Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Global Economic Manipulation?
Options
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
Anyone who has researched the bankers will know that they are quite capable of manipulating markets, and have done in the past. The question to be asked is not 'is this global economic manipulation?', rather the question is: 'to what end has this manufactured crisis been created?'
Another step towards causing fear in the sheeple, and another step towards a new world order. Involving a more socialist and centralised approach. How? Because of bailouts and nationalisation of banking.
But how does this help out the usual suspects? Many Bilderbergers are bankers. Rockefeller and Sutherland are just two. I'm having a problem getting my head around how nationalising banks benefits these guys.
0 -
Advertisement
-
-
alan dunne 27 wrote: »America plunged it's own economy into recession so that it would adversly affect India and China and weaken their economy so that they don't become world powers. Of course America has the muscle to build itself up again.
Interesting. I was pondering the reasons behind the manufactured economic 'crisis' and came to China myself.
I have a different belief forming however, that the bankers have looked at the Chinese model and seen that it is hugely successful and want to adopt it here. The notion of having complete control over a currency will only be effective for the bankers if they have global control. The one world agenda has been happening in stages (ie. European Union, North American Union, African Union etc.) by attempting to create regional superstates. I believe that one can predict that the same thing will happen with regional currencies (eg. proposed Amero, Euro etc.). I think the free markets are being reigned in, and that the regional governments will then have control over the regional currency in the same way that China has control over it's currency. More stable currency values will no doubt be more beneficial to world bankers, since there is less risk and fluctuation involved.
Of course, it also creates fear and uncertainty which are the tools of tyrants and governments to implement radical change and agenda. I'll watch Obama with great interest over the first term.
0 -
But how does this help out the usual suspects? Many Bilderbergers are bankers. Rockefeller and Sutherland are just two. I'm having a problem getting my head around how nationalising banks benefits these guys.
I understand what you mean. The nationalisation of the banks seems to be likely to be in the form of the government getting a small stake (non-controlling). This could be an agreement to allow the bankers to continue to operate a system of controlling the amount of currency issued, while at the same time allowing a level of government control. This agreement could have been made as far back as the Federal Reserve being formed, as the globalist NWO agenda seems to have been gaining momentum at roughly the same time in history. The upside for the bankers being that the global currencies will be more stable and secure due to the regional superstates of the NWO.
Tbh I'm still pondering this question you have asked, and have been thinking about it but have not come to a definitive (in my mind) plausible conclusion.0 -
-
Interesting. I was pondering the reasons behind the manufactured economic 'crisis' and came to China myself.
I have a different belief forming however, that the bankers have looked at the Chinese model and seen that it is hugely successful and want to adopt it here. The notion of having complete control over a currency will only be effective for the bankers if they have global control. The one world agenda has been happening in stages (ie. European Union, North American Union, African Union etc.) by attempting to create regional superstates. I believe that one can predict that the same thing will happen with regional currencies (eg. proposed Amero, Euro etc.). I think the free markets are being reigned in, and that the regional governments will then have control over the regional currency in the same way that China has control over it's currency. More stable currency values will no doubt be more beneficial to world bankers, since there is less risk and fluctuation involved.
Of course, it also creates fear and uncertainty which are the tools of tyrants and governments to implement radical change and agenda. I'll watch Obama with great interest over the first term.
A new Bretton-Woods agreement then? Fixed currency rates?0 -
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement