Madonna

cjbh

Madonna is currently being slated for recent pics of her on the internet:

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4U1Jn9uRHI/SnBvaXhUupI/AAAAAAAABN0/ADcT2RnshTM/s400/madonna+biceps.jpg


http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2006/08/madonna030806_600x445.jpg

Just wondering whether those of you with a fitness perspective have a different outlook?

corkcomp

even looking at it from a fitness perspective - that is NOT a good look

In the second pic, she looks awesome for a woman of that age, very attractive in my opinion.

I don't like the first pic very much.

RacoonQueen

I was going to post the first pic on here the other day. I wonder what her body fat% is in that one. :eek:

tlev

I think fairplay to her for working out and keeping fit. Okay aesthetically it doesn't exactly strike as attractive but it is better than being very overweight.

And at the same time, she should be careful of not becoming too obessed, unless she already is with working out.

Khannie

I think it's probably just an unfortunate pic tbh. She's obviously carrying a heavy weight and the lighting isn't helping. Let's not forget that she's no spring chicken any more. I think she looks relatively decent overall (though that first pic is a bit of a disaster).

funky penguin

Agreed, prob an unfortunate pic. The second ones are far mor flatering, just the right amount of body fat.

If she IS still burning away the fat % I hope she slows down for her own sake!

Frank Bullitt

This is what HGH in small doses over time does to ya.

G86

I think Madonna looks brilliant for her age and I'd love to look like that at 50. The first picture is down to bad lighting and her muscles are obviously under strain from whatever she's carrying. She looks flipping amazing in the second pic and I'd kill for a body like that.

Magic Eight Ball

Tabloids are such ridiculous bollox! I mean last week they were printing pictures of Kerry Katona pointing out how much weight she's piled on!!
You really can't win with that level of mentality!! :rolleyes:

Your damned if you do and your damned if you dont!

You're right Trevor. She looks amazing in that second pic, stunning in fact.

rubadub

I think a bad shot too, it wouldn't surprise me if they had flashes set to "muscly arms" or something!

I did a google image search for madonna arms and got tara palmer tompkinson, who is a lot younger and also thin.

all_smilz

that picture looks a bit fake and tabloidy....
madonna's arms look dreadful alright but mine look worse just at the other end of the extreme....

those veins are gross but for her age she is in good shape, i have known 60 year old ladies who cant wipe their own butt.... and have had to do that for them....

i wonder what madgypoos wud look like if she'd BORNE all those kids she carries around?

itsallaboutheL

Gintonious wrote: »

This is what HGH in small doses over time does to ya.

Funnily enough it's the first thing i thought of too.... reminds me of the pics of Sly from last year

parasite

that second pic reminded me of stupid sexy flanders :

Roper

can anyone with a keen eye or expertise tell if that is photoshopped?

Khannie

Roper wrote: »

can anyone with a keen eye or expertise tell if that is photoshopped?

Doesn't look it to me. I'm no expert though.

eclectichoney

The TPT picture looks very photoshopped to me.

Here's the take on the Madonna / photoshopping debate:
http://www.epk.com/2009/07/madonna-biceps-picture-altered/

Khannie

Hell, anyone with a low bodyfat and decent triceps is gonna look like that in the wrong light. Myself and my wife had this discussion and I picked up a heavy bag and wasn't a million miles off her. Night + flash = shadows = making things worse.

amazingemmet

Fwiw I'd hit it

gnolan

amazingemmet wrote: »

Fwiw I'd hit it

Yeah, with your car!

G-Money

That first pic of Madonna is hideous. I was never a fan of Tara Palmer Thompkinson anyway.

There's a few better pictures of Madonna to post, unfortunately they would probably get me booted off

Roper

I basically don't believe any photo or story I see on the web, or even in most broadsheets I read anymore. There's just too much to be gained from sexing up (or down in this case) photos to sell some more advertising.

So for me, the first photo, fake, the second ones, hawt.

justsomebloke

amazingemmet wrote: »

Fwiw I'd hit it

you'd hit anything though

itsallaboutheL

Khannie wrote: »

Hell, anyone with a low bodyfat and decent triceps is gonna look like that in the wrong light. Myself and my wife had this discussion and I picked up a heavy bag and wasn't a million miles off her. Night + flash = shadows = making things worse.

Hahaha Khannie looks like a girl!!


i was gonna say i've okay triceps and don't look like that, but then i say the low bodyfat bit..... nevermind!!

metamorphosis

i think the 1st pic is just a bad pic. sh looks fierce savage in the 2nd photo ... i mean she's old enough to be my ****in mother like. christ.

Hardrain

She's in great shape to my eyes. Fantastic body. I so would!!

Hail 2 Da Chimp

Khannie wrote: »

Hell, anyone with a low bodyfat and decent triceps is gonna look like that in the wrong light. Myself and my wife had this discussion and I picked up a heavy bag and wasn't a million miles off her. Night + flash = shadows = making things worse.

Just on that point, I'm tall and thin and have fairly vein-y arms. I'd say if I was photographed in the same light carrying something heavy I'd probably look the same.

amazingemmet

Joe the Santa wrote: »

you'd hit anything though

Nah I only hit classy girls and z list celebrities:pac:

tom_ra

Madonna stirring up controversy once again http://bit.ly/PBvA2p

Hanley

tom_ra wrote: »

Madonna stirring up controversy once again http://bit.ly/PBvA2p

Oh Madonna, you sassy sexbomb!

Hank_Jones

Hmmm, strange the way the writer of the article is also called Tom.

Just something I noticed...