Miley's 9-Year-Old Sister to Launch a Lingerie Line for Kids

hellomoto

Seems like every time we hear about Noah Cyrus she's doing something totally innapropriate for her age.

Whether it's dressing like a dominatrix for Halloween, skipping around a pole-dancing pole or performing the totally un-PG hits 'Smack That' and 'Tik Tok', we suspect this nine-year-old could easily notch up more scandals than her big sis by the time she hits her teens.

The latest news that's got us scratching our heads and wondering, yet again, 'what were her parents thinking?' ...little Noah is set to become a lingerie model.
She'll be teaming up with her pint-sized best friend Emily Grace to launch a children's lingerie collection for 'Ohh! La, La! Couture'.

The company's website describes The Emily Grace Collection as having a “trendy, sweet, yet edgy feel, reminiscent of Emily’s true personality. She is collaborating with Ooh! La, La! Couture designers to create versatile styles that can be worn with sweet ballerina slippers, funky sneakers or paired with lace stockings and boots for more of a rock and roll look. Emily’s collection will appeal not just to little girls - the line also has an exclusive Teen Collection available to a size 14."

seriously wtf? this is messed up to the highest degree.
a kids' effing lingerie line made by a ****ing nine year old?

Ruu_Old

Who gives a shite?!

Sheeps

I just blew my load.

ZAUR THE INCRED

hellomoto wrote: »

A kids' effing lingerie line made by a ****ing nine year old?

A lot of today's clothes are made by nine year olds in East Asia.

mikom

hellomoto wrote: »

Miley's 9-Year-Old Sister to Launch a Lingerie Line for Kids

Well, holy god.

Blackhorse Slim

Sheeps wrote: »

I just blew my load.

Is that yourself, Father?

phasers

Couldn't they have had sexy teenagers modeling it? I am gravely disappoint

Coriolanus

That pic... Is it just me or are their heads abnormally large?
Who the fuck is this Emily Grace one?

Anyway, kids eh? They grow up so fast.

bonerm

mikom wrote: »

Well, holy god.

Beat me to it! :mad: That's not on ... at-all at-all!

ZAUR THE INCRED

Nevore wrote: »

That pic... Is it just me or are their heads abnormally large?
Who the fuck is this Emily Grace one?

Anyway, kids eh? They grow up so fast.

Another useless Disney Channel actress.

smiley girl

I think it's desperate. Really, lingerie for kids?? It's just getting easier and easier for pedos:eek:

xzanti

hellomoto wrote: »

seriously wtf? this is messed up to the highest degree.
a kids' effing lingerie line made by a ****ing nine year old?

Good sh1te :eek: they're pole dancing that is just warped

Mike 1972

phasers wrote: »

Couldn't they have had sexy teenagers modeling it? I am gravely disappoint

Wouldnt that constitute child porn

MagicMarker

Who?

phasers

Mike 1972 wrote: »

Wouldnt that constitute child porn

But it's ok if 9 year olds do it? right so.

January

Their heads are abnormally large.

Billy Ray Cyrus must be a proud daddy

Mike 1972

phasers wrote: »

But it's ok if 9 year olds do it? right so.

Apparently ?

My name is URL

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_jWNhyMUpjSE/Sbm6PB1_6jI/AAAAAAAAC_0/Sho4qWL5Dq4/s400/pedo-bear-seal-of-approval.png

congo_90

I wish I didn't click the link without first reading the thread. That is borderline some bad bad stuff.

The parents need help letting their daughters be so perverted. Perhaps his business is failing so selling them keeps him up?

J.S. Pill

Did anyone notice that the kid on the right is giving 2 fingers?

They look like a pair of mini-hookers, awwww.

Biggins

Two words:

NUCKIN' FUTS!

My name is URL

J.S. Pill wrote: »

Did anyone notice that the kid on the right is giving 2 fingers?

They look like a pair of mini-hookers, awwww.

And there's a strip pole in the other pic.

Dennis the Stone

Some people shouldn't have kids.

Crann na Beatha

This post has been deleted.

BluesBerry

This is what happens when celebrities are let loose and allowed to do what they want no way would I let a child wear that

Its just sick...........kids cant be just kids anymore with all this crap :mad::mad::mad:

ejmaztec

ZAUR THE INCRED wrote: »

Another useless Disney Channel actress.

Or translated for the real world = A "cute" gobby kid with the acting ability of a lettuce, and deluded pushy parents.

Coriolanus

On second thoughts, who's calling it lingerie? And what does it look like? (preferably not modeled by tots)

I'm putting money on it being pretty generic kids underwear, made in the same factory in China as Penneys best, just with a hannah montana head slapped all over it.

Overheal

"As for the sudden spike in Child Molestation, Experts agree that Video Games are to blame."

Minstrel27

Mike 1972 wrote: »

Wouldnt that constitute child porn

18 is not child porn.

Son Of A Vidic

Kids lingerie WTF! what is the world coming to? Kid stalkers everywhere and now this, ffs who thinks of this $h1t. No doubt, you'll have muppet parents buying this lingerie for their kids. With all the sickos out there it's fcuking Burkas they should be buying instead.

Elliemental

hellomoto wrote: »

seriously wtf? this is messed up to the highest degree.
a kids' effing lingerie line made by a ****ing nine year old?

I am absoultely speechless. It just beggars belief. Although, not quite as creepy as those children's beauty pageants the Americans are so fond of.

MaybeLogic

Wait till I Am Xavier gets a load of this.

Overheal

MaybeLogic wrote: »

Wait till I Am Xavier gets a load off this.

fyp

Dont be at yourself

Emily’s collection will appeal not just to little girls

You don't say.

m5ex9oqjawdg2i

Very very wrong...

Choke

adrieanne__x wrote: »

Their heads are abnormally large.

Billy Ray Cyrus must be a proud daddy

And have a very sore wife.

Herb Powell

that is surreal................."lingerie for kids" really??????

OutlawPete

MaybeLogic wrote: »

Wait till I Am Xavier gets a load of this.

I don't have a good argument for this one

MaybeLogic

OutlawPete wrote: »

I don't have a good argument for this one

The bird kneeling down in the pic is hot as fuck. That's my argument.


(please tell me she's over 18)

RosyLily

Disturbing to say the least. Why can people let the children enjoy childhood?? It's short enough as it is and now 9 year olds are involved in lingerie.

we'llallhavetea_old

ok, nine yr old little sh!te has launched a lingerie line. she looks like a hooker in the pics etc.

the "lingerie" is fine, no crotchless knickers or nipple tassles, so its age appropriate.

kids have to wear knickers, so i think the "lingerie for kids, omg" comments are a little silly. do you walk into penneys and say "omg, they have teeny tiny knickers and bras here for children" ? nope.

i don't agree with the "whoring up" of a nine year old, but at the end of the day, its just kids underwear.

OutlawPete

MaybeLogic wrote: »

(please tell me she's over 18)

Sorry, she's 14 .. your going to hell

MaybeLogic

OutlawPete wrote: »

Sorry, she's 14 .. your going to hell

I was going there anyway.
I was on PornHub a couple of days ago and clicked on a Simpsons video link.

plein de force

i can already invisage hearing about this girls death aged 20 of an overdose and/or sexually transmitted diseases

OutlawPete

plein de force wrote: »

i can already invisage hearing about this girls death aged 20 of an overdose and/or sexually transmitted diseases

Oh relax.

They are just clothes folks.

Shirley Temple was playing prostitutes from the age of 3.

Herb Powell

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

MaybeLogic

plein de force wrote: »

i can already envisage hearing about this girls death aged 20 of a nasally transmitted sexual disease

FYP.

we'llallhavetea_old

Herb Powell wrote: »

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/h-rTrtlDPBM&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/h-rTrtlDPBM&hl=en_US&fs=1&&quot; type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

couldnt have said it better myself

SubrbanOblivion

Everything I am reading on this says it's to be a full clothing line, so my guess is a few writers grabbed on the fact that underwear would be included and decided to run with the sensational aspect.

*yawn*

Herb Powell

we'llallhavetea wrote: »

couldnt have said it better myself

I suck at teh internetz:(

OutlawPete

Herb Powell wrote: »

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/h-rTrtlDPBM&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/h-rTrtlDPBM&hl=en_US&fs=1&&quot; type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

To post a YouTube video..

Just place the code after the 'v=' in any YouTube url between YouTube tags like so: