PP messing up home and away team on my accu

x in the city

Had this accu coming along nicely until I realised Dinamo Kiev are away to some other team rather than at home.

Got onto a customer service guy and he says the onus is on the customer to know what they are betting on. meh

Never knew them to get home and away teams wrong before, I thought this fixture should be voide but he says it will stand

fekers

dsmythy

The guy you were talking to is right. Frustrating though it is.

x in the city

Thats bull ****, i have about 2 grad riding on this, wouldnt have put on kiev if i knew they were away at odds of 1.5

Chonaic

x in the city wrote: »

Had this accu coming along nicely until I realised Dinamo Kiev are away to some other team rather than at home.

Got onto a customer service guy and he says the onus is on the customer to know what they are betting on. meh

Never knew them to get home and away teams wrong before, I thought this fixture should be voide but he says it will stand

fekers

Why did you wait until the match was over to voice concerns?


[edit] Match was Ukrainian Super Cup so it was neutral ground [/edit]

x in the city

Chonaic wrote: »

Why did you wait until the match was over to voice concerns?


[edit] Match was Ukrainian Super Cup so it was neutral ground [/edit]

I told im while the game was playing, it was pretty obvious wit 30mins to go I was in trouble...!

It says

Football Matches
Ukrainian Matches
Dynamo Kiev v Vorskla-Naftohaz Poltava
11th of Jul 2009 6:45 pm
Win-Draw-Win
Dynamo Kiev @ 1.50


nothing about a cup game, if it was a cup game i would have kept well away!


wouldnt mind it but i had that on 2 accumulators of about 12 teams each

Chucky the tree

Ypu put €2k on a accumulator which you did absolutely no research for? wp. Edit - Actually I guess you mean you stand to win €2k rather then put €2k on.

raheny red

x in the city wrote: »

Thats bull ****, i have about 2 grad riding on this, wouldnt have put on kiev if i knew they were away at odds of 1.5

It's your own fault!

mike65

I can't belive this thread.

x in the city

was a fiver bet

PP should have said it was a cup game, wouldn't have laid it out otherwise especially at odds like that

bastards

thedini

x in the city wrote: »

was a fiver bet

PP should have said it was a cup game, wouldn't have laid it out otherwise especially at odds like that

bastards

lol, you got what you deserved-nothing. you obviously put no thought into the selection, you didn't even know where they match was on and you blame pp, just lol.

applehunter

I wouldnt laugh at your expense like the previous poster:mad:, at least you will have learned a lesson after this.

You'll get it back....:)

thedini

applehunter wrote: »

I wouldnt laugh at your expense like the previous poster:mad:, at least you will have learned a lesson after this.

You'll get it back....:)

I wasn't laughing at his expense at all, I was merely pointing out that his rant is pointless as he is in the wrong.

Headshot

accums are really pissing me off of late

one game always ****s me up

x in the city

Headshot wrote: »

accums are really pissing me off of late

one game always ****s me up

USA last nite??!


PP should have said that dinamo kiev game was a CUP game anyway

*****

Headshot

x in the city wrote: »

USA last nite??!


PP should have said that dinamo kiev game was a CUP game anyway

*****

On the money it was usa , still cant believe they drew

x in the city

Aye. They were crap odds tho, for a usa win.

theres always some **** team there to undo all your accus

Headshot

x in the city wrote: »

Aye. They were crap odds tho, for a usa win.

theres always some **** team there to undo all your accus

Actually i did half time/full time @8/15
Half time i was winning after that a total nose dive

Famous45

Paddy Power should have had an asterix next to the game on the coupon.

It's not exactly an error on your behalf because you should of been aware, personally I find it hard to believe that someone can place a bet without initially studing the form, especially a football bet, as there is numerous online sites which provides excellent stats. Anyway's although it ain't your error it IS, and I do not care what anyone else says, an error on the betting firms behalf. They should have it flagged up on their site that the game was going to be played in a neutral venue and in turn they should pay you the €1300+ and void the Kiev game on your bet.

In future, do your homework better and also find another bookmaker to place your bets with.

You would have placed Kiev in your bet regardless of the match being at home or at a neutral, you obviously seen the odds and knew Kiev are decent and said feck it, I'll stick them in - but that's beyond my point I am making above. With this taking into mind you havent really lost out as you knew no difference anyway. If Kiev were 1/2 away from home they would obviously be nailed on for a victory.

x in the city

Its true I thought they were st home, odds of 1.5 couldn't go wrong

when I realised it was a cup game in a neutral venue I was pissed off, PP should have it flagged as a neutral venu, then I would have thought twice before sticking it on the coupon.

If all my other best come thru I will get back to PP over this.

not like a couple of grand is much to them..

Headshot

x in the city wrote: »

Its true I thought they were st home, odds of 1.5 couldn't go wrong

when I realised it was a cup game in a neutral venue I was pissed off, PP should have it flagged as a neutral venu, then I would have thought twice before sticking it on the coupon.

If all my other best come thru I will get back to PP over this.

not like a couple of grand is much to them..

x in the city if i was you id kick up a right auld fuss

Id email pp and demand to talk to a supervisor and then plead your argument

personally i wouldnt let pp away with this

Chucky the tree

Whats there to let them away with? Is it their fault X in the city is to thick too do his own research? Do PP state on a coupon that the FA final is in a neutral venue or have some kind of astrix beside it?

Brimmy

Headshot wrote: »

On the money it was usa , still cant believe they drew

It's the USA. They're not the most reliable of teams to bet on/against. Hard luck though, I had a run for about a month on accumulators like that. For me it's usually always Corinthians that **** me up.

....and I put them in another accumulator again today. I must be insane.

Headshot

Chucky the tree wrote: »

Whats there to let them away with? Is it their fault X in the city is to thick too do his own research? Do PP state on a coupon that the FA final is in a neutral venue or have some kind of astrix beside it?

when the confederations cup was on pp had south africa venue after each team

eg

usa v brazil-south africa

Brimmy wrote: »

It's the USA. They're not the most reliable of teams to bet on/against. Hard luck though, I had a run for about a month on accumulators like that. For me it's usually always Corinthians that **** me up.

....and I put them in another accumulator again today. I must be insane.

usa v haiti

so they shouldve won it

lol at this thread.

raheny red

Famous45 wrote: »

They should have it flagged up on their site that the game was going to be played in a neutral venue and in turn they should pay you the €1300+ and void the Kiev game on your bet.

Good luck with that :rolleyes:. The OP only back D. Kiev because it was D. Kiev, nothing else - he got giddy when he saw the 1/2 for the win. Do your research in future.

x in the city

Headshot wrote: »

x in the city if i was you id kick up a right auld fuss

Id email pp and demand to talk to a supervisor and then plead your argument

personally i wouldnt let pp away with this

If Angelholms win tomorrow then the bet came thru [minus kiev], I think its a 2000+e pay out but haven't checked.

i will email pp for sure and demand them to pay our or cancel my account, they deffo should have that flagged as a neutral game or a cup game as I wouldn't have placed the bet other wise, odds of 1.5 would be crap for such a instance anyway.

x in the city

Chucky the tree wrote: »

Whats there to let them away with? Is it their fault X in the city is to thick too do his own research? Do PP state on a coupon that the FA final is in a neutral venue or have some kind of astrix beside it?

yes indeed, usually neutral venue is used beside the 'i' icon for such games that or 'cup'

:rolleyes:

x in the city

raheny red wrote: »

Good luck with that :rolleyes:. The OP only back D. Kiev because it was D. Kiev, nothing else - he got giddy when he saw the 1/2 for the win. Do your research in future.

Thats not the issue here, 1.5 odds mea diddly squat, it was the lowest odds of all the team in my accu.

What is a matter is the way pp flagged it as a Ukrainian Match, with DK at 'home'.

when it should be flagged as neutral and Ukraine cup

duh

ArmaniJeanss

If PP didn't flag this as neutral then the OP should pursue it and has a good case.
Also the OP is a comically bad gambler for not actually knowing what he is betting on. But that doesn't really matter.

Famous45

Do PP state on a coupon that the FA final is in a neutral venue or have some kind of astrix beside it?

I've no idea how Paddy Power operate, I don't use their service. The betting firms I use, Ladbrokes, Stan James, Expekt & Bwin have information next to games that are played at neutral venues. Once, recently, Ladbrokes failed to flag up a game and when my bet lost, I complained about that they never mentioned it was a neutral venue even though I was aware, but they weren't aware of that, after back and forth emails, I was paid out minus that game which was voided, so my treble was settled as a double. I'd expect Paddy Powers to do something similar in the case we have on this thread.

As much as it's in the bettors best interests to be aware of such obstacles, firms should provide all the relevant information to the bettor prior to him/her placing their bet. Personally, I wouldnt bet with an operator who didn't provide such information and I would feel cheated if I was in the OP's shoes.

It's very easy to log on and comment at how stupid he has been, perhaps he was in a rush, placed a bet for interests sake over the weekend - who knows, coming on and lashing into him saying he was stupid and its all his fault is wrong in my opinion, part of the fault lies with powers too, on this occasion. This information should simply be flagged up.

I would be on the lookout for upcoming games based in neutral venues on paddy powers site and see if its flagged up, is so why was the Kiev match not? Purely because they are a bunch of lazy, disrespectful biggots.

raheny red

Mods, poll please, there's alot of interest in this and I'd like to see the figures .

dsmythy

I don't think a poll is needed. Nobody's saying PP shouldn't make it clear it was a neutral venue but that the bet shouldn't be voided.

raheny red

dsmythy wrote: »

I don't think a poll is needed. Nobody's saying PP shouldn't make it clear it was a neutral venue but that the bet shouldn't be voided.

Sorry I should have been more clearer, the poll should be: Should PP refund the bet, Yes or No.

x in the city

Having done more than my share of accus I can say that PP mostly state whether a game is neutral [which would have a huge bearing on someone placing a bet in fairness] or indeed a cup game [which would have an even greater effect...:rolleyes:].

the fact that this was a neutral cup game pretty much made the whole thing void, anyway them tight ***** only had odds on 1.5, which would probably be acceptable for DK at home but not for a cup game on neutral ground

They let this one slip thru the radar so It should be void.

Headshot

x in the city wrote: »

Having done more than my share of accus I can say that PP mostly state whether a game is neutral [which would have a huge bearing on someone placing a bet in fairness] or indeed a cup game [which would have an even greater effect...:rolleyes:].

the fact that this was a neutral cup game pretty much made the whole thing void, anyway them tight ***** only had odds on 1.5, which would probably be acceptable for DK at home but not for a cup game on neutral ground

They let this one slip thru the radar so It should be void.

So what are you going to do about it

x in the city

If the other team left on the bet win tomorow im gonna get onto pp

if anyone here coughs up a constructive email to write them free 20e bet..:D

Headshot

x in the city wrote: »

If the other team left on the bet win tomorow im gonna get onto pp

if anyone here coughs up a constructive email to write them free 20e bet..:D

Heres a good one

**** you pp,you owe me money

Healio

OP you are seriously trying to milk this for all you can.

Originally you kicked up a fuss cause you thought they mixed up home/away, then someone informed you the match was a super cup match on a neutral venue, and now you are trying to get a selection voided. If the team won and PP turned around and said to you; sorry we had the teams in the wrong this is void, how would you feel?

Famous45 wrote: »

Paddy Power should have had an asterix next to the game on the coupon.

They probably should have but maybe they dont speak ukranian and couldnt see it was a neutral venue when they saw the fixtures.

Famous45 wrote: »

Anyway's although it ain't your error it IS,

Cant agree more, you are in charge of your bet, you decide whats goes in and what doesnt. Fair enough if you spot an error and take it up with a company before you have a bet, or at the very least before the said match starts. But you were totally unaware until someone pointed it out to you. If Dynamo had of won you would have said nothing, but PP would have been well in there rights to void any bets on dynamo in this instance.

famous45 wrote:

and I do not care what anyone else says, an error on the betting firms behalf.

Doesnt look like it the way it was priced. But you of course must be right, as the resident odds compiler :rolleyes: .

They should have it flagged up on their site that the game was going to be played in a neutral venue and in turn they should pay you the €1300+ and void the Kiev game on your bet.

Well this is a bit debatable, they probably should have said it was a neutral venue, but i cant agree with anyone who claims this on the basis of: "i wouldnt have backed it if id known they were away". This is bull****, it translates as: "I backed a loser but I want to use the get out of jail free card, please!"

Famous45 wrote:

I would feel cheated if I was in the OP's shoes.

Yeah so would I!! :rolleyes:
The chap didnt even realise it until he was told. Maybe the firm should have said it was neutral, which is all a fair argument if its raised pre-match. This was raised (according to post times 89 mins into match; but OP claims it was 30 mins before that, so 59 mins into match) but still the OP was unaware this was a Super Cup match. And to add to this argument Will Hills, Skybet and Boylesports didnt flag it as a neutral venue. As I had a bet on this myself after checking out various websites.

famous45 wrote:

It's very easy to log on and comment at how stupid he has been, perhaps he was in a rush, placed a bet for interests sake over the weekend - who knows,

I agree with you here on this point.

famous45 wrote:

coming on and lashing into him saying he was stupid and its all his fault is wrong in my opinion,

But not on this one. How is it wrong? i didnt tell him to back Dyanmo, How is it my fault not his?

famous45 wrote:

part of the fault lies with powers too, on this occasion. This information should simply be flagged up.

It should have been flagged up, but turning around after the result, you seriously cant take anyone seriously. Add to that they werent the only firm not to flag it up.

famous45 wrote:

I would be on the lookout for upcoming games based in neutral venues on paddy powers site and see if its flagged up, is so why was the Kiev match not?

This is the most retarded thing I've ever read on boards. You are trying to make out as if PP knew the match was neutral, and didnt bother stating it so as to con punters.

"Is so why the Kiev match not?"; maybe PP isnt fully run by robots with 0% error margain, but rather by humans who can make mistakes from time to time.

Yes it may be there mistakes, but looking at the prices 1/2 looks about right for the Dynamo, a team who have contested all 6 Ukrainian Super Cups, winning 4 in the process.

famous45 wrote:

Purely because they are a bunch of lazy, disrespectful biggots.

Cant understand this post at all, but by reading all your Anti-Powers posts added to your obvious dundalk location, you seem to be somehow attached to boylesports. Who are probably one of the worst in situations like the OP's.

What the fcuk are biggots, presumably you mean Bigots (not to sound as a grammar Bigot) [wanker sign] at you [/wanker sign]

x in the city wrote: »

when I realised it was a cup game in a neutral venue I was pissed off, PP should have it flagged as a neutral venu, then I would have thought twice before sticking it on the coupon.

If all my other best come thru I will get back to PP over this.

not like a couple of grand is much to them..

I dont know how much more full of **** you can get. "When i realised" it was about 40 minutes after full time when you realised (were told).

You defintiely would have thought twice, especially after knowing the result.

A couple of grand loss is a lot to any bookie if it is not lost fairly, and to quote famous45 above "I do not care what anyone else says".

x in the city wrote:

the fact that this was a neutral cup game pretty much made the whole thing void, anyway them tight ***** only had odds on 1.5, which would probably be acceptable for DK at home but not for a cup game on neutral ground

A bad gambler turned odds compiler? If you knew that the price was wrong why back it? Oh I forgot it was on in a neutral venue, you would still have taken 4/6 (or better), wouldnt you??

They let this one slip thru the radar so It should be void.

:rolleyes:, could have went the other way as well, but that is lost on you it seems.

x in the city

Healio wrote: »

OP you are seriously trying to milk this for all you can.

Originally you kicked up a fuss cause you thought they mixed up home/away, then someone informed you the match was a super cup match on a neutral venue, and now you are trying to get a selection voided. If the team won and PP turned around and said to you; sorry we had the teams in the wrong this is void, how would you feel?



They probably should have but maybe they dont speak ukranian and couldnt see it was a neutral venue when they saw the fixtures.



Cant agree more, you are in charge of your bet, you decide whats goes in and what doesnt. Fair enough if you spot an error and take it up with a company before you have a bet, or at the very least before the said match starts. But you were totally unaware until someone pointed it out to you. If Dynamo had of won you would have said nothing, but PP would have been well in there rights to void any bets on dynamo in this instance.



Doesnt look like it the way it was priced. But you of course must be right, as the resident odds compiler :rolleyes: .



Well this is a bit debatable, they probably should have said it was a neutral venue, but i cant agree with anyone who claims this on the basis of: "i wouldnt have backed it if id known they were away". This is bull****, it translates as: "I backed a loser but I want to use the get out of jail free card, please!"



Yeah so would I!! :rolleyes:
The chap didnt even realise it until he was told. Maybe the firm should have said it was neutral, which is all a fair argument if its raised pre-match. This was raised (according to post times 89 mins into match; but OP claims it was 30 mins before that, so 59 mins into match) but still the OP was unaware this was a Super Cup match. And to add to this argument Will Hills, Skybet and Boylesports didnt flag it as a neutral venue. As I had a bet on this myself after checking out various websites.



I agree with you here on this point.



But not on this one. How is it wrong? i didnt tell him to back Dyanmo, How is it my fault not his?



It should have been flagged up, but turning around after the result, you seriously cant take anyone seriously. Add to that they werent the only firm not to flag it up.



This is the most retarded thing I've ever read on boards. You are trying to make out as if PP knew the match was neutral, and didnt bother stating it so as to con punters.

"Is so why the Kiev match not?"; maybe PP isnt fully run by robots with 0% error margain, but rather by humans who can make mistakes from time to time.

Yes it may be there mistakes, but looking at the prices 1/2 looks about right for the Dynamo, a team who have contested all 6 Ukrainian Super Cups, winning 4 in the process.




Cant understand this post at all, but by reading all your Anti-Powers posts added to your obvious dundalk location, you seem to be somehow attached to boylesports. Who are probably one of the worst in situations like the OP's.

What the fcuk are biggots, presumably you mean Bigots (not to sound as a grammar Bigot) [wanker sign] at you [/wanker sign]




I dont know how much more full of **** you can get. "When i realised" it was about 40 minutes after full time when you realised (were told).

You defintiely would have thought twice, especially after knowing the result.

A couple of grand loss is a lot to any bookie if it is not lost fairly, and to quote famous45 above "I do not care what anyone else says".




A bad gambler turned odds compiler? If you knew that the price was wrong why back it? Oh I forgot it was on in a neutral venue, you would still have taken 4/6 (or better), wouldnt you??




:rolleyes:, could have went the other way as well, but that is lost on you it seems.

ummm

No, I would certainly not have placed that bet If I knew it was a friggin UKRAINE CUP FINAL

duh

anywayyyyyyyyy

the shoehorn guy I was on customer service said information on pp site is for display purpose only,

double duh

so I said, ok so can you give me the web address for gambling purposes please sir.:rolleyes:

He said the onus is on the customer to make sure they know what they are doing, which is well and good.

I said, yes but the onus is also on PP to know what fixtures they have and surely tell someone if a game is a cup final in a neutral venue. That Diev game looked 100% to be a home fixture and with odds of 1.5/1 seems pretty accurate.

If it was a cup final I doubt odds would be that low

thedini

That Diev game looked 100% to be a home fixture and with odds of 1.5/1 seems pretty accurate.

If it was a cup final I doubt odds would be that low[/quote]

It was a cup final and the odds were that low:rolleyes:

x in the city

thedini wrote: »

That Diev game looked 100% to be a home fixture and with odds of 1.5/1 seems pretty accurate.

If it was a cup final I doubt odds would be that low

It was a cup final and the odds were that low:rolleyes:[/QUOTE]

we all know now, it was a cup final.

I dont think PP did when they made out the fixture. As the team they played are also in their division. so it looked like it was a league fixture.

For a bookie not to notify the punters that a fixture was a cup final is a bit of a blunder in fairness.

Fearthelight

x in the city wrote: »

It was a cup final and the odds were that low:rolleyes:

we all know now, it was a cup final.

I dont think PP did when they made out the fixture. As the team they played are also in their division. so it looked like it was a league fixture.

For a bookie not to notify the punters that a fixture was a cup final is a bit of a blunder in fairness.[/quote]

Although, we should all know what we are betting on etc, I can understand your frustration. The venue is a huge factor when placing a bet. In fact, BET365 have voided bets on me in the past because the venue changed, I received an email and then a PHONE CALL to tell me. The guy that phoned me was able to place the bet again with him over the phone. Pretty cool CS I thought at the time. I was glad I did because the game won in my favour.

USUALLY, a book will notify a player when a venue has changed to a neurtal venue etc etc. However, they say the information is for 'display purposes only' to cover their backs in a case like you have. If you have bet enough with them, they MAY do something for you.

Famous45

They probably should have but maybe they dont speak ukranian and couldnt see it was a neutral venue

They should have, there's no probably about it.

Doesnt look like it the way it was priced. But you of course must be right, as the resident odds compiler

I never once mentioned anything about any odds, so what's with the odds compiling sarcasm?

I said it was an error on the firms behalf as they never flagged the match up as being neutral venue.

This is the most retarded thing I've ever read on boards. You are trying to make out as if PP knew the match was neutral, and didnt bother stating it so as to con punters.

"Is so why the Kiev match not?"; maybe PP isnt fully run by robots with 0% error margain, but rather by humans who can make mistakes from time to time

I never said they conned anyone, you are only one saying that. Do not try and change my post to something you believe yourself.

My qoute is with regards to an error or purely a lack of knowledge on the compilers behalf.

What the fcuk are biggots, presumably you mean Bigots (not to sound as a grammar Bigot) [wanker sign] at you [/wanker sign]

That's very clever of you, I am sure the mods will review your post and take action.

Cant understand this post at all, but by reading all your Anti-Powers posts added to your obvious dundalk location, you seem to be somehow attached to boylesports. Who are probably one of the worst in situations like the OP's.

Like you've done with almost all of your posts in response to mine, you have presumed - which is the wrong road to take.

5starpool

Less abuse please. 1 infraction given.

8-10

Dynamo Kyiv went on to win on penos? Harsh. Still OP's fault.

x in the city

well my last team Angelholms won just a bit ago 3-1 so the pay out minus Kiev is over 1,300e.

time to get a case onto PP.


Bet Receipt No. : XYX


Selection Selection Details Result

1 Football Matches Win

Betting in Running
Rochester Raging Rhinos v Puerto Rico Islanders
11th of Jul 2009 01:00 am
Team To Score the First Goal
No Goals @ 2.62


Selection Selection Details Result

2 Football Matches Pending
Swedish Superettan
Angelholms v Ljungskile
13th of Jul 2009 6:00 pm
Win-Draw-Win
Angelholms @ 1.83


Selection Selection Details Result

3 Football Matches Pending
Japanese J League
Jubilo Iwata v Oita Trinita
12th of Jul 2009 11:00 am
Win-Draw-Win
Jubilo Iwata @ 1.61


Selection Selection Details Result

4 Football Matches Pending
Ukrainian Matches
Dynamo Kiev v Vorskla-Naftohaz Poltava
11th of Jul 2009 6:45 pm
Win-Draw-Win
Dynamo Kiev @ 1.50



Selection Selection Details Result

5 Football Matches Win
Swedish Allsvenskanliga
Kalmar v Djurgardens
11th of Jul 2009 3:00 pm
Win-Draw-Win
Kalmar @ 1.57


Selection Selection Details Result

6 Football Matches Win
Japanese J League
Urawa RD v Sanfrecce Hiroshima
11th of Jul 2009 11:00 am
Win-Draw-Win
Urawa RD @ 1.53

Selection Selection Details Result

7 GAA Matches Pending
GAA Football Matches
Down v Laois
11th of Jul 2009 7:30 pm
Match Betting
Down @ 1.61


Selection Selection Details Result

8 GAA Matches Pending
GAA Hurling Matches
Tipperary v Waterford
12th of Jul 2009 4:00 pm
Match Betting
Tipperary @ 1.36

Selection Selection Details Result

9 GAA Matches Win
GAA Hurling Matches
Clare v Galway
11th of Jul 2009 7:02 pm
Match Betting
Galway @ 1.44

Selection Selection Details Result

10 GAA Matches Win
GAA Football Matches
Longford v Kerry
11th of Jul 2009 5:01 pm
Team to Score First Point
Kerry @ 1.36

Selection Selection Details Result

11 GAA Matches Pending
GAA Football Matches
Dublin v Kildare
12th of Jul 2009 2:00 pm
Match Betting
Dublin @ 1.50


Selection Selection Details Result

12 GAA Matches Win
GAA Football Matches
Monaghan v Derry
11th of Jul 2009 3:01 pm
Match Betting
Derry @ 2.20


Stake and Return Details

Bet Type Accumulator (12) (To Win)

Tax@Tax Free 0

Number of Lines 1 Total Stake Due
€5.00

Stake per Line €5.00 Freebets Redeemed €0.00

Channel Internet Total Amount Paid €5.00

x in the city

Dynamo Kiev vs.
Vorskla-Naftohaz Poltava
Vorskla-Naftohaz Poltava
Ukraine - Supercup, Date: Saturday July 11th, 2009, Time: 17:45 GMT
Match Summary (Saturday July 11th, 2009 17:45)
Home Team Final Score Away Team
Dynamo Kiev
90'0 - 0 Pen4 - 2
Vorskla-Naftohaz Poltava


from another betting site..........

Famous45

Good luck x in the city. Make sure you hear a response from a team manager why the game wasn't flagged and not your run of the mill customer service rep. Tell him/her you are willing to accept the bet minus Kiev.

whatsupdoc?

demand them to pay our

I'd say they will certainly do that.

PP gave odds on the match and irrespective of whether it was a winner or loser, the odds they gave would reflect what way they think the match would go.
As we all know there are many many people who make a living hitting
the bookies/exchanges on bets they know are priced up wrong i.e. wrong venue for a match, having a horse as fav for a race even though certain people know it won't win and lay it or bet on another horse to win etc etc.
There was nothing stopping the poster backing any of the other 2 selections in that match seeing as PP had priced the 3 outcomes up.

CHD

Are you looking to be paid the winning amount without Kiev or Looking for your fiver back or looking for some kind of compensation?

x in the city

got this from pp

what a joke, going to cancel my account pronto, if you instruct your bank to cancel transactions from pp can they still get funds off you as I own them a few hundred on my next bank debit.

cnuts, been with them for years and they cant honour a bet for once



Thank you for contacting Paddy Power Customer Support.



I have checked with our Team Leader and I'm afraid that the settlement will stand. As was stated in a previous email, the information on our site is for display purposes only, and we do not accept responsibility for any errors or omissions.



If you have any further queries please do not hesitate to contact us.



Kind Regards,