Norse Spiral

Overheal

http://gizmodo.com/5422574/giant-mysterious-spiral-takes-over-the-skies-of-norway

I thought the CT crowd would be All. Over this.

Could it all be a hoax? Maybe it's a massive joke, but all kinds of Norwegian news sites are reporting on it. According to NKR—Norway's national TV channel—it could be related to a rocket fired from a Russian submarine in the White Sea. The Russians are denying any part on it at this at the moment. Nick Banbury, a witness located at Harstad, described how it all happened:

We are used to seeing lots of auroras here in Arctic Norway, but on my way to work this morning I saw something completely unexpected. Between 7:50 and 8:00 a.m. local time, there was a strange light in the sky. It consisted initially of a green beam of light similar in colour to the aurora with a mysterious rotating spiral at one end. This spiral then got bigger and bigger until it turned into a huge halo in the sky with the green beam extending down to the earth.

As hard as it is to believe, you can't dispute the fact that the strange spiral was witnessed and recorded by thousands of people from hundreds of miles away, which means that the phenomenon occurred at a very high altitude. Even Phil Plait from Bad Astronomy agrees that this is real, and says that it was probably a rocket out of control.
So barring any epic group joke, expect your new alien overlords to arrive at any time now. We can only hope they are all peace-loving voluptuous blondes with blue eyes. [Altaposten, VG, NRK via SpaceWeather via Universe Today—thanks Gonzalo Oxenford]
If you know Norwegian and have any information, contact me on AIM or by mail.

Video in link



















Begin chin scratching.

MarkR

That's what I came here for. My head says laser hologram type stuff on low lying cloud. My heart says wormhole aliens.

Hal1

Apparantly it was a rocket that went out of control. Seen by thousands all over norway (really?). Well that's the explanation they give.

They always ruin all the fun with their explanations.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zx8i5EfmYU4

iknorr

This must be a rocket.

Look at the last picture on Overheals post. it clearly shows a trail coming from the ground. As the trail goes higher in the sky it disperses more. The colour of this trail matches the height/curvature of the earth in relation to the light from the sun.
The rocket was clearly in trouble when launched, as seen from the random looking smoke trail.

force eleven

http://www.interfax.com/newsinf.asp?id=135126

Probably this one.

espinolman

And another one over Siberia :

http://www.youtube.com/v/xPUUPNsZtRI

Lone Stone

I was looking at this on youtube there was a second the next night over norway aswell , and one over russia a few day's later aparently it came from some thing called haarp not to sure what that is tho and on the news they said it was like some new russian rocket being tested but it looks really wierd for a rocket

nyarlothothep

Looks like a missile in the vid

mysterious

Its not a rocket.

We dont have rockets that create that in the sky nor do we have rockets that is supposed to do that, and when a rocket lose control it does not make that spiral. If people are saying rockets they are buying into the mis information on this.

But this is exactly what the powers that be want us to think, its a satelite, its a rocket, its a bird, its a plane so on so forth.

indough

how do you know what rockets we have and what they can do?

me_right_one

mysterious wrote: »

Its not a rocket.

We dont have rockets that create that in the sky. If people are saying rockets they are buying into the mis information on this.

The rocket didnt purposely "create that", it went out of control and spun around in a spiral. Didn't something like that happen to one of NASA's rockets in the last 20 years?

mysterious

me_right_one wrote: »

The rocket didnt purposely "create that", it went out of control and spun around in a spiral. Didn't something like that happen to one of NASA's rockets in the last 20 years?

How do you know it was not done purposely. Maybe its a hologram. Maybe its not a rocket. This is what the powers fo be want us to think.

me_right_one

mysterious wrote: »

How do you know it was not done purposely. Maybe its a hologram. Maybe its not a rocket. This is what the powers fo be want us to think.

Why would they want us to think that? Who gives a sh1t?

mysterious

me_right_one wrote: »

Why would they want us to think that? Who gives a sh1t?

80% of people don't even believe in E.T life or alien visitation, despite the obvious evidence pointing to the opposing argurment.

The majority of people feel a lot more comfortable believing it was a rocket, bird or plane! lol no matter what. Here we are someting so strange and totally weird happening, and people are still calling these things, a rocket, bird or plane!.

Some people really do give a sh!t especially NASA.

me_right_one

mysterious wrote: »

80% of people don't even believe in E.T life or alien visitation, despite the obvious evidence pointing to the opposing argurment.

The majority of people feel a lot more comfortable believing it was a rocket, bird or plane! lol no matter what. Here we are someting so strange and totally weird happening, and people are still calling these things, a rocket, bird or plane!.

Some people really do give a sh!t especially NASA.

No but why do you think "THEY" want us to believe its a rocket? What difference does it make to "THEM" what we believe? And who cares what "THEY" want us to believe, you have a mind of your own, you are going to believe whatever you want:cool:

mysterious

me_right_one wrote: »

No but why do you think "THEY" want us to believe its a rocket? What difference does it make to "THEM" what we believe? And who cares what "THEY" want us to believe, you have a mind of your own, you are going to believe whatever you want:cool:

It has always been in the closet operation. We are never informed of what these space organisations are up too, ( what they are reaallly up too )and the top scientists are paid to ensure their research and development stays where the power is running!.

It is more likely to be

A. Galactic federation
B. Preparation for staged alien invasion or faked disclosure
C. Using holographic technology.
D. stargate opening.

Or even just to test to see how the public react to this.

PirateShampoo

mysterious wrote: »

80% of people don't even believe in E.T life or alien visitation, despite the obvious evidence pointing to the opposing argurment.

The majority of people feel a lot more comfortable believing it was a rocket, bird or plane! lol no matter what. Here we are someting so strange and totally weird happening, and people are still calling these things, a rocket, bird or plane!.

Some people really do give a sh!t especially NASA.

And heres you with, thats been givin the explination, but its still some sort of UFO.

Its a Rocket.

PirateShampoo

mysterious wrote: »

It has always been a in the closet operation. We are never informed of what these space organisations are up too, and the top scientists are paid to ensure their research and development stays where the power is running!.

It is more likely to be

A. Galactic federation
B. Preparation for staged alien invasion or faked disclosuretryi
C. Using holographic technology.
D. stargate opening.

Or even just to test to see how the public react to this.

No its a Rocket.

indough

mysterious wrote: »

It has always been in the closet operation. We are never informed of what these space organisations are up too, ( what they are reaallly up too )and the top scientists are paid to ensure their research and development stays where the power is running!.

It is more likely to be

A. Galactic federation
B. Preparation for staged alien invasion or faked disclosure
C. Using holographic technology.
D. stargate opening.

Or even just to test to see how the public react to this.

you honestly think they are more likely explanations? seriously?

nullzero

PirateShampoo wrote: »

No its a Rocket.

You think it's a rocket.
Even if you don't like what he's saying, it doesn't mean you should ridicule him.
As far as I know there's no good explaination for the "Norse spiral". It could be Santa Claus for all we know.
With no proof either way there can be no definitive statements.
It probably is something quite dull and boring, I won't be awaiting the arrival of our alien over lords any time soon.

espinolman

Two more spirals in china :

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xbg30b_ovni-332-china-same-spiral-of-norwa_

the_syco

mysterious wrote: »

It is more likely to be

A. Galactic federation
B. Preparation for staged alien invasion or faked disclosure
C. Using holographic technology.
D. stargate opening.

Or even just to test to see how the public react to this.

I love the Conspiracy Theories forun

PirateShampoo

nullzero wrote: »

Even if you don't like what he's saying, it doesn't mean you should ridicule him.
It probably is something quite dull and boring, I won't be awaiting the arrival of our alien over lords any time soon.

Yes like a Rocket, and ive made my views in him quite clear in other posts, at this point i just think hes being a troll trying to lure people into debating his ludicrous claims.

nullzero

PirateShampoo wrote: »

Yes like a Rocket, and ive made my views in him quite clear in other posts, at this point i just think hes being a troll trying to lure people into debating his ludicrous claims.

If you think he's being a troll report him.
I'm sure we can all make up our own minds on what we believe this phenomenon to be and to be honest, when you try to put him down with witty little retorts you're only showing yourself in a bad light.
In my opinion, I think the Norse spiral is probably something that can be explained quite easily. I don't see it as a conspiracy of any kind although I can understand how others might associate it with something like project blue beam which is related to conspiracy theory discussion.
As for luring "people into discussing his ludicrous claims", that's kind of the bread and butter of the CT forum. If you don't like it ignore it, it's easier that way.

PirateShampoo

PirateShampoo wrote: »

Yes like a Rocket, and ive made my views in him quite clear in other posts, at this point i just think hes being a troll trying to lure people into debating his ludicrous claims.

If you think he's a troll then use the report post function, don't say on thread that you think he's a troll, it's not only backseat modding, it also derails the thread. Take this as a warning.

Back on topic, guys.

Saruman

The original posted link says it is a Russian rocket and gives a link here to explain.

Lone Stone

It's been seen in different countries and different day's so it's not just some random once off thing. I read some where it's a prototype rocket made by the russia's to counter that anti missle systems the americans were working on.

And then i seen a video saying it's trail lead to haarp :eek: so who know's.

ps: i like mysterious post's

Tabnabs

More unusual light phenomena in Norway yesterday


http://www.yr.no/nyheter/1.6919749

aurelius79

The rocket explanation just doesn't hold water for me. Why would the Norwegian government be so quite about a Russian ballistic missile crash landing in their backyard? Why wouldn't Finland and Sweden kick off about the missile flying through their airspace? He's a better explanation.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread526637/pg1

aurelius79

aurelius79 wrote: »

The rocket explanation just doesn't hold water for me. Why would the Norwegian government be so quite about a Russian ballistic missile crash landing in their backyard? Why wouldn't Finland and Sweden kick off about the missile flying through their airspace? He's a better explanation.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread526637/pg1

Who said it crashed in Norway?
Who said it was ever in their airspace?

And you honestly think you get better explanation on ATS?
That's a laugh.

mysterious

King Mob wrote: »

Who said it crashed in Norway?
Who said it was ever in their airspace?

And you honestly think you get better explanation on ATS?
That's a laugh.

Whats a laugh again King Mob?:rolleyes:

Because you say so right? I do find it baffling that you seem to think only your sources are correct, and everytime somone post a link, you purposely ridicule them or the link. I have yet to actually see you taking into considerations of someone elses point of view.

But the funny thing to me is, you seem to think Wikipedia is a more reliable source over everything else. ATS is a site I don't go onto often, but it's one of the biggest trafficked site on the net, and information gets on there fast, quick and rather professionally. If its not reliable you will thousands debunking it.

Come on man!