Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Windows 7 Pricing - Europe loses out!

  • 26-06-2009 9:47pm
    #1
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭


    Microsoft will not be offering an upgrade version of Windows 7 in Europe.


    91076c.jpg


    wld3id.jpg



    In the past Microsoft has given people already using Windows a chance to upgrade to a new version when it becomes available.
    While that option will be offered in the US, Microsoft said its efforts to comply with competition regulations meant it could not do so in Europe.
    European regulators dismissed the claim, saying the move limited choices rather than opening them up.

    No choice
    Windows 7 is due to go on sale on 22 October around the world.
    Anyone buying a new PC between now and then - running Windows Vista Home Premium, Business or Ultimate - will get the chance to upgrade the operating system on it, at no cost, to Windows 7.
    While Microsoft will not charge for the upgrade, some PC makers may impose a fee to ship disks with Windows 7 on them to customers.
    The worldwide upgrade option programme is due to begin on 26 June
    Those who want to upgrade to Windows 7 on a older PC will pay a reduced price for the software. Stand alone versions of Windows 7, that can run on more than one PC, will also be available.
    Microsoft said these upgrade options will not be available to Europeans.
    "We will not be able to offer an upgrade product within Europe," said John Curran, Windows business lead at Microsoft UK, adding that only the full version of the software will be available to Europeans.
    In Europe, Microsoft will send buyers of new PCs a full version of the software rather than an upgrade version. The European edition will lack Internet Explorer.
    Europeans who want to get hold of Windows 7 but have not bought a new PC will be able to buy it at a discount. In the UK, the Home Premium edition of Windows 7 will be £79.99 until 31 December 2009.



    By contrast buying this edition after 31 December will cost £149.99.
    The upgrade option was not available, Microsoft said, because it was trying to comply with European competition regulations. This means that IE is not onboard Windows 7 in Europe.
    A Commission spokesman dismissed Microsoft's claim that it was taking the action to comply with European laws.



    "The essential point of our case is consumer choice," said the spokesman.
    "We would want to look extremely closely at the terms under which Microsoft is making Internet Explorer available to computer manufacturers," he said.
    "If the effect of the technical separation of Windows and Internet Explorer is neutralised by particular terms and conditions they offer to manufacturers to install Internet Explorer, they're no better off."
    The preferred remedy for Europe, he said, was to offer users a screen when they first switch on Windows 7 that gives them a choice between IE, Chrome, Firefox, Safari or Opera.
    "For them to claim that this is somehow imposed by the Commission or is going to resolve the problem with the Commission is far from clear," he said.
    "It's certainly not because we've asked them to do it."


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,405 ✭✭✭Dartz


    Microsoft wrote:
    **** You for getting in our way

    That's basically it.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    Dartz wrote: »
    That's basically it.

    Yep.

    They are getting their revenge!
    Feck them, I'll just order my upgrade eventually from the states by web sales site or ebay.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,180 ✭✭✭Mena


    Biggins wrote: »
    The preferred remedy for Europe, he said, was to offer users a screen when they first switch on Windows 7 that gives them a choice between IE, Chrome, Firefox, Safari or Opera.


    What the hell is that for? If you don't know how to download and use a different browser you shouldn't be near a computer anyway!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 202 ✭✭Peppapig


    What about peope using Windows 7 now?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    Peppapig wrote: »
    What about peope using Windows 7 now?

    If your talking about the pre-releases or the beta's out there, they expire in less than a year then a lot of features cut out in them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    ♪ She's a brick .... House...

    But then again, unless HP is going to republish my drivers so that they will install on Windows 7, I got nothing to celebrate anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 786 ✭✭✭center15


    Mena wrote: »
    What the hell is that for? If you don't know how to download and use a different browser you shouldn't be near a computer anyway!
    You can't even download a browser on the computer. You'll have to go to another computer and put IE or firefox etc on a usb drive or cd to install it on a windows 7 machine. going to be very annoying for general consumers


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    center15 wrote: »
    You can't even download a browser on the computer. You'll have to go to another computer and put IE or firefox etc on a usb drive or cd to install it on a windows 7 machine. going to be very annoying for general consumers

    Very good point.
    Especially for people that are not used to installing applications.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,983 ✭✭✭leninbenjamin


    Hmmm, was hoping to upgrade my current Vista install when it comes out. The prices for the professional edition are prohibitive enough...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,467 ✭✭✭smemon


    http://www.betanews.com/article/Microsoft-Europe-customers-must-wait-to-upgrade-Vista-to-Windows-7/1246039724

    upgrade availability and pricing for Windows 7 in Europe, including the UK, will be announced on July 15

    in fairness this is not microsoft's fault... they were bullied in to ditching IE which fecked up their plans as they now have to give us our own 'special' versions of 7 which don't include IE but as people are point out - unless you have another PC you can't go online as you need a browser :-)

    we will in fact benefit from this whole thing as we'll get full versions at upgrade prices.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,249 ✭✭✭✭Kinetic^


    smemon wrote: »
    in fairness this is not microsoft's fault... they were bullied in to ditching IE which fecked up their plans as they now have to give us our own 'special' versions of 7 which don't include IE but as people are point out - unless you have another PC you can't go online as you need a browser :-)

    That's something I was wondering tbh. :confused:

    I think I may get 7 Ultimate if I can get it in from the US.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    smemon wrote: »
    http://www.betanews.com/article/Microsoft-Europe-customers-must-wait-to-upgrade-Vista-to-Windows-7/1246039724

    upgrade availability and pricing for Windows 7 in Europe, including the UK, will be announced on July 15

    Seems to be a difference of opinion - the BBC say different but then they could be wrong if the latest reports are right.
    See: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8118749.stm
    I suspect we will have to wait some time this side of the water to get the upgrade in shops.

    I'll be getting mine through the net from the states.

    Guess we will have to wait and see what way Microsoft will jump!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,983 ✭✭✭Tea_Bag


    center15 wrote: »
    You can't even download a browser on the computer. You'll have to go to another computer and put IE or firefox etc on a usb drive or cd to install it on a windows 7 machine. going to be very annoying for general consumers

    Not entirely true:D You could use CMD in an ftp session to download Opera or whatever you wish to use. sounds more complicated than it is really..
    Biggins wrote: »
    Very good point.
    Especially for people that are not used to installing applications.

    bummer.

    but when buying a pc, even if OS is preinstalled, it still wont cater for you outthebox. setting up emails and other stuff isnt done for you afaik..

    well if you cant install an app then you've got no hope inho..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,078 ✭✭✭theCzar


    Microsoft wrote:
    for Europe, we will not have a separate upgrade SKU for the packaged retail product versions of Windows 7 at GA. But we will be offering upgrade pricing on our full licenses to make sure that European customers who want to upgrade have the pricing options available in the rest of the world

    http://windowsteamblog.com/blogs/windows7/archive/2009/06/25/announcing-the-windows-7-upgrade-option-program-amp-windows-7-pricing-bring-on-ga.aspx

    Full version for price of retail version? Terrific. I wouldn't contemplate doing anything other than a clean install so that aspect bothers me not at all.

    Still paying more than US of course but what else is new?

    (Opera ftw :D)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 101 ✭✭lucideer


    Just don't bother buying Windows 7 - get it free (kind of-ish).

    (no I'm not talking about hacks or cracks or anything illegal :D )

    Just get an evaluation version of Windows Server 2008R2 (fully featured server version of Win7 - comes with all the flashy glassy stuff, it's just turned off by default in the options) and go here: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/948472

    I've been doing it with the R1 since it came out in beta


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,563 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    EU / UK prices for windows are usually higher than US prices
    in addition US get extra special deals that we don't


    Not having an upgrade option is not a major issue IMHO
    Most people have OEM windows and so if they upgraded then the new copy of windows 7 would be bound forever to their current PC's mother board and would live and die with it.

    In fact not having an upgrade option will prevent many people from breaking the law, which is what you would be doing if you moved the copy of windows to another PC ( unless you are one of the few non-coporate users of a transferrable windows license )


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,180 ✭✭✭Mena


    Slashdot wrote:
    "European customers will pay up to twice as much for Windows 7 compared with US users, even though the new operating system will ship without a browser in Europe. Some of the money Microsoft stands to make on the European editions of Windows 7 comes from the weak dollar. Last week, for instance, the dollar fell against the euro the most in a month, hitting $1.41 per euro. For example, Windows 7 Professional, the key retail edition for businesses, will sport a price tag of 285 euros, or $400.60, and £189.99, or $313.84, at Saturday's exchange rate. In other words, EU customers will pay twice the $199.99 U.S. price; U.K. buyers will pay 57% more. And depending on your view on bundling IE, Europe's customers will be paying more for less, with Microsoft's decision to yank IE8 from Windows 7 in an effort to head off EU antitrust regulators, who may still force the company to take more drastic measures."

    Source

    It seems (besides the usual factors), the exchange rate will be knocking us for a six as well.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,275 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Would there be any issues with getting a friend in the US to purchase the half price Windows 7 upgrades and to send it to me?

    Would it work ok on my existing European Vista license?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭TiGeR KiNgS


    for internet explorer. presumably it will be possible to download it from windows update. ( no need for a browser to do that)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 101 ✭✭lucideer


    for internet explorer. presumably it will be possible to download it from windows update. ( no need for a browser to do that)

    Which means if you want to use an alternative browser, you will now have to download two things - first IE then use IE to get your other browser. Ridiculous. And people wonder why the EC objected to the decision by Microsoft to remove it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,094 ✭✭✭Doomofman


    Ok, so can anyone tell me what the deal is with buying a version of this. Will we (Irish people) be able to order a copy from the US Microsoft site or where are people planning to get their copy from?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭conchubhar1


    so there will be no ie? yay

    is there still the registry?

    is wmp still pre installed?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 67 ✭✭.Bob


    even though im not a fan of IE, not having it would be a problem, a lot of programs use an IE activex blah blah blah to connect to the internet. ive programmed a few application and if IE wasnt there it wouldnt be able to connect to the net :/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,078 ✭✭✭theCzar


    .Bob wrote: »
    even though im not a fan of IE, not having it would be a problem, a lot of programs use an IE activex blah blah blah to connect to the internet. ive programmed a few application and if IE wasnt there it wouldnt be able to connect to the net :/
    So download it and install it? This isn't a ban on IE, it's just not "as standard". Its an unnecessary inconvenience and not technically what the EU commission wanted but I think most of us will survive!

    I emailed microsoft to ask about availing of the pre-order offer in RoI and they told me to ring their Irish office, might do so in the morning though I don't know if they'll have an answer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,484 ✭✭✭✭Stephen


    Yeah, its just a two-fingered salute to the EU from Microsoft. The EU was trying to get them to bundle alternative browsers etc with Windows rather than to ship it with no browser at all.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,055 ✭✭✭probe


    They are already selling Windows 7 in the US in the microsoft online shop for $49.99 (Windows Home Premium upgrade) if you buy it now and wait until 2009.10.22 for delivery. I doubt if you will be able to purchase this in the EU, as the Windows versions available in the US have higher grade encryption compared with those sold in the EU. One can only assume that the US gov wants to snoop on everything going on in the EU.

    http://store.microsoft.com/microsoft/Windows-Windows-7/category/102?WT.mc_id=msccomhpfeature_win7

    Why isn't this advance purchase option available in Ireland I ask myself? Microsoft is availing of generous fiscal incentives in Ireland......

    As far as non-advance sales of Windows 7 upgrades, my understanding is that MS will be selling the "full product" for the "upgrade price" after 22 Oct in the EU because they have technical problems removing IE from an XP machine which might be the upgrade target. But this is hyper expensive compared with the advance purchase Windows 7 available in the US now.

    Mac OS X operating system sells for €129 - with the result that Mac users have no hesitation in upgrading to the latest operating system version every time. This simplifies the software platform for Apple and software developers because they don't have to support legacy software going back for decades, like MS Windows.

    Microsoft is dumb. The only reason why it makes big money is because of its monopoly in Windows. It gets away with this because the competition regulators in the EU and the US are dumb, and are going after the wrong issues. The AT&T phone monopoly was broken up by a judge in the US. Not the FCC nor the competition authorities.

    Most people use their PC for internet and office. You get this and zillions of other applications in Fedora for free. Looks like windows. As easy to use as Windows. Runs in 1 MB of ram, and performs as fast as Windows 7 on a 4 MB machine.

    Windows is dumbing down the world and ripping people off. If schools adopted Linux (eg Fedora or another good distro) Ireland would have far more software developers!

    download: http://www.fedoraproject.org/

    I have Windows 7 RC running on a machine for the past month and it is quite good. But no better than Fedora - which is free. Fedora is at the bleeding edge of Linux software - technologies appear on it long before red hat makes them available to corporate clients.

    Linus Torvalds uses Fedora! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linus_Torvalds


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭conchubhar1


    snow leopard will be 30 euros :p

    i joke i joke


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,814 ✭✭✭TPD


    I didnt read the whole thread so someone may have pointed this out, but cant you browse the web through windows explorer?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 786 ✭✭✭center15


    I didnt read the whole thread so someone may have pointed this out, but cant you browse the web through windows explorer?

    No you can't when windows 7 ships here there will be no way to browse the web outta the box. One simply solution would have been to just give an option of firefox, IE and Opera when installing windows 7.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,078 ✭✭✭theCzar


    center15 wrote: »
    No you can't when windows 7 ships here there will be no way to browse the web outta the box. One simply solution would have been to just give an option of firefox, IE and Opera when installing windows 7.
    which is what the EU intended. MS jumped the gun a little with their decision to simply strip browser functionality from W7. Fine them again I say!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 101 ✭✭lucideer


    I didnt read the whole thread so someone may have pointed this out, but cant you browse the web through windows explorer?
    Windows Explorer uses Internet Explorer's engine to browse. You can also browse the web with Windows Media Player, but it also uses Internet Explorer's engine. Another example that won't work is Firefox's IETab extension - it uses Internet Explorer's engine, so that extension won't work on EU Windows 7.
    center15 wrote: »
    One simply solution would have been to just give an option of firefox, IE and Opera when installing windows 7.
    That solution wouldn't benefit Microsoft though would it. This one benefit's them in so many ways:
    (a) it makes it look to unobservant people like MS are making some sort of compromise,
    (b) it allows them to charge Europeans more for certain things,
    (c) it pisses off customers allowing MS to tell them to "blame the EU" or "blame Opera" (see the recent JCXP boycott for examples of some ignorant people actually doing this) and,
    (d) it means people will now have to jump through two hoops to use an alternative browser: 1) download IE off Windows Update and 2) use IE to download your browser of choice.

    As I said above, just use Windows2008R2 for free instead of giving MS the satisfaction of another sale.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,492 ✭✭✭Sir Oxman


    EU / UK prices for windows are usually higher than US prices
    in addition US get extra special deals that we don't


    Not having an upgrade option is not a major issue IMHO
    Most people have OEM windows and so if they upgraded then the new copy of windows 7 would be bound forever to their current PC's mother board and would live and die with it.

    In fact not having an upgrade option will prevent many people from breaking the law, which is what you would be doing if you moved the copy of windows to another PC ( unless you are one of the few non-coporate users of a transferrable windows license )

    What law?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,055 ✭✭✭probe


    gambiaman wrote: »
    What law?

    Microsoft can create any contract terms they like and put it in the EULA (end-user license "agreement"). If you want the software you have to click "yes" (I agree to all your conditions) - otherwise click no and the software install is abandoned. Everything is non-negotiable. Microsoft creates the law, and given its monopoly position, can enforce Microsoft law on more people on the planet than any democratically elected government. Not that there are many of these on planet Earth!

    MS software calls home regularly to report on your compliance with "The Microsoft Law", without your express consent. Hitler, Napoleon and the Stasi were light touch softies by comparison when it comes to jackboot tactics....

    In answer to your question "What law"..... contract law (by the backdoor) which is a major aspect of the Microsoft monopoly abuse of power which would appear to have received little attention from the competition authorities, anywhere.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,055 ✭✭✭probe


    theCzar wrote: »
    which is what the EU intended. MS jumped the gun a little with their decision to simply strip browser functionality from W7. Fine them again I say!

    With no internet explorer pre-installed as the default, all the OEMs - Dell, HP, Sony, etc will install their own choice of browser - which will no doubt come pre-loaded with dozens of crapware, spamware, popping windows, bookmarks, other things that one will have to remove manually.

    I can't see how one can fine MS for not providing a browser. Anymore than than you can fine a car manufacturer for not providing air conditioning. While one could fine a car manufacturer for selling a car without brakes (a safety issue), a PC without internet explorer is a far more secure PC. The requirement to use IE to perform windowsupdate is artificial - and monopolistic smelling. One can update Adobe software using any browser.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,013 ✭✭✭SirLemonhead


    The EU's suggestion for including multiple browsers is stupid, there's more browsers out there than IE, Firefox, Chrome and Opera. It would hardly be competetive and fair to leave them out too wouldn't it :P


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    probe wrote: »
    They are already selling Windows 7 in the US in the microsoft online shop for $49.99 (Windows Home Premium upgrade) if you buy it now and wait until 2009.10.22 for delivery. I doubt if you will be able to purchase this in the EU, as the Windows versions available in the US have higher grade encryption compared with those sold in the EU. One can only assume that the US gov wants to snoop on everything going on in the EU.
    This hasn't been the case for about 10 years. Windows 2000 shipped with 56-bit encryption outside the US but this was increased to 128-bit in a later service pack and anything from Windows Me upwards is 128-bit as standard, Vista being 256-bit.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,055 ✭✭✭probe


    Karsini wrote: »
    This hasn't been the case for about 10 years. Windows 2000 shipped with 56-bit encryption outside the US but this was increased to 128-bit in a later service pack and anything from Windows Me upwards is 128-bit as standard, Vista being 256-bit.

    In Microsoft's book: "Windows Server 2008 - Administrators Pocket Consultant" page 309 (of 657 pages - big pocket!) isbn 0-7356-2437-2, Microsoft states:

    While US versions of Vista and Server 2008 support both 128 and 256 bit AES, export versions for use outside of the United States support only 128 bit encryption.

    AES encryption was invented and developed in Europe by Leuven University http://www.kuleuven.be/english/

    How dare Microsoft dumb this European encryption technology idown to 128 bits in Europe on their over priced platforms.

    How dare Microsoft take advantage of Ireland to sell its products to the rest of Europe in this way and deny Irish customers the right to purchase Windows 7 upgrades at similar advance purchase pricing as is available in the US.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,563 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    legal_hacks.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,405 ✭✭✭Dartz


    If you don't like paying for Windows. If you don't like the Microsoft conspiracy, or the monopolising leverage.... Join Ussss.

    TBH, I'm only using Windows 7 right now for the sake of 2 games.... because it came free until March-ish... I couldn't be arsed paying for the bugger when it comes out, mostly because it does nothing for me the above link doesn't do better, and for less fuss overall.

    But then again, I'm a tight bastard....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,225 ✭✭✭Ciaran500


    probe wrote: »
    With no internet explorer pre-installed as the default, all the OEMs - Dell, HP, Sony, etc will install their own choice of browser - which will no doubt come pre-loaded with dozens of crapware, spamware, popping windows, bookmarks, other things that one will have to remove manually.

    All the OEMs already use custom installs of Windows to stick whatever they want on a computer, this won't change it.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,055 ✭✭✭probe


    legal_hacks.png


    Filtering content - ie port blocking is another big issue for competition authorities. Port blocking allows ISPs to kill off competition in telecommunications services, prevent entertainment services - except those offered by the ISP in question, and act as a censor on their customers' freedom of speech.

    Illegal, unconstitutional, and in breach of European Convention on Human Rights. The government has given a de-facto monopoly to cable TV, and eircom in IRL. Eircom controls 95% of DSL internet connections - retail and wholesale combined. There is only one cable TV operator realistically speaking. Both of them are blocking ports and threatening customers.

    The incompetent overpaid regulators are doing nothing to correct the problem.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Convention_on_Human_Rights


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,492 ✭✭✭Sir Oxman


    probe wrote: »
    Microsoft can create any contract terms they like and put it in the EULA (end-user license "agreement"). If you want the software you have to click "yes" (I agree to all your conditions) - otherwise click no and the software install is abandoned. Everything is non-negotiable. Microsoft creates the law, and given its monopoly position, can enforce Microsoft law on more people on the planet than any democratically elected government. Not that there are many of these on planet Earth!

    MS software calls home regularly to report on your compliance with "The Microsoft Law", without your express consent. Hitler, Napoleon and the Stasi were light touch softies by comparison when it comes to jackboot tactics....

    In answer to your question "What law"..... contract law (by the backdoor) which is a major aspect of the Microsoft monopoly abuse of power which would appear to have received little attention from the competition authorities, anywhere.


    'Breaking the law' is not the same as not abiding by the terms of an EULA.
    I wish people (not you) would stop saying 'you're breaking the law' when it comes to bloody EULAs.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 101 ✭✭lucideer


    gambiaman wrote: »
    'Breaking the law' is not the same as not abiding by the terms of an EULA.
    I wish people (not you) would stop saying 'you're breaking the law' when it comes to bloody EULAs.
    As far as I'm aware a EULA is a legal contract, the terms of which you are therefore legally bound with when you Accept it on installation. Corrrect me if I'm wrong of course, but that sounds like breaking the law to me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 740 ✭✭✭z0oT


    I was once of the opinion that Microsoft should be allowed bundle whatever they like with Windows because it's them that make the operating system. But it's a classic case of Antitrust violation. So I see no problem in the EU fining Microsoft on Antitrust issues. Them removing IE and selling it without a browser in Europe is nothing more than Microsoft giving the EU the finger. With a bit of luck they'll be fined good and heavily.

    Anyway, Windows 7 is basically what Vista should have been, i really don't understand the excitement considering it's sort of like a big kick in the arse for those who bought Vista. It's basically like them saying "Ok what we released in 2007 was crap, and now we're fixing that crap, but oh... we're going to charge you heavily for it too".
    Microsoft always like to give out the image that they're very much on top of things with fixing bugs etc. and to be fair, they do patch them as they turn up, but when service packs and patchs are fixing hundreds of bugs something is a tad wrong there. The fact of the matter is that the bugs shouldn't be there in the first place, granted you won't catch them all, but releasing an OS with hundreds of bugs is very sloppy indeed. JMO though..
    Again where the monopoly comes in, were this a competive market, people just wouldn't buy a buggy OS because a viable alternative would be present, and they'd spend money on that instead. However a monopolist can afford to release a thrown together product and get away with it.
    Rant over. All my opinion btw, nothing more. :)

    I'll continue to stick with Ubuntu and XP for games and whatever software forces me to use Windows. Maybe after the first service pack of 7 I'll upgrade but not until then, looking back at all the releases of Windows would say to stay away from the early days of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,159 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    lucideer wrote: »
    As far as I'm aware a EULA is a legal contract, the terms of which you are therefore legally bound with when you Accept it on installation. Corrrect me if I'm wrong of course, but that sounds like breaking the law to me.

    You're only breaking the law, if a case is brought against you, and the EULA stands up in court as a valid contract that does not impinge on your consumer rights.

    Microsoft could write "you must be an elephant to use this software", it does not mean they could enforce it.

    Similar with Apple putting that OSX can only be used on Mac hardware in the EULA, this is dubious at best from a legal POV.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,563 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    It's a license so does not fall under the goods and services act which means most consumer rights don't exist :(

    Interesting if true that you only break the law if they sue you.

    It's all part of the FUD. Look at SCO their biggest asset was that they could potentially sue a lot of people. Microsoft et al and the BSA will go after companies in a similar manner to the RIIA / IMRO. You might not like the contract, you might not think it's unenforcable, but you can't afford to win that case in court because it could bankrupt you even if you won. And even if you got costs and when through the whole appeals it could easily take 5 years.


    I haven't checked in a while but last time I looked you could only claim back purchase price or $5 if there was a problem with the software.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 101 ✭✭lucideer


    Interesting if true that you only break the law if they sue you.
    Absolutely. I'm no legal expert, but I'd be interested to hear this from someone who was. I'll have to look into it.

    (btw astrofool do you have any legal qualifications/expertise, or more interestingly do you have a source for this distinction?)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 390 ✭✭jochenstacker


    Jeez, why do people pay good money for this cr*p?
    I still have XP Pro running on my main PC (and looks like it will continue to run for some time) and a laptop running Debian.
    Granted, it's a learning curve, but unless you're a complete cnut it's not impossible to work out.
    So, should i pay silly money for an OS that is quite intentionally buggy because of the advent of electronic surveillance? It's the equivalent of having to fit faulty locks so the government can come into your house and have a good snoop around. And paying for the privilege.
    Or would i be better off with an OS that installs from the bootup screen (no need for CD's), over the net, costs nothing, doesn't give your details to Big Brother and is secure?
    Hmmmh...tough choice...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,013 ✭✭✭SirLemonhead


    Oh god, get back under your tinfoil hat :p


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 390 ✭✭jochenstacker


    No tinfoil hats necessary, Windows just wasn't meant for networking.:)
    It was meant to be single PC, single user and all the networking abilities had to be added on top.
    The evidence is in the fact that the internet is virtually run by 90% by Linux and Unix based machines, no admin worth his salt would even consider Microsoft Server.
    The fact is that Linux has become more userfriendly and still remains free and open source.
    Windows is a bit like a Mercedes.
    Badly built, unreliable and prone to fall apart.
    I found this article on the net:
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/10/22/security_report_windows_vs_linux/
    It's a few years old, but I fancy things haven't dramatically swung around since.
    The basic principles still stand


  • Advertisement
Advertisement