slander

bmurphy4ireland

just noticed and quite ****in shocked to be noticed tat i was nominated for the 2nd yr in a row for muppet of the year on the boards absolutely retarted voting yoke.

u do know i can sue for defamation of charachter ye???????


oh ye just though i'd say xavi u see cambiasso linked with man city tell that gelson chap to gtfo and give him the number 19.

Économiste Monétaire

They've vilified an on-line persona? Good god, no. It's not actually defamation if it's true, though...

bmurphy4ireland

mo dhia ffs. of course it is. first of all wat did i do to be in for that award????? nothin.

Steve

This thread kinda proves them right doesn't it?

bye.

bmurphy4ireland

:rolleyes:

Économiste Monétaire

bmurphy4ireland wrote: »

mo dhia ffs. of course it is. first of all wat did i do to be in for that award????? nothin.

I have no idea who you are, I generally lurk here. I don't particularly feel like getting banned, though--I believe there was a post about inferring legal action vis-a-vis boards. However, your abrasive post would lead me to agree with you being added to the list of 'muppetry.'

Kold

Lolwut.

Hagar

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ.

Please accept with my compliments the above selection of capital letters.
Don't be afraid to try them out next time you post.
It's fun, it's trendy, it's hip to use capital letters.
All the cool kids are using them, join the gang, try them now.

Nerin

Easy there esteban. Threatening such silliness will hardly help.

Nerin

Hagar wrote: »

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ.

Please accept with my compliments the above selection of capital letters.
Don't be afraid to try them out next time you post.
It's fun, it's trendy, it's hip to use capital letters.
All the cool kids are using them, join the gang, try them now.

Todays show was brought to you today by the letters l o and L. And The number 23.
Elmo knows where we live

bmurphy4ireland

a false accusation of an offense or a malicious misrepresentation of someone's words or actions

what would you call nominating a poster, who actually no longer uses the site as a muppet? the answer? slander.

Économiste Monétaire

bmurphy4ireland wrote: »

what would you call nominating a poster, who actually no longer uses the site as a muppet? the answer? slander.

I believe the nomination would be based on one's posts during the year. If you were posting and using the site at some point through 2008, and were in fact 'a muppet,' then I don't really see your point... For it to be slander, it must be false. Threads like this would actually confirm the opposite of that--no?

bmurphy4ireland

no it would not. i object to being in the poll as long as i am no longer able to use the site freely.

Kold

If that were true, we wouldn't be subject to this retardacity.

Crash

Actually, surely it'd be libel as its written and recorded, while slander would be spoken.

also for it to be libel it would have to:
1. it must refer to the complainant
2. it must be false.

As for 1, it only refers to an internet persona, which cannot necessarily be linked to you as a person whatsoever.

and 2. well...you're a muppet.

Now where's my law degree?

bmurphy4ireland

http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/9/22-of-employers-check-your-facebook-profile-when-they-re-looking-to-hire-you-that-s-it-

Nerin

bmurphy4ireland wrote: »

http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/9/22-of-employers-check-your-facebook-profile-when-they-re-looking-to-hire-you-that-s-it-

Then sign off the net before we find out who you are

AckwelFoley

You must have missed the site announcement by hulaballu about 'legal threats'

AlmightyCushion

bmurphy4ireland wrote: »

http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/9/22-of-employers-check-your-facebook-profile-when-they-re-looking-to-hire-you-that-s-it-

Shít. I don't have a facebook profile. They'll think I don't exist. :eek:

AckwelFoley

Dear Dev.

i can use lolcats?

seanybiker

bit of a stupid award really. Kinda childish. Ah well.

bmurphy4ireland

snyper wrote: »

You must have missed the site announcement by hulaballu about 'legal threats'

who asked u snyper???? dont u have some teen u need to molest?

seanybiker

bmurphy4ireland wrote: »

who asked u snyper???? dont u have some teen u need to molest?

There goes your slander claim bud

Nerin

seanybiker wrote: »

bit of a stupid award really. Kinda childish. Ah well.

It kinda invites trouble. I think I've heard muppets of the year winners showing up?

bmurphy4ireland

was that meant nerin?????? thats class..post of the day anyway.

seanybiker

Nerin wrote: »

It kinda invites trouble. I think I've heard muppets of the year winners showing up?

What ya mean. They actually have an awards night?

bmurphy4ireland

lol ye.

AlmightyCushion

snyper wrote: »

Dear Dev.

i can use lolcats?

As long as there at least 50% more lol than cat.

Nerin

bmurphy4ireland wrote: »

was that meant nerin?????? thats class..post of the day anyway.

i should be pun-ished.

Yeah,i mean that since the awards happen on the night,that a muppet could cause hassle. Or they could just take the award and laugh it off.

sceptre

Banned user returns with a legal threat, despite recent boards-wide announcement that the latter would result in a ban.

Using either basis for decision, there's only one way this can end. Bye.

AlmightyCushion

sceptre wrote: »

Banned user returns with a legal threat, despite recent boards-wide announcement that the latter would result in a ban.

Using either basis for decision, there's only one way this can end. Bye.

Your math is flawed, 2 negatives make a positive. Looks like he's immune to bannings. :eek:

seanybiker

do you not find it unfair to call a banned user a muppet when he isnt allowed on to defend himself. Then when said user tries to defend himself he gets banned again.
Thought this site would be above internet bullying tactics

Steve

seanybiker wrote: »

do you not find it unfair to call a banned user a muppet when he isnt allowed on to defend himself. Then when said user tries to defend himself he gets banned again.
Thought this site would be above internet bullying tactics

Is it fair that lemmings jump off cliffs? Maybe not but there isn't a whole lot the internet can do about it.

5starpool

Going Forward wrote: »

Actually, surely it'd be libel as its written and recorded, while slander would be spoken.

also for it to be libel it would have to:
1. it must refer to the complainant
2. it must be false.

As for 1, it only refers to an internet persona, which cannot necessarily be linked to you as a person whatsoever.

and 2. well...you're a muppet.

Now where's my law degree?

He said Jehova!!!!!!

Stone him!!!!

AckwelFoley

AlmightyCushion wrote: »

As long as there at least 50% more lol than cat.

Im going to take that as a yes.

..and another ass gets banned.