Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Are you BORN gay?

  • 19-04-2009 3:55pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 66 ✭✭


    I think people are BORN gay, rather than wake up one day and just make the decision to be.

    You?

    BEING GAY: 113 votes

    Is a decision that someone makes.
    0% 0 votes
    Is from birth.
    15% 17 votes
    I have no opinion.
    84% 96 votes


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,163 ✭✭✭✭Boston


    You assume just because you're not-born a certain way, you have a conscious choice in it. A person will be a number of things, some they will decide to be, some will be an accident of birth, but the vast majority they will simply develop into.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 66 ✭✭GodOfRadio


    Oh, thanks.:pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,770 ✭✭✭Bottle_of_Smoke


    I don't think anyone decides on their sexuality, its more an expression of how they feel. Therefore, yes, I'd say its something you're born with.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 124 ✭✭Broad


    Gay guys I know say they think were definitely born gay and will stay that way! I know a couple of women who thought they were straight and had boyfriends/married and some had kids but now think they are gay later in life. They think they have changed. The only man I know who married and had children but came out as gay in his forties says her knew he was gay all along but wanted a family. This is only a tiny sample of humanity though!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 861 ✭✭✭KeyLimePie


    I refuse to vote in this poll cause it's just so stupid.

    Like come on.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 50 ✭✭ecdl07


    You are not born gay. Certain issue's in your life make you gay.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 124 ✭✭Broad


    ecdl07 wrote: »
    You are not born gay. Certain issue's in your life make you gay.

    So do you think that certain issues in your life make you straight as well?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 50 ✭✭ecdl07


    If you have a normal up bringing you''ll be straight!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 831 ✭✭✭DubArk


    ecdl07 wrote: »
    If you have a normal up bringing you''ll be straight!

    So what's you excuse?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,510 ✭✭✭Tricity Bendix


    ecdl07 wrote: »
    If you have a normal up bringing you''ll be straight!

    Lol. Define what a normal upbringing is.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,835 ✭✭✭unreggd


    I still dont get the whole "its a choice" argument

    Who would choose to be something that they know the majority of the world [ignorantly] hates?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 950 ✭✭✭cotwold


    KeyLimePie wrote: »
    I refuse to vote in this poll cause it's just so stupid.

    Like come on.

    Ditto, its a topic that could be interesting to discuss but the poll is just insultingly simple.
    ecdl07 wrote: »
    If you have a normal up bringing you''ll be straight!

    Nobody could be this stupid^ they must be trolling.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 299 ✭✭Donnaghm


    Whether or not it's a result of upbringing or one's innate biological urges or a combination of both is an open question. One thing that is for sure is that a person has absolutely no say with regards to sexual preferences. It's most definitely not a lifestyle choice and anyone who thinks it is is clearing at least bisexual.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,163 ✭✭✭✭Boston


    I love the above. Oh the irony.

    Are you born gay? No, however science has proven that excessive masturbation can turn you gay.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6 GlowStickXo


    A friend of mine has recently come out as a lesbian, well done happy for her; but I've known her all my life. I've seen her with guys she was a complete and utter excuse my french, cock fiend. Now suddenly after a dry spell, she's come out to everyone as being a lesbian. Am I right in questioning this complete change in her sexuality? I myself am bisexual and I just don't understand how one person can go from one extreme to the other in the space of a few months. You can't change and forget how much a person 'was' attracted to men born with your sexuality or not, I don't believe a person can forget attraction that quick She made a choice was defiantley not born with it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,163 ✭✭✭✭Boston


    Or maybe over time men appealed to her less and less, or perhaps she realised that her motivations for being with men where wrong. Who knows.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6 GlowStickXo


    who knows, but it was most defiantley a choice.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,712 ✭✭✭branners69


    ecdl07 wrote: »
    If you have a normal up bringing you''ll be straight!

    But plenty of people who are gay have had "normal" up bringing and they are gay? And what exactly is a normal up bringing?

    I voted that you are born gay because I think that is mostly what happens but there will always be cases that surrounding environment has a huge influence on their choice!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,163 ✭✭✭✭Boston


    who knows, but it was most defiantley a choice.

    Do you believe she had no attraction to females, and then one day decided to just change?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭Aoifums


    A friend of mine has recently come out as a lesbian, well done happy for her; but I've known her all my life. I've seen her with guys she was a complete and utter excuse my french, cock fiend. Now suddenly after a dry spell, she's come out to everyone as being a lesbian. Am I right in questioning this complete change in her sexuality? I myself am bisexual and I just don't understand how one person can go from one extreme to the other in the space of a few months. You can't change and forget how much a person 'was' attracted to men born with your sexuality or not, I don't believe a person can forget attraction that quick She made a choice was defiantley not born with it.

    Maybe she was just trying to convince herself that she was straight. Any one I've talked to has tried to do the same.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    its unreal to see people say that being gay is a choice! I've known I was gay since I was 11. I come from a family of 14, 7 boys and 7 girls. It certainly wasn't the way I was brought up because my younger brother is gay. I'm 26 and he's 19 and he laughed when I showed him this and that some people think we "choose" to be gay. If it was a case of choice, I'd certainly be straight but my lifestyle is me and like a lot of things, I don't have a choice. After years of soul searching I'm happy to be me and wouldn't change it for the world. People who think its a choice need to grow up and not live in tunnel vision.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 831 ✭✭✭DubArk


    Well when I first noticed that I was fantasising about men and been attracted to blokes and not women from a very young age I did everything in my power to put such thoughts out of my head.

    I went out with women and prayed that this feeling would go away.


    If I had had a choice I would have picked straight, life would have been so much easier. Id maybe of had the family I always wanted and of fitted in through my teen years and all the rest of social normality that has been denied to me through the fact that im gay. Don’t get me wrong im happy now due to the fact life has been good and a marvellous adventure


    I had no choice ever now or then. Any of you straight guys try and imagine you making a choice to suck on dick!! Think NOT.

    Choice me arse! :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,682 ✭✭✭LookingFor


    I'm not sure if anyone can say for sure if they were born that way.

    Afterall, who remembers how they felt or thought when they were born? :)

    However you can have an instinct based on how early your first memory of a sexual thought was.

    You can also certainly say whether or not it was a choice. You can recall if you ever made a conscious choice. Assuming a young child wouldn't be in a position to make such a choice - not knowing what sexuality is - such a choice would be made later, within the bounds of one's memory.

    Only gay people are really in a position to speak about this with any authority (well, anyone can ask themselves if they chose their sexuality..but it seems gay people are the ones most frequently asked..). My personal experience: certainly there was never a choice. If I ever had a choice I would not have chosen to be gay. I can be honest about that. It's not the sexuality itself that's an issue for me, but the context we live in that makes me wish I weren't gay. It's just a whole lot easier if you're not.

    In terms of my earliest sexual memory, I do remember being 'curious' about - don't laugh - He-Man, and what was under his loin cloth :pac:At a very early age, like 3 or 4. I'd no idea that was a sexual thing at the time, I had no idea what sexuality was, but in hindsight I know it was, and thus I know that my sexuality had formed or was forming from an even earlier age than that, if indeed I wasn't born with it. It would be about 10 more years before I realised what 'gay' was, what sexuality was, and when my innocence about things and the world I was born into started to be shattered.

    Based on my own experience, and how early I can remember 'first signs', I think it's something you're either born with, or something that forms very early, or an inclination you're born with that is solidified very early. I lean towards the first or the last, between which there's very little difference. I don't think nature leaves sexuality to chance (or to your choice), it's too important to the survival of the species.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 794 ✭✭✭hot2def


    ecdl07 wrote: »
    If you have a normal up bringing you''ll be straight!

    I wasn't convinced untill I got to the !, but now I question all my life experiences.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 33 smileyhappy


    I hate not being straight, really really really really I do. If I had a choice there's no way on this planet I'd be anything other than straight. Not even the slightest chance. I wish I liked guys like I like girls. Girls are so much prettier and sexy and *sigh* :o

    doesn't mean I don't try and convince myself otherwise. Doesn't mean I don't go out looking for guys. Doesn't mean I haven't had way, way, way too many sexual partners (men) over the last few years. I just have my own deamons to deal with and right now I'm still making a half hearted attempt at convincing myself I'm straight.

    Was I born that way... well... I think that's up for debate. I KNOW I was born with TENDANCIES that way because my first crushes were on girls, my first urges to kiss anyone were for girls (boys.. ew icky :rolleyes:). In fact, a lot of teens go through a "phase" some time between 10 and 15 where the same sex appeals. For some it's just a phase. For others it's not. Honestly, I believe it's a combination of nature and nurture. I was raped when I was 15. I'd say that has a fair bit to do with my current inability to 100% trust men, and perhaps my inability to accept myself. Maybe it'd have just been a phase if I hadn't been raped? Maybe then nurture would have overruled nature, but as it is, I think nurture has compounded nature.


    edit: could the mods add some more options? Maybe like "life experiences make you who you are" and "life experience combined with genetics"?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,488 ✭✭✭Goodshape


    Am I the only one who actually likes being gay? :)

    It's who I am and, since coming to terms with it, I wouldn't change it.

    Sure there was a time (for like 20 years) that I tried my best to be the 'normal' straight guy but if I had the power to go back and change anything it would be to come out and be comfortable with myself at an earlier age -- given the wish, that's what it'd be. I wouldn't wish myself straight. While I don't put my sexuality at the forefront of 'who I am', it just seems too much of a fundamental thing to change... I've no idea who I would be if I were straight.


    And I'm fairly sure I was born gay. All my early memories of attraction relate to guys, or of convincing myself that affection for females was in any way sexual.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 185 ✭✭jady88


    A friend of mine has recently come out as a lesbian, well done happy for her; but I've known her all my life. I've seen her with guys she was a complete and utter excuse my french, cock fiend. Now suddenly after a dry spell, she's come out to everyone as being a lesbian. Am I right in questioning this complete change in her sexuality? I myself am bisexual and I just don't understand how one person can go from one extreme to the other in the space of a few months. You can't change and forget how much a person 'was' attracted to men born with your sexuality or not, I don't believe a person can forget attraction that quick She made a choice was defiantley not born with it.

    People can choose to label themselves anything they like, and they can act in whatever manner they choose either. That does not mean that your friend is being truthful to herself or perhaps that she was in the past.

    Me personally born that way... and I have hours of excruciatingly embarrassing home videos to prove it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 831 ✭✭✭DubArk


    Goodshape wrote: »
    Am I the only one who actually likes being gay? :)

    It's who I am and, since coming to terms with it, I wouldn't change it.

    Sure there was a time (for like 20 years) that I tried my best to be the 'normal' straight guy but if I had the power to go back and change anything it would be to come out and be comfortable with myself at an earlier age -- given the wish, that's what it'd be. I wouldn't wish myself straight. While I don't put my sexuality at the forefront of 'who I am', it just seems too much of a fundamental thing to change... I've no idea who I would be if I were straight.


    And I'm fairly sure I was born gay. All my early memories of attraction relate to guys, or of convincing myself that affection for females was in any way sexual.

    No your not the only one i wouldn't change a thing as stated I wouldnt of met my partner and be the person who I am and had some of the most wonderful adventures that I have had.

    Hindsight is a wonderful thing and if only back when i was in my teens that i knew life was going to be so much better then i could of ever imagined, i would of never of felt so awful about being gay!

    Society is what needs to change not me. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,035 ✭✭✭Sir Ophiuchus


    Goodshape wrote: »
    Am I the only one who actually likes being gay? :)

    It's who I am and, since coming to terms with it, I wouldn't change it.

    ...

    I wouldn't wish myself straight. While I don't put my sexuality at the forefront of 'who I am', it just seems too much of a fundamental thing to change... I've no idea who I would be if I were straight.


    And I'm fairly sure I was born gay. All my early memories of attraction relate to guys, or of convincing myself that affection for females was in any way sexual.

    Seconded. Wonderful way of saying that.

    And regarding the women's "changing sexuality" thing, a number of studies have shown that women's sexualities tend to be more fluid and more likely to change over time than men's.

    Regarding the original poll, a much much better phrasing might have been:

    I believe sexual orientation is due to:

    a) Exclusively genetic factors
    b) Mostly genetic factors, with some environmental factors
    c) An approximately even mix of behavioural and environmental factors
    d) Mostly environmental factors, with some genetic factors
    e) Exclusively environmental factors
    f) A personal choice unrelated to genetic and/or environmental factors
    g) Other (please explain)


    This avoids a lot of the problems your original wording had that, to be honest, quite irritated me and others.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,597 ✭✭✭dan719


    Goodshape wrote: »
    Am I the only one who actually likes being gay? :)

    It's who I am and, since coming to terms with it, I wouldn't change it.

    Sure there was a time (for like 20 years) that I tried my best to be the 'normal' straight guy but if I had the power to go back and change anything it would be to come out and be comfortable with myself at an earlier age -- given the wish, that's what it'd be. I wouldn't wish myself straight. While I don't put my sexuality at the forefront of 'who I am', it just seems too much of a fundamental thing to change... I've no idea who I would be if I were straight.

    What is there to like? The stigma and alienation? Or maybe the tiny selection of 'gay' pubs and clubs? How about the increased risk of early death and disease?

    You say that sexuality isn't a fundamental part of who you are, but then contradict yourself by saying you don't know who you'd be if you were straight? If you truly believed that sexuality were incidental, than you would be you.......but straight. The same mannerisms, tastes and interests, no?

    Tbh saying you 'like' being gay sounds like a desire to swim against the tide/be confrontationally counter culture manifested in sexuality. Which is exactly the arguement the 'homosexuality is a choice' crew seem to be so fond of isn't it?:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 380 ✭✭Reflector


    dan719 wrote: »

    Tbh saying you 'like' being gay sounds like a desire to swim against the tide/be confrontationally counter culture manifested in sexuality. Which is exactly the arguement the 'homosexuality is a choice' crew seem to be so fond of isn't it?:rolleyes:

    you are talking sh.it here dan. I like being gay. I didn't when I was a teen but I suppose noone likes being different when you are a youngster and you want to be part of the gang.
    But I think it is a bit of a nonarguement as its not really that I like being gay but I like me as a person. I cannot imagine myself as any other way and if I wasn't gay I would be a different person with a different life and not necessarily happy.

    Your statement above is kind of insulting like being gay is somehow a fashion or trend, it is an integral part of someones person just like any sexuality is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 950 ✭✭✭cotwold


    dan719 wrote: »
    What is there to like? The stigma and alienation? Or maybe the tiny selection of 'gay' pubs and clubs? How about the increased risk of early death and disease?

    You say that sexuality isn't a fundamental part of who you are, but then contradict yourself by saying you don't know who you'd be if you were straight? If you truly believed that sexuality were incidental, than you would be you.......but straight. The same mannerisms, tastes and interests, no?

    Tbh saying you 'like' being gay sounds like a desire to swim against the tide/be confrontationally counter culture manifested in sexuality. Which is exactly the arguement the 'homosexuality is a choice' crew seem to be so fond of isn't it?:rolleyes:

    Do you hate being gay?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,597 ✭✭✭dan719


    Reflector wrote: »
    you are talking sh.it here dan. I like being gay. I didn't when I was a teen but I suppose noone likes being different when you are a youngster and you want to be part of the gang.
    But I think it is a bit of a nonarguement as its not really that I like being gay but I like me as a person. I cannot imagine myself as any other way and if I wasn't gay I would be a different person with a different life and not necessarily happy.

    Your statement above is kind of insulting like being gay is somehow a fashion or trend, it is an integral part of someones person just like any sexuality is.

    So you like every single aspect of yourself as a person? Nothing about you that you don't like? Is it not possible that someone can like themselves generally but maybe not like say their greed?

    And again you are assuming that sexuality is so important, why do you think being straight would change you so drastically?
    cotwold wrote:
    Do you hate being gay

    I am indifferent to it. I don't think sexuality defines me as a person.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,510 ✭✭✭Tricity Bendix


    Interesting argument. Deserves it's own thread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 380 ✭✭Reflector


    dan719 wrote: »
    So you like every single aspect of yourself as a person? Nothing about you that you don't like? Is it not possible that someone can like themselves generally but maybe not like say their greed?

    And again you are assuming that sexuality is so important, why do you think being straight would change you so drastically?



    Well I don't like everything about me obviously I have flaws but in general I like myself, I think that is important for anyone.

    If I was straight I would be a different. I would have different friends, I would have had so many different experiences. My outlook on life would be different. It is impossible to know what I would be like so I dont dwell on it because I am gay.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,764 ✭✭✭shay_562


    dan 719 wrote:
    You say that sexuality isn't a fundamental part of who you are, but then contradict yourself by saying you don't know who you'd be if you were straight? If you truly believed that sexuality were incidental, than you would be you.......but straight. The same mannerisms, tastes and interests, no?

    Not quite. There's a difference between something being a fundamental characteristic and a defining characteristic. Being gay shapes you, obviously, in ways too many to count. It's fundamental to many of the relationships in your life; your friends, your partners, your family, and how you view the world. But equally, it doesn't have to be defining; you can be gay and acknowledge that it has a huge effect on shaping you without suggesting that it's the only thing that defines you. It's the difference between being "a gay man" and "a man who is gay".

    That said, I do agree with you to some extent. I think you can like yourself and who you are and not want to change it without necessarily liking being gay.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,488 ✭✭✭Goodshape


    dan719 wrote: »
    You say that sexuality isn't a fundamental part of who you are, but then contradict yourself by saying you don't know who you'd be if you were straight?
    Read what I said again. I said I don't put it at the forefront of who I am -- I don't think "gay" would be the first thing on someone's "define Goodshape" list (could be wrong! ;)) -- but I also said it is a fundamental part of who I am.
    If you truly believed that sexuality were incidental
    Well I don't, and never said I did, so that sort of rubbishes most of your post.


    I didn't like being in the closet (particularly when it was hiding from myself). It's stressful, emotionally draining, confusing and all-round kinda horrible experience. I wouldn't wish that on anyone.

    Actually being gay I've found to be a lot better. I'm happy with the person I am, the friends I have, I like willys and naked men and to be perfectly ****ing honest I do like being a little bit 'different'.

    At this stage in the game I wouldn't change it, and I don't see why I shouldn't be allowed to like it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,488 ✭✭✭Goodshape


    shay_562 wrote: »
    I think you can like yourself and who you are and not want to change it without necessarily liking being gay.
    This is true. I don't mean to be on a pedestal above those who weigh up the options and decide the grass might be greener on the other side, but I've never been one to do that.

    Being gay isn't something that can be changed (whether I've grown to like it or not, it certainly wasn't a choice. I didn't choose to be Irish either... but I like that too) but imo it opens up a whole range of experiences which the 'normal straight bloke' simply isn't ever going to have. That's a plus for me.

    You can always look at the negatives (we're a tiny little nation with rotten weather, high prices and a ****ty health service) and over at the other side (UK is huge world player, London biggest city in Europe, world famous, free health care) but there's always another side to that coin.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 950 ✭✭✭cotwold


    dan719 wrote: »
    I am indifferent to it. I don't think sexuality defines me as a person.

    Do you like the person you are? If you could change your sexuality would you?

    If you're happy with yourself as a person and how your relevant characteristics have shaped who you are by extension you can say you're happy you're gay or 'you like to be gay'.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,597 ✭✭✭dan719


    cotwold wrote: »
    Do you like the person you are? If you could change your sexuality would you?

    If you're happy with yourself as a person and how your relevant characteristics have shaped who you are by extension you can say you're happy you're gay or 'you like to be gay'.

    I am in a bit of a rush so will address other points this eve, but this post is utter rubbish.

    If I am happy with who I am in general then I can say I am happy to be gay? How about if I am happy with myself in general, can I say I am happy to be greedy (or whatever trait you wish to choose)? Your logic is completely flawed.

    Regarding the first part of your post? Hmm no and yes. I believe there is always room for self-improvement and I can't understand why anyone would not choose to be straight if given the opportunity. Unless of course my earlier point about counter culture is a bit truer than you claimed.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 950 ✭✭✭cotwold


    dan719 wrote: »
    I am in a bit of a rush so will address other points this eve, but this post is utter rubbish.

    If I am happy with who I am in general then I can say I am happy to be gay? How about if I am happy with myself in general, can I say I am happy to be greedy (or whatever trait you wish to choose)? Your logic is completely flawed.

    Its flawed if you perceive the trait as negatively as something like greed. Personally speaking being gay and being has contributed both positively and negatively to my life and growth, on one side i've felt marginalised or excluded at times and as you said before "tiny selection of 'gay' pubs and clubs? How about the increased risk of early death and disease? ". However on the other side of things straight people deal with those issues as well and a lot of the negative aspects have allowed me become stronger, im more confident after having stood up as my own person. No straight person i know has had to do anything as courageous as come out. I'm a better person for it.

    dan719 wrote: »
    Regarding the first part of your post? Hmm no and yes. I believe there is always room for self-improvement and I can't understand why anyone would not choose to be straight if given the opportunity. Unless of course my earlier point about counter culture is a bit truer than you claimed.

    Well that exhibits a major issue you have with yourself and i'm not trying to be faceteous. Firstly you said you'd change your sexuality if you could but you're totally contradicting yourself when you said earlier you were indifferent to it.

    Secondly as for the room for self improvement this is just terrible, i'd like to know what you'd actually think would change if you were straight and how you're life would 'improve'. You're a total victim of heteronormativity, you're comments about counter culture totally reinforce it as well.

    I'm not trying to be mean or discredit you in saying this but you're obviously not in a good place mentally if you're not happy with who you are and you might benefit from talking this all out with a professional counselor or even your gp.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,597 ✭✭✭dan719


    cotwold wrote: »
    Its flawed if you perceive the trait as negatively as something like greed. Personally speaking being gay and being has contributed both positively and negatively to my life and growth, on one side i've felt marginalised or excluded at times and as you said before "tiny selection of 'gay' pubs and clubs? How about the increased risk of early death and disease? ". However on the other side of things straight people deal with those issues as well and a lot of the negative aspects have allowed me become stronger, im more confident after having stood up as my own person. No straight person i know has had to do anything as courageous as come out. I'm a better person for it.

    When did I say greed is negative? Why are you putting your own preconceptions on to traits? Should we not encourage greedy people to accept themselves and be happy? :rolleyes: After all it is not 'through the benevolance of the baker' we expect to be fed but rather as a result of their self interest.

    What would you consider to be as 'courageous' as 'coming out'? Going to war? Fighting cancer? Where in the grand scheme of things does your act rank? The idea that verbalising your sexuality makes you a better person is pathetic IMO.


    cotwold wrote: »
    Well that exhibits a major issue you have with yourself and i'm not trying to be faceteous. Firstly you said you'd change your sexuality if you could but you're totally contradicting yourself when you said earlier you were indifferent to it.

    Secondly as for the room for self improvement this is just terrible,

    It's facetious, it's the only word in the English language that has all the vowels in alphabetical order. *Not trying to be grammar Nazi*

    Regards my supposed contradiction, I am indifferent to it now. Does that preclude me, were the option avaliable, from deciding to change. I am of average weight, and am not particularly concerned. If I choose to change that in the future, am I I make, be made in reference to decisions and feelings in the past? Or can I look at things anew? (Not to mention you messed up your chronological order above)

    Where did I say that changing one's sexuality would be a form of self-improvement? I answered the question 'do I like myself', with the response that I was not wiling to be self satisfied in myself and would strive for self improvement (implying in all areas of my life). My sexuality is incidental to this.
    You're a total victim of heteronormativity, you're comments about counter culture totally reinforce it as well.

    Psuedoscientific much? Sorry to burst your bubbe, but in terms of sexual orientation heterosexuality IS normal, where normal means practised by the majority of the population. Claiming this to be some sort of vast conspiracy against gay people is simply paranoia, and the word itself has been stripped of it's original meaning with regard to Queer theory (literary theory).
    I'm not trying to be mean or discredit you in saying this but you're obviously not in a good place mentally if you're not happy with who you are and you might benefit from talking this all out with a professional counselor or even your gp

    Personal abuse much? You don't agree with me, so I must be depressed right? Is it not possible I just don't give a damn? Sorry I don't fufill your view of what a 'gay' person should be or should feel. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,035 ✭✭✭Sir Ophiuchus


    dan719 wrote: »
    Psuedoscientific much? Sorry to burst your bubbe, but in terms of sexual orientation heterosexuality IS normal, where normal means practised by the majority of the population. Claiming this to be some sort of vast conspiracy against gay people is simply paranoia, and the word itself has been stripped of it's original meaning with regard to Queer theory (literary theory).


    I had been planning to stay out of this, but Queer theory is a particular interest of mine, so I feel obligated to get involved.

    You are failing to make a distinction between "the norm" and "normal". If something is the norm, it is done by a majority of people. This could be anything from desiring someone of the opposite sex to eating white versus brown bread. The word "normal" on the other hand, carries connotations of "acceptable", "usual", "appropriate", and "right", and thus shouldn't be used the way you're using it.

    The concept of "heteronormativity" doesn't ignore the fact that heterosexuality is more common than other forms of sexuality - what it takes issue with is the presentation of heterosexuality as the "standard pattern" from which all else is a deviation. For example, when I filled out a survey at the TCD Sports Centre about my reasons for exercising, one of the options were "to make yourself more attractive to the opposite sex". That is what heteronormativity is - denying the possibility of alternates. (To the researcher's credit, she apologised when I pointed it out, and said other people had told her the same thing.)

    In summary, heterosexuality is the norm, it is not necessarily "normal".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭elekid


    dan719 wrote: »
    What would you consider to be as 'courageous' as 'coming out'? Going to war? Fighting cancer? Where in the grand scheme of things does your act rank? The idea that verbalising your sexuality makes you a better person is pathetic IMO.

    It's not so much verbalising your sexuality as choosing to face adversity in your life and deal with it that makes you a better person. Whether it's fighting cancer or going to war, or something less life threatening like accepting your sexuality and "coming out", these are the kinds of difficult experiences in life that people learn and grow from.

    As you said yourself:
    dan719 wrote: »
    What is there to like? The stigma and alienation?
    dan719 wrote: »
    In terms of sexual orientation heterosexuality IS normal

    Whatever a persons reasons are, coming out or at least being honest about being gay, does require some measure of courage regardless of how it compares to other challenges in life. Knowing you've been through something you found difficult and "survived" can give you a strong sense of strength and self-worth. I'd imagine that's part of what people mean when they say being gay has influenced who they are, without that having to define them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,597 ✭✭✭dan719


    I had been planning to stay out of this, but Queer theory is a particular interest of mine, so I feel obligated to get involved.

    Whatever.:rolleyes:
    You are failing to make a distinction between "the norm" and "normal". If something is the norm, it is done by a majority of people. This could be anything from desiring someone of the opposite sex to eating white versus brown bread. The word "normal" on the other hand, carries connotations of "acceptable", "usual", "appropriate", and "right", and thus shouldn't be used the way you're using it.

    (Norm) The usual or standard thing. 2. A required or acceptable standard.

    (Normal) Conforming to a standard;usual, typical or expected.

    Wow your so right. They are completely different and not at all similar. My argument obviously collapses straight away.:rolleyes:
    The concept of "heteronormativity" doesn't ignore the fact that heterosexuality is more common than other forms of sexuality - what it takes issue with is the presentation of heterosexuality as the "standard pattern" from which all else is a deviation. For example, when I filled out a survey at the TCD Sports Centre about my reasons for exercising, one of the options were "to make yourself more attractive to the opposite sex". That is what heteronormativity is - denying the possibility of alternates. (To the researcher's credit, she apologised when I pointed it out, and said other people had told her the same thing.)

    And you had to point it out to her? Did you wear a nice big t-shirt proclaiming your sexuality too? Maybe it simply was an oversight? See my earlier point about paranoia.

    And it is pretty much undeniable that heterosexuality is the normal pattern, and that other orientations are a deviation (that is are not the norm- wouldn't want you to think that I was describing homosexuality as deviant)
    In summary, heterosexuality is the norm, it is not necessarily "normal".

    See above.

    I'll finish this off later, I have work to do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 950 ✭✭✭cotwold


    Dan 719, Sir Ophiuchus made a perfectly reasonable point and phrased it as simply as possible.

    You still couldnt understand. You've obviously made up your mind as to whos right in this argument. You're just retaliating gratuitously at this stage and being obnoxious.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,601 ✭✭✭Marshy


    This argument is going around in circles tbh.

    Without wanting to sound clichéd, I don't think there's any set way someone should feel about being gay. To some its an integral part of their personality, to others its not. That said I do have serious issues with people trying to actively hide their orientation in most cases.

    Obviously if someone is deeply unhappy with themselves(because of their sexuality), they ought be helped, whether that means fully coming to terms with their sexuality or not. But I believe there's a difference between this self-loathing and one simply preferring to be straight if they had another chance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,764 ✭✭✭shay_562


    cotwold wrote:
    You're just retaliating gratuitously at this stage and being obnoxious.

    ...this from the guy who, 10 posts back, was questioning dan_719's mental health and suggesting he see a counsellor? 'Cause that's not gratuitous, obnoxious or a personal attack at all...

    To weigh in, I reckon he has a point. Heterosexuality is normal. So is having brown hair. So is being right-handed. Deviation =/= A Bad Thing. Deviations are what make the world interesting. That said...
    dan 719 wrote:
    And you had to point it out to her? Did you wear a nice big t-shirt proclaiming your sexuality too? Maybe it simply was an oversight? See my earlier point about paranoia.

    Yeah, actually, if he found the question kinda annoying, he did have to point it out to her. It's not being overly militant to point out when something has the potential to offend or marginalise, and from what Sir Ophicius said, he wasn't the first one to mention it and likely won't have been the last. Gay rights and freedoms don't just appear out of nowhere, and it's people like Sir O being willing to stand up for the little insidiuous things like that that make the big stuff possible. I say fair play to him.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 43,045 ✭✭✭✭Nevyn


    Some people will always find something to not be happy about themselves.
    Be it thier hair is not blonder, they are not taller, they cant' sing, or thier sexual orinatation.

    IF they let any of the above stop them from being happy in thier lives then tbh I feel sorry for them.

    heteronormativity is a right pain tbh and this country has a long way to go before it
    is more inclusive.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,597 ✭✭✭dan719


    cotwold wrote: »
    Dan 719, Sir Ophiuchus made a perfectly reasonable point and phrased it as simply as possible.

    You still couldnt understand. You've obviously made up your mind as to whos right in this argument. You're just retaliating gratuitously at this stage and being obnoxious.

    He made two points.

    One was based on the perceived difference between the definitions of normal and the norm. This I disagred with by quoting the corresponding definitions from the oxford dictionary.

    Secondly he defined heteronormativity as a situation where anything outside 'the norm' is excluded. I suggested this was not part of a 'campaign of hate' since heterosexuality is normal. I also suggested that his example was simply him being oversensitive and wearing his sexuality as a badge.

    Please do not question my understanding when I have replied to the points made. If you require a simplified and explicit version of every post, I am afraid I can't help you there.

    P.S I didn't realise this was an argument. I mean I don't like the connotations of the word argument, whyu can't we consider the alternative 'a frank exchange of views.'


  • Advertisement
Advertisement