Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

What have you watched recently?

Options
1252253255257258331

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,556 ✭✭✭Nolanger


    Voyage to the planet of prehistoric women - director was Peter Bogdanovich using a different name. As bad as it sounds.


  • Administrators, Computer Games Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 32,212 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Mickeroo


    I sort of disagree that the legal system stuff is uninteresting - I think it's what gives the film a more general relevancy and 'point' so to speak. What really gives it a push from personal letter to relevant public statement. But I do agree it's the human drama that is more involving.

    More than anything, I think it's a film that needs to remain a one-off. While true objectivity is probably impossible to achieve, good documentary makers need to embrace multiple view points. It's what separates Errol Morris - and Tabloid is a recent stellar example of using multiple perspectives to tell an (ahem) 'true' story in a surprising, 'Rashomon-esque' way - from, say, Religiluous (a film whose perspective I generally agree with, but was taken aback by its childish selective editing). Dear Zachary is defined by the director's self-interest, but if anything but a small minority of documentary film-making was that way it would be an unwelcome trend.

    I know it sounds cynical, but it's just one little aspect of an otherwise hugely involving film - lest I need to stress again that it was a fascinating achievement in many, many ways - that left a wee sour taste.

    I agree that documentaries should generally try to be as objective as possible but I don't really think it really had any place in Dear Zachary since the film was
    a tribute to his dead friend
    and I think the main reason it works so well is it does a good job of getting the viewr to empathise with the family and friends.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,763 ✭✭✭crushproof


    Watched Red Dog tonight. Lovely heart warming story about a dog in western Oz back in the 70's... based on a true story. Very funny, as well as being an emotional rollercoaster!
    Highly recommended to anyone who has a dog!


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,113 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    The Hitcher (2007)

    My god, this has to go down as one of the worst remakes in recent history. An utterly wretched film that isn't a patch on the 80's original in any way. Sean Bean is the eponymous character this time around, but while he’s a good actor, he completely lacks the menace of Rutger Hauer in the 1986 version.

    Michael Bay should be shot for his cinematic abuse and this is just another crime in his long list of film crimes.


    0/10



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,065 ✭✭✭Tipsy McSwagger


    I was sick yesterday so watched a film called Quest For Fire on Movies4Men while in bed. Have to say it was brilliant and I have set skyplus to record it on Saturday morning.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 105 ✭✭Robotnic


    Tony EH wrote: »
    The Hitcher (2007)

    Michael Bay should be shot for his cinematic abuse and this is just another crime in his long list of film crimes.


    You sure its Michael Bay, I only noticed 1 shot with camera pointing towards sky, 4 vechicles flipping through the air and 2 or 3 explosions:D!


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,295 ✭✭✭✭Duggy747


    Misery

    Hadn't seen it in years and wondered how it held up. Still a solid movie with a freaky but excellent performance from Kathy Bates frequently battering the shìte out of poor James Caan. :pac:

    The lads hadn't seen it before so it was funny to see their reactions to
    The sledgehammer to the feet bit


  • Registered Users Posts: 51,342 ✭✭✭✭That_Guy


    The Descendants:

    Really excellent film. I wouldn't class myself as a huge George Clooney fan but he was superb in this.
    When it's funny it's hilarious and when it's sad it's very sad. I have no qualms in saying that I shed the odd tear here and there.

    The character of Sid is really important for the emotive balance of the film in my opinion. A bit like Seth Rogen's character in 50/50. If you've seen both you might understand that a bit better.

    I'd highly recommend this myself.


  • Registered Users Posts: 42 Precious1


    crushproof wrote: »
    Watched Red Dog tonight. Lovely heart warming story about a dog in western Oz back in the 70's... based on a true story. Very funny, as well as being an emotional rollercoaster!
    Highly recommended to anyone who has a dog!

    I would say "Red Dog" is a film which will grab a viewer and keep them glued to their seat,whether they have a pooch or not. :]


  • Registered Users Posts: 829 ✭✭✭OldeCinemaSoz


    I well loved the BONANZA episode this
    morning on TG4 I did...

    the one with John Vernon...he
    of DIRTY HARRY and THE OUTLAW JOSY WALES...

    a gentleman of an actor. And he's appeared in some
    of the greats like POINT BLANK I think.

    You won't get smarter than that?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,224 ✭✭✭✭Marty McFly


    Backdraft: Id seen bit and pieces of this before but never got around to watching it from start to finish, and must say its a great film. My how I miss Kurt Russell these days he has a great on screen presence. Ron Howard does an incredible job with action, drama and romance all rolled into one.

    Priest: Meh it was ok a bit dissappointed I must admit after seeing the trailer I thought it looked amazing but it never really grabs hold of you theres no depth to the story. Its ok as an action film to watch for a couple of hour but dont expect anything special from it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,602 ✭✭✭emzolita


    the Film Four film Chatroom. It's seriously under-rated by critics. I seen it in the pictures in London last year, then downloaded it again this week to re-watch. It's a very interesting, and clever, psych-thriller.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,556 ✭✭✭Nolanger


    Bride of the gorilla - jungle horror with Raymond Burr turning hairy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,113 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Robotnic wrote: »
    You sure its Michael Bay, I only noticed 1 shot with camera pointing towards sky, 4 vechicles flipping through the air and 2 or 3 explosions:D!

    Michael Bay lite!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,302 ✭✭✭JohnMearsheimer


    I watched Felon last night. It was ok, not amazing or anything. It chugged along.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,295 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    Finally got around to the second half of You Can Count on Me. One of the strongest 'traditional' screenplays I've come across. Brilliantly realised characters and a very intelligent narrative (where even the perhaps expected resolutions play out in unusual and subtle ways) stand out. Linney and Ruffalo are superb, and it's the rare film that is highly accessible while also having lots of depth, humour and a surprisingly emotional core.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,973 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    Just watched The Incredible Hulk (2008). I have to say I wasn't impressed. Edward Norton is good in the Brazil & travelling scenes at the start, but doesn't have much to do later. Liv Tyler's sole job seems to calm him down when he turns green, and Tim Roth is miscast. (He's supposed to be a US soldier, but even if you're a specialist, you're still expected to shave and get a haircut!). I think I prefer Ang Lee's Hulk - hope it's on TV again soon.

    From out there on the moon, international politics look so petty. You want to grab a politician by the scruff of the neck and drag him a quarter of a million miles out and say, ‘Look at that, you son of a bitch’.

    — Edgar Mitchell, Apollo 14 Astronaut



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,923 ✭✭✭kearneybobs


    Watched The Prestige for the....ah who knows how many times I've watched it. Nolan's finest film and quite simply a masterpiece to me.
    It gets even better with multiple viewings. Never tire of it. Fantastic.


  • Administrators, Computer Games Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 32,212 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Mickeroo


    bnt wrote: »
    Just watched The Incredible Hulk (2008). I have to say I wasn't impressed. Edward Norton is good in the Brazil & travelling scenes at the start, but doesn't have much to do later. Liv Tyler's sole job seems to calm him down when he turns green, and Tim Roth is miscast. (He's supposed to be a US soldier, but even if you're a specialist, you're still expected to shave and get a haircut!). I think I prefer Ang Lee's Hulk - hope it's on TV again soon.

    I think Ang Lee's Hulk is very underrated. I don't think its a classic or anything but I loved that they tried to make a complex psychological drama out of it. They didn't quite achieve what they set out to do but it was an admirable effort imho. Having said that I enjoyed the Letterier one too, where Lee's was experimental this one embraced the source material both in terms of the comic and the Bill Bixby tv show and I thought it was heaps of fun. I think it fit into the Marvel universe nicely too and thought the cast was great for the most part. Would love if they got to make the sequel with Tim Blake nelson playing The Leader.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,549 ✭✭✭✭Judgement Day


    Pale Rider (1985) just now on TG4 ...hits the spot every time.

    clint.pale.rider.jpg

    'You.....' :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 504 ✭✭✭SVG


    Mickeroo wrote: »
    I think Ang Lee's Hulk is very underrated. I don't think its a classic or anything but I loved that they tried to make a complex psychological drama out of it. They didn't quite achieve what they set out to do but it was an admirable effort imho.

    It's definitely one of the most interesting superhero films, isn't it? I think it's a good Bruce Banner film but not a good Hulk film. I loved all the relationship parts but every time he turned into the Hulk, I just lost all interest. I don't think it's the only film with this problem but the fact that the human stuff was so good made the other parts look kind of bad in comparison.

    And they've gotten such good actors to play the character- Eric Bana, Edward Norton, and now Mark Ruffalo- but they never actually get to play "the Hulk", so you have an interesting actor playing Bruce Banner and then a computer generated Hulk. I just find it hard to care as much about a cgi blob as I do about a person but I suppose there's not really another way of doing it. Maybe they should go back to the green paint.:D


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,543 ✭✭✭✭Snake Plisken


    Mickeroo wrote: »
    I think Ang Lee's Hulk is very underrated. I don't think its a classic or anything but I loved that they tried to make a complex psychological drama out of it. They didn't quite achieve what they set out to do but it was an admirable effort imho. Having said that I enjoyed the Letterier one too, where Lee's was experimental this one embraced the source material both in terms of the comic and the Bill Bixby tv show and I thought it was heaps of fun. I think it fit into the Marvel universe nicely too and thought the cast was great for the most part. Would love if they got to make the sequel with Tim Blake nelson playing The Leader.

    nah it was crap Ang Lee should never have been left near it watched it again recently and still not impressed Norton's Hulk was a lot better imho


  • Registered Users Posts: 545 ✭✭✭WatchWolf


    Is "Spartacus" by Stanley Kubrick worth checking out?


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,113 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    WatchWolf wrote: »
    Is "Spartacus" by Stanley Kubrick worth checking out?

    Yes.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,113 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    'To Kill a Mockingbird'

    One of the most charming and facsinating films about childhood/racism/growing up/the deep south you will ever see. Haper Lee's excellent (and only) novel is turned into a wonderful film here by Robert Mulligan and the main characters are rendered beautifully by an excellent Gregory Peck, Philip Alford and (especially) Mary Badham.

    For a relatively long and winding film, 'To Kill a Mockingbird' is never boring and it's journey is always an interesting one. The mystery of "Boo Radley" sits perfectly with the almost standard (by hard hitting for the time) courtroom drama featuring the alledged rape of a white girl by a black man in a small Alabama town in the early 30's.

    There just isn't a bum note hit in the entire running time. It's one of the greatest American movies of all time and has been rightly preserved in the United States National Film Registry for being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant."



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,224 ✭✭✭✭Marty McFly


    Tony EH wrote: »
    'To Kill a Mockingbird'

    One of the most charming and facsinating films about childhood/racism/growing up/the deep south you will ever see. Haper Lee's excellent (and only) novel is turned into a wonderful film here by Robert Mulligan and the main characters are rendered beautifully by an excellent Gregory Peck, Philip Alford and (especially) Mary Badham.

    For a relatively long and winding film, 'To Kill a Mockingbird' is never boring and it's journey is always an interesting one. The mystery of "Boo Radley" sits perfectly with the almost standard (by hard hitting for the time) courtroom drama featuring the alledged rape of a white girl by a black man in a small Alabama town in the early 30's.

    There just isn't a bum note hit in the entire running time. It's one of the greatest American movies of all time and has been rightly preserved in the United States National Film Registry for being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant."



    +1 on everything you just said an amazing film I remember first seeing this in school as part of my junior cert we had to read the book going back a few years now:o, but its a film that always stuck with me some great performances and a filmthat is equel to the book aswell.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,113 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    'V for Vendetta'

    Boringly "stylish" with a childish, quasi, anarcho-liberal "political" message that is reduced to a laughable degree. 'V for Vendetta' was lauded in some quarters as a highly charged comment on the evils of a totalitarian government and the righteousness of its victims. It's completely absent of any gray area and is idiotic in its portrayal of both factions at the heart of the piece, where it would have been far more powerful and poignant if it had blurred the lines a little. Unfortunately, the Wachowski bros have proven themselves incapable of producing a film that could encompass such paradigms.

    What we are left with is a tedious display of the obvious. The "bad guys" are so presentably bad, it's utterly incredible that they would ever hold power, the "good guy" is a ridiculous semi-super hero, fond of quoting the Bard to show that he's...well, like...ya know...smart'n'all...and the story plays out like it was written by some first year University student that had just discovered a book by Chomsky, but had completely missed what he had to say.

    Having not read the Alan Moore graphic novel, I cannot be qualified to comment on how well the Brothers Wachowski have transferred the comic's panels to the screen. But, I would venture so far as to say that I'd guess that the majority of its fans weren't that happy with the cinematic result. Moore, incidentally, distanced himself from the project altogether. Certainly not a good sign.

    Besides the rather silly and inept "political" umph, it lacks terribly in the acting department too. Natalie Portman is woefully miscast and has a dreadful "British" accent to boot. Portman can be quite good in roles, but here she is just simply out of her depth and it's painfully on display. There are good moments from her, but like the rest of the cast, she occupies areas of the film that leave the viewer (ahem...me) irritated and I genuinely like her as an actress. Likewise, John Hurt hams it up as the leader of some farcical neo-Christian Fascist/Nazi party that is portrayed to an absurd degree. So ridiculous is the organisation he is part of, that any real political message that the story would wish to convey, is left rotting beneath the ham-fisted punch by which it is delivered. Stephen Rea tries hard as the essentially good "copper" who struggles with his handlers methods. But he's betrayed by some terrible dialogue. These missteps are spread across the entire cast.

    It's hard to take enjoyment from the wreckage that the Wachowski brothers have left in their wake and 'V for Vendetta' is just not as smart or a dangerous as it (of some of its fans) would like you to believe.







  • Registered Users Posts: 3,545 ✭✭✭tunguska


    Tony EH wrote: »
    'V for Vendetta'

    Boringly "stylish" with a childish, quasi, anarcho-liberal "political" message that is reduced to a laughable degree. 'V for Vendetta' was lauded in some quarters as a highly charged comment on the evils of a totalitarian government and the righteousness of its victims. It's completely absent of any gray area and is idiotic in its portrayal of both factions at the heart of the piece, where it would have been far more powerful and poignant if it had blurred the lines a little. Unfortunately, the Wachowski bros have proven themselves incapable of producing a film that could encompass such paradigms.

    What we are left with is a tedious display of the obvious. The "bad guys" are so presentably bad, it's utterly incredible that they would ever hold power, the "good guy" is a ridiculous semi-super hero, fond of quoting the Bard to show that he's...well, like...ya know...smart'n'all...and the story plays out like it was written by some first year University student that had just discovered a book by Chomsky, but had completely missed what he had to say.

    Having not read the Alan Moore graphic novel, I cannot be qualified to comment on how well the Brothers Wachowski have transferred the comic's panels to the screen. But, I would venture so far as to say that I'd guess that the majority of its fans weren't that happy with the cinematic result. Moore, incidentally, distanced himself from the project altogether. Certainly not a good sign.

    Besides the rather silly and inept "political" umph, it lacks terribly in the acting department too. Natalie Portman is woefully miscast and has a dreadful "British" accent to boot. Portman can be quite good in roles, but here she is just simply out of her depth and it's painfully on display. There are good moments from her, but like the rest of the cast, she occupies areas of the film that leave the viewer (ahem...me) irritated and I genuinely like her as an actress. Likewise, John Hurt hams it up as the leader of some farcical neo-Christian Fascist/Nazi party that is portrayed to an absurd degree. So ridiculous is the organisation he is part of, that any real political message that the story would wish to convey, is left rotting beneath the ham-fisted punch by which it is delivered. Stephen Rea tries hard as the essentially good "copper" who struggles with his handlers methods. But he's betrayed by some terrible dialogue. These missteps are spread across the entire cast.

    It's hard to take enjoyment from the wreckage that the Wachowski brothers have left in their wake and 'V for Vendetta' is just not as smart or a dangerous as it (of some of its fans) would like you to believe.






    Dont sugar coat it, tell us what you really think.......


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,545 ✭✭✭tunguska


    Pale Rider

    Yes its a bit of a vanity trip for Clint, I mean women (and 14 year old girls)are throwing themselves at him, and all the men all seem to be cowards. But its a good old fashioned western thats beautifully shot with an atmospheric and eerie score. Cool film.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,556 ✭✭✭Nolanger


    Of course it's old fashioned, it's a remake of Shane.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement