Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The Government Could Not Have Continued In Office If There Had Been A "No" Vote

  • 03-10-2009 10:46pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,290 ✭✭✭


    This was the last chance we had before 2012, the government will throw the greens some crumbs and they will get the 70 billion or so away to their bondholder and shareholder mates through NAMA.

    The country is finished.


«1345

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,661 ✭✭✭Fuhrer


    dresden8 wrote: »
    This was the last chance we had before 2012, the government will throw the greens some crumbs and they will get the 70 billion or so away to their bondholder and shareholder mates through NAMA.

    The country is finished.


    This wasnt a general election.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,290 ✭✭✭dresden8


    Fuhrer wrote: »
    This wasnt a general election.

    Prize for the obvious goes to....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,661 ✭✭✭Fuhrer


    dresden8 wrote: »
    Prize for the obvious goes to....


    Not to you apparently.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 877 ✭✭✭Mario007


    dresden8 wrote: »
    This was the last chance we had before 2012, the government will throw the greens some crumbs and they will get the 70 billion or so away to their bondholder and shareholder mates through NAMA.

    The country is finished.

    dude i know you're bitter, but no one is stating that this was a win for the government. not even cowen...so i dunno why you are getting worked up over it. lisbon is an european issue...NAMA is a national issue, as is the budget etc...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,290 ✭✭✭dresden8


    Do you disagree that the Lisbon result saved the government?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 877 ✭✭✭Mario007


    dresden8 wrote: »
    Do you disagree that the Lisbon result saved the government?

    yes because there was nothing endangering the government, since they have a comfortable majority in the dail, being elected there for 5 years. now why were they elected there for 5 years? i would like to know that too, but they were. so unless the majority will be somehow weakened or broken the government doesnt need to be 'saved' since there is nothing out there to get them


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,598 ✭✭✭✭prinz


    dresden8 wrote: »
    Do you disagree that the Lisbon result saved the government?

    Who do you think was going to lead a vote of no confidence? FG, Labour?? It's not like they didn't have a vested interest in a yes vote too. Give it up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,661 ✭✭✭Fuhrer


    dresden8 wrote: »
    Do you disagree that the Lisbon result saved the government?


    People who were going to vote for or against fianna fail in the general election will do so regardless of Lisbon


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,290 ✭✭✭dresden8


    I have it on good authority from a Fianna Failer that a No vote meant FF could not have continued in office.

    A senior-ish FFer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,661 ✭✭✭Fuhrer


    dresden8 wrote: »
    I have it on authority from a Fianna Failer that a No vote meant FF could not have continued in office.


    Oh, so the rules of government have changed magically or secretly then?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,379 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    dresden8 wrote: »
    I have it on authority from a Fianna Failer that a No vote meant FF could not have continued in office.

    Was this Fianna Failer, Brian Cowen by any chance?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,598 ✭✭✭✭prinz


    dresden8 wrote: »
    I have it on good authority from a Fianna Failer that a No vote meant FF could not have continued in office.

    A senior-ish FFer.

    O is this Willie O'Dea on TV earlier? :pac: yeah you mentioned that already, and no he didn't say that FF could not have continued in office.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭jank


    Dresden8 has a point. The government doesn't give 2 hoots about the people. IF it did it would offer itself up in an election before NAMA. The fact remains that this was the ONLY time the public could have folded the government with an election until 2012.

    Anyway continue on about the budget and NAMA.....
    I have lost a lot of my faith in the Irish people over the last few months on how meek we are and continuiously take it up the ass from people who "know better" about NAMA, Lisbon, Unions, Expenses etc.

    I am submitting my final residency forms this week. I am not sure if I ever want to go back, that is how much the government and the public reaction has made me turn against my home country.:(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,290 ✭✭✭dresden8


    prinz wrote: »
    O is this Willie O'Dea on TV earlier? :pac: yeah you mentioned that already, and no he didn't say that FF could not have continued in office.

    I didn't mention Willie O'Dea today. Is this a yes side lie?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭Rb


    Did Lisbon 1 sink the Government?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,598 ✭✭✭✭prinz


    jank wrote: »
    The fact remains that this was the ONLY time the public could have folded the government with an election until 2012...

    No, it really wasn't. Goodbye ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,661 ✭✭✭Fuhrer


    jank wrote: »
    The fact remains that this was the ONLY time the public could have folded the government with an election until 2012.


    How?

    This wasnt a general election, no outcome of this referndum would have any effect on the government being folded or not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,290 ✭✭✭dresden8


    Rb wrote: »
    Did Lisbon 1 sink the Government?

    That was Cowen's first failure. This would have been the last of a long line of failures.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,598 ✭✭✭✭prinz


    dresden8 wrote: »
    I didn't mention Willie O'Dea today. Is this a yes side lie?

    Sincere apologies

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=62382079&postcount=45


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,290 ✭✭✭dresden8


    prinz wrote: »

    Thanks, didn't see that.

    That makes one Minister and one senior-ish person who disagree with you folks.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,598 ✭✭✭✭prinz


    dresden8 wrote: »
    Thanks, didn't see that.
    That makes one Minister and one senior-ish person who disagree with you folks.

    Glad I could help ;) the only problem is that Paulie was being a bit liberal with the reality of what Willie O'Dea actually said.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 877 ✭✭✭Mario007


    dresden8 wrote: »
    That was Cowen's first failure. This would have been the last of a long line of failures.

    how do you know? the man has had so many failures in that year and a half in power that you'd think he got used to them. maybe this time he'll think he can succeed and when he fails again will be so broken that he resigns...sounds too far fetched? well just trying to think along the lines of the OP


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,290 ✭✭✭dresden8


    Mario007 wrote: »
    how do you know? the man has had so many failures in that year and a half in power that you'd think he got used to them. maybe this time he'll think he can succeed and when he fails again will be so broken that he resigns...sounds too far fetched? well just trying to think along the lines of the OP

    Like I said, It's a senior-ish FFer who thinks the government could not have continued in office, I just happen to agree with him, and said so before the vote, and today's "revelation".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,661 ✭✭✭Fuhrer


    dresden8 wrote: »
    Like I said, It's a senior-ish FFer who thinks the government could not have continued in office, I just happen to agree with him, and said so before the vote, and today's "revelation".


    I just talked to the same person and he said you're lying.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,290 ✭✭✭dresden8


    Fuhrer wrote: »
    I just talked to the same person and he said you're lying.

    Now that's a lie, and you know it.

    You sir, are a fibber.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,661 ✭✭✭Fuhrer


    dresden8 wrote: »
    Now that's a lie, and you know it.


    Prove me wrong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,290 ✭✭✭dresden8


    Fuhrer wrote: »
    Prove me wrong.

    How can I do that?

    Mr. Fibber.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 877 ✭✭✭Mario007


    dresden8 wrote: »
    Like I said, It's a senior-ish FFer who thinks the government could not have continued in office, I just happen to agree with him, and said so before the vote, and today's "revelation".

    and i was talking to a FG TD and FG MEP and Pat Cox and none of them mentioned even the possibilty of this government going down if there was a no vote.

    the only one to mix it all together was Ganley and Higgins. they thought this was a vote on Lisbon, Europe, NATO, Privatisation, NAMA and the government.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,290 ✭✭✭dresden8


    Mario007 wrote: »
    and i was talking to a FG TD and FG MEP and Pat Cox and none of them mentioned even the possibilty of this government going down if there was a no vote.

    the only one to mix it all together was Ganley and Higgins. they thought this was a vote on Lisbon, Europe, NATO, Privatisation, NAMA and the government.

    Not the only one.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,661 ✭✭✭Fuhrer


    dresden8 wrote: »
    How can I do that?

    Mr. Fibber.


    Yes well, you see the problem with you claiming an anonymouse source told you such information?

    It just makes you look like a liar.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,989 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    jank wrote: »
    Dresden8 has a point. The government doesn't give 2 hoots about the people. IF it did it would offer itself up in an election before NAMA. The fact remains that this was the ONLY time the public could have folded the government with an election until 2012.

    Anyway continue on about the budget and NAMA.....
    I have lost a lot of my faith in the Irish people over the last few months on how meek we are and continuiously take it up the ass from people who "know better" about NAMA, Lisbon, Unions, Expenses etc.

    I am submitting my final residency forms this week. I am not sure if I ever want to go back, that is how much the government and the public reaction has made me turn against my home country.:(
    I dont understand why a no result today would have removed the government from office. It didnt last time.........

    I am glad the people of Ireland didnt get as confused as some people about what the vote was about.

    There's a fairly high chance that the greens grass roots members will take down the government over NAMA, if all out public strikes dont first.

    So we all "take it up the ass"..... I think you'll find that given the proper conditions the government will be dumped, this just wasnt the method by which to do it.

    Good luck in N.Z, a country that has no problems what so ever.
    You speak of people being meek and taking it up the ass, you do worse and feck off when the going gets slightly tough. Fair play to you, I wish you well, I hear the winter sports are good out there.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 932 ✭✭✭PaulieD


    Mario007 wrote: »
    dude i know you're bitter, but no one is stating that this was a win for the government. not even cowen...so i dunno why you are getting worked up over it. lisbon is an european issue...NAMA is a national issue, as is the budget etc...

    This is what will happen. Cowen and Co will claim the result of Lisbon gives him and his party a mandate "to implement the tough decisions."

    -Nama will pass.
    -Unemployment will reach 550,000 by mid spring.
    -Fianna Fail and the Greens will stay in power until the summer of 2012.
    -The budget will crucify the average worker, there will be devestating cuts across the board.
    -Yes for recovery and all that malarkey will be conveniently forgotten about.
    -Multinationals will pull out and relocate to Eastern Europe and Asia.

    There has only been one winner in Ireland today, Fianna Fail. I hope Fine Gael and Labour enjoy their next three years in opposition.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,661 ✭✭✭Fuhrer


    PaulieD wrote: »
    This is what will happen. Cowen and Co will claim the result of Lisbon gives him and his party a mandate "to implement the tough decisions."

    -Nama will be passed.
    -Unemployment will reach 550,000 by mid spring.
    -Fianna Fail and the Greens will stay in power until the summer of 2012.
    -The budget will crucify the average worker, there will be devestating cuts across the board.
    -Yes for recovery and all that malarkey will be conveniently forgotten about.


    Any chance, did that crystal ball you have show any results of football matches coming up?

    Might have a flutter


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,290 ✭✭✭dresden8


    PaulieD wrote: »
    I hope Fine Gael and Labour enjoy their next three years in opposition.

    The problem is, I think they will.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 877 ✭✭✭Mario007


    dresden8 wrote: »
    Not the only one.

    ok sorry i forgot to include Green in it.

    if you were refering to the yes side, then yes they also did mix it up by joining Lisbon with Europe, but as you see no is still winning


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 932 ✭✭✭PaulieD


    dresden8 wrote: »
    That was Cowen's first failure. This would have been the last of a long line of failures.

    Sometimes you need somebody to point out the obvious. The backbenchers would have forced Cowen out if he failed once more, with Lisbon part deux. Alas, it wasnt to be. We are stuck with them until 2012.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,290 ✭✭✭dresden8


    Mario007 wrote: »
    ok sorry i forgot to include Green in it.

    if you were refering to the yes side, then yes they also did mix it up by joining Lisbon with Europe, but as you see no is still winning

    I don't understand.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,749 ✭✭✭CCCP^


    PaulieD wrote: »
    This is what will happen. Cowen and Co will claim the result of Lisbon gives him and his party a mandate "to implement the tough decisions."

    -Nama will pass.
    -Unemployment will reach 550,000 by mid spring.
    -Fianna Fail and the Greens will stay in power until the summer of 2012.
    -The budget will crucify the average worker, there will be devestating cuts across the board.
    -Yes for recovery and all that malarkey will be conveniently forgotten about.
    -Multinationals will pull out and relocate to Eastern Europe and Asia.

    There has only been one winner in Ireland today, Fianna Fail. I hope Fine Gael and Labour enjoy their next three years in opposition.

    Jesus, screw that, I thought 1984 was bleak but thats terrible. **** this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,980 ✭✭✭meglome


    Some of you people are hi-larious. We the people of Ireland voted in a shíte government, repeatedly. Now we're all living with the decision. If you don't like representative democracy then I suggest you vote in a bunch of fascists, it worked well in Germany I heard.

    Did the Yes people whine this much the last time?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 932 ✭✭✭PaulieD


    Fuhrer wrote: »
    Any chance, did that crystal ball you have show any results of football matches coming up?

    Might have a flutter

    I will happily put my money where my mouth is. What odds will you give me?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 877 ✭✭✭Mario007


    PaulieD wrote: »
    This is what will happen. Cowen and Co will claim the result of Lisbon gives him and his party a mandate "to implement the tough decisions."

    -Nama will pass.
    -Unemployment will reach 550,000 by mid spring.
    -Fianna Fail and the Greens will stay in power until the summer of 2012.
    -The budget will crucify the average worker, there will be devestating cuts across the board.
    -Yes for recovery and all that malarkey will be conveniently forgotten about.
    -Multinationals will pull out and relocate to Eastern Europe and Asia.

    There has only been one winner in Ireland today, Fianna Fail. I hope Fine Gael and Labour enjoy their next three years in opposition.

    yet again the only one who said that this gives cowen a mandate is ganley...cowen himself first thanked the opposition parties and didn't thus take it as a sign of endorsement.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 932 ✭✭✭PaulieD


    CCCP^ wrote: »
    Jesus, screw that, I thought 1984 was bleak but thats terrible. **** this.

    I can see it easily happening. It is staring us in the face. Let us not kid ourselves.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,980 ✭✭✭meglome


    PaulieD wrote: »
    Sometimes you need somebody to point out the obvious. The backbenchers would have forced Cowen out if he failed once more, with Lisbon part deux. Alas, it wasnt to be. We are stuck with them until 2012.

    sigh...

    And he would be replaced in normal circumstances by his second in command, Mary Coughlan. There are indeed worse things than Brian Cowan,


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 932 ✭✭✭PaulieD


    Mario007 wrote: »
    yet again the only one who said that this gives cowen a mandate is ganley...cowen himself first thanked the opposition parties and didn't thus take it as a sign of endorsement.

    Ganley was playing the game, Mario. If you believed him, you would swallow a brick.;)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 932 ✭✭✭PaulieD


    meglome wrote: »
    sigh...

    And he would be replaced in normal circumstances by his second in command, Mary Coughlan. There are indeed worse things than Brian Cowan,

    If Cowen was pushed Fianna Fail would had to have an election. Not even Fianna Fail would push three taoiseachs on us since the last election.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 877 ✭✭✭Mario007


    dresden8 wrote: »
    I don't understand.

    i meant to say that no included everything into this referendum from lisbon to NATO through NAMA whereas yes only had Europe and Lisbon included


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,027 ✭✭✭Kama


    Green Party talks on a new Programme for Government will continue in Leinster House today as results come in from the Lisbon referendum.
    Party sources accepted yesterday that a second 'No' outcome would make them academic.

    Independent


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 877 ✭✭✭Mario007


    PaulieD wrote: »
    Ganley was playing the game, Mario. If you believed him, you would swallow a brick.;)

    no i dont believe him, thats why i said it. it's obvious that the admiration from ganley to cowen was supposed to make people say 'damn now cowen will stay in power forever, i could have voted him out' even though thats not true.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,290 ✭✭✭dresden8


    PaulieD wrote: »
    If Cowen was pushed Fianna Fail would had to have an election. Not even Fianna Fail would push three taoiseachs on us since the last election.

    According to my source "a change of government would have been inevitable." "extraordinarily difficult to stay in power."

    Direct quotes.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,749 ✭✭✭CCCP^


    PaulieD wrote: »
    I can see it easily happening. It is staring us in the face. Let us not kid ourselves.

    We will have to fight this tooth and nail, no two ways about it. There is no way I want to face the future previous described, I'd rather leave this country (and I love this country) than face the indignity and embarressment.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement