Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Something Not Right

  • 28-04-2009 5:18pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,473 ✭✭✭✭


    Just got off the phone with one of my mates and he told me that his little girls foot was run over by a van earlier on this afternoon. The police were called and the 16yr driver was able to produce a full license that he bought a few months ago. One of the guards called an ambulance for the girl and then gave the boy a telling off and told him he didnt want to see him on the road again and as there were no witnesses to the accident he said there was no point in taking a statement. Now i'm not one for pointing fingers or accusing anyone of anything unless i am 100% sure but there is definitely something not right with this. This boy was not arrested and is still in the area as he passed by in the van as i was coming home. What should my friend do about this. Who should he complain to. Ombudsman, seargeant?? Any help would be appreciated.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 152 ✭✭bryanmurr


    get him to contact the guard to see what he's doin about it, he may be taking steps in dealing with it. cant arrest for no insurance, would have the expected the van be seized and the kid brought home and the JLO officer informed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,160 ✭✭✭TheNog


    super-rush wrote: »
    Just got off the phone with one of my mates and he told me that his little girls foot was run over by a van earlier on this afternoon. The police were called and the 16yr driver was able to produce a full license that he bought a few months ago. One of the guards called an ambulance for the girl and then gave the boy a telling off and told him he didnt want to see him on the road again and as there were no witnesses to the accident he said there was no point in taking a statement. Now i'm not one for pointing fingers or accusing anyone of anything unless i am 100% sure but there is definitely something not right with this. This boy was not arrested and is still in the area as he padded by in the van as i was coming home. What should my friend do about this. Who should he complain to. Ombudsman, seargeant?? Any help would be appreciated.

    how do you know the driver is 16?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,473 ✭✭✭✭Super-Rush


    how do you know the driver is 16?

    Because he lives three doors up from me...

    Heres an update on this...there was actually a witness to the accident. When he saw what happened he ran over and in his own words 'i hit him a smack and took the keys because he was going to drive off'. This fella received a phone call from a private number telling him to mind his new car in case something happens to it.
    The gardai came back half an hour ago and took the van away but the young lad is still at home.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,473 ✭✭✭✭Super-Rush


    bryanmurr wrote: »
    get him to contact the guard to see what he's doin about it, he may be taking steps in dealing with it. cant arrest for no insurance, would have the expected the van be seized and the kid brought home and the JLO officer informed.

    He is 16 and had a fake driving license, so i'd imagine he could/should have been arrested


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 923 ✭✭✭djtechnics1210


    And what exactly would you like him to be arrested for...
    the van wasn't stolen, he didn't leave the scene so its not hit and run, and id say the garda might not have known at time that the licence was a fake.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 923 ✭✭✭djtechnics1210


    Since this matter is now under investigation i don't think an open forum is the right place to be discussing it.
    If your friend feels like nothing is being done get him to ring sergeant and if no joy get onto ombudsman


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,473 ✭✭✭✭Super-Rush


    And what exactly would you like him to be arrested for...
    the van wasn't stolen, he didn't leave the scene so its not hit and run, and id say the garda might not have known at time that the licence was a fake.

    So having a fake driving license is not an arrestable offense?? Didn't know that but i stand corrected.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,935 Mod ✭✭✭✭Turner


    super-rush wrote: »
    So having a fake driving license is not an arrestable offense?? Didn't know that but i stand corrected.

    It is an arrestable offence but there is no need to arrest if you know who he is. All you would do would bring him to a station and release him immediately to an adult. A Garda station is no place for a child.

    If he is under 18 he cannot be prosecuted unless he is red starred for prosecution, usually only if he a a serious offender.

    If the child was injured he/she can take a civil case against the driver and/or claim off the mibi.

    As Dj said, if your friend is not happy contact a sergeant or the ombudsman.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,473 ✭✭✭✭Super-Rush


    Thank you for the replies


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 315 ✭✭Whitewater-AGS


    super-rush wrote: »
    So having a fake driving license is not an arrestable offense?? Didn't know that but i stand corrected.

    We dont need to arrest everyone, he can be brought before the court by means of a summons. Now i cant comment as to why he was not arrested but there could countless reasons for it. People have an obsession with this notion of arresting everyone.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,473 ✭✭✭✭Super-Rush


    My main concern was that he was still out driving after this happened.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 923 ✭✭✭djtechnics1210


    There's nothing to stop him driving tomorrow either though.
    There are numerous people driving everyday that are disqualified, have no license insurance etc.
    I know its terrible but unfortunately thats just the way it is.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,935 Mod ✭✭✭✭Turner


    In Ireland driving without a license or insurance is not an arrestable offence.

    Gardai would love if it was.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,473 ✭✭✭✭Super-Rush


    Even a fake one


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 152 ✭✭bryanmurr


    +1 Sing it from the mountain top!


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,935 Mod ✭✭✭✭Turner


    super-rush wrote: »
    Even a fake one

    That is an arrestable offence. Its a false instrument. A minor offence.

    Its the same as all J1 students get for going to america so they can buy drink in the over 21's states.

    Have seen people getting anything from €30 to €150 fines for these in the courts.

    As i said earlier if the person is under 18 they cannot be prosecuted. Only cautioned by a garda jlo officer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,777 ✭✭✭meathstevie


    Are you sure the age of criminal responsibility in Ireland is 18 ? I was under the impression the Children's Court is just a touch too busy for that to be the case.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 923 ✭✭✭djtechnics1210


    Under childcare act, person under 18 is considered child and must be dealt with as such. I.e closed court room, name can't be reported, all cases have to be directed on by jlo and dpp. Age of criminal responsibility is 10-12 but not sure exactly.... Sorry


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,572 ✭✭✭msg11


    Chief--- wrote: »
    In Ireland driving without a license or insurance is not an arrestable offence.

    Gardai would love if it was.

    Chief, not arrestable but driving without a license carries a fine, if you hold a license. Lets not forget.
    Are you sure the age of criminal responsibility in Ireland is 18 ? I was under the impression the Children's Court is just a touch too busy for that to be the case.

    I say them Children in there are repeat offenders who have been threw the JLO system a few times and the DPP has stepped it up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,160 ✭✭✭TheNog


    msg11 wrote: »
    Chief, not arrestable but driving without a license carries a fine, if you hold a license. Lets not forget.

    If brought to a court it does carry a fine but either way the child still has to go through the JLO system unless the child has already been through the JLO office and is on the Red Star list. The Red Star list is juveniles who are automatically recommended for prosecution by the JLO office and therefore no JLO referral form had to be sent to the JLO office.
    I say them Children in there are repeat offenders who have been threw the JLO system a few times and the DPP has stepped it up.

    AFAIK if the JLO office has nothing to do with the DPP. Most JLOs will never be seen by the DPP as the case would be dealt with summarily i.e. without direct DPP consent but rather with overall DPP consent such as seen in Section 49 or drunk driver cases


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 88 ✭✭pauldaly1888


    age of criminal responsibility in Ireland is 12


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 923 ✭✭✭djtechnics1210


    TheNog wrote: »
    The Red Star list is juveniles who are automatically recommended for prosecution by the JLO office and therefore no JLO referral form had to be sent to the JLO office.



    AFAIK if the JLO office has nothing to do with the DPP. Most JLOs will never be seen by the DPP as the case would be dealt with summarily i.e. without direct DPP consent but rather with overall DPP consent such as seen in Section 49 or drunk driver cases

    If a child, even if he/she is red starred and is involved in incident, DPP will not direct until they receive a certificate from JLO stating they have seen file and that child is still not suitable for inclusion in programe.

    For every incident involving a minor a referral form has to be sent to JLO officer, a certificate stating a child is not suitable for JLO is a disclosable document and will be looked for by defense in serious and even minor cases.

    It has been known for children to be brought back into JLO scheme, even if they were previously red starred


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 640 ✭✭✭King Ludvig


    Age of criminal responsibility is 12 but extends to 12-14 year olds with a rebuttable presumption doesnt it? Cant procequte someone under 14 without DPPs consent.

    Open to correction ^ ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,160 ✭✭✭TheNog


    If a child, even if he/she is red starred and is involved in incident, DPP will not direct until they receive a certificate from JLO stating they have seen file and that child is still not suitable for inclusion in programe.

    For every incident involving a minor a referral form has to be sent to JLO officer, a certificate stating a child is not suitable for JLO is a disclosable document and will be looked for by defense in serious and even minor cases.

    It has been known for children to be brought back into JLO scheme, even if they were previously red starred

    Would this still apply to Red Star juveniles who are charged or summonsed for summary cases?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 474 ✭✭civildefence


    From what I can gather the guard should have took statements from any witnesses, the girl and the driver. There should have been an ambulance called, even if she seemed ok. If someone at the scene claimed that the driver was underage, the guard would have reason to believe an offence had been committed and he should have arrested the lad on suspicion of driving without holding a a valid licence and hence no insurance, in any case the young lad should have been ordered to at least produce his insurance details at the station along with the licence. The van could also have been seized if i'm not mistaken.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 923 ✭✭✭djtechnics1210


    If someone at the scene claimed that the driver was underage, the guard would have reason to believe an offence had been committed and he should have arrested the lad on suspicion of driving without holding a a valid licence and hence no insurance,.

    Your very mistaken im afraid

    This is exactly why public get mis-informed about law when people give there 2 cents and its way off :mad:.... for the last time and its been mentioned already = there's NO power of arrest for driving without dl or insurance under the RTA

    And besides that people claim a lot of things at scenes of various crimes... and in my experience.. they are always a good bit off when you get the real picture.
    At the end of the day its a simple investigation.... its an traffic collision with a pedestrian and is investigated as such..... members of AGS can't go around arresting people for no reason.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 474 ✭✭civildefence


    This is exactly why public get mis-informed about law :mad:.... for the last time and its been mentioned already = there's NO power of arrest for driving without dl or insurance

    Well i'm sure its a different story if a fraudulent licence is produced at the scene.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 923 ✭✭✭djtechnics1210


    And how is a member meant to make that call at the side of the road?????
    How can a member decide if its a fake or not when out on the street?????????
    Have you seen how good the fakes are??? Well their very impressive.

    Member has to satisfy themselves before arresting someone in the first place, your not gonna take some other persons word for it just cause they tell you they know, then arrest your man and then end up in the high court getting sued for unlawful arrest.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 923 ✭✭✭djtechnics1210


    TheNog wrote: »
    Would this still apply to Red Star juveniles who are charged or summonsed for summary cases?

    A referral form is still supposed to be submitted, its so JLO know how many times child is JLO'd for future reference incase of HSE involvement etc


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 474 ✭✭civildefence


    And how is a member meant to make that call at the side of the road?????
    How can a member decide if its a fake or not when out on the street?????????
    Have you seen how good the fakes are??? Well their very impressive.

    Member has to satisfy themselves before arresting someone in the first place, your not gonna take some other persons word for it just cause they tell you they know, then arrest your man and then end up in the high court getting sued for unlawful arrest.

    No, i've never seen a fake DL.
    I suppose if the guards had access to a licence database on the roadside, like the one the DVLA provides to police in the UK we wouldn't have a problem.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 923 ✭✭✭djtechnics1210


    No, i've never seen a fake DL.
    I suppose if the guards had access to a licence database on the roadside, like the one the DVLA provides to police in the UK we wouldn't have a problem.

    +1
    It would be an invaluable tool for AGS if that was available to members.
    But sadly id say it will be a very very long way away


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,160 ✭✭✭TheNog


    +1
    It would be an invaluable tool for AGS if that was available to members.
    But sadly id say it will be a very very long way away

    There is the Driver Lookup to check the validity of a driving licence which is not a bad thing but for me it doesnt go far enough. A picture of the licence holder should be included in this search along with being able to search by name and DOB rather than the licence number. Maybe in time this will become available to us.


Advertisement