Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Elderly Scottish Woman ordered to pay loyalty fee for singing in her shop

«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,159 ✭✭✭✭phasers


    Good God the horror


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,811 ✭✭✭Gone Drinking


    I hope she sings better than she looks


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,942 ✭✭✭Danbo!


    lol @ the dope with the soup. Whats that all about?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 28,128 ✭✭✭✭Mossy Monk


    Them are the rules.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,508 ✭✭✭ElaElaElano


    ''Spontaneous outbursts of joy"- what a line!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,163 ✭✭✭smk89


    her 'spontaneous outbursts of joy' constitute live public performance

    I have never heard a more killjoy expression in my life.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,268 ✭✭✭Zapho


    For god sake, just leave her be. You don't see them slapping buskers with copyright infringement.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,984 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Royalty fee, surely?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,382 ✭✭✭petes


    Mossy Monk wrote: »
    Them are the rules.


    My bollocks. She sang a few tunes while she was working and has to pay. Madness.

    As for the guy with the soup, is that free advertising?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,228 ✭✭✭bluto63


    Well that's fair :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,239 ✭✭✭✭WindSock


    Leave the guy with the soup alone. He's cool. They both are.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,382 ✭✭✭petes


    WindSock wrote: »
    Leave the guy with the soup alone. He's cool. They both are.

    Cup a soups are cool!!!!!!!


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 14,321 CMod ✭✭✭✭The Master


    lol at soup guy


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 28,128 ✭✭✭✭Mossy Monk


    Insurgent wrote: »
    My bollocks. She sang a few tunes while she was working and has to pay. Madness.

    As for the guy with the soup, is that free advertising?

    I couldn't care less for what your bollocks may think.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,949 ✭✭✭✭IvyTheTerrible


    Yeah that's reasonable, cos everyone knows little old ladies are what is ruining the music industry...:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,382 ✭✭✭petes


    Mossy Monk wrote: »
    I couldn't care less for what your bollocks may think.

    What a witty retort.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 193 ✭✭Marvinthefish


    If she's too stingy to pay
    an £80 annual fee to keep the radio on in the shop

    then she gets what she deserves. As stated in the article she's just trying to worm her way out of paying the fee.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,391 ✭✭✭✭mikom


    Stee wrote: »
    lol @ the dope with the soup. Whats that all about?

    Sorry to tell you it's a gay test as Jordans tits were just across the way from him.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,949 ✭✭✭✭IvyTheTerrible


    If she's too stingy to pay

    then she gets what she deserves. As stated in the article she's just trying to worm her way out of paying the fee.
    Why should she pay it, she got rid of the radio.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭Cianos


    If she's too stingy to pay

    then she gets what she deserves. As stated in the article she's just trying to worm her way out of paying the fee.

    What? She deserves a fine for trying to cut costs? Maybe the shop hasn't been doing well and she needs to cut costs to keep it open.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 193 ✭✭Marvinthefish


    She's still putting out copyright music in a public place. She can cut costs by ditching the radio and singing uncopyrighted music.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,023 ✭✭✭beardo81


    Does this mean when we sing along at concerts we'll all have to pay royalties on the way out? I can see Bono coming back for another few gigs at Croker so!!! :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,824 ✭✭✭ShooterSF


    She's still putting out copyright music in a public place. She can cut costs by ditching the radio and singing uncopyrighted music.

    If they're going to go down that route let them start with the bands that play in pubs surely.

    Oh and LOL @
    'I'll basically just sing anything that comes into my head, and then Dale will start singing along with me, and people in the shop will say 'Oh I know that song too', and they'll start singing along too. It's a happy store.

    Sounds like they're living in one of those horrible cheesy musical films.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 193 ✭✭Marvinthefish


    ShooterSF wrote: »
    If they're going to go down that route let them start with the bands that play in pubs surely.

    p 4 of this document from The Performing Rights Society (PRS)

    It seems to me the woman in the article was being obtuse just because she got caught and was too stingy to pay up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,456 ✭✭✭✭ibarelycare


    56 is hardly elderly!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,949 ✭✭✭✭IvyTheTerrible


    She's still putting out copyright music in a public place. She can cut costs by ditching the radio and singing uncopyrighted music.

    She DID ditch the radio, that's the point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 193 ✭✭Marvinthefish


    Sorry should have put in an emphasis:

    She can cut costs by ditching the radio and singing uncopyrighted songs/music


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,603 ✭✭✭Mal-Adjusted


    *facepalm*


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,252 ✭✭✭✭stovelid


    Yeah that's reasonable, cos everyone knows little old ladies are what is ruining the music industry...:rolleyes:

    True. I haven't rated Madonna since the 80s.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,949 ✭✭✭✭IvyTheTerrible


    stovelid wrote: »
    True. I haven't rated Madonna since the 80s.

    She's not a lady... ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,824 ✭✭✭ShooterSF


    p 4 of this document from The Performing Rights Society (PRS)
    I've never seen it enforced in pubs I've worked but to be fair that's a tiny sample so fair enough.
    It seems to me the woman in the article was being obtuse just because she got caught and was too stingy to pay up.
    It's seems to me the PRS crowd are being the obtuse ones as they expect you to pay up rather than get rid of your radio. Do you want to go around fining anyone that sings in public (not that banning singing would be a bad thing :pac:).
    Anyway why is it illegal to have a radio playing in a shop. Has the radio station not licensed the songs to play on their station?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,230 ✭✭✭✭ejmaztec


    56 is hardly elderly!

    I assumed that she was 95 and barely alive.:eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 78 ✭✭kavoweb


    Why has the ol' coffin dodgin' bint glued some of the smarties on the ends of her fingers? :eek: Both her and soupy normal are weird!!!*





    *in a Father Ted grocery shop kinda way


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 45 Shoop


    That Dale is some **** eh?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 193 ✭✭Marvinthefish


    beardo81 wrote: »
    Does this mean when we sing along at concerts we'll all have to pay royalties on the way out?

    I'd say these singing people would be exempt because they've already paid the artist for their work in the price of the ticket. Once they don't sing on the way home...
    ShooterSF wrote: »
    It's seems to me the PRS crowd are being the obtuse ones as they expect you to pay up rather than get rid of your radio. Do you want to go around fining anyone that sings in public (not that banning singing would be a bad thing :pac:).
    Anyway why is it illegal to have a radio playing in a shop. Has the radio station not licensed the songs to play on their station?

    Maybe "singing in public" was the wrong term. But should not an artist expect some compensation when their work is played in, say, a shop or restaurant. Where the music is effecting customers or improving working conditions for employees in said shop/restaurant.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,931 ✭✭✭az2wp0sye65487


    Stee wrote: »
    lol @ the dope with the soup. Whats that all about?

    He looks like he was just in buying a few bits & pieces when the photographer stopped by!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,976 ✭✭✭✭humanji


    Is it just me or is this just a really crappy rip-off of the plot to "Be Kind Rewind"? I call shenanigans on this whole affair!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,473 ✭✭✭✭Blazer


    ShooterSF wrote: »
    Sounds like they're living in one of those horrible cheesy musical films.

    sounds like Hell to me...burn em out I say.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,190 ✭✭✭wolfric


    One small win for the music industry... on wait they were too distracted to see a couple 100 terabytes fly by of torrented music.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,942 ✭✭✭Danbo!


    mikom wrote: »
    Sorry to tell you it's a gay test as Jordans tits were just across the way from him.

    To be honest I'd hop on the singing shopkeeper before going near that munter.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,824 ✭✭✭ShooterSF


    Maybe "singing in public" was the wrong term. But should not an artist expect some compensation when their work is played in, say, a shop or restaurant. Where the music is effecting customers or improving working conditions for employees in said shop/restaurant.

    If she had a radio on does the station not license the songs they play? Anyway it may increase the sale of songs by having them playing in the background.

    To go back to the pubs example. If your sitting in your local and they put on soaps during the day do the actors union call around looking for a license or do they get thier money from the TV station (through their employer)?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,509 ✭✭✭✭randylonghorn


    Em .. her shop?

    She got rid of the radio because she was too stingy to pay?
    article wrote:
    Music police have told a grandmother to stop singing behind the counter of the corner shop where she works - or pay for a licence.

    So she's been hassled to pay a fee because she sings as she stacks shelves where she works?

    Arse, tbh!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 28,128 ✭✭✭✭Mossy Monk


    Insurgent wrote: »
    What a witty retort.

    I am glad you agree. One would think you and I had engaged in a conversation or something.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭orourkeda


    She should be let away with it if she can sing a full Pantera song and make it sound convincing


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,956 ✭✭✭consultech


    kippy wrote: »
    Royalty fee, surely?

    Took all too long for anyone to mention that! Nothin like a good ol Friday night malapropism...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Em .. her shop?

    She got rid of the radio because she was too stingy to pay?



    So she's been hassled to pay a fee because she sings as she stacks shelves where she works?

    Arse, tbh!
    in similar \news a justice recently ruled against record companies who were moving to make it a royalty payout every time a song-ringtone was played: as in everytime that phone rang, versus the royalty paid when the tone is bought. /shudder


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,221 ✭✭✭✭m5ex9oqjawdg2i


    I hope she sings better than she looks

    Fairly fit for a granny ;)


  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/tayside_and_central/8317952.stm
    Apology for singing shop worker

    Sandra Burt was told she needed a licence to sing in the store

    A shop assistant who was told she could not sing while she stacked shelves without a performance licence has been given an apology.

    Sandra Burt, 56, who works at A&T Food store in Clackmannanshire, was warned she could be fined for her singing by the Performing Right Society (PRS).

    However the organisation that collects royalties on behalf of the music industry has now reversed its stance.

    They have sent Mrs Burt a bouquet of flowers and letter of apology.

    They've apologised after making themselves out to be a bunch of complete ****


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,215 ✭✭✭Mrmoe


    The PRS can fuck right off, I am going to download as much music now as I can to piss them off. Bunch of kn0b heads so they are.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    I'm dissapointed RTDH. It's not like you to try sensationalise a story.

    "elderly"? really? she's 56.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement