Dublin Canals Cycle Route

DCC_Cycling (Ciaran)

The first stage of a proposed Dublin Canals Cycle Route is currently at public consultation stage. Documents can be viewed and comments made by following the link below and entering planning reference 4148/09.

http://www.dublincity.ie/Planning/PlanningSearch/Pages/PlanningSearch.aspx

Ciarán

p

Great to see a public representative posting on here!

I had a small problem though, searching for that number doesn't return any results? Any idea what the problem is!

sickle

I was goping to make a comment through the DCC website but it costs €20 so thought i'd make it here,
There is new parking proposed on the south side of Wiltton Terrace (just after leeson street bridge), its not very sensible to put parking right next to the new cycle lane with doors opening into the path of cyclists and passengers in the cycle lane...

72hundred

DCC_Cycling (Ciaran) wrote: »

The first stage of a proposed Dublin Canals Cycle Route is currently at public consultation stage. Documents can be viewed and comments made by following the link below and entering planning reference 4148/09.

http://www.dublincity.ie/Planning/PlanningSearch/Pages/PlanningSearch.aspx

Ciarán

When's the due date for submissions? I'm pretty busy at the moment to read through all the documents but will have the time around Christmas to do so, if that's not too late.



EDIT: Ah right found it;

DCC wrote:

A submission or observation in relation to the proposed development, dealing with the proper planning and sustainable development of the area may be made in writing to the Executive Manager, Planning Department, Dublin City Council, Block 4, Floor 3, Civic Offices, Wood Quay, Dublin 8 before 16.30hrs on 18th December 2009.

Bunnyhopper

p wrote: »

Great to see a public representative posting on here!

I had a small problem though, searching for that number doesn't return any results? Any idea what the problem is!

Try one of the other search fields - the layout came up a bit oddly for me in Firefox but I got it to work that way.

And +1 on DCC posting here.

Dirk Gently

Here's the planning application for anyone ahaving difficulty with the DC site.

Full Development Description

Planning and Development Act 2000 Planning and Development Regulations 2001-2007 (Part 8 Procedure) Display of proposed development for public comment.

Proposed premium cycle route - Grand Canal Cycle Route and Sutton to Sandycove Docklands Route Pursuant to the requirements of the above, notice is hereby given of the proposed construction by Dublin City Council of the above scheme. The proposed works will comprise of the following:

1. The construction of 2,040 metres of contra flow cycle way adjacent to the Grand Canal from Portobello to Grand Canal Street Lower.

2. The construction of 405 metres of cycleway from Grand Canal Street Lower to Pearse Street.

3. The construction of 409 metres of cycle way from Hanover Quay to the southside of the Samuel Beckett Bridge.

4. The construction of 1,156 metres of contra flow cycle way adjacent to the Royal Canal from Samuel Beckett Bridge to Ossory Road.

5. The construction of a single span pedestrian/cycle bridge (span 58 metres) directly adjacent to the existing Iarnrod Eireann Bridge at Ossory Road.

6. The construction of 580 metres of cycleway from West Road to East Wall Road.

7. The construction of an 87 metre long cycle boardwalk on western approach to Leeson Street Bridge.

8. The provision of toucan (pedestrian and cycle) crossings at the following locations: (a) Junction of Richmond Street South and Charlemont Mall (b) Ranelagh Road and Charlemont Bridge (c) Leeson Street Bridge (d) Baggot Street Bridge (e) Huband Bridge (f) Northumberland Road and Warrington Place (McKenny Bridge) (g) Clanwilliam Place (h) Grand Canal Street and Grand Canal Quay (i) Pearse Street and Grand Canal Quay (j) Forbes Street and Sir John Rogerson's Quay (2) (k) Sir John Rogerson's Quay and Samuel Beckett Bridge (l) North Wall Quay east of Guild Street (m) Mayor Street and Spencer Dock (n) Spencer Dock and Sheriff Street (o) Ossory Road and West Road (p) West Road and East Wall Road

9. Creation of 2 cul de sacs on Grand Canal Quay at Railway Bridge.

10. Removal of 144 metre strip of existing cobble sets on Grand Canal Quay/Clanwilliam Terrace and relocation further north on Grand Canal Quay.

11. Removal of 270 pay and display permit parking spaces at the following locations: - South Side of Charlemont Mall (40 spaces) - South Side of Wilton Terrace (100 spaces) - Herbert Place (70 spaces) - Warrington Place (24 spaces) - Clanwilliam Place (10 spaces) - Grand Canal Quay (26 spaces)

12. Provision of the appropriate directional signage and markings.

13. Minor carriageway narrowing at various locations along the scheme as shown on the scheme drawings.

14. Reconstruction of pedestrian footpaths along the scheme where required.

15. Road resurfacing will take place where required.

16. The provision of public lighting and security CCTV.

17. Provision of ducting for public lighting, CCTV, and communication cables together with associated connection and pulling chambers. An Ecological Report accompanies this application. Plans and particulars of the proposed scheme will be available for inspection during normal working hours for a period of six weeks from Friday 23rd October to Friday 4th December at: (a) Dublin City Council, Wood Quay, Dublin 8 at the Planning Counter 9.00 - 16.30hrs Monday to Friday (b) Dublin Docklands Development Authority, 52-55 Sir John Rogerson's Quay, Docklands, Dublin 2, from 09.00hrs - 17.30hrs monday to friday and 0900hrs - 1700hrs Thursday (c) Sean O'Casey Community Centre, St Mary's Road, East Wall, from 0900hrs - 2200hrs Monday to Friday (d) Rathmines Library, 157 Lower Rathmines Road, Dublin 6, from 10.00hrs - 22300hrs Monday to Thursday and 10.00hrs - 15.00hrs Friday to Saturday.

A submission or observation in relation to the proposed development, dealing with the proper planning and sustainable development of the area may be made in writing to the Executive Manager, Planning Department, Dublin City Council, Block 4, Floor 3, Civic Offices, Wood Quay, Dublin 8 before 16.30hrs on 18th December 2009.

BostonB

Wish they had a better and more detailed map of it.

loyatemu

how does this tie in with this scheme?

Doctor Bob

loyatemu wrote: »

how does this tie in with this scheme?

It doesn't.

There will be a gap between Blackhorse and Portobello. Parts of that missing section are still cycleable, but there's no dedicated cycle infrastructure.

DCC_Cycling (Ciaran)

This is part of a plan to develop cycle routes along Dublin's canals. We are about to start surveying the stretch from Portobello to Blackhorse to connect to the route coming in from Adamstown.

The drawings that are posted are not detailed design drawings because this project is at Part VIII planning stage. In the Part VIII process officials from the local authority present a proposal to the elected public representatives. Elected representatives then decide to reject, accept or accept with amendments the proposal. Drawings at this stage are there to allow elected representatives to make an informed decision on the merits of the project. Detailed design comes later.

Ciarán

Doctor Bob

Cheers Ciarán- good to know the gap is being looked at.

BostonB wrote: »

Wish they had a better and more detailed map of it.

I saw the full project on display in the Civic Offices recently, including colour drawings of the scheme laid out end-to-end. The DCC planning website usually just puts up low-resolution b&w scans of any planning documents. Drop in to the lobby of Wood Quay or - presumably - any of the other locations listed in the notice quoted above if you want to see it in the flesh.

justo

This plan is one of the best pieces of work underway at DCC. You should all be praised for it. I'd love to see the section inbetween the wooden brigde and the causeway in Clontarf finished as that stretch is very dangerous at the moment.

What would be the expected time for the city part to be completed, provided the objections are minimal by December 18th?

JacksonHeightsOwn

i reckon the local authorties should make it their business to extend the cycleways the full length of the cancal istelf,

id can only imagine that it would be a great tourist attraction, imagine cycling from dublin to athlone, along the cancal, now that`d be scenic

Bunnyhopper

If this succeeds it'd be good to see something similar done with the Royal Canal. It could connect into the other route near Ossory Road, and maybe have a link into the Park around Ashtown. At present some sections are ok, others (Castleknock-Clonsilla) are dangerous. It could provide a nice route out as far as Maynooth at least.

bealbocht

Thanks for posting this. Have not seen the maps, so may be nothing but ..

2. The construction of 405 metres of cycleway from Grand Canal Street Lower to Pearse Street.

9. Creation of 2 cul de sacs on Grand Canal Quay at Railway Bridge.


Bit unclear as to the two above points ??
Is this a "motorist" cul de sac, or are you making the street impassable to everyone. How is Lower Grand Canal St, connected to Pearse St ??

If the cycle lane did not go down Grand Canal quay, it would be pretty stupid.

Wont miss the cobbles myself (but suspect some will),
Otherwise, the sooner its done the better.

mmclo

Bunnyhopper wrote: »

If this succeeds it'd be good to see something similar done with the Royal Canal. It could connect into the other route near Ossory Road, and maybe have a link into the Park around Ashtown. At present some sections are ok, others (Castleknock-Clonsilla) are dangerous. It could provide a nice route out as far as Maynooth at least.

+1, of course most of the work is for Fingal, DCC will say their bit is done although I think private sector did a lot of it around Ashtown. Bit of joined up thinking needed and most of this is national DoT money??

Sean02

All very good Ciaran and thanks for your interest for informing the forum. I worries me when you see Phase v111 planning. and Adamstown stretch costing €8 million or whatever. The Dublin City plan about how much Ciaran my guess €40 million??. The City plan is a great pipedream. Why can we not replicate the Ashtown stretch which due to private involvment probaly was passed at Phase 2 and completed at a fraction of cost in about 3months if I remember. Can anyone find out the cost of the Clonsila to Porterstown section some 6 years ago. It was probaly done on the old C E scheme. This is what leisure, commuter and tourist cyclists want and it's environmentaly friendly.

Trojan

Some photos from Royal Canal route as-is (or as-was Sept 08). Wasn't bad, though the bridges in town were difficult during morning rush hour traffic.

mmclo

Trojan wrote: »

Some photos from Royal Canal route as-is (or as-was Sept 08). Wasn't bad, though the bridges in town were difficult during morning rush hour traffic.

Of course the Ashtown to Castleknock part is in bits after a bit of rain...like at the moment.

petethedrummer

Trojan wrote: »

Some photos from Royal Canal route as-is (or as-was Sept 08). Wasn't bad, though the bridges in town were difficult during morning rush hour traffic.

Great stuff. I've been meaning to cycle those routes for months now. As soon as this project is over I'll be heading down them.

colm ó maonaigh

Thanks for the pics Alastair. Can I ask you if the canal path was navigable by bike all along that route? I did about 70miles of the Nante-Brest canal without leaving the path this Summer and it was a joy to cycle. I cringed looking at the state of that canal path, in your pics, in some places.

Trojan

colm ó maonaigh wrote: »

Thanks for the pics Alastair. Can I ask you if the canal path was navigable by bike all along that route? I did about 70miles of the Nante-Brest canal without leaving the path this Summer and it was a joy to cycle. I cringed looking at the state of that canal path, in your pics, in some places.

It wasn't too bad. Wider tyres would have helped in a couple of places - I was on 25s I think. The main spot that caused trouble was this roadblock in the Deep Sink section. Otherwise it was fine - fatty MTB tyres would have made it a bit quicker and more comfortable.

Sean02

Well done Pete I admire your optimism. However this plan while welcomed I don't think will see any improvement in the canal towpaths on the Royal and none after Adamstown on the Grand. Hopefully when the Merc users see the benifet of this section and the increase in cycling commuters along the route they will be motivated or forced to put in place similar cycle / pedrestrian path to at least Kilcock. Correct me if I'm wrong. Hi Ciaran any possibility of a comment on my previous reply.

mmclo

hope the new bridge for the Dunboyne rail line will be cycle friendly...presume it will be. Have a pic i will try and post

petethedrummer

Sean02 wrote: »

Well done Pete I admire your optimism. However this plan while welcomed I don't think will see any improvement in the canal towpaths on the Royal and none after Adamstown on the Grand.

Bit of confusion. I meant I'll be heading down it when I'm finished my own project here in work (programming a glorified dishwasher), which has me in at work 10pm on a thursday night. :mad:

wotdef

A word of caution. Just be careful on the setion from Castleknock station to the Porterstown bridge it is strewn with smooth rock and nice big roots. They are nice and shiney this time of year.

Sean02

mmco thanks for pic of Bridge look great. was always apprensive going under the old fresh air bridge particuarly in bad weather. But more exciting than the easier option of the high track. Pete I was as much worried as confused I would not like to antisipate big results in the short term with this project. Yes that stretch mid castleknock to porterstown is challenging and can be very dangereous. I've had to call fire brigade to rescue cyclists from canal on two occasions. Both were lucky not to have drowned or have serious injuries Guess what the response was from Waterways Ireland, OPW, John Gormley, Noel Dempsey??

Bunnyhopper

Sean02 wrote: »

Guess what the response was from Waterways Ireland, OPW, John Gormley, Noel Dempsey??

Was it?:

...

petethedrummer

Sean02 wrote: »

I've had to call fire brigade to rescue cyclists from canal on two occasions. Both were lucky not to have drowned or have serious injuries

I wonder is it easy to unclip under water.

monument

Back on topic...

DCC_Cycling (Ciaran) wrote: »

The first stage of a proposed Dublin Canals Cycle Route is currently at public consultation stage. Documents can be viewed and comments made by following the link below and entering planning reference 4148/09.

http://www.dublincity.ie/Planning/PlanningSearch/Pages/PlanningSearch.aspx

Ciarán

A few comments and questions:

>> Pages 1 to 21: Portobello to Grand Canal Street: This all seems ok, but a lot depends on junctions and other elements such as the small bit of boardwalk which are currently noted as to be designed at a later stage.

>> On junctions in general: How are the Toucan crossing due to work? Will they have separated areas for cyclists and peds? Or will the green sequence for peds and cyclists allow for entry or exit off the main route onto different roads?

>> Pages 21 and 22: Grand Canal Street to Grand Canal Quay... it gets very disjointed here...

>> The junction with Pearse Street is not marked as to be designed later as others are. Is this an error?

>> On Grand Canal Quay, south of and at Pearse Street: Why does the two-way cycle track end on Grand Canal Street and split into two “advisory” tracks and then end at the junction rather than use of a Toucan crossing directly across Pearse Street?

>> North of Pearse Street: It should be noted the Dublin Docklands Authority area has some of the poorest, disconnected cycle lanes in Dublin. Besides the lanes along the river quays, the Docklands is also highly notable as a newly designed area with no cycling provision (maybe better off given what was done along the quays).

>> Why are no lane markings being used across the paved areas north of Pearse Street? It’s not clear what happens on the map, but it is noted that no lane markings will be used the other documents, and some kind of signage will be agreed with the DDDA.

>> Is it because Grand Canal Quay / Square is not designed as a cycle route and there’s an unwillingness to redesign it? It’s a wide open space, but it gets quite tight because of the way green areas are designed at one side of the square.

>> Pages 23 and 24: North of Grand Canal Square: How do or how can parking space (or loading bays or whatever) and only 1.25 “advisory” cycle lanes fit into the design of a project which is supposed to be world class?

>> On the Samuel Beckett Bridge: This can’t really be blamed on the designers of this cycle route, but two-way cycle lanes on both sides only at 2.5m? And marking only between cyclists and pedestrians? This is just 1.25m each way on cycle track which is part of a river crossing and a premium cycle route?

>> From the maps online it’s very hard to make out what exactly is happing on both sides of the bridge with cyclists, other traffic and pedestrians.

>> Page 26: North of the Samuel Beckett Bridge: Says the cycle tracks is along the proposed linear park... is there a foothpath beside this? If not, you can’t really blame pedestrians for walking on the cycle track.

>> Page 28 etc: Same with the section of the off-street north of Sheriff Street Will there be a path for people walking etc? [It says in the other documents the bridge will be ped and cycling bridge, but it’s not clear from the drawings]

Doctor Bob

You're bang on about the junctions, monument. The bits in between are pretty easy- this thing will sink or swim based on how the junctions are designed.

One other point not discussed yet is the fact that the section across the square in the Docklands looks to be a shared space, the type which presumably would not meet with the approval of the NCBI (re the article posted a while ago).

petethedrummer

I hope you're going to submit those comments somewhere monument. Even to a local councillor who might run with a few or all of the points you have raised.

alfalad

petethedrummer wrote: »

I hope you're going to submit those comments somewhere monument. Even to a local councillor who might run with a few or all of the points you have raised.

Very much agree with this, you raise some good points and have taken the time to go through the documents so would be very good to submit it to the councillors etc.

petethedrummer

Having been involved in many engineering projects (though not civil) and met many local councillors, nothing would please a person more than having list of concerns to raise in a planning or design meeting.

monument

To build on and fully explain my comments last night:

Also, sorry if any of this seems like nit picking to people who are trying to do good work, it's just if this is not done right I will become even more cynical about cycling provisions in Dublin.

>> Pages 1 to 21: Portobello to Grand Canal Street: This all seems ok, but a lot depends on junctions and other elements such as the small bit of boardwalk which are currently noted as to be designed at a later stage. These sections along the canal are easy enough to do right, as others have said, it's the junctions that cause problems. Will there be extra room for stacking and/or turning, at least at major junctions, as is best design elsewhere?

>> On junctions in general: How are the Toucan crossing due to work? Will they have separated areas for cyclists and peds? Or will the green sequence for peds and cyclists allow for entry or exit off the main route onto different roads?

>> Page 11: Wilton Terrace: A text box pointing to the cycle track reads: "new 2.4m parking on south side of Wilton Terrace." The cross section does not note parking on or beside the cycle path here. Is this an error?

>> Pages 21 and 22: Grand Canal Street to Grand Canal Quay... it gets very disjointed here...

>> Page 21 and 22: On Grand Canal Quay, south of and at Pearse Street: Why does the two-way cycle track end on Grand Canal Street and split into two “advisory” tracks and then end at the junction rather than use of a Toucan crossing directly across Pearse Street?

>> Page 22: The junction with Pearse Street is not marked as to be designed later as others are. Is this an error?

>> Pages 22 and 23: North of Pearse Street: It should be noted the Dublin Docklands Authority area has some of the poorest, disconnected cycle lanes in Dublin. Besides the lanes along the river quays, the Docklands is also highly notable as a newly designed area with no cycling provision (maybe better off given what was done along the quays). OR has the DDDA really changed as it's newer head, Professor Niamh Brennan, claimed about other functions of the authority recent newspaper reports?

>> North of Pearse Street: Map looks to show Grand Canal Quay as road way, when this is now a paved area [marked as 'Forbes Street']?

>> Why are no lane markings being used across the paved areas north of Pearse Street to after Grand Canal Square? It’s not clear what happens on the map, but it is noted in the other documents that no lane markings will be used, and some kind of signage will be agreed with the DDDA.

>> Is it because Grand Canal Quay / Square is not designed as a cycle route and there’s an unwillingness to redesign it? It’s a wide open space, but it gets quite tight because of the way green areas are designed at one side of the square.

>> Pages 23 and 24: North of Grand Canal Square: How do or how can parking space (or loading bays or whatever) and only 1.25 “advisory” cycle lanes fit into the design of a project which is supposed to be world class?

>> Pages 21 to 24: This could be viewed as creating a number of problems:

>>>> [1] Creating a conflict with pedestrians -- it's one thing mixing cyclists and pedestrians in areas like small short cuts or leading up to cycling parking or buildings, but is this suited on a high standard cycle route which is should expect to have high volumes of passing (rather than slowing) cyclists? Is it suited to an area like a square where you'd expected to have pedestrians wondering around in all different directions?

>>>> [2] Creating a conflict with motorists at both sides of the square with only "advisory cycle lanes".

>>>> [3] Both of these break the high standard of the route, both the practical and visual level. Leading to a disjointed feeling when this is supposed to be a fully joint up project.

>>>> [4] Slowing slowing some commuter and leisure cyclists down so much as to make the route, or at least the section, unattractive to many.

>>>> [5] Creating confusion among cyclists and pedestrians -- if cyclists are to be allowed here are they also allowed to cycle in large paved areas around the Docklands? Around the city? Are there legal issues here? Should policy be set at a city or national level rather than in a patch work manner?

>> Pages 25 and 26: On the Samuel Beckett Bridge: This can’t really be blamed on the designers of this cycle route, but two-way cycle lanes on both sides only at 2.5m? And marking only between cyclists and pedestrians? This is just 1.25m each way on cycle track which is part of a river crossing and a premium cycle route?

>> Pages 25 and 26: How will the cycle tracks on the bridge link with the current [as already noted, poorly designed and maintained] cycle tracks on the quays?

>> From the maps online it’s very hard to make out what exactly is happing on both ends of the bridge with cyclists, other traffic and pedestrians.

>> Page 26: North of the Samuel Beckett Bridge: Says the cycle tracks is along the proposed linear park... is there a foothpath beside this? If not, you can’t really blame pedestrians for walking on the cycle track.

>> Page 28 etc: Same with the section of the off-street north of Sheriff Street Will there be a path for people walking etc? It says in the other documents the bridge will be ped and cycling bridge, but it’s not clear from the drawings. And will the bridge be wide enough for cyclists and others?

>> Page 35: East Wall Road: What exactly is the issue where it states "continuation of cycle lane to be decided later"?

petethedrummer

All they need to do is send the plans to Denmark City Council and ask them to have a look over them for an hour or 2.

I wonder has any guidance been sought from experts in Amsterdam, Copenhagen or Germany? Or are we going to get it wrong the first time and have to spend even more money in the long run having to fix it up.

p

petethedrummer wrote: »

All they need to do is send the plans to Denmark City Council and ask them to have a look over them for an hour or 2.

I wonder has any guidance been sought from experts in Amsterdam, Copenhagen or Germany? Or are we going to get it wrong the first time and have to spend even more money in the long run having to fix it up.

They could also talk to Copenhagenize Consulting
http://www.copenhagenize.eu/

I actually have a few contacts in the Copenhagen City Council. I wonder if there would be some way to organise a trip to copenhagen for some planning/council folks? I'd be happy to try use my contacts to make it a good trip.


Monument - if you want a hand doing up drawings to reflect the issues you're talking about give me a shout. It's probably hard to read text that are critiques of these things.

monument

Ok so this is the street that's apparently too small to have a two-way segregated cycle track on it [sorry for the poor quality of the pics!]:

monument

And this is the area cyclists are due to pass by and interact with pedestrians, with no lane marking or changes.



Or go around this way? Will be lovely on a busy evening and even more so on a nice sunny day...

justo

DCC_Cycling (Ciaran) wrote: »

The first stage of a proposed Dublin Canals Cycle Route is currently at public consultation stage. Documents can be viewed and comments made by following the link below and entering planning reference 4148/09.

http://www.dublincity.ie/Planning/PlanningSearch/Pages/PlanningSearch.aspx

Ciarán

Hi Ciaran,

I've used the new Samuel Beckett bridge, both North and South bound on my bike. It's a little unfortunate the way the bike lane is merged with the pedestrians' walk space. After a cyclist uses the lane you get dumped at either end onto the pavement with no easy way to get back onto your bike path. Heading north bound this is particularly problematic, becasue if you want to proceed straight ahead, you need to situate yourself on the RHS of vehicles turning left whcih means leaving the bike bath and crossing the left turning line of traffic. Heading north and south bound, getting on to the bike path is diffifult too, as you have to get around people who are waiting to cross the road. Personally, I'll stick to using the bus lane for safety sake, which is a pity, because it's better to design things well and use them in that fashion.

monument

Submission by the Dublin Cycle Campaign is here:

http://www.dublincycling.com/sites/dublincycling.ie/files/users/12/2009-12-18-Portobello-Fairview_Submission.pdf

They list some of the points I made above and more general points too.

JacksonHeightsOwn

monument wrote: »

Ok so this is the street that's apparently too small to have a two-way segregated cycle track on it [sorry for the poor quality of the pics!]:

since when did Dublin turn into fasionable Berlin?

where is that?

loyatemu

chrisbonnie wrote: »

since when did Dublin turn into fasionable Berlin?

where is that?

Here

JacksonHeightsOwn

loyatemu wrote: »

Here

wow, looks fantastic :eek:

mambo

Work seems to have started on this route, at Wilton Terrace (between Leeson St & Baggot St bridges).

AidanadiA

Hi there,

I'm currently working on an accdemic report on the cycle paths along the Grand Canal.

Would there be any interest in taking part in the questionnaire segment?


Please feel free to PM me.

Thank you,

BostonB

Can you post some details of the report?

AidanadiA

BostonB wrote: »

Can you post some details of the report?

It's a course report for my communications module.

I've chosen the revamping of the waterways focusing on the cycle paths.

I want to find out just some basic questions. If people are for the revamp, if it will be used more etc.

justo

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?threadid=2056080076

mambo

mambo wrote: »

Work seems to have started on this route, at Wilton Terrace (between Leeson St & Baggot St bridges).

Progress seems slow, they are still working on this small section of the route, though most of it seems substantially complete (in that there is a double lane separated from the road), except for painting, signage, etc.

Have any other sections been started?

mambo

mambo wrote: »

Work seems to have started on this route, at Wilton Terrace (between Leeson St & Baggot St bridges).

Work also now underway at Herbert Place (next section after Wilton Terrace, heading towards docklands), and at Macken Street (opposite Maldron Hotel, in docklands).

Hope the money doesn't run out before they finish!