Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Kettlebell Training

  • 16-11-2008 8:35pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,886 ✭✭✭


    I see my gym has got an assortment of kettlebells in recently. Heaviest is 12kg.

    Never used em before - can anyone suggest any suitable exercises etc to use them for, or a way to work them into my routine. My programme is based around the kind of standard lifts, like bench press (bar and dumb bell), squat, some deadlifting as well as chins, shoulder presses, cleans etc...

    The kettlebells look like fun, all shiny and bright-coloured n whatnot so thought I'd have a whack at them!


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3 kbireland


    Hi,

    I would recommend that you get the book enter the kettlebell by Pavel Tsatsouline. It's an excellent book on how to learn the main exercises. I have trained / certified with this man. I run classes too so drop me a mail if you want to come along?

    Shane.
    info@kettlebellsireland.com


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,081 ✭✭✭Musashi


    Your first stop should probably be the video instructionals from Crossfit at http://www.crossfit.com/cf-info/excercise.html#KBs

    Some more links you may find useful.

    http://www.groundfighter.com/details/prodid/202.html

    http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/kettlebells.htm

    http://www.dragondoor.com/

    or even Youtube, but be aware that some sorry stuff is thrown up there by people!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,448 ✭✭✭Roper


    12kgs isn't going to do much for you. Is that the heaviest in the gym?

    The lightest most people use for strength training is 16kgs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,886 ✭✭✭WHIP IT!


    Roper wrote: »
    12kgs isn't going to do much for you. Is that the heaviest in the gym?

    The lightest most people use for strength training is 16kgs.

    That's what I thought, I was surprised at how light they are... but mind you tried a few kind of Squat thingies with em a couple of weeks' back. Said I'd do two sets of a hundred.

    After the first 100 I knew I wasn't getting a second set - so after 50 of Set 2 I staggered over to the water fountain bandy-legged and light-headed and waving a white flag!

    So it looks like 12kg might be heavy enough for me! :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭fcleere


    why would you do that many squats?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,158 ✭✭✭Chris89


    Roper wrote: »
    12kgs isn't going to do much for you. Is that the heaviest in the gym?

    The lightest most people use for strength training is 16kgs.

    16kg is "beginner male" in russia.

    Whether or not you could use the 12 for strength would depend on your weight, strength and experience.

    Theyre great investments for home though, tools for life. Got mine on irishlifting.com


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,158 ✭✭✭Chris89


    fcleere wrote: »
    why would you do that many squats?

    Why would you not?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭fcleere


    i dont know.
    im under the impression that if you want to build muscle,its high weight low rep and if you want to tone muscle its low weight high rep,but surely not that high??would your muscles not be adjusting to such a repetitive motion?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,158 ✭✭✭Chris89


    I don't know what you mean by tone a muscle. what is that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭fcleere


    for muscle definition?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,158 ✭✭✭Chris89


    As in like, be able to see the muscle better?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,981 ✭✭✭Diarmuid


    fcleere wrote: »
    for muscle definition?

    I think Chris is trying to point out that muscle tone is a misnomer. If you want to see your muscles better, do cardio to get rid of excess fat and do resistance training to build the muscle size.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,886 ✭✭✭WHIP IT!


    I dunno if they're "squats" as such - more "swings" - something like this except I used alternating hands as the weight was so light:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-xxiZTlvZ8


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,893 ✭✭✭Canis Lupus


    Chris89 wrote: »
    I don't know what you mean by tone a muscle. what is that.

    We're all friends... No need to bait someone.

    I'd like to know more as well. 200 squats even with light weights has to hurt. What are the benefits over standard heavy squatting?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,886 ✭✭✭WHIP IT!


    We're all friends... No need to bait someone.

    I'd like to know more as well. 200 squats even with light weights has to hurt. What are the benefits over standard heavy squatting?

    I dunno, I just wanted to try em out and thought this would be a decent aerobic and all-over workout... It was very hard on the legs and I was actually light-headed after it. I had done a kinda push-up routine before it which was tough but other than that I had only done a brief warm-up before it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,448 ✭✭✭Roper


    Ah you're talking about kettlebell swings then? doing 100 is just painful, without any real gain other than a bit of endurance and a lot of crying when you sit on the crapper the next day. With only 12kgs though you could have just swung your water bottle or something for 100 reps and you'd still be sore the next day.

    If you have 12kgs max then you're probably not going to get much from them that dumbells wouldn't give. The whole idea of them is that they give that offset weight for swinging and moving in different ways but there's not a whole lot of benefit to them.

    WHOA! Hold on did you mean a set UP TO 12kgs????? There are lighter ones! Let me guess, are they multicoloured and covered in foam :D I'm not all "grrr everything should be heavy and manly" but really the whole point of the bells isn't as a direct replacement for dumbells, but as a tool for strength training.

    It's funny though when people see kettlebells they do their 50 reps or 100 reps but they wouldn't dream of doing 100 bodyweight squats in a workout. Not saying that's you by the way, just in general.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,893 ✭✭✭Canis Lupus


    Roper wrote: »
    doing 100 is just painful, without any real gain other than a bit of endurance and a lot of crying when you sit on the crapper the next day. l.


    *Chuckles*

    I was of the opinion that doms are a good thing. Not whilst youre suffering from them :) but a sign, if nothing else, that you did a good bit of work.

    Is that not the case?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,886 ✭✭✭WHIP IT!


    *Chuckles*

    I was of the opinion that doms are a good thing. Not whilst youre suffering from them :) but a sign, if nothing else, that you did a good bit of work.

    Is that not the case?

    Same question from me, please! :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,158 ✭✭✭Chris89


    Roper wrote: »
    Ah you're talking about kettlebell swings then? doing 100 is just painful, without any real gain other than a bit of endurance and a lot of crying when you sit on the crapper the next day. With only 12kgs though you could have just swung your water bottle or something for 100 reps and you'd still be sore the next day.

    If you have 12kgs max then you're probably not going to get much from them that dumbells wouldn't give. The whole idea of them is that they give that offset weight for swinging and moving in different ways but there's not a whole lot of benefit to them.

    WHOA! Hold on did you mean a set UP TO 12kgs????? There are lighter ones! Let me guess, are they multicoloured and covered in foam :D I'm not all "grrr everything should be heavy and manly" but really the whole point of the bells isn't as a direct replacement for dumbells, but as a tool for strength training.

    It's funny though when people see kettlebells they do their 50 reps or 100 reps but they wouldn't dream of doing 100 bodyweight squats in a workout. Not saying that's you by the way, just in general.

    Eh, if you dont see the benefit from doing 100 swings then you are obviously not doing them right. Even with 12kgs if you are doing 100 swings full tilt, without any problems other than a sore bum the next morning, you should think about competing.

    As for his gym having a set of kbells only up to 12, i think thats brilliant, first of all ive never heard of any other (im assuming commercial) gym with kbells, secondly i doubt the gym has anyone qualified to teach so noone will have a clue what to do with them, if they had a bunch of 2pood bells, there would be a huge amount of injuires.

    As far as I am aware DOMS are just lactic acid buildup, but i remember reading that the jury is still out on that as lactic acid should flush away a lot sooner that that. Either way, they are by no means an indication of how good your workout was, thats a silly assumption.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,448 ✭✭✭Roper


    *Chuckles*

    I was of the opinion that doms are a good thing. Not whilst youre suffering from them :) but a sign, if nothing else, that you did a good bit of work.

    Is that not the case?
    WHIP IT! wrote:
    Same question from me, please!
    Well since two of you asked :D

    It's not that DOMS isn't a good indication of a hard workout, just that the 100 swings or whatever is not going to be be a good workout for most people's goals. Endurance, yes but there are better ways of building that, as regards strength gains, minimal and again there are better ways, fat loss I couldn't say but I'd imagine relatively low as compared to other methods.

    I'm sitting on my ass right now but I could give myself DOMS tomorrow by picking up my laptop and pressing it over my head with one arm 100 times but that doesn't make it a good workout.
    Chris89 wrote:
    Eh, if you dont see the benefit from doing 100 swings then you are obviously not doing them right. Even with 12kgs if you are doing 100 swings full tilt, without any problems other than a sore bum the next morning, you should think about competing.
    I didn't say it wasn't easy, just that things that make you sore aren't neccessarily the best route to take.

    Now I'm no mathematician but I reckon: Average gym goer + 12kgs(or 10kgs or 5kgs or 1kg) kettlebell - qualified instructor + explosive motion repeated 100 times = injury at worst, soreness at best.

    But hey I'm sure you know that since you know that
    Either way, they are by no means an indication of how good your workout was


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,886 ✭✭✭WHIP IT!


    Well I could definitely feel my stomach muscles, hamstrings etc being worked as I did the Swings and I was fairly beat up after it I must say.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,158 ✭✭✭Chris89


    Roper wrote: »

    Now I'm no mathematician but I reckon: Average gym goer + 12kgs(or 10kgs or 5kgs or 1kg) kettlebell - qualified instructor + explosive motion repeated 100 times = injury at worst, soreness at best.

    Thats my point though, you were saying they should have heavier bells. surely they should start off at the lightest possible, which i assume they have with a set of <12kg bells.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,886 ✭✭✭WHIP IT!


    Completely forgot - the reason I came up with 200 Reps was because I came across this: http://kettlebellplanet.blogspot.com/2008/10/kettlebell-november-200-reps-challenge.html

    I knew the weight was light because they recommend starting on twice the weight that was available to me (12kg, as we know!).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,448 ✭✭✭Roper


    Chris89 wrote: »
    Thats my point though, you were saying they should have heavier bells. surely they should start off at the lightest possible, which i assume they have with a set of <12kg bells.

    The swing if you do it right is still a pretty jerky exercise that I wouldn't reccomend to anyone beyond kettlebell competitors. They have to do it the rest of us have a choice and personally I choose walking straight up when I'm 50. Like any powerful motion, I wouldn't have anyone do more than 8 reps or so in a set.

    To put it another way, would you have someone who walked into the gym do the same motion without a weight 100 times? Stand there, bend down, snap your hips up straight, repeat 100 times? I wouldn't, It'd be pretty useless at best.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,158 ✭✭✭Chris89


    Roper wrote: »
    The swing if you do it right is still a pretty jerky exercise that I wouldn't reccomend to anyone beyond kettlebell competitors. They have to do it the rest of us have a choice and personally I choose walking straight up when I'm 50. Like any powerful motion, I wouldn't have anyone do more than 8 reps or so in a set.

    I dont mean to be condescending, but this is quite a ridiculous thing to say, bu that logic people shouldnt have sex or play with one of them hula hoop things.
    Do you think that there is some huge warehouse in Russia where all the retired Kettlebell competitors are just lying around, crippled and hooked up to IV's??

    Do you not own a gym?
    Roper wrote: »
    To put it another way, would you have someone who walked into the gym do the same motion without a weight 100 times? Stand there, bend down, snap your hips up straight, repeat 100 times? I wouldn't, It'd be pretty useless at best.

    No, I obviously wouldn't... I would have them do it with a kettlebell?

    Would you have someone shoulderpress without a bar?

    Your post has confused me to no end.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,448 ✭✭✭Roper


    Right look mate you don't have a clue what I'm on about and I'm not in the humour of explaining basic principles to people so best of luck with your swinging.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,158 ✭✭✭Chris89


    Very true.
    I must google which basic principles you are reffering to.
    Apologies for ruffling your feathers.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,448 ✭✭✭Roper


    My feathers remain unruffled, I just have a new year's resolution to not spend too much time on people who try to get a rise out of me on the interweb.

    You didn't know what I was on about in my previous post so you obviously don't know the very basics, then you attempted to be condescending in your response, which makes me think you'll be unlikely to want to hear what I have to say anyway.

    If anyone else has a question though, fire away.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,287 ✭✭✭davyjose


    Roper wrote: »
    The swing if you do it right is still a pretty jerky exercise that I wouldn't reccomend to anyone beyond kettlebell competitors. They have to do it the rest of us have a choice and personally I choose walking straight up when I'm 50. Like any powerful motion, I wouldn't have anyone do more than 8 reps or so in a set.
    Roper, do you think it's any worse than jogging? Pounding your ankles, knees, hips, a couple of thousand times a week off a pavement is surely no better than a few hundred kettle bell swings?

    Not to jump on the "your talking b0llox" bandwagon, but i'm genuinely curious to see how you think it compares.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 21,981 ✭✭✭✭Hanley


    I've seen this method of arguing used before.... I don't like it.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 21,981 ✭✭✭✭Hanley


    Roper wrote: »
    12kgs isn't going to do much for you. Is that the heaviest in the gym?

    The lightest most people use for strength training is 16kgs.

    Is it fair to assume you only see KB's as a tool for strength training from that statement?

    Or did you think it was inferred from WHIP IT!'s other exercises choices that strength gains is what he's after?
    WHIP IT! wrote: »
    I just wanted to try em out and thought this would be a decent aerobic and all-over workout...

    Looks like he was going for an all over workout...
    Roper wrote: »
    With only 12kgs though you could have just swung your water bottle or something for 100 reps and you'd still be sore the next day.

    Seriously?
    It's funny though when people see kettlebells they do their 50 reps or 100 reps but they wouldn't dream of doing 100 bodyweight squats in a workout. Not saying that's you by the way, just in general.

    Clarify something, is it high reps as a conditioning tool you have an issue with, or high reps AND kettlebells??
    Roper wrote: »
    It's not that DOMS isn't a good indication of a hard workout, just that the 100 swings or whatever is not going to be be a good workout for most people's goals. Endurance, yes but there are better ways of building that, as regards strength gains, minimal and again there are better ways, fat loss I couldn't say but I'd imagine relatively low as compared to other methods.

    And as stated by the OP, what about swings being used as a general workout tool for a quick overall workout, in conjunction with other methods of training??

    As for the fat loss aspect, unless they brought out some new low kcal edible KB's, there's definitely more efficient methods.
    I'm sitting on my ass right now but I could give myself DOMS tomorrow by picking up my laptop and pressing it over my head with one arm 100 times but that doesn't make it a good workout.

    Bit of a straw man argument tbh.
    Now I'm no mathematician but I reckon: Average gym goer + 12kgs(or 10kgs or 5kgs or 1kg) kettlebell - qualified instructor + explosive motion repeated 100 times = injury at worst, soreness at best.

    But hey I'm sure you know that since you know that

    The fact it's a low load (as you pointed out) would suggest that a violently explosive motion isn't all that neccessary. It's not like he's going for a 1rm with KB. Any prolonged swinging sessions that I've seen have been quite smooth and controlled, not very snappy.
    Roper wrote: »
    The swing if you do it right is still a pretty jerky exercise that I wouldn't reccomend to anyone beyond kettlebell competitors. They have to do it the rest of us have a choice and personally I choose walking straight up when I'm 50. Like any powerful motion, I wouldn't have anyone do more than 8 reps or so in a set.

    Do you know many ex-kettlebell competitors?
    To put it another way, would you have someone who walked into the gym do the same motion without a weight 100 times? Stand there, bend down, snap your hips up straight, repeat 100 times? I wouldn't, It'd be pretty useless at best.

    Another straw man argument.

    Nowhere has anyone said that the OP was using an agressive snap of the hips to get the KB up.

    Roper wrote: »
    My feathers remain unruffled, I just have a new year's resolution to not spend too much time on people who try to get a rise out of me on the interweb.

    Just trying to spend time online getting a rise out of others yeah? :D
    You didn't know what I was on about in my previous post so you obviously don't know the very basics, then you attempted to be condescending in your response, which makes me think you'll be unlikely to want to hear what I have to say anyway.

    If anyone else has a question though, fire away.

    How would you respond to the above points?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,507 ✭✭✭DamienH


    Not to jump in on the argument and ruin the fun , but you could try bottom up presses with them. They're pretty tough to get them going up in a controlled way . Swing the ****e out of it that's what I say :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,287 ✭✭✭davyjose


    :D:confused:
    Hanley wrote: »
    I've seen this method of arguing used before.... I don't like it.
    What argument? I asked a simple question from one of those whose opinion I value*. I even included an addendum in case someone misread the tone of my question. :rolleyes:
    I'll repeat ... ahem, would 200 kettlebell swings be less effective, and/or more harmful than jogging? Seriously? It's less impacting, equally repetitive, and from Whip It's account, not easy to complete.

    *BTW, you're one of those ;)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 21,981 ✭✭✭✭Hanley


    davyjose wrote: »
    :D:confused:
    What argument?

    Straw man arguments and the use of hyperbole that only vaguely relates to the topic at hand as a method of reducing the opposing persons position to something that seems so ridiculous no further discussion should be neccessary.

    It was a general comment, not directed at you!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,287 ✭✭✭davyjose


    Hanley wrote: »
    It was a general comment, not directed at you!
    Fair enough, but say someone chose to forego watching Fair City in favour of swinging a kettlebell for half an hour a night, surely they'd be better off. Hell, they could even do it while watching Fair City. How can it be a 'negative' exercise, is my point?

    I'm not saying it's the most ideal way to exercise (and in a way, yourself and Roper are probably least qualified to comment - because you guys are very commited to your training, and would never consider quick, cheap ways to work out). But is it really any worse than the guy that jogs for half an hour a night and leaves it at that, thinking he's the sh!t?

    (I may be dragging this OT, and if so, my apologies :D;))


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 21,981 ✭✭✭✭Hanley


    davyjose wrote: »
    Fair enough, but say someone chose to forego watching Fair City in favour of swinging a kettlebell for half an hour a night, surely they'd be better off. Hell, they could even do it while watching Fair City. How can it be a 'negative' exercise, is my point?

    Cos it breaks your hips.... duh.

    Haha seriously, I don't know either. Maybe Roper will tell us.
    I'm not saying it's the most ideal way to exercise (and in a way, yourself and Roper are probably least qualified to comment - because you guys are very commited to your training, and would never consider quick, cheap ways to work out). But is it really any worse than the guy that jogs for half an hour a night and leaves it at that, thinking he's the sh!t?

    (I may be dragging this OT, and if so, my apologies :D;))

    Again, I dunno.... I don't have much time for joggers anyway, so I won't comment!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,886 ✭✭✭WHIP IT!


    Gee, look what I've started...

    I wanna put Hanley, Roper, DaveyJose and Chris in a dark room. Slap each one in the face then leggit and turn the lights back on! :D

    Now that's entertainment...

    Anyway, you B*stards have ruined kettlebell swinging on me, forever!! :pac: :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,158 ✭✭✭Chris89


    WHIP IT! wrote: »
    Gee, look what I've started...

    I wanna put Hanley, Roper, DaveyJose and Chris in a dark room. Slap each one in the face then leggit and turn the lights back on! :D

    Better do it soon though, these hips only have so much left in them


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,287 ✭✭✭davyjose


    Hanley wrote: »

    Again, I dunno.... I don't have much time for joggers anyway, so I won't comment!

    Lol, fair enough :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,287 ✭✭✭davyjose


    WHIP IT! wrote: »
    Anyway, you B*stards have ruined kettlebell swinging on me, forever!! :pac: :D

    No WAY dude, I'm all for swinging kettlebells forever. I'm gonna ditch the couch and leave a few kettlebells in place, so when people call up they can swing their way through a few episodes of 24. Jack Bauer will have nothing on us :D
    Seriously though, I'm with you on this. Exercising in place of not-exercising ... I'm all for it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,386 ✭✭✭✭rubadub


    I read Bruce Lee used to use a light dumbbell watching TV.

    I would sooner be crippled for life than sit through 30mins of faircity though..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,448 ✭✭✭Roper


    Hanley wrote: »
    Is it fair to assume you only see KB's as a tool for strength training from that statement?

    Or did you think it was inferred from WHIP IT!'s other exercises choices that strength gains is what he's after?

    Looks like he was going for an all over workout...
    No that was a throwaway comment. My opinions on the use of kettlebells is simple- great tool when used properly.
    Seriously?
    No, not really.
    Clarify something, is it high reps as a conditioning tool you have an issue with, or high reps AND kettlebells??
    I have a problem with neither. Conditioning for what anyway? High reps and kettlebells are great competition training for high rep kettlebell training I'd say. What other sport, daily activity or anything would require me to do 100 consecutive reps with a weight swinging between my legs? (insert dirty joke here)
    And as stated by the OP, what about swings being used as a general workout tool for a quick overall workout, in conjunction with other methods of training??
    Yeah great. See below.
    As for the fat loss aspect, unless they brought out some new low kcal edible KB's, there's definitely more efficient methods.
    Trying to eat an iron kettlebell would probably make you lose some weight.
    Bit of a straw man argument tbh.
    I don't think so. My point in it's original context was that you can give yourself DOMS in many ways, not all of them big or clever.
    The fact it's a low load (as you pointed out) would suggest that a violently explosive motion isn't all that neccessary. It's not like he's going for a 1rm with KB. Any prolonged swinging sessions that I've seen have been quite smooth and controlled, not very snappy.
    It boils down to this. Lets suppose for a moment that a violently explosive motion ISN'T required to swing 12kgs. If I give you 100 to do I guarantee as fatigue sets in, form will deteriorate. It's not people's hips I'd be concerned about, it would be their lower back. Now after x amount of reps, the motion that was previously smooth is bound to become less so as a greater drive is required at the start of the motion to get the weight moving again. That will be your jerk, now do that little jerk with a slight misalignment of the spine 100 more times and what you have is injury. I use kettlebells as part of training that I do. Pick up the bell, do 10 reps, on to pull ups, or 3 sets of 10 or 20 even.
    Do you know many ex-kettlebell competitors?
    Well there's Boris, Igor, Vladimir... no actually I'm just going through Russian names there. I do know enough about physiology to know bad practise when I see it though. Not much, but enough.
    Another straw man argument.
    You keep using that word, I don't think it means what you think it means.
    Nowhere has anyone said that the OP was using an agressive snap of the hips to get the KB up.
    See above regarding deterioration of form. But my point was that why would you have anyone do a motion weighted if you wouldn't have them do the same motion unweighted. Then add in some massive amount of reps... are you seeing the lack of logic here?
    Just trying to spend time online getting a rise out of others yeah? :D
    Nah, just waiting on some Indians. That's not a joke by the way I am actually just waiting on some Indians... so I have some time.
    I forgot wrote:
    Roper, do you think it's any worse than jogging? Pounding your ankles, knees, hips, a couple of thousand times a week off a pavement is surely no better than a few hundred kettle bell swings?

    Not to jump on the "your talking b0llox" bandwagon, but i'm genuinely curious to see how you think it compares.
    Well there's a massive difference between doing a motion you've been doing since you stopped walking and swinging a weight between your legs. (insert dirty joke here) Not that running loads on the roads is all that clever either.

    I'll put it better. If I had someone walk in now and ask me to get them fit or strong or whatever, would I do:
    1) get them to pick up a 2 or 5kg kettlebell and have them do 200 swings
    or
    2) Bring them out on the road and have them do 5k
    The answer is I'd have them do neither. I'd do an assessment on them and before I did anything exercise that required weight I'd have them do weeks or days or months or years of unweighted work until they were ready to involve a weight in that motion. And when that was done unless I had some kind of retarded death wish for them, or I thought he and I were going to be running for the same bus seat the next day, I would never have them do a motion involving their lower back 200 times.
    WHIP IT! wrote:
    Anyway, you B*stards have ruined kettlebell swinging on me, forever!!
    No no no, you misunderstand me. Swing away. Do it smart, as part of a programme and with good form and don't do what some guys on a blog are doing and you'll have a whale of a time. Why are you training? Fitness weight loss etc?
    Seriously though, I'm with you on this. Exercising in place of not-exercising ... I'm all for it.
    Ah yeah great and all, I agree, your worst day in the gym is better than you best day on the zzzzzzzzz.... sorry conked out. Look I'm not getting at you and of course, I agree, exercise is good, and better than the TV. But one of the reasons that fat people stay fat and skinny people stay skinny in spite of gym programme after gym programme is because they get pissed off at the lack of results from doing dumb ass training with no logic, no idea what they want and no guidance on how to get there. Gym's respond by just sticking in more equipment so people can wander aimlessly and do a few more reps on the new station or the new piece of equipment like the Power Plate, or the Kettlebells, or the Eliptical trainer or whatever. Show me the guys and gals in the best shape in your gym and I guarantee they do very, very basic things as the core of their programme.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,886 ✭✭✭WHIP IT!


    Roper wrote: »
    Do it smart, as part of a programme and with good form and don't do what some guys on a blog are doing and you'll have a whale of a time. Why are you training? Fitness weight loss etc?

    Cos I want to get stronger, leaner and look better nekid - the witty banter aint getting it done so much anymore! :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,158 ✭✭✭Chris89


    Roper wrote: »
    I'd have them do weeks or days or months or years of unweighted work until they were ready to involve a weight in that motion.

    Are you serious?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,448 ✭✭✭Roper


    Chris89 wrote: »
    Are you serious?

    Yes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,158 ✭✭✭Chris89


    Roper wrote: »
    Yes.

    Super Serious?

    Why would you have clients do that?
    Fair enough start them off light, but no load for months and months?

    thats not how to get shtrong.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,448 ✭✭✭Roper


    Chris89 wrote: »
    Super Serious?

    Why would you have clients do that?
    Fair enough start them off light, but no load for months and months

    I didn't say that. I said days, ... some other stuff... or years.

    Most people, whether they like it or not, are ill equipped to use resistance training effectively. That's why this forum and others like it are full of threads with "shoulder problems when benching please help" or "hip pain when squatting what do I do?" Most people can't manage bodyweight effectively.

    Quick anecdote, very little to do with kettlebells but illustrates my point. I had a client last year who came to me for kickboxing privates but we did some other stuff as he was complaining about his shoulders when punching (he was mucho inflexiballé). Big barrell chested lad, benched his bodyweight +30kgs "I lift a LOT of weights man". We did a quick strength test I do with the fighters I have and he was PATHETIC. Zero on most things but worst of all in spite of his big bench press he couldn't do more than 12 push ups to depth and not 1 pull up. When I told him what I thought he asked me "how much can you bench then?" which is about where we parted ways.

    Most people cannot manage to do bodyweight exercises and lack the flexibility to complete the simplest of movements. (squat, press, lunge) Why oh why oh why would I put additional weight in someone's hand if they were already struggling to keep form with nothing? I'm hurting them.

    As for what I do with my clients. I don't have many clients, and I probably won't ever have too many either because when they come in I don't give them the fancy stuff. I'll never forget the look on one guy's face when I was putting him through push ups. He was sort of longingly staring at the power rack, willing me to put him on the bench... but he stuck with it and lo, he's doing great now (and benching too)

    So in short-
    thats not how to get shtrong.
    Yes it is. It's how to get strong in a balanced way that keeps you fit and injury free for years to come rather than fvcking yourself in any old way.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,081 ✭✭✭Musashi


    I'd not heard of kettlebells until I did a few seminars with Mick Coup. He rated them highly and showed us a few exercises with them. Luckily David Lewis of Kapap.ie had lots of bells so we all got a go :)

    Mick doesn't much like how the kettlebell competitors train either, he likes a short sharp shock of basic moves combined with the unbalancing effect of the bells. Reps are short or max. over 30 seconds. Saves on fatigue wrecking technique!

    Makes you blow like an inside out Dyson, and doing core stability work in between sets hurts my inside belly!

    I do think the bells have a place in training, especially martial arts where you train to move unwieldy weight at less than optimal angles, they don't call it body weight or dead weight for nothing!

    Move yourself around the bell, nothing worse than smashing the wrists off yourself trying to press overhead! Don't flip the bell over, orbit your hand around the outside diameter of the bell! Sounds worse than it is and can be shown very quickly!

    I can see where Roper is coming from, ha makes some good points! Do you like the Crossfit type training protocols Roper lad? The only problem I've had with Crossfit "apart from not being fit" is that I've no formal instruction in Olympic lifting. Same for bells, lack of available formal coaching can wreck you. Even after rereading "Starting Strength" a lot, I dunno if I'm squatting or Deadlifting properly?

    Having a good coach on hand to spot your mistakes is worth anything!

    Keep up the good work lads, hope to meet some more of the forum this year!


Advertisement