Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Talks Between Gov. and unions break down

«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,997 ✭✭✭gally74


    no they got it spot on,

    all the unions could offer was a nuts plan that would have shut the country 12 days!!!

    well done ff


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭PomBear


    gally74 wrote: »
    no they got it spot on,

    all the unions could offer was a nuts plan that would have shut the country 12 days!!!

    well done ff

    everyone wasn't gonna take the 12 days all at once :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,997 ✭✭✭gally74


    the country borrowed 22 billion this year,

    would you just keep borrowing?

    get real, this 4 million next week has to be followed up with another 18 billion over the next 4 years!

    all this talk of 1.3 billion, were off by 22 billion


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,097 ✭✭✭Darragh29


    kev9100 wrote: »
    http://www.rte.ie/news/2009/1204/partnership.html

    This was a great oppurtunity for ff and they blew it.

    I'd like to know why it is only now when the threat of a pay cut has been wheeled out, that all of a sudden, the PS unions start talking the same language as the rest of us when it comes to change and delivering value for money in the workplace...

    David Begg has just admitted on Newstalk 10 minutes ago that now PS unions will return to being hostile to change and reform yet again within the workplace...

    What we need now is legislaton that outlaws obstruction of change and improvements within the public sector workplace. Constitutionally you can join a union, but this noton of blocking change and carrying on like a gimp every time you want a payrise, we need to deal with this for once and for all.

    Change is not a "once in a lifetime opportunity", it is something that happens in most workplaces every hour of every day, the government need to get with the script here and start putting the line down again between employer and employee..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,575 ✭✭✭✭FlutterinBantam


    Bring it on David and Liam and Peter and Brendan......

    See what public support you have( I'l tell you in case you don't already know....fook all!)

    Jaysus I'm now listening to Gilmore who was cut in two by Eamon Keane on Newstalk waffling about that this was a lost opportunity.

    For Christ's sake this crap has been going on for the last 15 years and nothing has changed.I just can't believe this guy.

    Keep that idiot out of Govt. for sure.

    I'd vote FF to keep that stupid attitude out.:mad:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,166 ✭✭✭SeanW


    kev9100 wrote: »
    http://www.rte.ie/news/2009/1204/partnership.html

    This was a great oppurtunity for ff and they blew it.
    How? From everything I know about the Public Sector, its fat and bloated, full of overpaid, underworked, spoiled, strike-happy tools.

    The unions plan didn't deal with any of the multitude of structural deficiencies in the public sector. Enough with this partnership bollix. The PS needs to be taken on, perferably with a chainsaw.

    Their plan was just "hey we'll take 12 days off to drive to Newry and fill our cars with crates of booze" ...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,575 ✭✭✭✭FlutterinBantam


    Gilmore's just pulled the ripcord... he's fcuked.:mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,337 ✭✭✭positivenote


    SeanW wrote: »
    How? From everything I know about the Public Sector, its fat and bloated, full of overpaid, underworked, spoiled, strike-happy tools.

    Their plan was just "hey we'll take 12 days off to drive to Newry and fill our cars with crates of booze" ...

    well you dont know much about teachers, nurses, firemen and other people who educate, care for and protect the general public


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,097 ✭✭✭Darragh29


    SeanW wrote: »
    How? From everything I know about the Public Sector, its fat and bloated, full of overpaid, underworked, spoiled, strike-happy tools.

    The unions plan didn't deal with any of the multitude of structural deficiencies in the public sector. Enough with this partnership bollix. The PS needs to be taken on, perferably with a chainsaw.

    Their plan was just "hey we'll take 12 days off to drive to Newry and fill our cars with crates of booze" ...

    These guys are DELUDED... Their statement that, "a once in a lifetime opportunity to completely reform the public sector", means nothing other than that the public sector is a complete inefficient mess as it is currently constituted.

    Their refusal to offer cooperation for the necessary reform, which most of them have spent their entire careers opposing, goes to the very core of the selfishness and greed that has us now borrowing half a billion a fortnight just to turn the lights on... It's sickening to any private sector worker, to see this gimp like behaviour in motion, it's revolting to see the country in such a state and people still batting for their own particular agenda...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,271 ✭✭✭kev9100


    Darragh29 wrote: »
    What we need now is legislaton that outlaws obstruction of change and improvements within the public sector workplace. Constitutionally you can join a union, but this noton of blocking change and carrying on like a gimp every time you want a payrise, we need to deal with this for once and for all.

    I`m sorry, but i don`t understand your point at all. Are you suggesting that a legislature has a right to dictate to a union what it can or cannot do? You may not like the unions, but they have a right to act in whatever way they believe is best for their members.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,097 ✭✭✭Darragh29


    well you dont know much about teachers, nurses, firemen and other people who educate, care for and protect the general public

    Teachers and the others you refer to above:

    Superior salaries than private sector workers

    GUARANTEED salary increments based on nothing other than time served

    Never have to have a performance review in their entire career

    Guaranteed job for life

    Guaranteed pension, totally insulated from market forces

    In the case of teachers, outrageous holiday entitlements

    Untouchable if sick days are taken


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,097 ✭✭✭Darragh29


    kev9100 wrote: »
    I`m sorry, but i don`t understand your point at all. Are you suggesting that a legislature has a right to dictate to a union what it can or cannot do? You may not like the unions, but they have a right to act in whatever way they believe is best for their members.

    We need legislation now stop unions obstructing the change that is necessary for the provision of proper public services. I have a license to drive a car, I can drive my car anywhere I wish, but it is not open to me to park my car sideways on the middle of the M50 and obstruct other people, because the law balances my right to drive a car, with the right of other road users to be able to progress without me obstructing them.

    I'm all for union membership, but we cannot allow this situation to prevail, change in any workplace is something that needs to be taken seriously, an employer cannot run any organisation when change is obstructed for any reason.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,081 ✭✭✭fricatus


    Darragh29 wrote: »
    Change is not a "once in a lifetime opportunity", it is something that happens in most workplaces every hour of every day, the government need to get with the script here and start putting the line down again between employer and employee..

    QFT...

    And if you work in the private sector, the reason you need to change and adapt constantly is because if you don't, the competition will, and very soon you'll be out of a job.

    These days the public sector have to realise that this country has to compete against India and China, etc., and deliver efficient public services that support the high-value jobs we need here. They can't do that by keeping all the old attitudes and practices.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,811 ✭✭✭✭billy the squid


    A lot of teachers don't have a job for life though, many are on temporary contracts while their lazy counterparts go on career breaks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,097 ✭✭✭Darragh29


    fricatus wrote: »
    QFT...

    And if you work in the private sector, the reason you need to change and adapt constantly is because if you don't, the competition will, and very soon you'll be out of a job.

    These days the public sector have to realise that this country has to compete against India and China, etc., and deliver efficient public services that support the high-value jobs we need here. They can't do that by keeping all the old attitudes and practices.

    These guys just don't "get" how the world turns these days... If you have people who are open to change and innovation within your workplace, these are your best assets. To have any organisation witholding this asset to the detriment of the state who is paying, and the citzizens who use the service, is criminal in these times.

    What we should do, is every person in the private sector should join a new union specifically for those in the private sector and restore some long overdue balance to this spectacle that is called the "partnership process"....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,575 ✭✭✭✭FlutterinBantam


    We need common sense from the taxpayer to see through the agendas of these people.

    Look at it this way... about 8- 10 pople telling the ELECTED GOVT what to do.

    David Begg

    Jack O' Connor

    Peter Mcloone

    Brendan Ogle

    Liam Doran

    Harbour

    + a few others.

    hardly the most reasonable lights in the firmament, and a bunch of whom, I for one, would gladly consign to the fcuking scraheap of the vested interests outdated section of the nearest available landfill.

    Bunch of imposters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,166 ✭✭✭SeanW


    well you dont know much about teachers, nurses, firemen and other people who educate, care for and protect the general public
    Granted, I should have qualified my post to differentiate the front line (where there's a lot less of the above malaise) and the back offices of managers and administrators (where the above maladies are a pandemic).

    Just a few examples:
    Dog tax costs twice as much to administer as it collects:
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055752037

    Driving test madness:
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=58570832&postcount=40
    Many of you recall the reality that the driving test "system" used to be barely functional, with waits up to 1 year 2 months, a malady partly caused by the greed and intransigence of driver tester unions.

    Health sector lunacy
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=53013555
    Most of the increased budget for health services was spent on administration.

    And this is probably just the tip of the iceberg.

    Asking the unions for help sorting this out is like asking the burglar to give you back your stuff.

    Taking on these bloated, spoilt, overpaid and underworked tools and ramming through structural reform with a 5-iron is the only way to get public services that work, while avoiding massive debts and property taxes, 60% income taxes and God knows what else that would be necessary to keep these people in their little bubble.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,528 ✭✭✭NinjaTruncs


    well you dont know much about teachers, nurses, firemen and other people who educate, care for and protect the general public
    Hasn't that excuse been done to death? They all knew what the job was when they took it on, it's like a binman giving out that he has to collect rubbish all day.

    4.3kWp South facing PV System. South Dublin



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 960 ✭✭✭Shea O'Meara


    Fianna Fail screwed up royally. They created this. Of course all areas need to be looked at for cuts etc. Of course unions will be up in arms. We've seen it all before.
    Public Service pay is one amoungst the multitude of areas we should be looking at. The only difference is Fianna Fail can deflect from themselves in providing the public with scape goats, such as public service workers. They are trying to evoke a sense of empathy from the public, ("We're trying to fix everything but the public service won't think of the children!") who should be calling for their blood and they know it.


    Begg "The people who condemned this union initiative out of hand concentrated solely on the bridging mechanism for 2010, which was only a secondary part of the overall plan. They failed to appreciate, or perhaps did not want to hear the detailed blueprints for medium-term reform and cost savings set out in documents agreed for each sector of the public service, which were the primary focus of the union proposal."
    http://news.eircom.net/breakingnews/16913365/

    My stance on this is; yes cuts need to be made. Unions have a right to strike when Fianna Fail wants to make changes without proper debate. Fianna Fail are loving the whole Public/Private debacle....divide and win over.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 960 ✭✭✭Shea O'Meara


    Hasn't that excuse been done to death? They all knew what the job was when they took it on....

    Yes, that's why their Unions are up in arms over Fianna Fail changes to those contracts.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭Misty Chaos


    I was very disappointed when I heard talks had broken down.

    If the unions want to the ship to sink, then LET IT, I say. It will be the ONLY way they'll get it. Then we'll see what will happen when the country goes completely bankrupt, how will the unions feel then?

    If that happens, I'm soldering the blame on the unions and the monkeys that run it as well, not just FF.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,418 ✭✭✭loobylou


    Darragh29 wrote: »
    goes to the very core of the selfishness and greed that has us now borrowing half a billion a fortnight just to turn the lights on...

    Closer to half a billion a week actually.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,271 ✭✭✭irish_bob


    gally74 wrote: »
    no they got it spot on,

    all the unions could offer was a nuts plan that would have shut the country 12 days!!!

    well done ff

    good news for the country as a whole , david begg was on rte saying how much he deeply regretted this outcome , when begg and co are bitterley disapointed , the rest of us should be happy , time to bury the ghastly sham that is social partnership , enough time has been wasted consulting jumped up beardos on thier opinions on how the country should conduct its affairs , time now to govern


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,236 ✭✭✭Dannyboy83


    Fianna Fail screwed up royally. They created this. Of course all areas need to be looked at for cuts etc. Of course unions will be up in arms. We've seen it all before.
    Public Service pay is one amoungst the multitude of areas we should be looking at. The only difference is Fianna Fail can deflect from themselves in providing the public with scape goats, such as public service workers. They are trying to evoke a sense of empathy from the public, ("We're trying to fix everything but the public service won't think of the children!") who should be calling for their blood and they know it.
    I agree, to an extent.
    Begg "The people who condemned this union initiative out of hand concentrated solely on the bridging mechanism for 2010, which was only a secondary part of the overall plan. They failed to appreciate, or perhaps did not want to hear the detailed blueprints for medium-term reform and cost savings set out in documents agreed for each sector of the public service, which were the primary focus of the union proposal."
    http://news.eircom.net/breakingnews/16913365/
    I disagree.
    I've been following this calamity since the start.
    I never heard any proposals of medium term reform.
    All I heard was refusals.
    Begg is entitled to his opinion, but regardless, he has failed to convey it to the public.
    My stance on this is; yes cuts need to be made. Unions have a right to strike when Fianna Fail wants to make changes without proper debate. Fianna Fail are loving the whole Public/Private debacle....divide and win over.
    [/quote]
    I disagree.
    The Union leaders made themselves the targets. At every opportunity.


  • Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 32,387 Mod ✭✭✭✭DeVore


    Fianna Fail screwed up royally. They created this. Of course all areas need to be looked at for cuts etc. Of course unions will be up in arms. We've seen it all before.
    Public Service pay is one amoungst the multitude of areas we should be looking at. The only difference is Fianna Fail can deflect from themselves in providing the public with scape goats, such as public service workers. They are trying to evoke a sense of empathy from the public, ("We're trying to fix everything but the public service won't think of the children!") who should be calling for their blood and they know it.


    Begg "The people who condemned this union initiative out of hand concentrated solely on the bridging mechanism for 2010, which was only a secondary part of the overall plan. They failed to appreciate, or perhaps did not want to hear the detailed blueprints for medium-term reform and cost savings set out in documents agreed for each sector of the public service, which were the primary focus of the union proposal."
    http://news.eircom.net/breakingnews/16913365/

    My stance on this is; yes cuts need to be made. Unions have a right to strike when Fianna Fail wants to make changes without proper debate. Fianna Fail are loving the whole Public/Private debacle....divide and win over.
    If Mr Begg wants to come here and answer our questions and detail his medium term reform plans, I will give him all the platform he can cope with. I will give him an unfettered, unrestricted, unedited platform to potentially 0.5 Million irish people seated in the state, this month.

    Serious offer, no catches.

    DeV.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 976 ✭✭✭Arnold Layne


    Fianna Fail screwed up royally. They created this. Of course all areas need to be looked at for cuts etc. Of course unions will be up in arms. We've seen it all before.
    Public Service pay is one amoungst the multitude of areas we should be looking at. The only difference is Fianna Fail can deflect from themselves in providing the public with scape goats, such as public service workers. They are trying to evoke a sense of empathy from the public, ("We're trying to fix everything but the public service won't think of the children!") who should be calling for their blood and they know it.


    Begg "The people who condemned this union initiative out of hand concentrated solely on the bridging mechanism for 2010, which was only a secondary part of the overall plan. They failed to appreciate, or perhaps did not want to hear the detailed blueprints for medium-term reform and cost savings set out in documents agreed for each sector of the public service, which were the primary focus of the union proposal."
    http://news.eircom.net/breakingnews/16913365/

    My stance on this is; yes cuts need to be made. Unions have a right to strike when Fianna Fail wants to make changes without proper debate. Fianna Fail are loving the whole Public/Private debacle....divide and win over.

    I wonder how Begg is going to act now with the pending redundancies in Aer Lingus, being on its board an' all


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 228 ✭✭gnxx


    With the unions kicked out of the negotiations, maybe Lenihan and others in Finance will grow some balls and take on the other vested interests like the banks and IBEC.

    After the years of mismanagement of the countries finances, we need a budget that makes everybody equally unhappy :)

    I will say it again, if the government started the budget with 50% cuts in their own pay, they would have the moral high-ground to implement a punishing budget.

    It will be interesting to see if we see some action in the areas of corporation tax, capital gains and the closing of loopholes that allow certain members of society avoid paying their share of the tax burden.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 157 ✭✭CeNedra


    FF pulled a master stroke. They have the unions where they want them. The Unions need some public support for any serious action to work. Outside of those working in the public sector they don't have support at all. They are in a very hostile environment. It got even more hostile this week when it was leaked (by the unions??) that they had agreements on 12 weeks leave. The public were up in arms over that one .... cop out.

    Where ever they go from here the Govt has more public support on this issue then they have. The Govt are in a position to royally screw public sector workers on the wage front next Wed. Will be interesting to see how much the wages drop by........
    Labour have dropped big time in my estimation .... what in Gods name would they do to cut cost out of the public sector current expenditure????


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,271 ✭✭✭irish_bob


    CeNedra wrote: »
    FF pulled a master stroke. They have the unions where they want them. The Unions need some public support for any serious action to work. Outside of those working in the public sector they don't have support at all. They are in a very hostile environment. It got even more hostile this week when it was leaked (by the unions??) that they had agreements on 12 weeks leave. The public were up in arms over that one .... cop out.

    Where ever they go from here the Govt has more public support on this issue then they have. The Govt are in a position to royally screw public sector workers on the wage front next Wed. Will be interesting to see how much the wages drop by........
    Labour have dropped big time in my estimation .... what in Gods name would they do to cut cost out of the public sector current expenditure????


    most leaders and goverments would now move in for the kill and finish off the stinking beasts that are the unions and while they have the support of the general public , having heard him interviewed on the 6 o clock news , cowen the coward ( who through pressure from his own party did the right thing ) still clings to the corrupt blanket that is social partnership


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭Poccington


    As a PS worker, I can honestly say I'm glad the Government put the foot down on this particular issue. The Unions are completely out of hand in this country, the past few weeks have shown that.

    Our country is in a bad way financially... 12 days unpaid leave would only ever be a temporary attempt at fixing things, what would happen next year?

    PS pay reform is inevitable, no amount of unpaid leave is going to change that.

    I just hope that the reforms are done in a fair manner, rather than a hatchet job.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 823 ✭✭✭MG


    Hurrah! Good news at last. Enough of the faffing around. They've had 18 months. Get on fixing the public finances.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28 square leg


    As a teacher - and before you reach for the reply buttons - I support the government on this one. I am deeply ashamed to be a member of a union after this weeks debacle.
    There are many good teachers but we as a profession are all to blame for signing up to the mantra that all teachers are the same and should have looked for meaningful ways to pay those who were prepared to work harder more rather than turning teaching in a greyocracy where merit was judged by how long you were in the classroom and not by what you actually were prepared to do or your actual talent. Now we will reap the whirlwind in the budget. I will not take part in any further action proposed by my or any other union
    May I also add that everyday I remind myself how lucky I am to have a job and I wish more teachers would show a realistic commonsense attitude about the present situation.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,012 ✭✭✭✭thebman


    CeNedra wrote: »
    FF pulled a master stroke. They have the unions where they want them. The Unions need some public support for any serious action to work. Outside of those working in the public sector they don't have support at all. They are in a very hostile environment. It got even more hostile this week when it was leaked (by the unions??) that they had agreements on 12 weeks leave. The public were up in arms over that one .... cop out.

    Where ever they go from here the Govt has more public support on this issue then they have. The Govt are in a position to royally screw public sector workers on the wage front next Wed. Will be interesting to see how much the wages drop by........
    Labour have dropped big time in my estimation .... what in Gods name would they do to cut cost out of the public sector current expenditure????

    Agree with this, all the pre-emptive strikes have done is p*** off private sector workers. As someone in work put it, I can't say it to <insert relatives name here> but they have it way too easy compared to whats happening in the private sector.

    Many of the people that appear to be supporting the public sector IRL, I very much doubt if they actually do if those people aren't within ear shot.

    FF seem to be realising this and despite my dislike for them, I think Brian Cowen could at least recover some support for them by taking on the unions and winning and getting some proper reform for the public sector to make it more efficient. I don't think it would be enough that I'd actually vote for them though since they created the mess in the first place that has made these cuts required.

    Realistically if cuts weren't required in the public sector, I'd support them but its not sustainable anymore in its current form.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 285 ✭✭sold


    kev9100 wrote: »
    http://www.rte.ie/news/2009/1204/partnership.html

    This was a great oppurtunity for ff and they blew it.

    Actually!! I think its the best decision FF ever made!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 232 ✭✭oncevotedff


    sold wrote: »
    Actually!! I think its the best decision FF ever made!!!

    It is.

    Because come the next election we needn't feel one bit guilty about ramming it up Fianna Fail's ass.:D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,197 ✭✭✭Eutow


    kev9100 wrote: »
    I`m sorry, but i don`t understand your point at all. Are you suggesting that a legislature has a right to dictate to a union what it can or cannot do? You may not like the unions, but they have a right to act in whatever way they believe is best for their members.


    So to hell with the country then yeah? Only thinking about yourselves. It is this stupid attitude that is ONE of the reasons why this country is bankrupt, and it's a reason why we have self-seeking parasites in a position of power.

    Why should public-sector workers be immune from job cuts and pay cuts?

    Unions should not be able to dictate and hold the country to ransom because a government wants to introduce efficiencies into an inefficient wasteful sector. Companies in the private sector have had continuous improvement policies for years. It's about time the public sector had a bit of cop-on and introduced it themselves.

    Unions should not be able to act in whatever way they want. You serve the public, not yourselves, hence why it is called the PUBLIC-sector.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,895 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    Unions should not be able to dictate and hold the country to ransom because a government wants to introduce efficiencies into an inefficient wasteful sector.

    They cant dictate or hold the country to ransom. They have been given every incentive to believe they can due to public partnership, but whats the worst the unions can do? Go on a 3 month strike, see their members fall in arrears on their mortgage and lose their homes?

    The lower paid public sector workers seem to be waking up to the fact that theyre being used as puppets for the admin staff on the 60K - 250K wages. Unions have always been parasites, both on business and the govenment, but also on their own members.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 605 ✭✭✭vinylbomb


    If Cowen (but I think the main force will be Lenihan) dont absolutely CRUSH the PS unions now it'll be a seriously wasted opportunity.

    That partnership shambles should be rolled back gradually to 2006 levels.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 138 ✭✭frman


    vinylbomb wrote: »
    If Cowen (but I think the main force will be Lenihan) dont absolutely CRUSH the PS unions now it'll be a seriously wasted opportunity.



    I agree. It is time to bring the hammer down on the Unions. Union representatives have no place in determining economic policy of a country.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,997 ✭✭✭gally74


    ive actually heard of people withdrawing from the cs union,

    delighted to hear it,

    there is a way forward for this country, but people need to wake up and innovate their way out, how can unions think they hold the cards on change in a ny job,

    unions had their place when employee legisiation was weak many years ago, however now they cant run a country!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 211 ✭✭imstrongerthanu




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 338 ✭✭SARZY


    It is.

    Because come the next election we needn't feel one bit guilty about ramming it up Fianna Fail's ass.:D

    We might get a chance sooner than we think. Getting the budget thru is going to be interesting. Might be a January election if Mc Daid and Grealish and 1 or 2 others are Man enough to back up the spin.

    No actually, 'man enough' is not what TD's do.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 430 ✭✭Steviemak


    vinylbomb wrote: »
    If Cowen (but I think the main force will be Lenihan) dont absolutely CRUSH the PS unions now it'll be a seriously wasted opportunity.

    The take away the tax credit for Trade Union fees for a start. Hit the unions where it hurts - in the pockets. The trade union leading socialists are all on €150k +. Parasites:mad:. Pay yourself an average wage like the rest of us and then you might have some credibility.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,271 ✭✭✭irish_bob


    vinylbomb wrote: »
    If Cowen (but I think the main force will be Lenihan) dont absolutely CRUSH the PS unions now it'll be a seriously wasted opportunity.

    That partnership shambles should be rolled back gradually to 2006 levels.

    lets not loose the run of ourselves here , fianna fail are not the kind of party to follow through all the way , while they won a victory , being a quientesentially populist party , they dont believe in slaying enemys , they dont even believe in enemys full stop , they believe in being all things to all men , listening to cowen on six - one yesterday evening , i have no doubt they wish to keep on reasonable terms with the unions , cowen is at the end of day the same as bertie ( minus the charisma ) when it comes to how he does things , had thier been a single alternative to pay cuts or breaking ranks with the unions , biffo would have chosen it , luckily for the rest of us , he had no choice but to lay down the law to the beards but as sure as night follows day , when prosperity returns , fianna fail will be courting the unions , anyone who truly wishes to see the country rid of theese narrow idealogues must vote for another party

    that said , at least with fianna fail , they can sometimes get it right , they are practical and therefore flexible , labour on the other hand genuinley believe that public servants are of a higher moral calibre than those who work in the vulgar pure capitalist private sector and would oppose cutting ties with unions regardless of the cost to the country , personally , i would vote in fianna fail again ( especially if lennehan took over ) as bad as they are rather than see labour involvement in any goverment and seeing that fine gael dont seem willing to go all out for the private sector vote or ditch their flat tyre of a leader , thier is little option but to stick with the soldiers of destiny , for now


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,271 ✭✭✭irish_bob


    Steviemak wrote: »
    The take away the tax credit for Trade Union fees for a start. Hit the unions where it hurts - in the pockets. The trade union leading socialists are all on €150k +. Parasites:mad:. Pay yourself an average wage like the rest of us and then you might have some credibility.

    indeed , the unions cloak themselves in language like equal society and solidarity while at the same time insisting on a 25% pay differential between public and private sector


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,012 ✭✭✭✭thebman


    irish_bob wrote: »
    lets not loose the run of ourselves here , fianna fail are not the kind of party to follow through all the way , while they won a victory , being a quientesentially populist party , they dont believe in slaying enemys , they dont even believe in enemys full stop , they believe in being all things to all men ,

    Yeah well they are stuck between a rock and a hard place now. Votes lost either way so go against the unions or against the private sector.

    I'm guessing that must seem ironic if you believe it was the government that was trying to get both sectors to argue against each other.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,165 ✭✭✭✭brianthebard


    Fianna Fail screwed up royally. They created this. Of course all areas need to be looked at for cuts etc. Of course unions will be up in arms. We've seen it all before.
    Public Service pay is one amoungst the multitude of areas we should be looking at. The only difference is Fianna Fail can deflect from themselves in providing the public with scape goats, such as public service workers. They are trying to evoke a sense of empathy from the public, ("We're trying to fix everything but the public service won't think of the children!") who should be calling for their blood and they know it.


    Begg "The people who condemned this union initiative out of hand concentrated solely on the bridging mechanism for 2010, which was only a secondary part of the overall plan. They failed to appreciate, or perhaps did not want to hear the detailed blueprints for medium-term reform and cost savings set out in documents agreed for each sector of the public service, which were the primary focus of the union proposal."
    http://news.eircom.net/breakingnews/16913365/

    My stance on this is; yes cuts need to be made. Unions have a right to strike when Fianna Fail wants to make changes without proper debate. Fianna Fail are loving the whole Public/Private debacle....divide and win over.


    QFT. Where does the idea that cuts=reform come from? I don't believe the unions are blocking reform, there has not been anything to suggest that the government is trying to reform the public sector to make it work better, only that they want to cut wages. The division between workers now is insane, obviously everyone is scared, but in their haste to be told everything's all right again the general populace seem willing to throw anyone under the train, no matter what. When this is all over and the dust settles, there will be more recrimination as they realise what they've done.

    I haven't heard one word from the government or anyone on boards who hates the unions about job creation, but they're more than happy to call for cuts.
    DeVore wrote: »
    If Mr Begg wants to come here and answer our questions and detail his medium term reform plans, I will give him all the platform he can cope with. I will give him an unfettered, unrestricted, unedited platform to potentially 0.5 Million irish people seated in the state, this month.

    Serious offer, no catches.

    DeV.

    If this was a serious offer then you'd want to send it to his office rather than just making a post on boards. Might get his attention quicker.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,012 ✭✭✭✭thebman


    QFT. Where does the idea that cuts=reform come from? I don't believe the unions are blocking reform, there has not been anything to suggest that the government is trying to reform the public sector to make it work better, only that they want to cut wages.

    Unions exist to protect their members. If a members job can be done by a computer they will fight against the introduction of the computer system even if the computer could do 200 times the amount of work in one day that the person could.

    Unions because of what their role is, prevent efficiencies and changes to work practices in many cases.
    The division between workers now is insane, obviously everyone is scared, but in their haste to be told everything's all right again the general populace seem willing to throw anyone under the train, no matter what. When this is all over and the dust settles, there will be more recrimination as they realise what they've done.

    People aren't doing anything except demanding the government get their books in order. Doesn't matter how that happens but it has to happen. Cuts could be intelligent but the government probably left it too late to do that.
    I haven't heard one word from the government or anyone on boards who hates the unions about job creation, but they're more than happy to call for cuts.

    You can't force jobs to exist. You can give incentives I guess but you need money to do that and the government doesn't have any.

    The best they can hope to do is remove red tape which they should do. The budget is the immediate concern though as without cuts there won't be a government next year.


  • Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 32,387 Mod ✭✭✭✭DeVore


    I'm deadly serious and I make the same offer to the IBEC crowd. We'll mail them on Monday morning but I'd put my bollox we will never hear back from them.

    No one wants the public to scrutinise things here. They want you to accept their soundbitten point scoring.

    DeV.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,575 ✭✭✭✭FlutterinBantam


    QFT. Where does the idea that cuts=reform come from? I don't believe the unions are blocking reform, there has not been anything to suggest that the government is trying to reform the public sector to make it work better, only that they want to cut wages. The division between workers now is insane, obviously everyone is scared, but in their haste to be told everything's all right again the general populace seem willing to throw anyone under the train, no matter what. When this is all over and the dust settles, there will be more recrimination as they realise what they've done.

    I haven't heard one word from the government or anyone on boards who hates the unions about job creation, but they're more than happy to call for cuts.


    If this was a serious offer then you'd want to send it to his office rather than just making a post on boards. Might get his attention quicker.

    I wouldn't bother actually, all you would get is outdated rhetoric.

    Set up a 'common sense and reality forum' and maybe he might contribute one post out of 600.;)


  • Advertisement
Advertisement