a bit rich?

Zulu

See:

Zulu wrote: »

How do you determine which personal experiences are not relevant though? You can't, as you can't predict what will happen during a childs life. Hence as broad an experience as possible is "ideal".

The fact that men & women are different (see linked document as sample evidence of this) implies that their experience of life differs. This is a logical assumption, which you are free to dispute. I am not bothered to search for evidence of this, however, generally people will accept that each person has a different experience of life, as they live different lives. If men and women perceive the world differently, as is suggested in the linked document, then it's reasonably safe to conclude that their experiences differ. The experiences of puberty is an example of one thing that will differ greatly between men and women. Actively engaging in society and social circles is another.

Now if we are talking about ideals, I'm suggesting that the broadest experience is ideal, and the combination of both sexes would suggest the broadest experience.

On the subject of manners, you continue to call me a troll, and that's rude. In the past few days, I've been nothing but polite & I've answered your questions again, and again as I have here again. I might suggest that because you don't like an answer I've provided doesn't make it any less of an answer.

nozzferrahhtoo

As I said, you have not established the „ideal“ and you have not established it is even relevant, saying yourself that the „ideal“ is far from what a child might actually „need“. You even ask me, despite it being your position, how we should evaluate what experiences are needed at all.

So if it is not established and not relevant and you do not even know how to evaluate it yourself and I have said I have learned all I can, I fail to see the use of repeating posts previously posted, especially as I replied to it already detailing what was my issue with it. Maybe you are enjoying the dizzy circles and want to keep them going.

But thanks anyway.

Zulu

Again see:

Zulu wrote: »

How do you determine which personal experiences are not relevant though? You can't, as you can't predict what will happen during a childs life. Hence as broad an experience as possible is "ideal".

The fact that men & women are different (see linked document as sample evidence of this) implies that their experience of life differs. This is a logical assumption, which you are free to dispute. I am not bothered to search for evidence of this, however, generally people will accept that each person has a different experience of life, as they live different lives. If men and women perceive the world differently, as is suggested in the linked document, then it's reasonably safe to conclude that their experiences differ. The experiences of puberty is an example of one thing that will differ greatly between men and women. Actively engaging in society and social circles is another.

Now if we are talking about ideals, I'm suggesting that the broadest experience is ideal, and the combination of both sexes would suggest the broadest experience.

nozzferrahhtoo

What is the use of repasting things you have posted already? Am I to re paste my reply to that, you yours to that again, me mine to that again and so on back around the loop?

If you have nothing to say then say nothing, I am not about to pander to sequentially regurgitating the thread however.

Zulu

nozzferrahhtoo wrote: »

I am not about to pander to sequentially regurgitating the thread however.

What? We've been doing exactly that for, how many pages now? 4? 5?

nozzferrahhtoo

And so I am done unless you have anything to add.

Zulu

You're not really though, are you? :pac:..............

nozzferrahhtoo

Fraid so

Zulu

I knew you weren't. :pac:...