Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Accident with Learner Permit.....

Options
  • 09-11-2009 5:25pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 14


    Today I had an accident on the drumcondra road, dublin with my provisional license with no full license driver beside me.

    To make things worse is that I crashed into the back of an aircoach, not really any major damage done to the bus and the driver is fine aswell so is the passengers, but my car (fiat punto) had to be scrapped off.

    The gardai came forward and asked me a few questions and said that a summonce will be send out to me to go to court, I have 3rd party insurance and I am not claiming anything from my insurance, so.......

    Now my question is..... what will happen to me?


«1

Comments

  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,654 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    You could get a big fine and a wodge of penalty points.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,438 ✭✭✭TwoShedsJackson


    Your insurance will pay out for whatever damage you did to the coach, your premium will go up.

    As for the summons, presumably the guard is doing you for driving without a licenced driver with you, it's a €1000 fine I think.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,102 ✭✭✭✭Drummerboy08


    Done for driving without a full licence holder, possibly no L plates, maybe careless driving?

    You'll only be punished for one though. I think.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,160 ✭✭✭TheNog


    Did the Guard say what the summons is for?

    I know you were driving unaccompanied but is there anything else?


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,678 ✭✭✭✭R.O.R


    And perhaps you'll learn not to attempt driving by yourself.

    €1,000 fine for driving alone isn't it? Another €1,000 for not having L-Plates if they weren't up.

    Not to mention the fact your insurance will sky rocket after Air Coach have claimed. That's if the insurance company don't sue you to recover the 3rd party's costs - which they are entitled to do.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,465 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    R.O.R wrote: »
    And perhaps you'll learn not to attempt driving by yourself.

    €1,000 fine for driving alone isn't it? Another €1,000 for not having L-Plates if they weren't up.

    Not to mention the fact your insurance will sky rocket after Air Coach have claimed. That's if the insurance company don't sue you to recover the 3rd party's costs - which they are entitled to do.

    Yep, technicilly you werent actually insured at the time of driving the car, things could get messy.
    Have you informed the insurance company?


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,798 ✭✭✭Mr. Incognito


    Depends on your insurance really.

    If you are unaccompanied and no L plates, technically you are not insured. If your insurance company deny liability you will be liable for the damage but I doubt this would happen, though it could.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,160 ✭✭✭TheNog


    R.O.R wrote: »
    And perhaps you'll learn not to attempt driving by yourself.

    €1,000 fine for driving alone isn't it? Another €1,000 for not having L-Plates if they weren't up.

    The €1,000 fines are the maximum allowed but the Judges have discretion over the amount they can give.
    kippy wrote: »
    Yep, technicilly you werent actually insured at the time of driving the car, things could get messy.
    Have you informed the insurance company?

    No he was still insured even if unaccompanied


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 23,157 Mod ✭✭✭✭Alanstrainor


    kippy wrote: »
    Yep, technicilly you werent actually insured at the time of driving the car,

    That depends entirely on the policy, and is not universally true for all insurance policies.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,438 ✭✭✭TwoShedsJackson


    kippy wrote: »
    Yep, technicilly you werent actually insured at the time of driving the car, things could get messy.
    Have you informed the insurance company?

    It's technically possible but very unlikely the insurance company would sue him to get the 3rd party costs back, have you ever actually heard of them doing this to anyone?

    Maybe if he had crashed into someone's brand-new Lamborghini or 740 and you were talking 100,000 plus to replace, but for €500 - €2000 damage to a coach?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 26,149 ✭✭✭✭Berty


    You had better hope the Aircoach was not full of Yanks otherwise they will start feeling "rubber necks" at the airport and go in search of a solicitor. :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14 albertonman


    TheNog wrote: »
    Did the Guard say what the summons is for?

    I know you were driving unaccompanied but is there anything else?



    He just said that the summonce will be cause I was driving unaccompanied...... I wasnt driving wrecklessly and I was certainly not driving without my L plates.

    Do you know, if I will be banned from driving on the roads.

    The story is as follow....

    I was behind the bus and I tried to swing passed it and I didnt steer it enough to pass it and crashed into the back of the bus, so I was still in 1st gear, but as you know how a fiat punto crush when in an accident.... I could only imagine if I am driving wrecklessly, I wouldnt be here typing.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 23,157 Mod ✭✭✭✭Alanstrainor


    He just said that the summonce will be cause I was driving unaccompanied...... I wasnt driving wrecklessly and I was certainly not driving without my L plates.

    Do you know, if I will be banned from driving on the roads.

    The story is as follow....

    I was behind the bus and I tried to swing passed it and I didnt steer it enough to pass it and crashed into the back of the bus, so I was still in 1st gear, but as you know how a fiat punto crush when in an accident.... I could only imagine if I am driving wrecklessly, I wouldnt be here typing.

    No one can say for certain what will or wont happen, these threads always end up with people calling for blood. What's done is done, you'll just have to deal with it as it comes.


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,465 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    That depends entirely on the policy, and is not universally true for all insurance policies.

    I was under the impression that if you were in breach of the law when involved in an accident then your insurance policy is null and void. Technicilly.
    I havent personally heard of any cases whereby the insurance company uses something such as this to get out of payout however I do believe they can. I was also under the impression that such a "clause" was in all insurance policies that you sign up for.
    Obviously I am mistaken. Apologies.


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,149 ✭✭✭✭Berty


    He just said that the summonce will be cause I was driving unaccompanied...... I wasnt driving wrecklessly and I was certainly not driving without my L plates.

    Do you know, if I will be banned from driving on the roads.

    Nobody can say for sure BUT I would seriously doubt you will be banned from driving for even one day.

    Did you watch the RTE programme called Traffic blues recently? You could have done a whole lot worse and still not have gotten banned.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,102 ✭✭✭✭Drummerboy08


    Berty wrote: »
    Did you watch the RTE programme called Traffic blues recently? You could have done a whole lot worse and still not have gotten banned.


    Wasnt that just the irish version of the Bill? It wasnt real was it?





    /Awaits TheNog or NGA to agree


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,201 ✭✭✭KamiKazi


    Start saying your goodbyes OP, you're looking at hard time.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,062 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    kippy wrote: »
    I was under the impression that if you were in breach of the law when involved in an accident then your insurance policy is null and void. Technicilly.
    Technicilly (sic) almost all incidents are as a result of someone being in breach of the law (exceeding the speed limit, not using due care and attention, etc.)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14 albertonman


    KamiKazi wrote: »
    Start saying your goodbyes OP, you're looking at hard time.


    quote what you are trying to say....


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,465 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    kbannon wrote: »
    Technicilly (sic) almost all incidents are as a result of someone being in breach of the law (exceeding the speed limit, not using due care and attention, etc.)
    Fair enough...........


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14 albertonman


    kippy wrote: »
    Yep, technicilly you werent actually insured at the time of driving the car, things could get messy.
    Have you informed the insurance company?


    Yep they know, the girl told me (asgard insurance) that they will pay out for the damage to aircoach.

    Will have to see what happens.


  • Registered Users Posts: 743 ✭✭✭breeno


    As a motor insurance underwriter, I can assure you that your claim will be paid out and you will not be pursued for reimbursement of any payout. You will more than likely pay an increased premium at your next renewal though.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,160 ✭✭✭TheNog


    kippy wrote: »
    I was under the impression that if you were in breach of the law when involved in an accident then your insurance policy is null and void. Technicilly.
    I havent personally heard of any cases whereby the insurance company uses something such as this to get out of payout however I do believe they can. I was also under the impression that such a "clause" was in all insurance policies that you sign up for.
    Obviously I am mistaken. Apologies.

    I reckon thats in England you are thinking of


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,465 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    TheNog wrote: »
    I reckon thats in England you are thinking of

    It could well be, apologies again for the misinformation..........


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    breeno wrote: »
    As a motor insurance underwriter, I can assure you that your claim will be paid out and you will not be pursued for reimbursement of any payout. You will more than likely pay an increased premium at your next renewal though.
    Insurance companies are actually bound by law to discharge all 3rd party liabilites against an insuree unless some material detail relating to the insurance policy was omitted or changed, i.e. the driver is driving a different car, didn't disclaim that they don't have a licence, etc.

    It basically means that no matter what, provided that you have been honest with your insurance company about who you are and what they are insuring, then they absolutely cannot get out of their obligation to cover your third party costs, regardless of how the incident occured.

    They can of course chase you for the cash, but only after they compensate the other guy. It would be extremely rare for them to pursue a driver for the compensation they've paid out.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,279 ✭✭✭snowman707


    breeno wrote: »
    As a motor insurance underwriter, I can assure you that your claim will be paid out and you will not be pursued for reimbursement of any payout. You will more than likely pay an increased premium at your next renewal though.


    Thanks for a reply from someone who knows what they are speaking about,

    OP: do not take much notice of some the idiotic replies from individuals who obviously know sfa what they are on about.

    A mishap happened no body was killed or injured, life will go on & in time you may well be all the stronger by it.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,654 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    A mishap yes, but it was also a flagrant disregard for the law.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,470 ✭✭✭DonJose


    Question to AGS on this board, could the OP be charged with driving without a valid license? I contacted the Garda Traffic Corp before and was told that a person driving unaccompanied on a learner permit could be charged with driving without a valid license.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,445 ✭✭✭Absurdum


    quote what you are trying to say....

    have you seen the movie Midnight Express?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,465 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    snowman707 wrote: »
    Thanks for a reply from someone who knows what they are speaking about,

    OP: do not take much notice of some the idiotic replies from individuals who obviously know sfa what they are on about.

    A mishap happened no body was killed or injured, life will go on & in time you may well be all the stronger by it.

    Listen,
    Who on this thread knows the least.
    The guy who rear ended a coach in his Punto while driving on a provisional alone, who doesnt know what the cop is going to charge him with, or me, who got a pretty small technical point wrong and has apologized for it since.
    I wouldnt call my reply idiotic either.......


    Totally agree though, this time its only money, nothing too bad, hopefully you've your lesson learned.


Advertisement