Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
A cruise missile slammed into the Pentagon on 911
-
24-06-2010 10:15AM#1http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWj-dUOWNzI
Reporter says a cruise missile struck the building!
http://disclose.tv/viewVideo.php?video_id=44286
The missile strike which must have come from high level classified sources, is at 1 minute 09 seconds of the above 3m 42s video, which also has footage of a cruise missile in American Airlines livery being loaded onto a B52 Bomber!
Another version of the same photo without the AA paint, turned up in a 2003 Joe Vialls story titled..
CIA False Flag Attack on Kuwaiti Shopping Mall
http://z10.invisionfree.com/The_Unhived_Mi...showtopic=29892
The bystander's eyes in the upper shot have been blacked over proving the photo has been shopped, however it could have been done to confuse the fact that the AA paint has been shopped out of the lower shot! As well the actual missile that hit the building had a pointier nose than the one above, which does however illustrate that "they" have no qualms about disguising attack drones and missiles as civilian aircraft!
Looks like the cruiser had a device that homed in on the laser spot!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcWT2lQszEE
Only minutes after the strike, a television reporter says there is nothing to indicate a plane struck the Pentagon.
The highlighted object in the small pic, which is the first frame in the only officially released footage of the Pentagon strike, resembles the nosecone on the cruiser and the streaking object in the moving video above!
Above is a shot of an aerial launch of a Russian CH 55 cruise missile, from a TU 160 aircraft.
Pentacon.com
Now we must consider whether the plane climbing above the Pentagon, similarly launched the missile that hit that building.
It seems it did, a cruise missile on the test range.. looks exactly like the Pentagon strike.
Above N644AA2 Flght 77, the aircraft "they" say struck the building.
Pentacon.com
This is the latest mystery plane, it is thought to be the same aircraft seen climbing over the Pentagon during its approach!
Above, from Pentacon.com, a computer animation of the flyover compiled from the testimony of numerous eye witnesses.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daNr_TrBw6E
Major General Albert "Bert" N. Stubblebine III, former head of all intelligence says: "I do know that the Pentagon was not hit by an aircraft, no way, the press is saying what they have been told to say, the stories about 9/11 are false."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUmr9dFbf2c
911 Commission member says missile strike, then quickly corrects himself.
The previous mystery plane pictured over the White House at 9:44 am on 11 September 2001, was a highly modified E-4B Boeing 747 operated by the National Airborne Operations Center.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ld7fn2qykv4
This video shows no plane impact accompanied the explosion!0
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
Very impressive listing but fact is there are police officers in this youtube video who all are 100% sure they saw commercial flight go north on flight path of Citgo station and one police officer in south park saw a commerical flight not fighter jet go over Pentagon and over his head in south park.Also these 3 officers have been told to not talk to media since these interviews took place especially roosevelt cop in south park on the opposite side of explosion zone of pentagon.I would call that very interesting indeed.If not interesting it is convenient for the official line .
Yeah I'm more than familiar with the pentaconned team.It was just after 9:30 on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, and Walter, then a senior correspondent for USA Today Live, the newspaper's television division, was stuck in traffic across the street from the Pentagon, listening to National Public Radio updates about the terrorist attacks against New York's World Trade Center earlier that morning. He knew that if he didn't reach work soon, somebody else would get the choice assignment of flying to New York to cover the deadliest sneak attack on U.S. soil since Pearl Harbor. "I was getting upset because I was stuck," Walter says.
He rolled down a window to get some fresh air. That's when he noticed the American Airlines passenger jet arcing down from the sky. "I saw the jet bank and watched as it dove down toward the Pentagon. . . . I saw it crash," he recalls. "It exploded. The wings folded back, and it went right into the Pentagon. All the people around me started panicking, and when everyone said it hit the Pentagon, it registered that it was another terrorist attack."
Walter ran out of his car and waited for a USA Today photographer to show up to take pictures. Scattered pieces of wreckage lay strewn across the lawn and several light poles had been knocked down by the jet in a diagonal line pointing to the smoldering southwest wall of the building. "I saw pieces of the wreckage," he says. "There were people taking pictures of themselves with pieces of the wreckage. The next morning, I was interviewed by all the network shows."
Those interviews made Walter probably the most well-known eyewitness to what happened at the Pentagon on 9/11, which is why, a little more than five years later, in November 2006, he found himself hosting a barbecue for a group of eager young men who were making Loose Change, a documentary about the terrorist attacks. After getting a telephone call from a self-described 9/11 researcher named Russell Pickering, Walter invited Pickering and Dylan Avery, the film's director, to his house in Fairfax, Virginia.
They showed up with a couple of other people Walter had never spoken with: Craig Ranke, a fast talker with wild eyes, and Aldo Marquis, a heavyset guy who didn't talk much. The two said they were helping Avery and Pickering with research for their film. Walter chatted casually with the pair, and at one point, he realized that Ranke was surreptitiously tape-recording the conversation.
That was weird, he thought. And increasingly, so was the conversation itself. Although Pickering and Avery seemed relatively normal, Ranke and Marquis appeared to be on a mission to prove that the Pentagon plane crash never happened. They wouldn't listen to anything that contradicted this notion.
"I understand why people have certain feelings about this government," Walter says. "There are things this administration did that I'm not pleased with, but facts are facts. I was on the road that day and saw what I saw. The plane was in my line of sight. You could see the 'AA' on the tail. You knew it was American Airlines."
Marquis and Ranke simply refused to believe Walter saw what he saw. "They were saying things like, 'Are you sure the plane didn't land [at Reagan airport] and they set off a bomb?' They kept coming up with all these scenarios.
"Some of those guys [at the party] were young and nice and disaffected [about] their government," Walter concludes. "And some of them were crazy."Unfortunately, their film, The PentaCon, doesn't provide any evidence of this. What it does show is a series of interviews Ranke and Marquis have filmed over the past few years on location in Arlington, Virginia, usually within a stone's throw of the Pentagon building. They've interviewed Pentagon police officers, journalists, gas-station employees, local residents, a boat captain and several Arlington National Cemetery gravediggers, all of whom believe they witnessed an American Airlines jet crash into the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001.
The fact that all those eyewitnesses and many more believe they saw the jet hit the Pentagon—which happens to be both the official version of what happened that day as well as the accepted truth among most conspiracy theorists—doesn't bother Ranke and Marquis.
If you actually watch the video and listen to the witness statements none of the people interviewed believe anything other than United 77 hit the Penatgon.Where some might find contradictory eyewitness accounts a normal outcome of an intense, traumatic event, Marquis and Ranke view any eyewitness statement placing the plane on the north side of the gas station as clear evidence that the NTSB data is phony and further proof that the military was behind 9/11. They seized on Lagasse's e-mail as a smoking gun. Marquis and Ranke interviewed the manager of the gas station while Avery and Pickering filmed background shots of the Pentagon from a small hill next to the gas station. The manager claimed that one of her employees, Robert Turcios, had also seen the plane on the north side of the station. Marquis and Ranke couldn't believe their ears.In the clip, Lagasse also makes repeated references to the fact that he saw the plane hit the Pentagon—and didn't see any plane fly away from the area. When reached at the Pentagon Force Protection Agency (PFPA)—the official name of the Pentagon police agency, where he's now a lieutenant—Lagasse groaned when he heard the names Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis and said he couldn't comment without permission from a press officer.
Chris Layman, a PFPA spokesman, said the agency now prohibits officers from speaking directly to the media, but he sent the Weekly a brief, written statement saying the Pentagon "was hit by American Airlines Flight 77 at 9:37 a.m., killing all 64 passengers and crew and 15 Pentagon employees," that the event was "witnessed by hundreds of people," and while some "have their own theories," the "facts have been verified and are clear."
Marquis and Ranke also interviewed several Arlington National Cemetery employees after receiving permission to bring cameras to the facility. The cemetery is next to the Pentagon. In footage in The PentaCon, several employees state the plane was flying on the north side of the CITGO gas station. More important, all of them—who without exception believe the plane struck the Pentagon—claim the plane started to bank in the sky just before they saw the explosion. To the filmmakers, that banking motion, along with the plane's location north of the CITGO station, proves that the aircraft actually flew over the Pentagon, not into it.
The Researcher's Edition of The PentaConalso includes an interview with Keith Wheelhouse, who was at Arlington National Cemetery on 9/11 to bury his brother-in-law. In the interview, Wheelhouse tells Marquis and Ranke that he saw an American Airlines jet crash into the Pentagon. He also claims to have seen a second plane that seemed to be shadowing the first one. But Marquis and Ranke apparently don't believe Wheelhouse saw the crash because, their film notes, a line of trees partially obscures the view of the building from the location where he claimed to have been standing.
Another witness Marquis and Ranke suspect is part of a deliberate disinformation campaign to trick people into thinking the plane that actually flew over the building at the precise moment someone ignited an explosion was actually a second plane shadowing the phantom American Airlines jet.
USA Todayeditor Joel Sucherman backs the second-plane claim and also appears in The PentaCon. "I'm very confident that what I saw was a jet passenger airplane, silver, the 'AA' on the tail," he says, adding that he also saw a second plane that was "much higher in the sky than the passenger jet was."
Also included in the film is a tape-recorded telephone call with USA Today reporter Vin Narayanan. "Yeah, there was another plane off in the distance," Narayanan says. "It was a jet; it was definitely a jet."
* * *
How witnesses who saw a second plane high in the skies above the Pentagon could possibly be part of a conspiracy to fool the public into thinking that a plane that nobody saw fly over the Pentagon actually crashed into a building is a question that is as ridiculously convoluted and inherently illogical as the very theory embraced by Marquis and Ranke. In fact, other than a few interesting interviews with people who saw a plane fly on one side of a gas station when the official data places it on the other, ThePentaCon includes no evidence of anything whatsoever, just a lot of questions and innuendo set to an ominous hip-hop beat.Among the "suspicious coincidences" that Ranke and Marquis have "exposed," none is as instructive as the fact that several USA Today employees—Walter, Sucherman and Narayanan, to name a few—rank among the "supposed" eyewitnesses to the Pentagon plane crash. The obvious fact that so many USA Today workers were near the Pentagon that morning because they drive past the building on their way to work every morning is something that apparently doesn't impress the Citizen Investigation Team.
http://www.ocweekly.com/2008-08-14/features/pentaconned/1
A pair of delusional conceited idiots.0 -
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
they might have believed it hit the pentagon but didnt see it hit because they had natural reaction of turning their back on Pentagon and run away in those last few seconds .
Thats pure speculation on your part.The irrefutable witness is police officer in the south park who he said defintely saw a commercial liner just fly over the pentagon noone can take that witness apart .
Except er the police officer himself.From the article quoted wrote:In the clip, Lagasse also makes repeated references to the fact that he saw the plane hit the Pentagon—All it takes sometimes in life is one witness to seal an argument
So all the witnesses are wrong except the one that agrees with you and even he's wrong.and that police officer is only one who has come forward with that sighting .I doubt if he was seeing things very hard to mix up a fighter get with a commerical airline slight bit bigger I would think .
Yeah. Because the plane flew so low it clipped light posts over an eiht lane freeway packed with morning commuters.
Hence we know it was a 737
fighter jets don't have the wing span of a 737 so it could not have done the damage created by United 77.0 -
-
That's a bit of an odd conclusion. Lots of people say they say the plane hit, but can't be trusted. 1 says he saw that it didn't hit and must be telling the truth. Why is is more likely that over 100 people are lying/wrong, and 1 must telling the truth?
100 are likely to be either bought off or scared off,while always will be one who wont
0 -
-
Here is the truth.. flightpath, poles, the lot. Other 7 parts on YT
Or Full 121 minutes. 200,000 views in 15 or so days
0 -
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
Brown Bomber wrote: »
The word Talkie Walkie is looking for is "flawless".
Perhaps instead of engaging in tedious pedantry you could actually point out the "flaws" in the idea that United 77 hit the pentagon.
That'd require you to up your game from insinuations about jews though I suppose.0 -
-
-
-
TalkieWalkie wrote: »Why would they not shoot down a plane that was heading toward the pentagon ? (please don't give me the answer that you hears from the proven liars).
Could you tell us what that large gray area just to the south south east. of the pentagon is?
The one with the runway pointed in the direction of the Pentagon?0 -
Advertisement
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGvXVzdlcQk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o
![[Deleted User]](/applications/dashboard/design/images/defaulticon.png)
Advertisement