Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Libertas and a few issues with the Lisbon Treaty

2»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭turgon


    trying to bolster your reasons for a second vote

    If the no side concerns had been legitimate, why would there be a second reasons given these legitimate concerns are unchanged? If the No side reasons had been legit there would have to have been a new treaty. Instead we got a list of "truths."


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭conchubhar1


    well i would advocate that

    the commission was set up - not effective
    the yes camp was as useful as an athiest priest...

    a no, kept the status qou


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭conchubhar1


    You obviously don't. You keep ignoring the points people are making about how polls work. I posted the following in a different thread and you ignored it; will you answer it now?

    "Polling may be an inexact science, but it's based on sound statistical sampling methods, and gives a good representation of the opinions of the people as a whole. For example, the Millward Brown Survey used a sample size of 2100 people from a wide demographic range (county, age, social class, etc). The margin of error for a 2100 sample size is +/-2.1%.

    You seem to be disregarding the fact that such a poll gives a good representation of the opinions of the nation; if so, you need to give a good mathematical reason for such an opinion."

    okay - that is right.
    im not debating it........


Advertisement