The mystery of Seat Number 666 at the EU Parliment in Strasbourg.

Run_to_da_hills

(Carried this over from another thread and gave it its own title. )

From hundreds of websites and blogs it appears that seat number 666 in the European Parliament is left vacant.

Just Google the subject and find for your self, its just so weird.
http://www.google.ie/search?hl=en&q=seat+666+eu+parliment&btnG=Google+Search&meta=

It is said that towards the end times a very evil man who is synonymous with this notorious number will control all the worlds economics through a cashless system of codes in the human body.

IS THIS SEAT REALLY VACANT?.

Mahatma coat

We are waiting for Oscar or Diogenes to provide a link to this Italian fella who suposedly occupies this seat. I didnt see it on his website, but surely the lads wouldnt make such bold claims without proof

Peyton Manning

I was at the European Parliament buildings in 2004 and 2005 for the Euroscola competition. One of my mates made it a point to sit in seat 666 in 2004.

Mahatma coat

Yes, but did an MEP come bounding over roarin

'Oi You, Get outa MY chair'???

oscarBravo

Mahatma coat wrote: »

We are waiting for Oscar or Diogenes to provide a link to this Italian fella who suposedly occupies this seat. I didnt see it on his website, but surely the lads wouldnt make such bold claims without proof

I'll provide evidence, if Rtdh agrees in advance to admit that he was completely and utterly wrong.

It would be a bonus if he'd take it on board as a lesson not to blindly trust random links he finds on Google, but I'm not going to hold out for a miracle.

humanji

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

It is said that towards the end times a very evil man who is synonymous with this notorious number will control all the worlds economics through a cashless system of codes in the human body.

Does the bible say that he's got a special seat reserved in the EU parliment?

Now maybe I'm just putting in the wrong keywords, but am I the only one who finds it odd that there doesn't seem to be any seating plans for any government? Or does that actually make sense to not make them public?

Oh, and just to show how brilliant Boards is, we're ranked No. 3 on RTDH's google search link. Go us!

studiorat

Are we talking about the conspiracy that is Christanity here? or am I missing something?

Robbo

Isn't that Dana's old seat?

humanji

Right, it's a slow day in work so I did a bit of math. I calculated roughly where I think seat 666 could be. The layout being symetrical, I assume that the seat could be on either side.


Granted, since the picture quality isn't the best, you can't really tell anything. So basically, this isn't evidence of anything other than the fact that I've too much time on my hands.

Also, the picture above is an old one as there's an extra row of seats at the back now.

Run_to_da_hills

studiorat wrote: »

Are we talking about the conspiracy that is Christanity here? or am I missing something?

It is still a conspiracy, and even if it was posted in the Christianity forum it would end up being redirected here.

humanji wrote: »

Does the bible say that he's got a special seat reserved in the EU parliment?

No, but it tells us to be vigilant about the number and its association with commercial activity.

WhaLofShi

oscarBravo wrote: »

I'll provide evidence, if Rtdh agrees in advance to admit that he was completely and utterly wrong.

It would be a bonus if he'd take it on board as a lesson not to blindly trust random links he finds on Google, but I'm not going to hold out for a miracle.

Wouldn't it be good to provide it anyway, so we all can see it. I've googled and can't find a seating plan at all (and I thought I was a pretty good "googler").

BTW, is there a possibility that all this stemmed from Paisley's enquiry in 1999 and that the situation no longer exists? i.e. the seat has been filled.

A lot of googles results mention Paisley's site (I haven't looked at them so don't know if they link back).

Run_to_da_hills

WhaLofShi wrote: »

Wouldn't it be good to provide it anyway, so we all can see it. I've googled and can't find a seating plan at all (and I thought I was a pretty good "googler").

BTW, is there a possibility that all this stemmed from Paisley's enquiry in 1999 and that the situation no longer exists? i.e. the seat has been filled.

A lot of googles results mention Paisley's site (I haven't looked at them so don't know if they link back).

Paisleys site is almost 10 years dated, I'm sure some of the political candidates mentioned on the adjacent seating are already dead. We need an official update.

oscarBravo

Here you go.

r3nu4l

Thread title needs to be updated with the word "Solved" at the end of it

humanji

oscarBravo wrote: »

Here you go.

Dammit Oscar, thanks for showing me and my math skills up! I spent about an hour trying to figure that one out.

WhaLofShi

oscarBravo wrote: »

Here you go.

Good thread. Question asked. Answer given.

Nice one Oscar.

GhostInTheRuins

oscarBravo wrote: »

Here you go.

Fair play.

Now all we need is RTDH so say a little something....

Run_to_da_hills

WhaLofShi wrote: »

Good thread. Question asked. Answer given.

Nice one Oscar.

Answer appreciated.

However up dates will be required.

The world will be watching this seat. :eek:

humanji

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Answer appreciated.

However up dates will be required.

The world will be watching this seat. :eek:

Oh I'd love the irony if Satan took seat 666 in the US congress.

oscarBravo

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Answer appreciated.

However up dates will be required.

The world will be watching this seat. :eek:

What was that? An acknowledgement of the fact that something you kicked up rather a large fuss over was completely unfounded?


...didn't think so.


@humanji: sorry, dude

javaboy

r3nu4l wrote: »

Thread title needs to be updated with the word "Solved" at the end of it

Busted would be better.

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Answer appreciated.

However up dates will be required.

The world will be watching this seat. :eek:

Very gracious of you to admit you were wrong.

seamus

Seat 1 or seat 666 have to be the most awesome ones to be assigned.

javaboy

seamus wrote: »

Seat 1 or seat 666 have to be the most awesome ones to be assigned.

I'd specifically ask for that seat even if it meant switching parties.

Run_to_da_hills

javaboy wrote: »

Busted would be better.



Very gracious of you to admit you were wrong.

Where did I say that I was right. Where did I ever claim in this post that the seat was always vacant?

Read the OP again.

RTTH wrote:

From hundreds of websites and blogs it appears that seat number 666 in the European Parliament is left vacant.

Just Google the subject and find for your self, its just so weird.
IS THIS SEAT REALLY VACANT?.

javaboy

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Where did I say that I was right. Where did I ever claim in this post that the seat was always vacant?

Read the OP again.

Sorry I was thinking of the other thread that this thread was spawned from.

Run_to_da_hills

javaboy wrote: »

Sorry I was thinking of the other thread that this thread was spawned from.

I rephrased that one too.

amacachi

seamus wrote: »

Seat 1 or seat 666 have to be the most awesome ones to be assigned.

Nah, 69 is funnier.

Well if I was the the Antichrist I'd probably ask for a better seat than that 666 one. It's all the way down the back.
I'd go for a throne made of skulls or something.

studiorat

If I was the anti-christ I'd probably be over on the christianity forum.

Mahatma coat

RTDH, We had this discussion via PM, what did I say you had to do once Oscar provided proof?

Run_to_da_hills

Mahatma coat wrote: »

RTDH, We had this discussion via PM, what did I say you had to do once Oscar provided proof?

I guess you can close the thread, we may need a sours to that link of OB so we can keep an eye on that seat.

Yet looking at the plan, it doesn't look like the best seat in the ariana.

Mahatma coat

NO, thats not what I said,

I said that if Oscar provided you with a link, which he has, Christ we've even got the guys phone number, someone in that timezone ring him up and ask him - "Eh lad, You De Anitchrist?"

anyway I digress, I said that if they provided the info you would have to publicy concede and accept that you were wrong,

So now

WakeUp

if thats true thats incredible lol why would it be vacant must be waiting for someone special..

sprinklesspanky

This guy currently sits there http://www.europarl.europa.eu/members/expert/delegations/view.do?language=EN&id=1944

studiorat

Hmmmm? Sebastiano Muscmeci, well he has asked questions about the slaughter of cats and dogs and made inquiries about the persecution of christians in iraq. So he could be belzeebub or one of his minions.

I for one will be supporting our new dark overlord.
Behold his image and adore...

The guy

What about recent evidence that says the Devil's number is actually 616?

thecommander

The guy wrote: »

What about recent evidence that says the Devil's number is actually 616?

If it is true, then it automatically debunks theories including 666 as a sign of NWO etc.

That is, if you take the bible as a factual book on history.

Mahatma coat

616 - 666 -999 - whatever

RTDH, we hadthis chat yesterday, Oscar has provided the info that disproves your basic premis, either you follow up on detail about how this Mascaponi(sp) fella is the Antichrist, or you come out and say, Soz Iwere wrong, and I am very hopeful that given a bit of investigation this lad may just be satanreincarnate :D:D

javaboy

thecommander wrote: »

If it is true, then it automatically debunks theories including 666 as a sign of NWO etc.

That is, if you take the bible as a factual book on history.

I wouldn't say it debunks it. It could just mean that the NWO people who planted 666 on barcodes and wherever else were as misinformed as the rest of us.

So?
Myth busted?

And rtdh has yet to admit he was wrong.

edit:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sebastiano_(Nello)_Musumeci

Nothing screams wanting a one world government like founding an autonomist party.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sicilian_Alliance

Run_to_da_hills

King Mob wrote: »

So?
Myth busted?

And rtdh has yet to admit he was wrong.

edit:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sebastiano_(Nello)_Musumeci

Nothing screams wanting a one world government like founding an autonomist party.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sicilian_Alliance

Again you fail to read posts before you start spouting, Read the OP again. :rolleyes:

javaboy

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Again you fail to read posts before you start spouting, Read the OP again. :rolleyes:

Ok so you will you admit you were wrong about seat 666 in the other thread?

And don't give me that rubbish about how you rephrased it. That's shifting the goal posts. With that approach nobody would ever have to admit they were wrong. :rolleyes:

Run_to_da_hills

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Again you fail to read posts before you start spouting, Read the OP again. :rolleyes:

From the Lisbon=satan thread

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I will also state that seat no 666 has been Vacant in the European Parliament for almost a decade. :eek:
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/End%20of%20the%20World/seat_666.htm

This has been proven wrong.
Thus you were wrong.

Run_to_da_hills

King Mob wrote: »

From the Lisbon=satan thread

This has been proven wrong.
Thus you were wrong.

Dawh, :rolleyes:

There you go agaiin. :rolleyes:

You don't seem to bother following the threads.:rolleyes:


Mentioned again in this thread.

Javaboy wrote:

Actually you stated it as fact:

RTTH wrote:

Seat no 666 in the Tower Building that holds the Current EU Parliament at Strasbourg has NEVER been occupied to this day.

Rephrased in Thread NO79.

RTTH wrote:

According to several websites seat number 666 is still vacant at the EU tower building in Strasbourg.

I couldn't find any answers to tell me that this seat is now occupied.

that's funny. That wasn't what you were saying before OB had proof to the contrary.

Like when you said:

I will also state that seat no 666 has been Vacant in the European Parliament for almost a decade.
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/End%2...d/seat_666.htm

So where you right when you said that?

javaboy

Just to point out to you RTDH:
"According to several websites seat number 666 is still vacant at the EU tower building in Strasbourg."

does not have the same meaning as:

"Seat no 666 in the Tower Building that holds the Current EU Parliament at Strasbourg has NEVER been occupied to this day."

So it is not simply "rephrasing" the sentence. It is changing the meaning of the sentence.

Diabhal Beag

I wonder does the occupant use FAS funding to get its hair done. Does anyone think its belongs to the quare fella?

Kernel

Little Shyte wrote: »

I wonder does the occupant use FAS funding to get its hair done. Does anyone think its belongs to the quare fella?

Ah, nothing like a timely topical throwaway comment to lift the mood at the end of a thread. Thanks Little Shyte.

humanji

Kernel wrote:

Ah, nothing like a timely topical throwaway comment to lift the mood at the end of a thread. Thanks Little Shyte.

lol, I didn't realise his username and was wondering why you were being so abusive to him. D'oh!

Run_to_da_hills

" Sorry folks, it looks my the initial claims from the links were incorrect from the links and my assumption that seat number 666 was unoccupied, thank you Oscar your link clarified things here.

Looking at the seating layout of the round room it dose looks like a very unsuitable position for a world dictator to sit unless this infamous person sits here first prior to taking upp his office. :eek:

I will endeavor to find more information on this issue so that we may have a definitive answer

Yours sincerely
Run to Da Hills

Mahatma coat

Thank you RTDH, that wasnt so hard now was it

fair point too, tis a ****ty seat for the antichrist to be in:D