Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Is it time to cut funding to the Societies?

Options
2»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,163 ✭✭✭✭Boston


    Denerick wrote: »
    Boston, I wasn't even referring to you. In fact I find your megalomania somewhat charming if nothing else (How long is it now since you were stripped of your moderatorship?)

    What, seriously, this is how you troll me? It's been six years since I packed in that thankless roll, you were about 9 at the time. I'm still bitter about it though :rolleyes:. Hey remember when I got you sitebanned, yea, they were simpler times alright.
    D.R cowboy wrote: »
    With times becoming worse societies like LGBT and the Afro-Caribbean society will have there funding cut which will be justified by making it racist thing which it's not

    Are you seriously taking the piss. Societies like LGBT and the Afro-Caribbean society will no more have their funding cut then any other society. Spending on societies is relatively tiny anyway, the savings made there wont have any impact. Trinity isn't that strapped for cash, infact its capital expenditure is accelerating.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,764 ✭✭✭shay_562


    Denerick wrote:
    P.S- This spin you're coming out with is moderately impressive, but leave out the 'twatwaffle' comments. I know its painful after you worked so hard and licked such arse to get to such a cozy position in one of the societies, but do mind your manners.
    Boston wrote:
    You know nothing. I haven't been on a society committee in years.

    Think that one might have been at me, Boston :) Denerick, excluding positions that I've been fired from directly or indirectly (specifically for not being enough of a suck-up) I've been elected to two positions on committees in college ever. One of those was in the Hist and involved 5 people voting for me, which wouldn't be a huge amount of arse-licking even if most of them hadn't been personal friends. The other was in DUUFC, not a sports club known for its internal politicking or for caring very much at all about internal structures. I've only seen the position of captain contested twice in the last 5 years, let alone people caring much who's treasurer. See, when I make things personal and insult your ignorance or twatwafflery, I do it because your failings are pretty blatant. When you insult me back, you make sweeping assumptions about the kind of person I am and just further prove your own ignorance. Dig upwards, man.
    Denerick wrote:
    And you shouldn't take 3,000 + membership of the Hist as a ballpark, a rather cynical observation to make considering they usually offer huge freebies for freshers who join up over that week. (I am a member of both it and the Phil by the way, which instantly dashes your point)

    Not what I said. Read better. Of the 3,000, yes, there's undoubtedly hundreds who only join for Freshers' Week freebies. That in and of itself isn't bad; the Hist makes Freshers' Week more fun for a whole lot of people. Beyond that, there's a huge chunk of the membership who'll come to maybe one event a year, but get a lot out of that event. I can name at least 8 events in a given year that will attract more than 200 people. It's almost certainly not the same 200 at each (I know people from my course who've come to one or two events yearly and left it at that), which means that even looking at just the big events and not the weekly debates, plenty of people are being served. That's before you even take into account the snooker rooms or conversation room. But this isn't even the issue; you'd keep funding for the Hist in your world.
    I don't see the contradiction in giving funding to sports clubs, because they are far more than some simple social outlet for the egomaniac. As for the opportunity cost of society rooms, yes, I'd agree, college could do something more profitable. But I'm not anti society persé, I just feel that its egregious that we should be expected to pay even some of their operating costs

    Like Boston said, this is the crux of your argument. It's not about the "should I pay for stuff for other people?" thing - Boston gave you loads of examples of times we all pay for the good of some students, and your acknowledgement that sports clubs should exist at all sinks that idea. It's just about whether you think societies are "more than some simple social outlet for the egomaniac". Plenty of us do. You don't. You're more than entitled to that opinion, and good luck with it, but it's not a solid basis for proposing cutting funding to societies. Even if you don't understand the benefits, thousands of other students do, and most importantly, so do the people who make Trinity's financial decisions. College is about more than lectures. Subsidising non-academic activities to make them cheaper and more accessible is a good thing. End of argument.
    Fo Real wrote:
    You still havn't answered my question: What does the Afro-Carribean society actually do? I can only assume "black guy stuff"

    I honestly don't know what they do, though I'm guessing it's more than you think. I can tell you from experience that the Japanese society offered classes in Japanese from beginner level, and also (if memory serves - it's been a few years) did random cultural events like origami nights to teach non-Japanese people more about Japan. You know, expanding people's cultural horizons a little? Not necessarily a bad thing. Probably worthy of whatever tiny amount of funding they require.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 698 ✭✭✭D.R cowboy


    Eh.. What?

    Did they not teach you to comprehend the English language in sligo or are you all to busy watching the "hardy bucks" and being racist it's the 21 century man come on!!!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,488 ✭✭✭Denerick


    D.R cowboy wrote: »
    Did they not teach you to comprehend the English language in sligo or are you all to busy watching the "hardy bucks" and being racist it's the 21 century man come on!!!

    Getting old now.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,163 ✭✭✭✭Boston


    D.R cowboy wrote: »
    Did they not teach you to comprehend the English language in sligo or are you all to busy watching the "hardy bucks" and being racist it's the 21 century man come on!!!

    You are a funny one, I'll give you that. How about you form a coherent sentence before attacking someone else's English abilities.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 698 ✭✭✭D.R cowboy


    Boston wrote: »
    What, seriously, this is how you troll me? It's been six years since I packed in that thankless roll, you were about 9 at the time. I'm still bitter about it though :rolleyes:. Hey remember when I got you sitebanned, yea, they were simpler times alright.


    Well done BOSTON you burned him ahhh Denerick stick I bet !!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,979 ✭✭✭Jammyc


    D.R cowboy wrote: »
    Boston...your a smelly disengage philistine of a troll that eats away at everything that the human existence has evaluated thur life and the experiences which we share you demoralise yourself for everything you write you swine or a swine ahhhhhhhhh I'm yelling at the computer in rage *
    Surely if this was the case, he would be agreeing with Denerick? Correct me if I'm wrong.


  • Registered Users Posts: 676 ✭✭✭ilovemybrick


    sigh (in reference to all the silliness above)

    OT but Im going to go out and play in the snow.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,163 ✭✭✭✭Boston


    Its futile to confront nonsense with logic and rationality


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,979 ✭✭✭Jammyc


    sigh (in reference to all the silliness above)

    OT but Im going to go out and play in the snow.
    Mind if I join?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 676 ✭✭✭ilovemybrick


    Jammyc wrote: »
    Mind if I join?

    There are people snowboarding on the bridge by my house. I wish my camera would charge faster.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,488 ✭✭✭Denerick


    Boston wrote: »
    Its futile to confront nonsense with logic and rationality

    Agreed!


  • Registered Users Posts: 676 ✭✭✭ilovemybrick


    Denerick wrote: »
    Agreed!

    em, i think that was aimed at you.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 698 ✭✭✭D.R cowboy


    Guys we all good out of hand lets just forget about it and move on their is more to life that fighting over the internet

    Ilovemybrick let it go leave him alone it's over


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,979 ✭✭✭Jammyc


    duty_calls-742039.bmp


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,488 ✭✭✭Denerick


    em, i think that was aimed at you.

    Well d'uh.


  • Registered Users Posts: 90 ✭✭cantankerous


    Denerick, I agree with your anti-hack sentiments but i think attacking the societies is the wrong way to go about things. It's ineffective, inefficient and will cause a lot of collateral damage.

    What we need to do is start targeting the hacks directly.
    We need to make hackery even more socially unacceptable than it is now. This can be achieved by an "SU hacks, named and shamed" thread and toilet graffitti campaign. A stealth attack where anti-hack messages are printed in the college papers could also help our cause.

    Unfortunately I do not have the time nor the resources for such a campaign as i am currently battling an internet pornography addiction. However I will be with you in spirit should you start fighting back against the hackery.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,488 ✭✭✭Denerick


    Denerick, I agree with your anti-hack sentiments but i think attacking the societies is the wrong way to go about things. It's ineffective, inefficient and will cause a lot of collateral damage.

    What we need to do is start targeting the hacks directly.
    We need to make hackery even more socially unacceptable than it is now. This can be achieved by an "SU hacks, named and shamed" thread and toilet graffitti campaign. A stealth attack where anti-hack messages are printed in the college papers could also help our cause.

    Unfortunately I do not have the time nor the resources for such a campaign as i am currently battling an internet pornography addiction. However I will be with you in spirit should you start fighting back against the hackery.

    Unfortunately I'm an armchair critic, and the thought of active resistance fills me with dread as I knock over my massive ham sandwich. Can't someone else do it?


  • Registered Users Posts: 679 ✭✭✭just-joe


    Hey everyone, I've kinda skipped all the bitching from the middle of the thread, so forgive me if I repeat what anyone else has said. I just have a couple of points:

    1 - 5 % is a ridiculous statistic, just from looking at my own class and people I know, almost all have benefited from socs/clubs in some way. Some perhaps in a once off way (some famous guy coming to the phil) but most by going to many different functions/sports clubs training every week. So I think its feckin great that there are so many clubs/socs that are funded to do what they do.

    Also, why are sports clubs in any way better than socs, and deserve funding moreso than socs?

    However, as a maths student, I have upon occasion been to mathsoc events. After, they have money to buy wine and crisps. (Maybe some of this comes from subs but as far as I'm aware they also get CSC funding for this). Drinking wine has nothing to do maths. No sports club gets money to drink with. I know of a dozen sports clubs that really need money for equipment/travel/competition. Many have to pay their own coaching fees.

    So while some people are drinking for free others are paying to do sport. What I'm trying to say is that mathsoc should get funding for maths-related expenses and that is where it should stop. I find this super-annoying.

    Lastly this does naturally sway in the direction of those in power in the society, so the treasurer/whoever who bought the wine has one for himself and the new first years are left without a single glass. Kinda ridiculous.

    And perhaps wrongly, but I presume that alot of societies operate like this.


Advertisement