Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Quick Infrared filter strength question

  • 17-05-2009 1:57pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,718 ✭✭✭


    I'm going to buy a IR filter off ebay to see what fun i can have with it. The cheapest start of around €10-12 so they are worth a try! Anyways, would a noob like me be better off with the 720 NM or 850 NM version?

    I think I understand that the 850 one will block more visible light than the 720- so which would be better to get started?


Comments

  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,686 Mod ✭✭✭✭melekalikimaka


    what film ya using?? i'd go for 850 with some proper ir film, if its only near ir film drop it down a bit or you wont get much


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,718 ✭✭✭.Longshanks.


    what film ya using?? i'd go for 850 with some proper ir film, if its only near ir film drop it down a bit or you wont get much

    Film?? Whats that? :pac: :D
    Its for my DSLR. I intend to give a tutorial from the FAQ section a go!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,657 ✭✭✭trishw78


    I assume you've checked that you're camera can take IR shots. If so....

    I have the Hoya R72 which I use the most and the Tiffen 87 filter... I plan on using the Tiffen this summer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,718 ✭✭✭.Longshanks.


    trishw78 wrote: »
    I assume you've checked that you're camera can take IR shots. If so....

    I have the Hoya R72 which I use the most and the Tiffen 87 filter... I plan on using the Tiffen this summer.

    .....:o good point. Haven't a clue. Its a canon 1000d. It can go on adverts.ie if the camera can't take IR shots


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,657 ✭✭✭trishw78


    just point your remote control at the camera if you can see a purple or pink light when you press the buttons you're in business


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,718 ✭✭✭.Longshanks.


    trishw78 wrote: »
    just point your remote control at the camera if you can see a purple or pink light when you press the buttons you're in business

    Thanks. I'll have a look at that when get home this evening.
    A quick google revealed this. It may need mod'ed and if so i'll pass.....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 214 ✭✭Duchovny


    Be aware as well that Canon have issues working with IR, I shoot with a 40D and works fine but all the shoots need to be long exposure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,718 ✭✭✭.Longshanks.


    Duchovny wrote: »
    Be aware as well that Canon have issues working with IR, I shoot with a 40D and works fine but all the shoots need to be long exposure.

    **noob alert****

    When you say issues – in what sense? From my very limited knowledge I understand that (if it works at all) I will have to use long exposures for IR pics as the filter blocks out most of the light visible to the eye…. Im not expecting to be able to take high / normal speed pics……if you get what I mean?
    Or will putting an IR filter on my 1000d mean I get no pic at all?

    Thanks....!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 214 ✭✭Duchovny


    If you had a Nikon D60 for example you could take pictures with like a 1s long exposure when in canon you need 30s... something like that.

    In my 40D it works and in Ireland i always do no less then 30s at F3.5


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,718 ✭✭✭.Longshanks.


    Perfect - thats what i thought. For €10-12 i think i'll give it a try to see how it goes


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 617 ✭✭✭sasar


    I had both 720 & 850 nm filters, used them on 400d and 40D.

    I have to say 850nm was of no use, it doesn't let through enough light, so exposure had to be 30sec or more on a sunny day. 720nm is a lot better, you can get away with 10-15sec.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 582 ✭✭✭thefizz


    what film ya using?? i'd go for 850 with some proper ir film, if its only near ir film drop it down a bit or you wont get much

    I know the OP is not using IR film but just to let anyone know who may want to try it, a 850nm filter will not work on any of the current IR films on the market.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 214 ✭✭Duchovny


    sasar wrote: »
    I had both 720 & 850 nm filters, used them on 400d and 40D.

    I have to say 850nm was of no use, it doesn't let through enough light, so exposure had to be 30sec or more on a sunny day. 720nm is a lot better, you can get away with 10-15sec.

    I use the Hoya R72 and less then 30s needs to be a really really sunny day and well we live in Ireland... I didnt try yet with the 24-70 F2.8 but i will when i will have the chance.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,686 Mod ✭✭✭✭melekalikimaka


    from my understanding... the glowing effect from ir comes not from the image being IR but from the anti-halation layer missing in the IR film causing the blooming... on digi what happens? do folk just add diffused glow?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,718 ✭✭✭.Longshanks.


    I arrived home this evening to my 720nm filter from China :D Anyways, i have a very quick go at trying it out.


    18mm f3.5 ISO 200 on the kit lens
    picture.php?albumid=612&pictureid=3099

    With the filter, 16 second exposure
    picture.php?albumid=612&pictureid=3100

    Some quick processing
    picture.php?albumid=612&pictureid=3101

    More practice me thinks. Anybody got a links to in depth tutorials for when the sun next comes out?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 279 ✭✭TheNorthBank


    Here's a couple of links I had saved in my favourites, don't know if they'll be much use to you but have a look.
    I was using a Hoya R72 filter when I experimented with IR photography last year, I didn't do too well at it and I don't think my 400D was really cut out for it either. When I eventually upgrade my camera I'll have another crack at it.

    http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/ir.htm

    http://dpfwiw.com/ir.htm#87x


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,718 ✭✭✭.Longshanks.


    ^ Thanks for those link, i'm about to have a look into them

    A second attempt after setting the WB to the a pic of bright grass with the filter on -used a 15 sec exposure. Then took a random pic in the back garden, again with 15 sec exposure. Into to PS and auto levels, auto contrast and reversed the blue and red colour channels.
    Getting the funny colours i was after but still a long way to go
    picture.php?albumid=612&pictureid=3102


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,424 ✭✭✭bernard0368


    This is one I got with a 400d and Hoyar72 filter. If I am right I am sure the exposure was 2-3mins. I must try this on the 40d.
    2763577440_5225017a5d.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,318 ✭✭✭O'Coonassa


    This is one I got with a 400d and Hoyar72 filter. If I am right I am sure the exposure was 2-3mins. I must try this on the 40d.

    Did you photoshop that shot Bernard or was that how it was straight from the camera?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,718 ✭✭✭.Longshanks.


    This is one I got with a 400d and Hoyar72 filter. If I am right I am sure the exposure was 2-3mins. I must try this on the 40d.
    http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3277/2763577440_5225017a5d.jpg

    That’s totally stunning and exactly the effect I am hoping to get….but realise I’ve a long wat to go yet! Is there any chance you could post a brief step by step guide of how to set this shot up? From what I understand, setting up the custum white balance with the filter on is a very important step……but what setting should I have to do this? How long should the exposure be on this shot? …..so many possible questions
    Im aware that my 1000d camera simply mightn’t be able to do this, but I really want to give it a try

    thanks in advance


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,424 ✭✭✭bernard0368


    This was taken a while ago. I will try my best to explain how this was done. I just tried a quick test with a 40d and it didnt work( i Think I have set the white balance wrong using Av rather than M will have a look again at lunch I am getting a green cast as opposed to a red one .)

    First I took a shot using manual of a dense tree (you could use grass) with the filter on. I then set this as the custom white balance.

    Exposure was 2-4mins I am not 100% sure. on a 400d.

    In photoshop I changed the channel mixer:
    Red channel - red to 0, blue to 100
    Blue Channel red to 100, blue to 0.

    The I just messed around with the hue and saturation till I was happy.

    look here as well

    www.stevencastle.wordpress.com/2008/06/17/tips-for-infrared-shooting-on-a-d-slr

    or
    http://www.pbase.com/dlarson2/ir_work_flow

    or
    http://www.dphotojournal.com/photoshop-tutorial-adjusting-white-balance-in-ir-photos/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,718 ✭✭✭.Longshanks.


    Thanks a million of that. I’ll have a good look into those links this evening after work.

    Just another (!!) quick question – should the grass be red or white in the first shot that you base your new custom WB on? I had originally guessed red, but if it is suppose to be white when I was totally on wrong track!
    I think I know what I’m at in PS about switching the red and blue channels….but didn’t go near curves or anything else just yet in my IR attempts.

    Hopefully there is still a bit of sun this evening!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    Here's one taken with the R72 and a Nikon D40

    4D44A1CB86A040678B2B0D97D56003A0-800.jpg

    Exposure time was quite short - 1-2 sec (at f8) it was a bright and sunny day though.

    I've never really mastered the pseudo colour images - just converted to monochrome.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,718 ✭✭✭.Longshanks.


    Thats a lovely shot. From wat i can gather your camera can handle infrared better so you can get away with a 1 second exposure but my canon needs a much longer exposure to get the same effect


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,424 ✭✭✭bernard0368


    Longshanks, to take the original image for the w/b use manual setting take a photograph of the grass as you would normally but with the filter on. In playback it will be black use this as to set the custom white balance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,313 ✭✭✭Mycroft H


    Theres an excellent article on ir and how to in this months what digital camera. I picked it up in tescos for 4 euro


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,718 ✭✭✭.Longshanks.


    Cheers for all the help people! Will swing past newsagent this evening as well as lookin at those links posted above


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,424 ✭✭✭bernard0368


    A quick one taken at lunch just to check on the previous post. 3566102003_b02df45ee9.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,718 ✭✭✭.Longshanks.


    First of all thanks for all the help so far people!

    So i had another go at a IR shot this evening. Its still not there so maybe somebody could point me in the right direction. I had a few attempts but this is the best i got before it started to cloud over and got.

    1) Pic i used to set my custom WB. Taken with filter on, pic deliberately out of focus of some grass in sunshine to avoid reduce highlights in grass. 10 sec exposure at f3.5
    picture.php?albumid=612&pictureid=3108
    Was this too orange and not red enough?


    2) original from camera. Not in focus (ingore that and crap scenery :o). It was a 60sec exposure again at f3.5.
    picture.php?albumid=612&pictureid=3109
    Look too grey?

    3) Best edit i could come up with without blowing out the darker colours. The greens should be white...any ideas where i'm going wrong?
    picture.php?albumid=612&pictureid=3110

    Hope to try a 2-3 min shot tomorrow - weather depending.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 279 ✭✭TheNorthBank


    I was using a Hoya R72 filter when I experimented with IR photography last year, I didn't do too well at it and I don't think my 400D was really cut out for it either.
    This is one I got with a 400d and Hoyar72 filter. If I am right I am sure the exposure was 2-3mins. I must try this on the 40d.
    2763577440_5225017a5d.jpg

    Oops, it certainly wasn't the 400D so! Thats a fantastic shot Bernard.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,424 ✭✭✭bernard0368


    Longshanks, The image that you are using for the custom w/b is wrong.

    Focus on the grass better if you have a tripod. Set the exposure manually with the filter fitted. The settings will be very close to the same as if the filter was not fitted. 10sec is too long. The image will appear black though. (basically as if you are taking a normal photograph) Set this as custom w/b, now make sure that you change the white balance on the camera to custom. Compose the image with the filter off, put the filter back on. Using the M setting set the shutter speed to bulb the f-stop at 5.6. Using a remote take the snap leave it going for 2mins next one at 3min and final one at 4min. Then see which works best. on the playback these images will have a reddish tint.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,718 ✭✭✭.Longshanks.


    Longshanks, The image that you are using for the custom w/b is wrong.

    Focus on the grass better if you have a tripod. Set the exposure manually with the filter fitted. The settings will be very close to the same as if the filter was not fitted. 10sec is too long. The image will appear black though. (basically as if you are taking a normal photograph) Set this as custom w/b, now make sure that you change the white balance on the camera to custom. Compose the image with the filter off, put the filter back on. Using the M setting set the shutter speed to bulb the f-stop at 5.6. Using a remote take the snap leave it going for 2mins next one at 3min and final one at 4min. Then see which works best. on the playback these images will have a reddish tint.

    Thanks for the above.....now i need to apologise in advance as i must be getting annoying now..... but i'm still having trouble. I set the WB exactly as above and got the black image i needed.

    The used this custom WB, framed the shot, reattached filter. The first pic below was for 4 minutes, but they all came out a green colour.

    NB it was bright but overcast when i took these (i don't have patient to wait for the next sunny day with nice clouds :))

    All pics at f5.6 and ISO 100

    Original after 4 min exposure
    picture.php?albumid=612&pictureid=3112

    Auto levels and auto contrast
    picture.php?albumid=612&pictureid=3113

    Revered reds and blues
    picture.php?albumid=612&pictureid=3114

    Any suggestions?


    Thanks,
    Kevin


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,686 Mod ✭✭✭✭melekalikimaka


    set the wb after you take the shot???


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,718 ✭✭✭.Longshanks.


    Yep - set up the custom WB as described above. Then turn it on and took 4 min exposure that turned out green....?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,424 ✭✭✭bernard0368


    You are on the right track here. Sun Is important in taking Infared. I found with the 40d I was getting a green image as well. When I Used auto w/b on the image in raw processing it would give the red I was used to before. I had a qiuck look at the image you took.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,718 ✭✭✭.Longshanks.


    Good to know im moving in the right direction! I'll have another go at this next week when get back from a trip that cameras aint allowed (a stag do :D). Maybe i should be shooting raw?


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,686 Mod ✭✭✭✭melekalikimaka


    yes in raw, wb correction is impossible without raw


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 9,047 CMod ✭✭✭✭CabanSail


    +1 for RAW.

    I was wondering why there was all this carry on about WB when if you shoot RAW then you just select the WB you want in PP


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,718 ✭✭✭.Longshanks.


    The penny dropped when bernard0368 & melekalikimaka mentioned raw. Changing the custom WB again in the raw converter gave the pink/red look i need before going anything else in PS. Before this i though setting the custom WB on the camera was enough but this made all images initially come out green :o

    Anyways, finally some success. Need better subject but at least now i know what to start doing before trecking off the local lake or hillside

    Cheers again guys for all your help.

    Now to figure out how to get more colour into the final pic...!

    Click for larger version on flickr
    3573204453_1ba1e117be.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 279 ✭✭TheNorthBank


    The penny dropped when bernard0368 & melekalikimaka mentioned raw. Changing the custom WB again in the raw converter gave the pink/red look i need before going anything else in PS. Before this i though setting the custom WB on the camera was enough but this made all images initially come out green :o

    Anyways, finally some success. Need better subject but at least now i know what to start doing before trecking off the local lake or hillside

    Cheers again guys for all your help.

    Now to figure out how to get more colour into the final pic...!

    Click for larger version on flickr
    3573204453_1ba1e117be.jpg

    Excellent stuff. Looking forward to seeing some more of your IR stuff now!


  • Advertisement
Advertisement