National Demonstration set for Feb 21... Are you participating?

Darragh29

Right, according to the ICTU website www.ictu.ie, there will be a national protest/demonstration on 21st February starting at Parnell Square at 2PM.

It's for all workers to protest at the way this government is going about making an already terrible situation, a lot worse.

I'm participating for defo and I'm not even in a union. I'm self employed and I'm protesting at the lack of a strategy to protect jobs and tackle unemployment. I could do so much more if I had some backing or access to capital. As things stand, I'm doing what I can with what I have. I'm lucky that I'm still in business at the moment to be honest, I had to close one business down a year ago and I kept others open, these are small business operations by the way, not big wealthy ventures. I've colleagues/friends who are also self employed who are letting people go now on a daily basis and I don't think it is good enough so I'm all for a good decent protest. These people cannot get access to working capital from the banks because the banks are using their capital to support extremely wealthy developers who cannot service their huge loans.

So I'm wondering, how many other people on the forum will be going and if so why will you be protesting, and if not, well then why not??? I seriously don't want this thread to turn into a public -vs- private sector, just if you are participating or not and why...

P. Breathnach

It's group therapy for the disaffected.

Permabear

This post has been deleted.

irish_bob

donegalfella wrote: »

This post has been deleted.

+1

he speaks the truth

i for one will be happy to join a protest , a counter protest to theese sacred cows who would happily bleed the rest of us dry so as to maintain thier status as europes highest paid public sector

Scofflaw

If there's anyone who didn't profit from the boom at all, but is being asked to pay for the bust, then I will support their protest. Anyone else is simply complaining that they had the gain, but don't want the pain.

unsympathetically,
Scofflaw

lods

irish_bob wrote: »

+1

he speaks the truth

i for one will be happy to join a protest , a counter protest to theese sacred cows who would happily bleed the rest of us dry so as to maintain thier status as europes highest paid public sector

+ 2 , good post

murphaph

Great post donegallfella-sums up my feelings entirely. The country and the people NEED this recession to teach us that we have to work hard for our prosperity and not just borrow it. This is going to be really hard for the folks who recently joined the 'property ladder' and who must now service mortgages which are well above the true value of their homes.

I would be afraid that any ICTU organised march would send the exact opposite signal to the politicians, ie that we are not ready for pay cuts and a reduced standard of living. We must tell them that we are ready for this AND that we expect the boys at the top to resign if they are in any way culpable and take massive pay cuts if they are not. No golden handshakes. No secret deals. Hard work and honesty from all is needed in good measure in this country.

thomasj

irish_bob wrote: »

+1

he speaks the truth

i for one will be happy to join a protest , a counter protest to theese sacred cows who would happily bleed the rest of us dry so as to maintain thier status as europes highest paid public sector

I presume by that you mean the government?
They earn 50% more than their british counterparts and do about 50% less work (in sitting in dail) than their british counterparts!

That is the biggest ripoff! :mad:

TDs paid far more than MPs for less work

THE new year is just a fortnight old and many more Irish workers find themselves out of a job.

But there are 166 lucky Irish workers who haven’t returned from the holidays yet, haven’t lost their jobs and have not been docked pay... they are TDs.

In the lead-up to Christmas there was much discussion over the difference in euro and sterling prices for the same goods in the same shops.

So considering that the Irish parliamentary system is a copy of the British one, how do our TDs compare with MPs, and are we being ripped off in politics as much as we are in the shops?

In 2008, the Dáil sat for 97 days compared with 155 days for the House of Commons. The Commons sat for 19 four-day and 12 five-day weeks.

In contrast the Dáil only managed one lousy four-day week during 2008.

It must to nice for the increasing numbers of Irish workers on a three-day week to know their TDs have being doing just that on full pay for years.

Naturally, TDs will excuse their behaviour by saying they have to attend to constituency business and that rural TDs have long distances to travel.

But MPs have to attend to constituency business, too, and look at the distances that Scottish and Welsh MPs have to travel.

Also each TD has only an average of 25,500 constituents to attend to, but an MP has more than 94,000.

So if MPs sit 50% more days, have longer working weeks and shorter holidays, have nearly four times more constituents to look after and have to travel vastly longer distances, they must be on fantastic pay.

Well, an MP gets the sterling equivalent of around €70,000 compared to €105,000 for a TD; a British minister gets roughly €160,000 compared to €240,000 for an Irish minister and the Prime Minister earns €220,000 compared with €310,000 for the Taoiseach. We have a deepening financial crisis and there is much debate of late on radical cuts in public sector pay and numbers, more taxes on Irish workers and calls for patriotism as a solution.

But while TDs do less work for 50% more pay than MPs, they are just not entitled to participate in such debates and make demands on others.

So for the rest of January, I request all TDs to take a hard look at themselves in the mirror and ask if there shouldn’t be radical cuts in both the numbers and pay of Irish politicians.

As an example of how radical, perhaps politicians should be paid according to the number of days their parliament sits.

If an MP is paid €450 for each day the House of Commons sits, then a TD would have his salary cut by nearly 60% to €43,650.

http://archives.tcm.ie/irishexaminer...story81968.asp

Alot of people letting these people getting away with murder!

lods

thomasj wrote: »

I presume by that you mean the government?
They earn 50% more than their british counterparts and do about 50% less work (in sitting in dail) than their british counterparts!

That is the biggest ripoff! :mad:

you can't compare the British system with the Irish one. Iwouldn't do their job. Your on call 24/7 . Just because their not in the Dail does not mean their not working.

murphaph

thomasj wrote: »

I presume by that you mean the government?
They earn 50% more than their british counterparts and do about 50% less work (in sitting in dail) than their british counterparts!

That is the biggest ripoff! :mad:



http://archives.tcm.ie/irishexaminer...story81968.asp

Alot of people letting these people getting away with murder!

...and they represent about 25,000 constituents each while an MP at Westminster represents 95,000. Reform needed from the TOP down alright!

turgon

Does the OP realize that this march is not a general protest at the state of the economy, it is simply a mechanism by which the unions hope to cling onto all they undeservedly got?

A simple analogy: if you spoil your child with candy, as soon as you stop giving candy, or expect reward in return, you will be dealing with a moaning crying little infant. The governments gave the unions a lot more candy than they were ever entitled to, and now that its drying up they are pulling their hissy fit. Boo hoo.

murphaph

lods wrote: »

you can't compare the British system with the Irish one. Iwouldn't do their job. Your on call 24/7 . Just because their not in the Dail does not mean their not working.

.....but that's the problem! The Dail is a glorified county council chamber. TDs and MPs are elected to......legislate. Their job is to promulgate laws for society. Their job does not include getting planning or a replacement hip for Mrs. Murphy down the road. They SHOULD be sitting as much as Westminster and getting laws through efficiently.

thomasj

The grievance is that the lower paid civil servants are having to fork out!

While I have no problem with that, I think the fact that people with more than me can claim allowances resulting in some cases in people with greater salary than me forking out less.

This also couples with the recommendation that senior civil servants and TDs get a 10% rise. whatever happened to the more you pay the more you earn, because of this allowance rule not enough will be collected from this!

turgon

thomasj wrote: »

The grievance is that the lower paid civil servants are having to fork out!

To pay for their own pension. I fail to see the problem?

thomasj

murphaph wrote: »

.....but that's the problem! The Dail is a glorified county council chamber. TDs and MPs are elected to......legislate. Their job is to promulgate laws for society. Their job does not include getting planning or a replacement hip for Mrs. Murphy down the road. They SHOULD be sitting as much as Westminster and getting laws through efficiently.

And I'm not so sure whether that happens or not! :rolleyes:

mike65

I may throw some cake.

thomasj

They already pay for their own pension. (6.5%)

Its not a pension levy, in that those who are not entitled to a pension (ie less than 20) have to pay aswell.

MG

I won't be participating because I don't live in La La Land

turgon

thomasj wrote: »

They already pay for their own pension. (6.5%)

Its not a pension levy, in that those who are not entitled to a pension (ie less than 20) have to pay aswell.

What do you men by "less than 20"?

I do believe I am right though, although tell me wrong if am. Up to now public service contributions to their pension have not been sufficient to fund it; ie on top of their wage they got a secure pension. And now they just have to pay for it.

NewDubliner

turgon wrote: »

What do you men by "less than 20"?

I do believe I am right though, although tell me wrong if am. Up to now public service contributions to their pension have not been sufficient to fund it; ie on top of their wage they got a secure pension. And now they just have to pay for it.

No exactly. The pension is not secure and the money is being paid (along with loads of our tax money) to allow the banks to forgive the debts of property speculators.

It should be noted that for many private sector workers the amount they pay in PRSI and also into defined benefit pension plans is not sufficient to pay for their pensions either. We all pay for their pensions though taxes and higher prices for goods and services.

irish_bob

thomasj wrote: »

I presume by that you mean the government?
They earn 50% more than their british counterparts and do about 50% less work (in sitting in dail) than their british counterparts!

That is the biggest ripoff! :mad:



http://archives.tcm.ie/irishexaminer...story81968.asp

Alot of people letting these people getting away with murder!

i mean politicians , nurses , guards , teachers , all across the public sector , wages are far higher than in the rest of europe

this country was never any richer than the likes of the netherlands , the uk , germany belguim and france , the mirrage that was the property boom and cheap credit only gave the illusion that it was , wages and prices are completly out of whack with the rest of europe
we need a new round of benchmarking , benchmark us against other european nations

turgon

NewDubliner wrote: »

We all pay for their pensions though taxes and higher prices for goods and services.

So point that they are giving out because they finally have to pay their own way is true. Greedy baxtards.

thomasj

I leave it at this I am just stunned that as this country falls down the drain as a result of

ppars
e-voting
banking bailouts and scandals
increasing wages (senior management and TDS)
tribunials
Politician claiming a pension for each department
Beverley cooper flynn
The government jet
Kildare stud
Decentilisation
The payoff of the banking ombudsman
not to mention the development sector

Just to name a few, it is disgusting that all this is brushed to a side and when the PS who worked with the public (not like politicians not showing up for dail events) some of us have sense to know how bad things are asking to share th burden and people are greedy enough in this age still not to! :mad:

thomasj

turgon wrote: »

So point that they are giving out because they finally have to pay their own way is true. Greedy baxtards.

We always have, this levy is not for our pensions! Its to help get us out of this mess!

But theyll get the estimate wrong and some other stelth tax will have to appear!

murphaph

NewDubliner wrote: »

No exactly. The pension is not secure and the money is being paid (along with loads of our tax money) to allow the banks to forgive the debts of property speculators.

Can you provide a link or even tell me where you heard that the banks won't be pursuing their developer customers for their debts? Huge mistakes have been made but I can't see any benefit for any bank in writing off debts without making every effort to recover their loans. The banks need capital. The precise mechanism for injecting capital is imperfect IMO but sadly it seems it must happen or banks will fold. The international loss to our reputation would make us like another Iceland-the IMF just a call away and would ensure this recession turns into a depression and Ireland stays in a downturn while the rest of the world recovers.

NewDubliner

turgon wrote: »

So point that they are giving out because they finally have to pay their own way is true. Greedy baxtards.

I take it that you're referring to the public sector workers? What you say would be true if the money was being applied towards their pensions. It is not.

The whole anti-public-sector frenzy whipped up by IBEC and IN&M is drawing attention away from the bank recapitalisation. You guys are getting excited about the 2bn being taken from PS workers, while another 5bn is being taken out of everyone's back pockets.

dresden8

turgon wrote: »

To pay for their own pension. I fail to see the problem?

That's the thing you see. They're not paying for their pension.

The government is throwing this money at the banks. The National Pension Reserve Fund is being thrown at the banks. Today's 7 billion is the start of it. They are bankrupting the country to bail out their developer mates. Very shortly there will be no pension money.

You may remember that the government were all about how we were in a national emergency, the situation was dire, we are screwed something must be done and done now. Public servants must take a pay cut.

This sense of national urgency lasted just until somebody mentioned that maybe those who made the money from the unsustainable boom should maybe pay some of that back.

Miraculously, it bacame "Slow down, don't act too hastily, wait for the results of the report".

What has happened is the government and IBEC have scapegoated public servants, some of whom Lenihan is now hiding behind.

They have spent the last six months on their masterplan. Which consists of shafting Public Servants. We knew they were going to do that from the start so why the long wait?

Maybe they could have used that time to come up with a proper plan instead of targetting just one section of society.

Rest assured though, once they have beaten the Public Service and split the workers, they will move onto the next sector and shaft them on a rolling blitzkrieg against the low to middle paid, children, old people and the poor. You know, the people who don't count.

Don't expect me to have too much sympathy when they come for you.

Permabear

This post has been deleted.

Darragh29

turgon wrote: »

Does the OP realize that this march is not a general protest at the state of the economy, it is simply a mechanism by which the unions hope to cling onto all they undeservedly got?

A simple analogy: if you spoil your child with candy, as soon as you stop giving candy, or expect reward in return, you will be dealing with a moaning crying little infant. The governments gave the unions a lot more candy than they were ever entitled to, and now that its drying up they are pulling their hissy fit. Boo hoo.

From what I can make out about the protest on www.ictu.ie this protest is not for public sector workers exclusively, although the ICTU says that this issue of the public sector levy is one of the ten points on their plan for a recovery in the situation facing us. Check out www.ictu.ie

dresden8

donegalfella wrote: »

This post has been deleted.

You obviously haven't been reading the threads where public servants are public enemy number 1 then, have you?

irish_bob

while the banks have behaved appallingly , i think its unfortunate that the banks are being used as a convenient excuse not to tackle public sector ineficency , over staffing and over pay relative to our european neighbours
the public sector has a breathtaking sense of entitlement , developed through years of being pandered to by various goverments

Darragh29

donegalfella wrote: »

This post has been deleted.

Hang on, me and the OH, we bought ONE house together around 5 years ago. We bought the house to live in and start a family in. We went to Cyprus on holiday one year and Portugal the next year and every year, we went away for a week in the sun, nothing extravagant or sexy, one week away self catering. I do not accept that our decision to buy one house and have a one week holiday once a year has contributed in ANY WAY WHATSOEVER, to the crisis that the country is now in.

Permabear

This post has been deleted.

eoinbn

dresden8 wrote: »

That's the thing you see. They're not paying for their pension.

The government is throwing this money at the banks. The National Pension Reserve Fund is being thrown at the banks. Today's 7 billion is the start of it. They are bankrupting the country to bail out their developer mates. Very shortly there will be no pension money.

:rolleyes:

That sorta nonsense doesn't help. The government ARE bailing out the banks, not their developer pals. Developers are asset rich, but cash poor. Not only are the assets worth less than what they paid for them, but nobody wants to buy them- they are the toxic assets. So the banks go after the developers and take their assets, but those assets are worthless atm- hence the BANK bailout.

As for the unions and their members- just more rolleyes for them. They were in bed with FF for the last 20 years- maybe they should of "offered" them some useful advice during that time? Instead of asking for pay hikes at every occasion maybe they should of demanded they take action on house prices, and prices in general.
Reap what you sow etc.

Permabear

This post has been deleted.

Darragh29

donegalfella wrote: »

This post has been deleted.

Unfortunately this has turned into a debate about public sector -vs- private sector workers as I had feared it would.

I'm getting the impression that there is a view emerging here that any person who feels like protesting is basically protesting against themselves, as "we were all in it". I simply don't accept this. I know I have been struggling since 2005 with business start ups and before that I worked in a 30K a year job in the private sector. I don't know how anyone can suggest that a Garda or a nurse or a Fireman should take a 10% hit.

When I'm driving around, I see more people driving 80K BMW's, Lexus & Mercedes cars and SUV's than I see driving any other type or value of vehicle. Who are the people who can afford to drive around in 80K cars???

I don't think they are nurses or gardai. So who are they???

Darragh29

donegalfella wrote: »

This post has been deleted.

There definitely was an element of Bertie Aherne throwing pallets of cash at any group who threatened to cause industrial unrest, through the benchmarking process. If we need a smaller public sector, then the answer is to cut the numbers, not levy those that are working there.

NewDubliner

Darragh29 wrote: »

When I'm driving around, I see more people driving 80K BMW's, Lexus & Mercedes cars and SUV's I don't think they are nurses or gardai. So who are they???

Banksters.

Permabear

This post has been deleted.

nesf

Darragh29 wrote: »

Unfortunately this has turned into a debate about public sector -vs- private sector workers as I had feared it would

The main instigators of this protest were public sector unions, it was impossible for this not to have an element of public vs private in it. ICTU is trying to incite unity between the two groups and there are sizeable numbers of the private sector who don't see things that way. Such is just the lay of the land at the moment.

turgon

Ok so let me try to get my point striaght, and sorry if I ve been wrong.

I am led to believe that up to now public sector workers (like my teaching father) havent been paying 100% of their pension; ie the government makes a lot of the contribution. But now this "pension levy" is being applied which I see as the workers finally starting to pay more of the overall pension contribution, right?

Now, if thats all true, saying this levy is going towards bankers is ridiculous, and its a red herring. We could as easily say that the levy is going towards social welfare, if phrased thus would people be as easy on your case? I think not.

So instead of criticizing the government for the levy, which ye do, admit the levy is ye simply paying for what ye already get for free, then stop beating about the bush and give out about the governments spending policies.

doolox

There has existed in Ireland for many years two different economies. One had a monopolistic grip on the other, sought and obtained pay rises well beyond what they deserved or the country at large could afford.
The other economy was exposed to the full rigours of international competition and was denied payrises at every turn. The formation and recognition of trade unions was denied to them. They were forced to compete for work with non-irish who have no idea of employment rights or customs of this country and give more than most employers deserve in terms of increased productivity, flexibilty and in some cases, working hours with little or no return in term of pay increases etc.
People in the private sector still work standard 39 hour week while those in the public sector work 37.5 and some work 35 hours a week.
Teachers in the secondary sector have class contact hours of 22 hrs a week.
Many professionals have similar short weeks, compare that to Engineers or other professionals in private industry who work even longer hours than the ordinary workers and all unpaid overtime...it is expected.
We have in the past lost jobs in the private sector because Ireland is too dear a place in which to do business. SR Technics is gone in North Dublin precisely because of high wages and rising costs.
The private sector workers are expected to compete with the public sector for housing, food and services etc and so need a higher wage here than their counterparts elsewhere can command in order to live.
Unfortunately, lacking the monopoly of the public sector ( cf. ESB and their recent 3.5% pay rise, and their double-digit rate increases despite cheaper oil......) They haven't enough bargaining power to get pay rises to keep pace with their counterparts in public service and many have lost their jobs as the work goes to the lowest bidder ( cf Irish Ferries and non-Irish crews......).
We are not unique in this. Many sectors in the US economy are restricted, monopolistic and lay distorted claims on the financial resources of their country but are eventually met with legal action and resolved. Anti trust and competition law is centuries old in the States and elsewhere in Europe but we haven't even started yet.
Only in the last 10 years or so have I heard the sort of challenging high prices and fighting rising costs which is taken as normal in other countries.
I think the internet, exposing as it does, the difference in price between "dear" old Ireland and the rest of the World has a part in this.
Also increased education, travel, immigration and other exposure to other nationalities and cultures has opened eyes to the cancerous rip-off paralysing our country.
In summary, the exposed private sector ie. farmers shopkeepers and other self employed people, factory workers and sevice providers in the private sector etc... need to be protected from rising costs relative to their competitors in the rest of the world.
While we need to watch rises in wages etc we also need to transition all workers to a more skilled level of work so as to meet the challenge of foreign competition. We may not be able to compete on cost but should be able to compete in terms of quality, up-to-dateness and innovation etc.
While this requires input from the government and employers in terms of planning, research time and money, it also requires a mature approach from employees which in the past many were not encouraged to give.

Muggy Dev

Great posts Donegalfella.

The ongoing outrage about the price difference between shops in the North and those in the republic illustrates how difficult we are finding it coming to terms with our present difficulties.A 50% differential is common but try as we may,we cannot reconcile it.This despite the fact that the average industrial wage in Ireland is E36,000 and the UK is 24,000UKP ,50% dearer.I don´t have the exact figures for energy but I´ll bet we´re mile away from being competitive.We are in serious denial.

Under normal circumstances Jack O´Connor´s (SIPTU) "call to arms" last week would have been dismissed as hot air.But in the context of our present predicament,it was,in my view,treasonous.

The_Minister

murphaph wrote: »

.....but that's the problem! The Dail is a glorified county council chamber. TDs and MPs are elected to......legislate. Their job is to promulgate laws for society. Their job does not include getting planning or a replacement hip for Mrs. Murphy down the road. They SHOULD be sitting as much as Westminster and getting laws through efficiently.

And who makes them do local work or they lose their job?

Us.

utyh2ikcq9z76b

irish_bob wrote: »

+1

he speaks the truth

i for one will be happy to join a protest , a counter protest to theese sacred cows who would happily bleed the rest of us dry so as to maintain thier status as europes highest paid public sector

+ Me

irish_bob

Darragh29 wrote: »

Unfortunately this has turned into a debate about public sector -vs- private sector workers as I had feared it would.

I'm getting the impression that there is a view emerging here that any person who feels like protesting is basically protesting against themselves, as "we were all in it". I simply don't accept this. I know I have been struggling since 2005 with business start ups and before that I worked in a 30K a year job in the private sector. I don't know how anyone can suggest that a Garda or a nurse or a Fireman should take a 10% hit.

When I'm driving around, I see more people driving 80K BMW's, Lexus & Mercedes cars and SUV's than I see driving any other type or value of vehicle. Who are the people who can afford to drive around in 80K cars???

I don't think they are nurses or gardai. So who are they???

of course the gardai and nurses should take a pay cut , they are far higher paid then thier counterparts in other european countries and this is not a richer country than the likes of the netherlands , germany belguim , france or the uk
this country can no longer afford sacred cows , nurses work hard but that does not make them special or immune from the sacrafices needed to ride out a rescession , guards on the other hand for the most part dont work hard but are still extremly well paid


ps, judging from your posts , its clear you have a persecution complex , this of course is common among the public sector

BroomBurner

To answer the OP's question, before all of you jumped back up on your high horses and spouted off again, I'm not sure yet whether I will be protesting.

The main reason is that the general public are still mainly ignorant as to why we would be protesting, so it would be hard to garner support.

On the other hand, I find the whole levy thing unfair. I'm all for paying my way (and I hate seeing wasters in my office whinging about having to do a days work), but the levy is weighted incorrectly.

I also think it's time to hit those on a public sector pension aswell. For instance, Bertie Ahern is getting €260,000 a year on his, €100,000 for being a TD and the balance for being the Taoiseach. Maybe that could be cut by €60,000. Neary's also.

Looks like I'll be balloted soon though on more than one days strike, so guess it's sh*t or get off pot time.

If I decide to protest, it will be based on the wholly unfair way in which low and middle income earners are being hit harder than those on more money.

irish_bob

BroomBurner wrote: »

To answer the OP's question, before all of you jumped back up on your high horses and spouted off again, I'm not sure yet whether I will be protesting.

The main reason is that the general public are still mainly ignorant as to why we would be protesting, so it would be hard to garner support.

On the other hand, I find the whole levy thing unfair. I'm all for paying my way (and I hate seeing wasters in my office whinging about having to do a days work), but the levy is weighted incorrectly.

I also think it's time to hit those on a public sector pension aswell. For instance, Bertie Ahern is getting €260,000 a year on his, €100,000 for being a TD and the balance for being the Taoiseach. Maybe that could be cut by €60,000. Neary's also.

Looks like I'll be balloted soon though on more than one days strike, so guess it's sh*t or get off pot time.

If I decide to protest, it will be based on the wholly unfair way in which low and middle income earners are being hit harder than those on more money.

id have no problem with the unions and public servants opposing the fact that the local guy working a shovel on the side of the road is paying a disproportionatley larger amount of his wage towards his pension than the local pompous ass of a judge but that arguement is at the bottom of the page in small print , the headlines appear to read that the unions and public sector are against any form of levy or pay cut at all

BroomBurner

irish_bob wrote: »

id have no problem with the unions and public servants opposing the fact that the local guy working a shovel on the side of the road is paying a disproportionatley larger amount of his wage towards his pension than the local pompous ass of a judge but that arguement is at the bottom of the page in small print , the headlines appear to read that the unions and public sector are against any form of levy or pay cut at all

Perhaps you should start reading the full text then, and not just the headlines. EVery statement from my Union, and that of the CPSU has been pretty much in line with my own thoughts.

Darragh29

nesf wrote: »

The main instigators of this protest were public sector unions, it was impossible for this not to have an element of public vs private in it. ICTU is trying to incite unity between the two groups and there are sizeable numbers of the private sector who don't see things that way. Such is just the lay of the land at the moment.

I remember back on 2006, my old man had a serious health scare. He was rushed to St. James A & E where, due to the very best of immediate medical care, he survived a medical event that should have killed him stone dead before he even got to the hospital. At the time, I had an independent garage in Dublin and a few short months after this event happened, a nurse working in the same A & E ward in the same hospital (who didn't know me or my old man), came into my garage with her car with a problem. She had just finished a night shift and told me that she had stopped off in the oratory in the hospital, to pray that there was nothing seriously wrong with her car, because she couldn't afford a major or even a non-major car repair bill.

Now this same nurse, 2-3 years later is being asked to shoulder the banks. Not on I say...

K-9

Unions don't represent most Private Sector workers.