Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

An Everyday Classic?

  • 17-12-2008 9:55pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 46


    Even though I'm not in the position to buy a car at the moment (due to moving country), could anyone give me their opinions on having a classic as an everyday runner? Can it really happen or am I being naive?

    My Dad used to never buy new cars due to the unbelievable depreciation (ie €100k car, add 3 years of use, suddenly worth €50k... WTF!), which always got me thinking - why not have a really cool classic car and minimise the amount of depreciation - but would upkeep swallow the wallet?

    Anyones experiences would be great to hear. I've always fancied a P1800 / Bmer 2002/ Datsun in comparison to a .... Carolla!


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,318 ✭✭✭✭carchaeologist


    Provided you buy a good car with good parts availability to start with its entirely possible,many people do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 688 ✭✭✭bugsntinas


    we do.we have a mk4 cortina used most days.and a beetle and 2 mk5 cortinas.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46 georgeous


    Provided you buy a good car with good parts availability to start with its entirely possible,many people do.

    Ok, so what car brands are best for parts access, or is it more 'model' specific?? ie would brands that don't exist anymore (Datsun? Jensen?etc), or more relevant to the popularity of the model - Interceptor/240z etc.

    Thanks for the reply


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,318 ✭✭✭✭carchaeologist


    Well,i have a 1980 datsun cherry FII,there cant be many left on the road and i got brake shoes and wheel cylinders easily enough from my local motor factors a month or so ago.
    If you are new to the game a beetle or an MGB would be some of the best cars for parts availibility though,they are pretty simple mechanicly aswell.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46 georgeous


    bugsntinas wrote: »
    we do.we have a mk4 cortina used most days.and a beetle and 2 mk5 cortinas.

    Mmmmm... sound. So what are the major differences between owning a classic and a new car (apart from looking a f@*K load cooler, and no doubt feeling great to drive). Do you just go to independent garages for servicing? Are there any drawbacks in comparison to new cars?

    I'm completely new to this, so thanks for your replies!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,318 ✭✭✭✭carchaeologist


    If you can find a mechanic who "gets" older cars you will be onto a winner,my mechanic is a serial collector,so it works out well.
    The differences from new cars?
    Brakes wont be as good
    heater more than likely wont be as good
    you will probably have to use a manual choke to start it
    Will probably need more regular servicing
    Often has a 4 speed gearbox,which seems unusual if your used to 5(or6!)
    Rust problems
    Possible breakdowns
    Parts availibility(dependant on model)

    But its worth it when your driving around on a good day!!:):)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46 georgeous


    But its worth it when your driving around on a good day!!:):)

    No doubt!

    Do you ever find the safety comparison ever scares you? Do classics generally need to be driven in a more 'safe' way? Any horror stories?

    Also, just thinking about rust - is there any way of 'rust-proofing' a classic? Does this get done if/when it's resprayed etc sandblasting/stripping it back to metal? Also, isn't there EU limits on lead (ie NO LEAD!) in paint these days?

    I've always kinda liked beetles, but could never see myself in one. Also can't imagine myself in an MGB, it looks too 'thin' or something. Although, as you said, on a good day I'm sure the feeling is there!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,694 ✭✭✭✭L-M


    I'd say an MgB Gt. Parts can easily be got, and they're not a very expensive car to buy in the first place.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46 georgeous


    I'd say an MgB Gt. Parts can easily be got, and they're not a very expensive car to buy in the first place.

    Do you have any experience with them? They seem to be very popular in the UK, I studied there and the MGB GT were everywhere! Speaking of which, just looking at one on classicsforsale.co.uk, and it said 10months MOT - aren't classics exempt from NCT in Ireland?

    Thanks for the replies guys, it's difficult to find info for classics newbies, great to hear from wisdom.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,568 ✭✭✭Blue850


    A Mercedes W123 from 76 - 86 , best all rounder would be a 230CE, 4 cylinder fuel injected coupe, not 30 yet though, I think they were launched in 81
    Mercedes_Benz_82_280CE_Coupe_Green_ssf11.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 564 ✭✭✭Itsfixed


    Hi

    I have a BMW 2002 tii from 1974 which I use nearly every day. Its not garaged or anything. It used to be my only car when i first bought it four years ago, and it followed two previous 2002 (carb versions). A good solution for you might be to run two cars, one a cheap, modern small engined banger (we have a 99 Mazda 1.3) and your classic.

    Careologist is onto to something with his point about chokes. I hate chokes but because this car has mechanical fuel injection (and very reliable at that), there's no choke, and let me tell you, it makes a huge difference in terms of living with car day to day. Crappy heater and less efficient brakes i can put up with, but you are unlikely to find me running a carbed car again, unless it wasn't going to be pressed into everyday service. Injection gives better fuel economy too, in the vast majority of cases.

    In terms of safety, I find I'm more careful and aware of the car's limitations compared to moderns, which i think makes me a better, more cautious driver, and with a car like this, you don't ahve to drive fast to have fun. I have an 18 month old that I pick up from the childminder in it now and again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,648 ✭✭✭gyppo


    Blue850 wrote: »
    A Mercedes W123 from 76 - 86 , best all rounder would be a 230CE, 4 cylinder fuel injected coupe, not 30 yet though, I think they were launched in 81

    I'd second that. Indeed any w123 model is a fine car. I run a 230e auto saloon, and I find it a practical everyday car. A 280 is by all accounts a thirsty animal, so maybe this one is best avoided.
    Get a clean w123 and you won't go too far wrong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 688 ✭✭✭bugsntinas


    as said a beetle is good to get parts for.a restored one would solve the rust issue and it's easy enough to waxoyl.a mechanic is a help but i don't have one so have to do repairs me self.the cortina mk5 is a nice car to drive,quite reliable and comfy.drive it like a normal car and a very solid hence why they were always used for banger racing.the best bit of advice is look around the classic scene,go to shows and see if a particular car makes you go f..k me that's nice then look into it more.i've always loved beetles and mk4 and mk5 cortinas that's why we have a few.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46 georgeous


    georgeous wrote: »
    Also can't imagine myself in an MGB, it looks too 'thin' or something.

    Just realised I was thinking of the Midget - ie late 70's with the plastic moulded bumper (seems GTs also had plastic bumpers in late 70's too - anyone want to give their expertise?) which I can't stand the look of - but having looked at a few ads there are some beautiful early 70's ones.
    Blue850 wrote: »
    A Mercedes W123 from 76 - 86
    Gyppo wrote: »
    A 280 is by all accounts a thirsty animal, so maybe this one is best avoided.

    Cool, thanks guys. I've always loved the old mercs. I'd imagine they weigh a ton! What's your MPG like?
    Itsfixed wrote: »
    I have a BMW 2002 tii from 1974 which I use nearly every day.

    I love the 2002 sooooo much. There is a guy in Ferns, Wexford who has one (amongst other classics - beside the small roundabout) and every time I go by I get envious... besides from the fact he lives in Ferns.

    Good point as well about having a modern banger - what's the situation getting insured on your classic as your main car? I thought it'd almost be a given you'd need a modern car as well, just in case, hence the thread title about having a classic every day.

    I haven't used a manual choke since... my old ride-on lawnmower! Can't even remember how it works - another good point though.

    Do you guys find that you're more hands-on with your classics then? That you know more about their engines etc than other people would about their modern cars? I think that's a lot of the appeal for me, to learn about engines and so on... might be a slight romanticised view however!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,266 ✭✭✭MercMad


    I have used a 40+ year old Mercedes for the last 9 years as an every day driver. My first one ( now being restored) I clocked up 50,000 miles with zero breakdowns. The only time I was left stranded was when the modern alarm system blew a fuse, which could have happened to any car.

    I know everyone will have theor own choice and requirements, and Carchaeologist makes some good points but the car I use now have 4 wheel disc brakes (no ABS), excellent heater & ventilation system, no choke as its fuel injection. It starts with one turn of the key hot or cold just like a modern, its has auto transmission (but can still be roll started) power steering, seats 5, massive boot, has crumble zones and side impact protection.
    Parts are widely available, I can get a service kit ( 6 Bosch plugs, Mann air/fuel & oil filters) for €50 and brake pads are €25 per set.

    The only thing is the rust, you will have to spend time checking out prospective purchases to ensure you get a rust free example, then clean it thoroughly and have it rust proofed. Then just keep it clean and enjoy.

    You MPG will be poor though, most will be in the 20-25mpg bracket at best no matter what you read.

    I would second Blue850's suggestion of a W123 series Mercedes, though 30 year old ones will be either 200 petrol ( slow but still a bit thirsty) 250 ( smooth 6 cylinder but v.thirsty) 280E (Relatively smooth + not bad mpg) or the diesel 240D (it is a plodder, noisey but decent MPG) or 300D ( 5 cylinder,smooth, not too noisey, not too slow) but the diesels are sought after especially the 300D.

    The 230E is probably the best of the bunch but as said only from '81 onwards.

    Good luck.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,648 ✭✭✭gyppo


    georgeous wrote: »



    Cool, thanks guys. I've always loved the old mercs. I'd imagine they weigh a ton! What's your MPG like?


    Its like a bank vault on wheels. Mpg worst = 17/18mpg. Mpg best = 33mpg.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,374 ✭✭✭Saab Ed


    Saab 900. Bomb proof , looks cool , utterly dependable , great heater , fantastic to drive (and super quick as a turbo but the mpg will plummit), and people always let you out at junctions. GM 1993 onwards 900's dont count.

    http://cars.donedeal.ie/for-sale/cars/843330

    http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/1989-SAAB-900-2-0-Turbo-16S-Aero-175bhp_W0QQitemZ300269675035QQcmdZViewItemQQptZAutomobiles_UK?hash=item300269675035&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=66%3A2%7C65%3A7%7C39%3A1%7C240%3A1318

    Just examples


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 468 ✭✭VanhireBoys


    The Saabs are really class. I had an '85 2dr 900i which I hacked up and down from Donegal to Galway twice a week for about a year and a half. I clocked up about 18 or 19k and it was comfortable - quiet and had that charm... It never as much as stuttered even in the worst of weather. The heater would put you out of it. It feels like you are inside a helmet with that curved screen. And 30+ mpg on the open road... They are strong and safe........

    I shouldnt have sold it... ...oh why did I sell it....!!!!!

    I am kicking myself ever since I sold it......:(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46 georgeous


    MercMad wrote: »
    I have used a 40+ year old Mercedes for the last 9 years as an every day driver....
    Good luck.

    Wow, thats pretty impressive - my Dad has had 5 Mercs now (an 88 300 TD Estate. a 91-300TD Estate, a 95 E200, a 99 E320 CDI and an 02 S320 CDI) and had unbelievable problems with ALL of them. Seems the Merc quality definitely dipped for the 90's! Great to hear about your experiences though, sounds great.
    gyppo wrote: »
    a bank vault on wheels

    Good description! Apparently my Dads 88-300TD is still rolling the streets of Enniscorthy as is nicknamed 'The Tank'! At least its presence is acknowledged!
    Saab Ed wrote: »
    Saab 900. Bomb proof

    That eBay 900 is pretty sweet, and uber-clean. I like it.
    Saab Ed wrote: »
    and people always let you out at junctions

    They just want to look at your (cars) a$$!
    I shouldnt have sold it... ...oh why did I sell it....!!!!!

    I'm guessing it the reason was female related?

    Thanks for the replies guys, keep 'em coming!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 827 ✭✭✭PaulK_CCI


    georgeous wrote: »
    Thanks for the replies guys, keep 'em coming!


    I would totally aggree with the Mercedes benz suggestions and the Saabs.

    Re: Saab, pity the 900's are still difficult to find in the 'tax/vrt' free zone, but you might consider a 99. The 99 combi coupe gives you the space and shape of the 900, but the shorter nose of the 99. A 99 feels more nimble than a 900, as it's less weighty. A 900 however, has a better dash layout and feels more comfortable.

    Mercs: the old "116" S-classes offer enormous comfort and good reliability. The smaller 114/115's are very practical too, and would be great for daily driving, with even diesel versions available.

    Other suggestions: Volvo Amazon, Volvo 140 series (144 or 145)
    BMW 2002, as suggested, but also the early 5 series is within the 30 year band now, or a very early 320/323i !

    Porsche 912 !! The shape of the 911, but the practicality of the 4 cylinder 1600cc engine, or the 2.0 fuel injected in the 912E.

    Datsun 240/260Z. Japanese reliability and beautiful styling, makes these cars superb daily drivers. But finding a good one is difficult! Other options the mid seventies Toyota Celica.

    Volkswagen of course should not be overlooked: Karmann ghia's offer the ultra reliability of the beetle, in an "Italian suit"...

    Just a few that popped into my head


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46 georgeous


    Cool, thanks Paul!
    PaulK_CCI wrote: »
    Volvo Amazon, Volvo 140 series (144 or 145)

    How about the P1800? Are they as robust? I always associate old Volvos with being pretty bulletproof.
    PaulK_CCI wrote: »
    Porsche 912 !! The shape of the 911, but the practicality of the 4 cylinder 1600cc engine, or the 2.0 fuel injected in the 912E.

    Wow, never realised there was a 912! I'd imagine they'd be difficult to find in RHD though? Or is that a stupid assumption?
    PaulK_CCI wrote: »
    Datsun 240/260Z. Japanese reliability and beautiful styling, makes these cars superb daily drivers. But finding a good one is difficult!

    Love the 240z. Just love it. It's like a Japanese E-type with a little more street styling. Is finding a good one difficult due to rust?
    PaulK_CCI wrote: »
    Volkswagen of course should not be overlooked: Karmann ghia's

    The Karmanns are great as well - and if as bulletproof as you say then no doubt a great buy.

    Here's a quick question - Just looking at MGB GT's in classifieds etc, and there are MGB's, MGC's, MGA's, MG's.... what's the difference between them all?! I can't seem to make sense it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 827 ✭✭✭PaulK_CCI


    georgeous wrote: »
    How about the P1800? Are they as robust? I always associate old Volvos with being pretty bulletproof.
    The Volvo's are very robust and reliable but with quite advanced mechanics, like front discs and double wishbone suspension. The B18 and B20 engines are bulletproof and capable of half a million miles without overhaul!! The Amazon can be a bit claustrofic for 'shorter' drivers, with high waistline, but the light steering and gearbox make well up for surprisingly ease of driving!

    The P1800 is in fact an Amazon in a coupe styling, so it has the same qualities, plus the added bonus of a twin carb setup and electric overdrive! So same engine and running gear, etc. Won;t set the tarmac alight, but you sit on the floor and it gives you a great sporty sensation, they drive and behave a lot better than an MG. The P1800S I had, I enjoyed immensively.
    georgeous wrote: »
    Wow, never realised there was a 912! I'd imagine they'd be difficult to find in RHD though? Or is that a stupid assumption?
    Unfortunately, there is only one answer possibe, and this would go for most of the cars that I have suggested: YES, very difficuly to find good examples in RHD. 912's are identical in shape to the early 911's and the only difference is the engine. Also the difference in performance between a 912 (1600cc, 90bhp) and a 911T (which is the 'entry level' 911 that most people would start off with, as opposed to the more powerfull 911E and 911S, that are much more complex and expensive! A 911T = 2.0 flat 6, 115bhp) is surprisingly small, with the 912 being lighter than the 911T, and with 2 cylinders missing at the very rear of the car, making the weight distribution a lot better :D. I have driven both and found the 912's handling better than the "T", with the only big downside that when you have to stop and wait at the traffic lights, there is no mistaking that deep rumbling 'Beetle' sound, wheras the T sounds a lot more 'potent'.

    But why is RHD so important? You limit yourself to cars that have spent all their lives in the UK, so you would end up with cars that have undergone one or more restorations, which generally doesn't help. Driving a LHD is surprisingly easy, and you would have access to a wealth of cars that have originated in sunny climates, like California, South of France or Italy...
    georgeous wrote: »
    Love the 240z. Just love it. It's like a Japanese E-type with a little more street styling. Is finding a good one difficult due to rust?
    Indeed rust is the problem. See above, however if you would include LHD cars you would have so much more candidates available. I owned a 240Z for a while, and I loved it to bits. It has a 150bhp straight 6, silky smooth, and powerfull, with a slick five speed box like only the Japanese can make. A little cramped inside, and plasticy, but nevertheless a cracker of a car, and very reliable!
    georgeous wrote: »
    The Karmanns are great as well - and if as bulletproof as you say then no doubt a great buy.
    Very reliable, because in essence, they are a beetle. So no winter worries with coolant/antifreeze :D, The only possible drawback could be the frameless windows, letting in a bit of water if the rubbers are worn, but only in severe driving rain spells. But note, this goed for most older classics in that rubbers tend to shrink and can let in the odd drop of moisture during prolonged spells of rain, if a car is kept outside. If you have a garage, then all for the better!
    georgeous wrote: »
    Here's a quick question - Just looking at MGB GT's in classifieds etc, and there are MGB's, MGC's, MGA's, MG's.... what's the difference between them all?! I can't seem to make sense it.
    Personally I am not a fan of MG's and Midgets. I think for the money they do not offer enough in performance and reliability. The only cars that bring out a smile on my face while driving them are the big Healy's, but on bumpy Irish roads I am always waiting on the next crash and bang of the exhaust against the Tarmac!
    - MG A is the old mid fifties Roadster, beautiful styling, not so practical.Quite expensive to buy. They came as a Fixed head coupe as well, but personally they are ugly compared to the sweeping beauty of the roadster.
    - MG B is the normal 'MG' the peope refer to. Available a Coupe called the MG B "GT" or the Roadster, simply called MG B
    - MG C is the MG B, but with the three litre straight 6 Austin lump squeezed in. Recogniseable by the hump in the bonnet. Powerful but dreadful handling.
    - MG B GT V8. MB B with the 3,5 litre Rover V8. This started out as conversion by a British tuning company, quickly adapted by MG. Only for one year. To be preferred over the MB C, as the V8 engine is lighter than then 3 litre Austin 6 engine!!! and it is tucked away deeper in the car, imprving the handling, but it's still a bit of a handfull to drive...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46 georgeous


    Jeebus Paul, you're just an absolute fountain of knowledge! Thanks for the detailed reply, really interesting.
    PaulK_CCI wrote: »
    911T (which is the 'entry level' 911 that most people would start off with)

    Does the T stand for Targa, or did I make a really lame attempt at trying to sound like I know something?!
    PaulK_CCI wrote: »
    But why is RHD so important? You limit yourself to cars that have spent all their lives in the UK, so you would end up with cars that have undergone one or more restorations, which generally doesn't help. Driving a LHD is surprisingly easy, and you would have access to a wealth of cars that have originated in sunny climates, like California, South of France or Italy...

    I suppose it was just 'ease' of driving, but you raise a great point and something that someone of my experience of classic cars (ie zilch!) would not have thought of/realised, so thanks a lot for that!
    PaulK_CCI wrote: »
    I owned a 240Z for a while, and I loved it to bits. It has a 150bhp straight 6, silky smooth, and powerfull, with a slick five speed box like only the Japanese can make

    Another great point, a lot of the stuff I've look at/thought of only have 4 speed.
    PaulK_CCI wrote: »
    Personally I am not a fan of MG's and Midgets. I think for the money they do not offer enough in performance and reliability. The only cars that bring out a smile on my face while driving them are the big Healy's, but on bumpy Irish roads I am always waiting on the next crash and bang of the exhaust against the Tarmac!

    So, is it fair to say a lot of the old English manufacturers aren't as reliable as the Japanese/German/Swedish? Or would that be too generalising?
    PaulK_CCI wrote: »
    - MG A is the old mid fifties Roadster, beautiful styling, not so practical.Quite expensive to buy. They came as a Fixed head coupe as well, but personally they are ugly compared to the sweeping beauty of the roadster.
    - MG B is the normal 'MG' the peope refer to. Available a Coupe called the MG B "GT" or the Roadster, simply called MG B
    - MG C is the MG B, but with the three litre straight 6 Austin lump squeezed in. Recogniseable by the hump in the bonnet. Powerful but dreadful handling.
    - MG B GT V8. MB B with the 3,5 litre Rover V8. This started out as conversion by a British tuning company, quickly adapted by MG. Only for one year. To be preferred over the MB C, as the V8 engine is lighter than then 3 litre Austin 6 engine!!! and it is tucked away deeper in the car, imprving the handling, but it's still a bit of a handfull to drive...

    Paul, are you, in fact, a car?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,501 ✭✭✭Alfasudcrazy


    Did someone mention everyday classics? Well I am a bit of an expert on everyday classics - and am trying my hardest to have an everyday classic for each day of the week. :rolleyes:

    My first every day classic was this - my 1990 Golf Gti Mk II 8v - trying to relive my yuppy youth, :o
    IMAG0055528x396.jpg

    Then I fancied a bit of French chic with my 1990 Peugeot 205Gti 1.6. ;)
    pug2.jpg

    Then a bit of Italian flair with my 1996 Fiat Coupe 16V
    IMAG0013.jpg

    Then I wanted some more Italian flair with my 2000 Fiat coupe 20V Turbo.
    P1010505.jpg

    .. and from next week I will be driving in style in this - my 1994 Mercedes E220 Coupe sportline.
    0454217001208200191.jpg

    The basic thing with everyday classics is that they will always require regular tweaking and repairs - which is why I love them so much.
    Don't expect to be able to drive an old car for six months without getting your hands dirty a few times - and you will need a good set of tools too. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,694 ✭✭✭✭L-M


    Your missing the pic of the Merc, absolute brilliant choice of cars though. Fair play to you:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,501 ✭✭✭Alfasudcrazy


    Thanks and thanks for the alert - that what you get for 5:30am starts.

    I should point out that I do have older classics but in my opinion cars older than 1990 are not going to prove suitable as everyday classics and in my opinion it would be a pity to subject rare older cars to the everyday rigours of everyday motoring. Just my 2 cents. :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46 georgeous


    Did someone mention everyday classics? Well I am a bit of an expert on everyday classics - and am trying my hardest to have an everyday classic for each day of the week.

    Haha, nice collection. Your Golf is stunning - squeaky clean.

    Good point about the hands getting dirty, I think that's half the appeal to be honest!
    I should point out that I do have older classics

    Jeebus, where do you put them all!?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 468 ✭✭VanhireBoys


    georgeous wrote: »
    Haha, nice collection. Your Golf is stunning - squeaky clean.

    Good point about the hands getting dirty, I think that's half the appeal to be honest!



    Jeebus, where do you put them all!?

    That Golf is fantastic BTW


    If you are driving them everyday then theres no problem with where to keep them. If you park them for long periods outside thats where the harm gets done.... Regular use is the secret

    I parked my focus for 3 weeks and came back and there was funky stuff growing in the gutters and window rubbers


    Anyone mention the Porsche 924...? They are damn cool with bombproof mechanicals and very easy to work on. I have an '83 Lux with 2 s**tters for spares

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porsche_924


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,266 ✭✭✭MercMad


    And I would also go along with Pauls suggestions and viewpoints, especially since he not only has read a lot of info, he has bought & sold and actually driven all of these cars he is talking about.

    I love those early Saab's too...............what about a Mk1 Golf GTI. I think I will start looking for one of those next year !


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46 georgeous


    I parked my focus for 3 weeks and came back and there was funky stuff growing in the gutters and window rubbers

    Tell me about it, I recently parked in London for 2 days (!) and came back to find my car had apparently been humped by a mound of moss.
    Anyone mention the Porsche 924...? They are damn cool with bombproof mechanicals and very easy to work on. I have an '83 Lux with 2 s**tters for spares

    Pics?! I've never been fully seduced by the 924, but then again I've never driven one so I can't really judge!
    MercMad wrote: »
    I would also go along with Pauls suggestions and viewpoints, especially since he not only has read a lot of info, he has bought & sold and actually driven all of these cars he is talking about.

    Tell me about it, what a great addition to the boards! Everyone is pitching in with some great info though, so anyones comments and experiences are great to hear.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46 georgeous


    LIGHTNING wrote: »
    Here is a photo of my 1981 924

    Wow, that's pretty sweet. Love your wheels, very slick - they're not original are they?
    LIGHTNING wrote: »
    very 70`s stylish black&white chessboard interior

    MORE PICS!!!!

    Anyone know where's a good resource for a newbie to start looking at/learning about engines (obviously at a VERY simple/beginners level!)? I'd google it, but finding what you want on the net is a needle in a haystack situation these days.

    Been looking at 240z's all over the place. I quite honestly think I'd sacrafice having a family in later life to have one. Just mindblowingly stunning. Anyone have one (other than Paul having owned one)???


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46 georgeous


    LIGHTNING wrote: »
    Here is the interior photo as requested, its pretty funky but it actually looks really decent in person. The wheels are the original 924 wheels but the inside parts are sprayed black. Alot of people hate the original wheels but I love em!

    Great, thanks Lightning. It's definitely an acquired taste, but why change it if you're not going to make it your own! Really weird, it looks like there's a 'vortex' or some other strange effect happening on the cheque pattern on the passenger door. I think what you've done with the wheels looks absolutely great.

    On another note, came across a little history lesson for Datsun Z's....
    http://videos.streetfire.net/video/The-History-of-the-Zcar_159867.htm
    Haven't watched it yet, waiting for it to download properly (BT broadband my ar$e).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,815 ✭✭✭✭Anan1


    I love that interior, very trippy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,132 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    The checkered interior was in other Porsches of the time (late 70s I think?) as well. I've seen it in 911s and 928s. The pattern is called "Pasha". Kinda groovy :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 827 ✭✭✭PaulK_CCI


    georgeous wrote: »
    Jeebus Paul, you're just an absolute fountain of knowledge! Thanks for the detailed reply, really interesting.
    No worries. I guess it helps being a classic car trader :D
    georgeous wrote: »
    Does the T stand for Targa, or did I make a really lame attempt at trying to sound like I know something?!
    The model designation for Porsche 911's can be a bit confusing, so no need to feel embarrassed... All 911's were either a Coupe or Targa, until the Convertilbe was introduced in 1982. The early (pre-74) 911's generally came in 3 engine specs: the T's (where the T would stand for Touring), with approx 110-120bhp, the "E's" (Einspritzung=Injection) and top of the range "S" (Super or Sport, depending on who you're talking to) with 180-190bhp. The later models would normally have just 2 specs, SC and Carrera... but this is generalising slightly.
    The difference in performance with these old 911's is quite large, and driving an "S" compared to a T is exhilarating, raw and sheer enjoyment, whereas a T can feel a bit underpowered. Although, we need to look at this in perspective: these cars are 30-40 years old, and even though they are quick even by today's standard, the WAY they deliver this to you is a lot more in your face, and you get the sensation of going fast while still at reasonable speeds, and this is the crucial element that is lost in these ultra fast sports cars nowadays, the likes of the Subaru's, M5's and modern Porsche's: to get that same sort of satisfaction of the feeling of going fast, you have to crank the cars up to insane speeds..... (rant over, just my 2 cents worth.)
    georgeous wrote: »
    So, is it fair to say a lot of the old English manufacturers aren't as reliable as the Japanese/German/Swedish? Or would that be too generalising?
    It's a difficult generalisation to make, and i guess personal preference is a very important factor. Generally people go after cars that they admired when they were little, because their dad, uncle, neigbour had a car they would love to have owned then, and only now can afford. I guess growing up in Ireland or the UK would automatically mean a preference for Cortina's, Austins, Triumphs, Jaguars, etc.... simply because there was hardly and AlfaRomeo, Lancia, Volvo, BMW or Saab around. From my own experience, I found that Swedish and German built cars are just that bit more robust and the engines and electronics are better finished and protected, which means they keep up better in those harsh (i.e. wet!!!) Irish winters (make that Autumns!!).
    georgeous wrote: »
    Paul, are you, in fact, a car?
    No, I just buy and sell them :D

    I think that generally speaking, if you are looking for a classic to use on a daily basis, it is possible, but you will need to make sure that you know what you are going to get yourself into as you will be stepping back in time. If you choose wisely, and get your hands on a good car, it will be a mostly pleasant experience, but you MUST learn to get your hands dirty yourself, start to learn something about 'trouble shooting' so that you can easily recognise a potential problem, and be prepared to live with some of the lesser appealing things like bad heaters/no rear windscreen demister.

    I think your first priority is not as much determine what model to choose, but ask yourself what you are after. It is purely a Tax/VRT/NCT exempt driver that has to be as reliable as possible, how much comfort are you prepared to give up for the sake of driving a classic car. Do you have a garage or not, what is your budget roughly, will you ever need to take passengers, how much of a distance to travel, etc. Once you've answered those, you can narrow things down a bit, as it's nice to dream about a 912 for example, but you will have to bring around 15k nowadays for a good one, and if your budget is only 5, that rules it out immediately.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 468 ✭✭VanhireBoys


    Good Advice there Paul...! Thats a nice rundown of the different 911's. I didnt know that - Everyday is a school day ....!

    Love that 924 BTW LIGHTNING

    For LIGHTNING and georgeous
    My 924 on a rare outing
    1966798766_fc03e07c9f.jpg

    I have her parked until 2013....!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46 georgeous


    PaulK_CCI wrote: »
    I think your first priority is not as much determine what model to choose, but ask yourself what you are after. It is purely a Tax/VRT/NCT exempt driver that has to be as reliable as possible, how much comfort are you prepared to give up for the sake of driving a classic car. Do you have a garage or not, what is your budget roughly, will you ever need to take passengers, how much of a distance to travel, etc. Once you've answered those, you can narrow things down a bit, as it's nice to dream about a 912 for example, but you will have to bring around 15k nowadays for a good one, and if your budget is only 5, that rules it out immediately.

    Great advice again, thanks Paul.

    I won't be buying for a while as I have to move country in 2 weeks, so I'm thinking more in relation to when I eventually am a little more geographically settled (could be 1 year, could be 5 years!). But I thought best to start researching now so I at least know my options, what to expect from being a classic owner and learn from other peoples experiences so when I do finally get 'settled' and manage to buy, that I can make a much more informed decision and feel comfortable with buying - which is why everyones input is really valued, so thanks to all of you so far! The great thing about hearing from everyone on here is that the knowledgebase is so broad.
    My 924 on a rare outing

    Nice shot! The rear windscreen is fantastic, couldn't really get a sense of it from Lightning's photo. I really like your paint job as well. Is the rear windscreen wiper actually mounted on the window?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 468 ✭✭VanhireBoys


    LIGHTNING wrote: »
    Nice! Your 924 is in great nick, mine needs a good t-cut and polish to get her looking like yours. I`m hoping to have her up and running over the net month or two.

    Thanks for that - The laquer is peeling on the bonnet so no frontal shots :D

    You know you have to bring her to Galway in April ;)


    The wiper is mounted to the screen. If you would have ordered the car without the wiper you got a big silver bung instead. I have heard of an urban myth which the owner of a 924 put loads of stuff in the boot and didnt think about the wiper motor promptly breaking the glass :eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46 georgeous


    Ok, I know you'll all probably laugh at me, but I've just noticed something...

    Most classics only have 1 wing mirror...! Why is that?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,318 ✭✭✭✭carchaeologist


    georgeous wrote: »
    Ok, I know you'll all probably laugh at me, but I've just noticed something...

    Most classics only have 1 wing mirror...! Why is that?
    Because the passenger side one was usually an optional extra!!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46 georgeous


    Because the passenger side one was usually an optional extra!!

    No way! Are you serious? So do most people who buy a classic with only a drivers side mirror install one (if it hasn't already been)?. Would that not affect the ability to insure the car?

    That's hilarious, thanks carchaeologist.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,318 ✭✭✭✭carchaeologist


    georgeous wrote: »
    No way! Are you serious? So do most people who buy a classic with only a drivers side mirror install one (if it hasn't already been)?. Would that not affect the ability to insure the car?

    That's hilarious, thanks carchaeologist.
    Yes,as far as i know you just have to have two rearview mirrors to be legal,and that includes the windscreen mounted one!
    It shouldnt make a difference to your insurance.
    If you look at 70s car catalogues you should see that a passenger mirror was optional.My chevette only has the one on the drivers door,and the beetle the same.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,132 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    The passenger side wing mirror only became standard in most cars since the late 70s / early 80s iirc, or even later in lower end cars

    The driver side wing mirror is essential for merging from slip roads onto mainroads and for overtaking. The passenger side wing mirror isn't essential :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,132 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    you just have to have two rearview mirrors to be legal,and that includes the windscreen mounted one!

    Yup I learned to drive in the mid 80s and you were only taught to use the internal mirror plus the drivers side mirror (plus looking over your shoulder etc.)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 827 ✭✭✭PaulK_CCI


    georgeous wrote: »
    No way! Are you serious? So do most people who buy a classic with only a drivers side mirror install one (if it hasn't already been)?. Would that not affect the ability to insure the car?

    That's hilarious, thanks carchaeologist.
    it wasnt even as far back as the eighties, that a "Radio" was an optional extra !!!!! The mid/late seventies Japanese cars set the trend by fitting radio's as standard to their cars, which was picked up by European manufacturers...

    Things were even more dismal in the 50-ies and 60-ies, where things like seatbelts were not standard options!!! The early beetles only received ONE sunvisor!! The Jaguar MK2 did not come with mirrors and it was up to the owners or dealers to fit wingmirrors. Same with the mid sixties series Mercedes, where owners had to 'tick the box' wether they wanted a side mirror, let alone two!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,318 ✭✭✭✭carchaeologist


    PaulK_CCI wrote: »
    it wasnt even as far back as the eighties, that a "Radio" was an optional extra !!!!! The mid/late seventies Japanese cars set the trend by fitting radio's as standard to their cars, which was picked up by European manufacturers...
    Aye,my datsun 100A has a factory fitted radio,as had the 120Ys,dont think the fords of the time had cought up.
    f768_1.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46 georgeous


    After a few days of laptop based window shopping, I came across the 1st gen Celica liftback...

    http://www.classiccarsforsale.co.uk/classic-car-page.php/carno/37210

    I love the fact it's got fastback styling but Japanese built. Anyone ever have any experience with them? How's the engine? Not the best example above, but my god I've seen some beautiful ones advertised, particularly down in Oz. The fender mounted wing mirrors do nothing for the above one though.

    Wish... I... could... buy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,318 ✭✭✭✭carchaeologist


    ^Jap stuff is usually grand mechanically once its been looked after,its the rust that you have to watch for...:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,722 ✭✭✭maidhc


    unkel wrote: »
    The passenger side wing mirror only became standard in most cars since the late 70s / early 80s iirc, or even later in lower end cars

    My parents had an 1986 Corolla and a 1988 Starlet, neither had a passenger wing mirror.

    Of course BMW didn't fit radios as standard until when? Late 90s?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,755 ✭✭✭ianobrien


    georgeous wrote: »
    No way! Are you serious? So do most people who buy a classic with only a drivers side mirror install one (if it hasn't already been)?. Would that not affect the ability to insure the car?

    That's hilarious, thanks carchaeologist.

    Even now, the requirements are for two rear view mirrors. That means the driver's side external mirror and the central windscreen mirror. It's even in the NCT manual.

    I've a Mk2 Escort with no passanger door mirror (as factory) that passed the NCT that way. I've managed to get my hands on a passanger one, but I'm not fitting it.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement