Moustache - twas only huge in the 70s.

    Also - Ireland would be united ... possibly independent when the Germans realised even they couldn't get our trains to run on time.

    Instead of fading pics of Pope <insert holy guy here> on Ireland's walls we'd have faded pictures of Der Fuhrer.

    We'd have the sexiest military uniform in the world.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭xflyer


    When you talk about Nazi Germany winning the war people tend to think we would all be occupied and speaking German. In fact even during the war countries that were aligned with Germany were not occupied. Countries like Romania, Italy, Hungary. That would have remained the case. We would all be in one form or another be vassals of Germany included in the greater Reich but not occupied. Countries like France, Holland etc would probably have German troops based there but would be independant and allied with Germany. Indeed if you look at Vichy France they were halfway there during the war. We and the British would probably be left pretty much alone. Hitler in reality never wanted to fight the British and he had little interest in Ireland except as a back door to Britain. Southern Europe would be left to the Italian fascists for the most part. The Germans were really sucked into that area by the blundering activities of Mussolini.

    Other countries and peoples would not be so lucky, Poland would simply be part of Germany and not many Poles would be left to complain. The same goes for many other eastern European countries. That was where Hitler's real interests lay. Germay itself would be a sprawling giant and a superpower but mainly to the east having eliminated the Soviet Union.

    However this all supposes that Germany stayed the course after Hitler died. He was a sick man in '45 anyway. How long he would have survived after that nobody knows. The Nazis were actually quite fragmented other than in their loyalty to Hitler. He liked to keep it that way. So they were constantly undermining each other and working to their own agenda often in an attempt to please Hitler.

    Once Hitler died the Wehrmacht were released from their oath of loyalty to him. They might have turned on the SS or vice versa. There was no obvious natural successor to Hitler, no charismatic figure to take up his role. There could easily be a huge civil war in Germany as rival Nazis attempted to take control. How that might have turned out is anybody's guess. The third reich may simply have fallen apart with Germany returning to it's status pre 1871 with a multitude of independant states each ruled by whoever won the local battle.

    So Germany may have won the war but lost the peace once Hitler was out of the picture. He really held together the unity of Germany during his time. It was devotion and loyalty to him and his vision that kept the Germans going.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,427 ✭✭✭Dr Strange


    Pauleta wrote: »
    We wouldnt be speaking German although im sure we would all have a good grasp of the language how we could understand what Der Fuhrer is telling us from the capital in Berlin..

    It wouldn't have been Berlin anymore. It would have been called Germania rebuilt and designed by Albert Speer.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 420 ✭✭NoseyMike2010


    Preusse wrote: »
    It wouldn't have been Berlin anymore. It would have been called Germania rebuilt and designed by Albert Speer.


    Doubt it. I think we'd all be German speaking!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,427 ✭✭✭Dr Strange


    Doubt it. I think we'd all be German speaking!

    No, we were talking about the capital, Berlin. Hitler's plan was a rebuilding of the capital and a re-naming of it into GERMANIA.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,932 ✭✭✭hinault


    xflyer wrote: »
    .

    However this all supposes that Germany stayed the course after Hitler died. He was a sick man in '45 anyway. How long he would have survived after that nobody knows. The Nazis were actually quite fragmented other than in their loyalty to Hitler. He liked to keep it that way. So they were constantly undermining each other and working to their own agenda often in an attempt to please Hitler.

    Once Hitler died the Wehrmacht were released from their oath of loyalty to him. They might have turned on the SS or vice versa. There was no obvious natural successor to Hitler, no charismatic figure to take up his role. There could easily be a huge civil war in Germany as rival Nazis attempted to take control. How that might have turned out is anybody's guess. The third reich may simply have fallen apart with Germany returning to it's status pre 1871 with a multitude of independant states each ruled by whoever won the local battle.

    So Germany may have won the war but lost the peace once Hitler was out of the picture. He really held together the unity of Germany during his time. It was devotion and loyalty to him and his vision that kept the Germans going.

    You raise some very interesting points here.
    Hitler was very ill by 1945.
    His illness may have been worsened after the failed July 1944 plot.

    In terms of his succession, Rudolf Hess who had been Hitlers designated second in command until he absconded would have been executed presumably.

    Who would have succeeded Hitler? Boorman, Goering?
    And what processes would the Fuhrer put in place to ensure his legacy, if victory had been achieved?
    All interesting questions.

    As regards Ireland, I imagine that in victory Ireland would have been considered an extension of Britain.
    Hitler, it is claimed, wanted to form a pact with Britain so that together they could take on the world.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭Mahatma coat


    WEll We know from Historical records presented at Nuremberg that Hitler was aware of the ReichMarshals Drug Dependencies and excesses, so its facertain that despite his bluster Goering would not have been Hitlers Successor.

    Had the thing gone a little better towards the end then the one to watch would have been Himmler, the SS woould still have been a formidable force and fiercly loyal.

    fortunatley for the rest of the world Himmler was a snivelling coward who took his own life.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 644 ✭✭✭filthymcnasty


    hinault wrote: »
    You raise some very interesting points here.
    Hitler was very ill by 1945.
    His illness may have been worsened after the failed July 1944 plot.

    In terms of his succession, Rudolf Hess who had been Hitlers designated second in command until he absconded would have been executed presumably.

    Who would have succeeded Hitler? Boorman, Goering?
    And what processes would the Fuhrer put in place to ensure his legacy, if victory had been achieved?
    All interesting questions.

    As regards Ireland, I imagine that in victory Ireland would have been considered an extension of Britain.
    Hitler, it is claimed, wanted to form a pact with Britain so that together they could take on the world.

    A comparison could be life in the old Iron Curtain Eastern Europe under Russia. Under Nazism we could expect something similar, for example puppet governments were put in place in each country.
    The local language was maintained, but in most countries Russian had to be learned as as second language such as in the old East Germany and Czech Republic ( for example Angela Merkel who grew up in the old communist east germany is fluent Russian but limited English) whereas in West Germany English was learned as a a second language.
    We would also presumably have zero US investment and have a trade embargo, so we could look to the likes of Cuba to have an idea of what life is like without American technology, unless of course if Germany had advanced at a similar rate.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,847 ✭✭✭HavingCrack


    Apparently Hitler had plans to turn Ireland into a giant labour/ concentration camp for political dissidents/communists/anyone he decided to take a dislike to. Hitlers Irish Movies on RTE said something about it if I remember, has anyone else heard of this??

    I presume Christian religions would have been nearly eradicated under German control if you go by Nazi activites leading up to and during the war.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 369 ✭✭Empire o de Sun


    We would also presumably have zero US investment and have a trade embargo, so we could look to the likes of Cuba to have an idea of what life is like without American technology, unless of course if Germany had advanced at a similar rate.

    Actually it is reckoned that the US, Britain etc gained billions of dollars in wealth from the intellectual property rights they obtained from germany at the end of the war.

    One example is Rocket Technology


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,858 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    Actually, if anyone has read 'The Fatherland' novel it gives a fairly scary and grim opinion on what it may have been like.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 369 ✭✭Empire o de Sun


    That was made to a movie and is on youtube


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,847 ✭✭✭HavingCrack


    That was made to a movie and is on youtube

    The plot of the film is so far removed from that of the book that its slightly ridiculous. I'd recommend the book over the film any day.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 794 ✭✭✭Redlion


    Thought this might be noteworthy for anyone interested in some light fictional reading, try 'the man in the high castle' by Philip K. Dick. The book deals with several characters who must exeprience a world where the Axis defeat the Allies


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,005 ✭✭✭GhostInTheRuins


    Preusse wrote: »
    It wouldn't have been Berlin anymore. It would have been called Germania rebuilt and designed by Albert Speer.

    It's really interesting stuff that. I was reading this page about this very subject just the other day. - http://www.darkroastedblend.com/2009/02/totalitarian-architecture-of-third.html


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSrfp_uJiik


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 830 ✭✭✭SEANYBOY1


    We would also presumably have zero US investment and have a trade embargo, so we could look to the likes of Cuba to have an idea of what life is like without American technology, unless of course if Germany had advanced at a similar rate.

    German technology was superior in nearly ever field.
    First to develop military submarines.
    First to develop cruise missiles.
    First to develop balistic missiles.
    First to develop jet aircraft.
    First to develop the machine gun.
    First to develop night vision scopes.
    First to develop radio guided bombs.
    Had the best tanks.
    The US took Germays rocket engineer Von Braun amd his team and they developed the Apollo 11 mission to the moon even though some of them were directly involved in forced labour camps during the manufature of the V2 rocket.

    The US Stealth Bomber the one like a bat wing was designed on a German plane which was stored in a hanger in the states which was shipped over after the war and was stumbled upon in the 1980's, they even knew how to develop planes that could evade radar.

    If Hitler wasnt such a lunatic they would have without doubt won WW11


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,391 ✭✭✭d22ontour


    Financial war, yeah they were winners as they bankroll the EU now.The eastern front led to their their demise of course, but hey lets all believe the yanks and brits won that war....If they never went east and actually invaded Britain when they had superiority regardless of what western history tries to tell us then we would live in a different world. A better world ? Who knows ...Can it be any worse than what we have now though ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,752 ✭✭✭cyrusdvirus


    SEANYBOY1 wrote: »
    The US Stealth Bomber the one like a bat wing was designed on a German plane which was stored in a hanger in the states which was shipped over after the war and was stumbled upon in the 1980's, they even knew how to develop planes that could evade radar.

    If Hitler wasnt such a lunatic they would have without doubt won WW11


    Didn't Northrop build 2 flying wings in the late 1940's? Possibly with your 'bat wing' plane as inspiration (i think you are referring to the Ho-229??)

    Not too sure if 'stumbled across' is the right phrase here. There were numerous examples of both Propeller driven and jet powered Northrop flying wings waaay back in the day


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭Mahatma coat


    SEANYBOY1 wrote: »
    German technology was superior in nearly ever field.
    Now I would not argue that they were fierce Clever Bastards, but some of those Firsts arent tho.
    First to develop military submarines.
    Nope, twas a Liscannor man called John P Holland
    First to develop cruise missiles.
    Dunno If Id call the V1 or V2 Cruise Missiles in the Modern Context, they were veery much Point and hope in the guidance department.
    First to develop balistic missiles.
    This requires a tighter Definition, Balistic generally refers to anything designed to be hurled with Force in anger at a Target, the name derives from the Roman invention, the Balista
    First to develop jet aircraft.
    Nope, Twas an English Fella called Frank Whittle
    First to develop the machine gun.
    Nope,The Maxim gun was the first self-powered machine gun, invented by the American-born British inventor Sir Hiram Maxim in 1884.

    Altho you might be thinkin of the assault rifle, which I believe was a German invention.
    First to develop night vision scopes.
    Actually I'm fairly sure you're right about this, they were the first with Blacklight sights for Tankers and Snipers.
    First to develop radio guided bombs.
    Yep, twould seem that they did, Henschel Hs 293
    Had the best tanks.
    this is subjective, they had the most highly engineered and Complicated Tanks, but whether that was the Best in comparison to the Russian is debatable, the Germans may have had the better Design but Russia had the Numbers, and in a War of attrition thats what counts.
    The US took Germays rocket engineer Von Braun amd his team and they developed the Apollo 11 mission to the moon even though some of them were directly involved in forced labour camps during the manufature of the V2 rocket.
    Thats True, no Von Braun no Apollo
    The US Stealth Bomber the one like a bat wing was designed on a German plane which was stored in a hanger in the states which was shipped over after the war and was stumbled upon in the 1980's, they even knew how to develop planes that could evade radar.
    Their Long range Delta Bomber, I remember reading about that in a few places, problem was it were only a prototype as hitler didnt have the vision to make it early enough in the War for it to be of any practical use
    If Hitler wasnt such a lunatic they would have without doubt won WW11
    True that, Shame he was a Little Bonkers init.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,752 ✭✭✭cyrusdvirus


    Not even gonna TRY multi quoting and not meaning to be pedantic pat here, but was the first military submarine the CSS Hunley during the American civil war? Or does the Turtle from the American war of Independence count?

    The Holland boats were the first 'modern boats', with an electric motor for submerged running and a gasoline engine for surface running, but to my mind the Hunley counts as the first military sub.

    And while i'm at it (HONEST, i'm not being pedantic here!!! :D) the ME-262 was the first OPERATIONAL jet fighter aircraft, Whittle wasn't paid much heed by the British establishment early on...


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭Mahatma coat


    Yeah they BUILT the first Jetfighter with the ME262, but whittle invented the Jet engine.

    Also I wouldnt count the American Civil war 'Submarines' the Hollands was the first machine that we would recognise today as a Submarine, it had all the bits and bobs worked out, like electric motrors and torpedo tubes (even tho they hadnt torpedos)



    An interesting thing about Jet development,

    I have heard it from many sources that the Air war in Corea was essentially fought by 2 different batches of Captured German scientests one Side designing the Mig15 and one side the F86Sabre, both of which were surprisingly simmilar to the Last project they had worked on in Germany


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,752 ✭✭✭cyrusdvirus


    Yeah they BUILT the first Jetfighter with the ME262, but whittle invented the Jet engine.


    Also I wouldnt count the American Civil war 'Submarines' the Hollands was the first machine that we would recognise today as a Submarine, it had all the bits and bobs worked out, like electric motrors and torpedo tubes (even tho they hadnt torpedos)



    An interesting thing about Jet development,

    I have heard it from many sources that the Air war in Corea was essentially fought by 2 different batches of Captured German scientests one Side designing the Mig15 and one side the F86Sabre, both of which were surprisingly simmilar to the Last project they had worked on in Germany


    Wasn't denying that Whittle invented the jet engine, but the poster said first to develop jet aircraft. It could be taken either way i suppose.

    I acknowledged that the Holland's were the forefather of the modern submarine, but the Hunley was the forefather of the Holland's, and carried out the first successful anti ship mission


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,779 ✭✭✭Ping Chow Chi


    d22ontour wrote: »
    Can it be any worse than what we have now though ?

    I suppose that all depends on what your racial and religious profile is I guess.


Advertisement