Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Wimax Latency

  • 07-11-2009 3:40pm
    #1
    Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 17,142 Mod ✭✭✭✭


    Hi folks, just wondering for those of you who are currently on Wimax.

    Whats the average latency you get when pinging some well known sites? Also, gaming servers. I hear its pretty rubbish, but I wanna hear it straight from some boardsies mouths :o Thanks!


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14 Gizo


    Anyone got a review of Wimax yet?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,606 ✭✭✭Jumpy


    Midband forum no?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 104 ✭✭Hammer of Thor


    Seriously? None of you Dubs have it yet? :)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Wimax where ??

    There are different versions of it some of which have been live for 2 or more years . It would be classed as Broadband were it fixed .

    No boards user has tested and commented on the Imagine one yet Hammer .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,713 ✭✭✭✭jor el


    Fixed or nomadic Wimax? They're very different, and user experience will vary significantly.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 17,142 Mod ✭✭✭✭cherryghost


    lets go with fixed. far more stable and reliable i believe.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    It is , now where do you want it ??


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 17,142 Mod ✭✭✭✭cherryghost


    its coming in february in longford, i just want to know the latency yee dubliners are getting before i decide whether its viable for me or not.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,713 ✭✭✭✭jor el


    I don't think there is any fixed Wimax in Dublin yet, is there?

    If anyone's thinking Imagine Wimax, that's mobile, and will not be any indication of what you'll get on fixed.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Wimax is available already in parts of Longford .


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 17,142 Mod ✭✭✭✭cherryghost


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    Wimax is available already in parts of Longford .

    that isnt actually wimax and its a terrible service :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,713 ✭✭✭✭jor el


    Westnet operate fixed wimax in Mayo. You could ask them what typical performance is like. I believe the owners are also members of these boards.

    One companies implementation in one area, may not be a very good indication of what you might get from a different company in your area though. Think of Three, Vodafone and O2. All using the exact same technology, but with vastly varying results.

    You'll really need to wait and see what comes to your area.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,151 ✭✭✭Thomas from Presence


    Sales at Imagine told me that the contention for Wimax is 24:1 at busy periods. No big leap forward there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,821 ✭✭✭Xcellor


    its coming in february in longford, i just want to know the latency yee dubliners are getting before i decide whether its viable for me or not.

    Who is offering this?


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 17,142 Mod ✭✭✭✭cherryghost


    Xcellor wrote: »
    Who is offering this?

    imagine, according to their website


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    what is wrong with Crossan in the town ???


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 980 ✭✭✭macroman


    I've had WiMax for around 2 months now. Took the installer 3 attempts and 3 receivers to get it working (1st wouldn't allow devices to connect, 2nd wouldn't receive a signal and 3rd worked eventually).

    I wouldn't dare call it stable, as I can be at my witts end sometimes when it loses connection. Sometimes its gone weeks without dropping signal whereas sometimes it can happen 3 or 4 times a day.

    The only reason I have it is because it's cheap (€18.95 a month), it was a Free Upgrade and UPC B/B won't be in my area until January.

    620332216.png


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    from whom ??

    and is it a fixed or mobile wimax ???


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,243 ✭✭✭DECEiFER




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 104 ✭✭Hammer of Thor


    So from reading the posts am I to gather that Imagine WiMax is not going to be fixed wireless at all? So its not going to be any good for Xbox Live? Say it ain't so!!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,243 ✭✭✭DECEiFER


    So from reading the posts am I to gather that Imagine WiMax is not going to be fixed wireless at all? So its not going to be any good for Xbox Live? Say it ain't so!!!
    Did you not read my post? :)

    Check the links that I provided, the middle two specifically. There's mobile and fixed WiMax coming...soon.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    There is no fixed Wimax coming soon anywhere.

    Imagine ( and Motorola ) only do mobile wimax also known as 802.16e but sometimes the signal is so weak they gotta do ( literally) fixed mobile wireless instead at an unknown extra cost to the customer .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 104 ✭✭Hammer of Thor


    DECEiFER wrote: »
    Did you not read my post? :)

    Check the links that I provided, the middle two specifically. There's mobile and fixed WiMax coming...soon.


    I did, I did!!! lol, yeah but I just checked again and it doesn't metion anything about fixed, just the dongle and the hub, how can the hub be fixed? I'm a noob in these matters btw, so be kind!:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 104 ✭✭Hammer of Thor


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    There is no fixed Wimax coming soon anywhere.

    Imagine ( and Motorola ) only do mobile wimax also known as 802.16e but sometimes the signal is so weak they gotta do ( literally) fixed mobile wireless instead at an unknown extra cost to the customer .

    So if I'm living close to the mast, around 1 km, and have a pretty clear line of sight, which I do, I shouldn't need fixed to get a decent speed with a low latency? Am I living in cuckoo land?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    The hub is 'nomadic'...strictly speaking... and can be made 'mobile' if you pay them extra amount every month ...and you plug it in to power wherever you are if there is a signal . At one km the hub should work and the dongle...just about .

    The fixed version ( external antenna) is not shown on their website at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 104 ✭✭Hammer of Thor


    Understood, thanks very muchski! So when do ye reckon the first boards members may have news for us? Anyone been signed up yet or does all that start mid-November still?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,713 ✭✭✭✭jor el


    imagine, according to their website

    That is not going to be fixed. Imagine are only offering mobile Wimax.

    Since this thread appears to mainly be about mobile Wimax, and more specifically Imagine's new product, I think it's best off in the Midband forum.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Lots of variables here, it depends on how they implement QOS and MAC address based prioritisations to an extent . It also depends on whether they implement the full ERTPS QOS for all customers/services or indeed what if any of UGS, ERTPS, RTPS, NRTPS or BE they use ( and when) and whether this applies to the IP stream or the VOIP only .

    The marketing people don't seem to want to tell us !


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 17,142 Mod ✭✭✭✭cherryghost


    ugh.. feck that then. im too far out of town to get anything above 1mb :/


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 745 ✭✭✭cable842


    no we dont have it in dublin at all.

    its said to bring down the prices


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 396 ✭✭zt-OctaviaN


    Hey there,
    jor el wrote: »
    Westnet operate fixed wimax in Mayo. You could ask them what typical performance is like. I believe the owners are also members of these boards.

    One companies implementation in one area, may not be a very good indication of what you might get from a different company in your area though. Think of Three, Vodafone and O2. All using the exact same technology, but with vastly varying results.

    You'll really need to wait and see what comes to your area.

    For me I have been on Fixed Wireless Access for about 2 years from Westnet.
    The company are great and my pings are solid 10 - 16ms on the speedtest.net never above and range from 10 - 25 on pingtest.net again a min max range normally 16ms.

    Friends of mine on various 8/9 meg connections get from 40 - 80 ms pings

    However their maximum speed available may not quite compete with packages available by DSL suppliers at the moment but thats exactly the point if you cannot get DSL then its great you can get a low latency FWA connection!

    Getting back to the Wimax 4G it will be interesting to see how this will shake up existing Wireless ISPs in terms of packages available on current Wimax offerings.


    Nick


  • Subscribers Posts: 16,663 ✭✭✭✭copacetic


    jor el wrote: »
    That is not going to be fixed. Imagine are only offering mobile Wimax.

    Since this thread appears to mainly be about mobile Wimax, and more specifically Imagine's new product, I think it's best off in the Midband forum.

    Have seen this stated as fact a few times, where are people getting this info from? The most useful info I've seen on boards was this post

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=62898797&postcount=398
    Each customer is prequalified, depending on their address and proximity to the mast. Those that are closest to the mast can get either an indoor unit or an external antenna . Those further away (but still within coveage) just get the external antenna option. So, if you wanted 7Mb and an external antenna you can get it. At the moment there is no difference in set-up charge. Not sure if this will change in the future tho.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,874 ✭✭✭✭PogMoThoin


    copacetic wrote: »
    Have seen this stated as fact a few times, where are people getting this info from? The most useful info I've seen on boards was this post

    Having some fixed users while any other users are nomadic cannot be classed as fixed wimax, they're telling lies here. They are not using fixed wimax gear, Motorola don't do it. Also the fact that there are nomadic users mean they can never control contention.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166 ✭✭jellies


    Hey there,



    For me I have been on Fixed Wireless Access for about 2 years from Westnet.
    The company are great and my pings are solid 10 - 16ms on the speedtest.net never above and range from 10 - 25 on pingtest.net again a min max range normally 16ms.

    Friends of mine on various 8/9 meg connections get from 40 - 80 ms pings

    However their maximum speed available may not quite compete with packages available by DSL suppliers at the moment but thats exactly the point if you cannot get DSL then its great you can get a low latency FWA connection!

    Getting back to the Wimax 4G it will be interesting to see how this will shake up existing Wireless ISPs in terms of packages available on current Wimax offerings.


    Nick

    Fixed WiMax (802.16d) provides a great broadband service. One advantage of it is that it is FDD, which means low latency. Your own service bears this out...

    802.16e is a TDD system. This means higher latency than 802.16d - generally around 70ms vs 30ms for fixed. However, TDD systems are far cheaper than FDD systems. There is also a huge amount of international development and large scale deployment in rev e which will drive innovation and reduce costs further.

    Time will tell, but this should mean that 802.16e can offer a real alternative/compliment to other mobile and fixed broadband platforms.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 320 ✭✭liamnojo92


    i seem to be having a bit of a problem now with westnet during peak times atm my ping is averaging around 200ms even with this i know it will be perfectly fine by 11 o clock, so i'm not sure whether it's westnet over selling in our area or just one person going mental with torrents and the like.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8 Invis


    It is a horrible service..... I am in Longford, and i highly disrecommend Imagine Wimax!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    Over sold masts with Mobile Wimax will be even worse latency.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,821 ✭✭✭Xcellor


    Invis wrote: »
    It is a horrible service..... I am in Longford, and i highly disrecommend Imagine Wimax!

    Can you visit www.pingtest.net and give results and also www.speedtest.net

    My dad is ordering so want to warn him about it...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 320 ✭✭liamnojo92


    Btw my latency was fixed a couple of weeks after i posted that. Wimax can be better than normal broadband if implemented properly and not oversold which is what imagine seem to be doing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    Depends what you mean by "normal broadband"

    Mobile Wimax is never going to be even Broadband standard. True Fixed WiMax can be as good, but not better.

    Imagine WiMax is 3.6GHz which is only suitable for a Fixed Only WiMax, which Imagine's is not. There is no way Imagine WiMax can be as good as Broadband never mind "better than normal Broadband"


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 320 ✭✭liamnojo92


    watty wrote: »
    Depends what you mean by "normal broadband"

    Mobile Wimax is never going to be even Broadband standard. True Fixed WiMax can be as good, but not better.

    Imagine WiMax is 3.6GHz which is only suitable for a Fixed Only WiMax, which Imagine's is not. There is no way Imagine WiMax can be as good as Broadband never mind "better than normal Broadband"
    Yeah I meant fixed wimax can be better which is what i have now I think (Westnet).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16 westhfra


    Invis wrote: »
    It is a horrible service..... I am in Longford, and i highly disrecommend Imagine Wimax!

    Also in Longford, and can honsetly say the amount of trouble I had so far is not worth the so-called cost saving. You only realize all the additional issues once you get the service up and running.
    Want my advice , stay clear and stick with Eircom


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6 zatgun


    Hi, i'm in Longford also. I've had it a while now and have to say that it's really terrible. I got the 7 meg bundle. On the first day I was getting 5 meg np, but then a week later it dropped to 2 meg and now its nearly always just barely getting 1 meg.

    Youtube is horrible, can't load in a low res video with out the loading symbols popping up. Gaming is bad also, playing Warcraft I get about 700ping some times might drop to 300. Played a few times with pings hitting 2 and 3k. Playing fps games you won't get below 250ping even if its working great just because its wireless, its bad for gaming. Don't buy it if your a gamer, even if your current one is crap.

    Also if you want to down load stuff from torrent sites you won't be able to until about 2 am or so. It seems to have some kind of down load limiting going on with some websites. Youtube might be included in that, definitely torrent sites. Though it will let you DL stuff later at night at max speed.

    Also the guy who was installing it showed it to me on his PC and it was rocket fast. He showed me a website and how fast it was. Then he told me that there would only be 5 other people on the system with me. I think he is lying about that but I can't prove it.


    33575584.png

    1137442992.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    That's nearly 10x worse than proper Broadband latency.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 6,522 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Steve


    Ok,

    Been with Imagine for a long time using landline broadband, and to be fair, it was reliable, and didn't give me much grief.

    For all sorts of reasons, mostly financial, I've bitten the bullet of Wimax, as it's just become available in this area.

    It's taken a bit of work to get it working the way I want it to, and Imagine's Motorola router is not the friendliest of devices, as it won't allow the subnet mask to be changed, which for me with a low usage network of 12 Pc's and 4 or more netwoked printers that won't work with DHCP as they have to be fixed IP addresses, that's a pain, as I have to rejig all my network settings,

    Most of the machines are XP Pro, the laptop is XP home, fully patched SP3+

    Here's where it gets interesting. On initial set up, once I'd got the router to sort out the provisioning of the system, (It uses a browser, but if your home page is set to "about blank", it never goes out to the net to trigger the setup) it works fine.

    There is an issue with not being able to set the subnet mask, and as standard, it's not possible to disable access to the router settings from WiFi,

    The laptop was interesting, in that on Cable connect, I was seeing high 7+ down, and .75 or above up, but on WIFi, the speeds were a lot lower. The first change was suggested by Imagine, and was a change to the encryption protocol to suit XP, use TKIP only, not TKIP+AES. That helped to get above 1.0 on WiFI. It was about 3 or so at that stage.

    I then did some more digging over the evening, and came up with some interesting information. The WiFI bands overlap, and there are at least 4 other WiFi installations near me, so a channel change helped there,

    The real improvement was 2 fold. The first was to get rid of 2 analysis drivers from the Network settings, and then to run a little utility that I downloaded, TCPoptimiser, which made a number of changes to my system (I've not analysed them yet), and made a huge difference to the overall WiFi speeds,

    My ping and speedtest from a few minutes ago looks like this

    33626823.png

    1138460774.png

    1138492888.png

    That's every bit as good as the fixed line speeds I've had for the last while, and I can see from the way that it's running the tests that it can go higher, a good bit higher depending on how the server software is throttling things.

    So, while Wimax may have been less acceptable than fixed line broadband, it's now reached the point where it's competitively priced, and is delivering comparable speeds.

    OK, bottom line is that in comparison to most of Europe and the rest of the world, what we still have is not broadband, it's Midband, with restrictions like being Asynchronous, so it's almost impossible for a company in this area that's outside of Dublin's fibre hub to offer any sort of viable server service, as it's impossible to get good upload speeds.

    Hopefully, this election will focus some attention on this before it's too late, but I'm not about to hold my breath.

    Smmary,

    Very initial impressions of Wimax in this area are good, a lot will depend on how many people move over to Imagine, there could well be a lot of former ICE customers who were taken over by Ripplecom that may still not be happy, and this will be an alternative for them.

    I don't know how well Ripplecom have done since they took it over, In the same way, Imagine Wimax in this area is very new, so hopefully, they have learnt from the mistakes of the earlier installs, and will keep the provisioning of the backhauls and the like up to spec as the network grows.

    Time will tell

    Steve

    And before anyone asks, I'm not employed by Imagine, and my only relationship with them is as a customer.

    Shore, if it was easy, everybody would be doin it.😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,260 ✭✭✭MrVestek


    Gizo wrote: »
    Anyone got a review of Wimax yet?

    Yeah here's my review: It's ****.

    That's coming from someone on both sides of the fence. I have worked for Imagine and you wouldn't believe the ****e they get away with.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,874 ✭✭✭✭PogMoThoin


    Ok,

    Been with Imagine for a long time using landline broadband, and to be fair, it was reliable, and didn't give me much grief.

    For all sorts of reasons, mostly financial, I've bitten the bullet of Wimax, as it's just become available in this area.

    It's taken a bit of work to get it working the way I want it to, and Imagine's Motorola router is not the friendliest of devices, as it won't allow the subnet mask to be changed, which for me with a low usage network of 12 Pc's and 4 or more netwoked printers that won't work with DHCP as they have to be fixed IP addresses, that's a pain, as I have to rejig all my network settings,

    Most of the machines are XP Pro, the laptop is XP home, fully patched SP3+

    Here's where it gets interesting. On initial set up, once I'd got the router to sort out the provisioning of the system, (It uses a browser, but if your home page is set to "about blank", it never goes out to the net to trigger the setup) it works fine.

    There is an issue with not being able to set the subnet mask, and as standard, it's not possible to disable access to the router settings from WiFi,

    The laptop was interesting, in that on Cable connect, I was seeing high 7+ down, and .75 or above up, but on WIFi, the speeds were a lot lower. The first change was suggested by Imagine, and was a change to the encryption protocol to suit XP, use TKIP only, not TKIP+AES. That helped to get above 1.0 on WiFI. It was about 3 or so at that stage.

    I then did some more digging over the evening, and came up with some interesting information. The WiFI bands overlap, and there are at least 4 other WiFi installations near me, so a channel change helped there,

    The real improvement was 2 fold. The first was to get rid of 2 analysis drivers from the Network settings, and then to run a little utility that I downloaded, TCPoptimiser, which made a number of changes to my system (I've not analysed them yet), and made a huge difference to the overall WiFi speeds,

    My ping and speedtest from a few minutes ago looks like this

    33626823.png

    1138460774.png

    1138492888.png

    That's every bit as good as the fixed line speeds I've had for the last while, and I can see from the way that it's running the tests that it can go higher, a good bit higher depending on how the server software is throttling things.

    So, while Wimax may have been less acceptable than fixed line broadband, it's now reached the point where it's competitively priced, and is delivering comparable speeds.

    OK, bottom line is that in comparison to most of Europe and the rest of the world, what we still have is not broadband, it's Midband, with restrictions like being Asynchronous, so it's almost impossible for a company in this area that's outside of Dublin's fibre hub to offer any sort of viable server service, as it's impossible to get good upload speeds.

    Hopefully, this election will focus some attention on this before it's too late, but I'm not about to hold my breath.

    Smmary,

    Very initial impressions of Wimax in this area are good, a lot will depend on how many people move over to Imagine, there could well be a lot of former ICE customers who were taken over by Ripplecom that may still not be happy, and this will be an alternative for them.

    I don't know how well Ripplecom have done since they took it over, In the same way, Imagine Wimax in this area is very new, so hopefully, they have learnt from the mistakes of the earlier installs, and will keep the provisioning of the backhauls and the like up to spec as the network grows.

    Time will tell

    Steve

    And before anyone asks, I'm not employed by Imagine, and my only relationship with them is as a customer.

    I'll be expecting another speedtest and pingtest a month from now

    What You fail to mention is what Wimax setup You've got, its obviously not a dongle and is the FIXED install, not everyone gets this, You cannot order it, they only give it as a last resort when an indoor dongle fails to work.

    You also failed to mention how far from the mast You are situated. Its obviously very close with pings and speeds like that. Its obviously not over-subscribed yet either.

    I've worked for two different providers with Wimax installations in the last few years, non (or even partial) line of sight does not work on 3.6Ghz. Indoor receivers or dongles don't work well either. Wimax on 3.6Ghz needs a fixed install, and thats fixed install only, where everyone gets the best possible signal, not this self install dongle crap.

    Overlapping wifi channels has nothing to do with your Wimax service, there are only 11 channels (13 if you don't want to support USA devices) 802.11g overlaps the next 2 channels. Laptop speeds on wireless have nothing to do with the service either.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6 zatgun


    zatgun wrote: »
    Hi, i'm in Longford also. I've had it a while now and have to say that it's really terrible. I got the 7 meg bundle. On the first day I was getting 5 meg np, but then a week later it dropped to 2 meg and now its nearly always just barely getting 1 meg.

    Youtube is horrible, can't load in a low res video with out the loading symbols popping up. Gaming is bad also, playing Warcraft I get about 700ping some times might drop to 300. Played a few times with pings hitting 2 and 3k. Playing fps games you won't get below 250ping even if its working great just because its wireless, its bad for gaming. Don't buy it if your a gamer, even if your current one is crap.

    Also if you want to down load stuff from torrent sites you won't be able to until about 2 am or so. It seems to have some kind of down load limiting going on with some websites. Youtube might be included in that, definitely torrent sites. Though it will let you DL stuff later at night at max speed. "Edit" This is just speculation on my part could be just slow speeds. "Edit"

    Also the guy who was installing it showed it to me on his PC and it was rocket fast. He showed me a website and how fast it was. Then he told me that there would only be 5 other people on the system with me. I think he is lying about that but I can't prove it.


    33575584.png

    1137442992.png

    Today at peak time.

    33766372.png

    1141240764.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    For comparison, Digiweb Fixed Wireless, Metro, shared with Limerick City.
    33815247.png

    (Note Limerick <-> Dublin <-> Galway is Route for both tests)
    1142133642.png

    In use reliably with two phone numbers (virtual phone lines, inc Fax) for over 5 years. Original Modem. third router/wifi (self supplied)!

    About 14km from the Mast.

    Imagine should have rolled out "Fixed WiMax" on their 3.6GHz licence. It's an FWLA licence, not a mobile Licence. The Mobile system used as "Imagine WiMax" isn't suitable for 3.6GHz and no system with some indoor aerials can perform as well as Fixed using ONLY directional outdoor aerials meeting a minimum spec at install time. Typically x8 worse.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    The following says it all as regards their Ping/latency...

    capturejlu.jpg

    1902tue18th2011.jpg

    ...And this is the normal quality of service I get from them!

    Disgusting.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement