Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

How much faith do you put in prayer?

  • 24-09-2008 3:59pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,353 ✭✭✭


    Here's a purely hypothetical for any Catholics out there.

    Say you fell ill with some unknown terminal illness. The Pope happened to be touring your town and learnt of your plight. He came to your bedside and said that he would pray for you, he would also ask for all his Archbishops and Priests to pray for you, in turn he would ask for all his congregations to also pray for you. In fact he was so adamant that God would answer his prayer for you that he invoked Papal Infallibility in this matter and received confirmation of such from the Church's magisterium. His only condition is that you do not receive medical treatment for your illness so that the spirit of God can clearly be seen to be acting upon you.

    But while you where thinking it over a Doctor comes to you and says that he might be able to treat you for your illness. It is purely experimental but with your consent he would like to try. You learn that this doctor is an Atheist.

    Which do you choose?

    Aside from this, in what instance would you have faith that God will answer your prayers?

    Which would you choose? 6 votes

    Popes prayers
    0%
    Doctors medicine
    0%
    I'm not Catholic, but I believe prayers help people
    50%
    dorymurrayp4Burial 3 votes
    I'm an Atheist, I don't believe in prayers
    50%
    PuckFanny Cradockphilologos 3 votes


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,245 ✭✭✭✭Fanny Cradock


    I'm an Atheist, I don't believe in prayers
    Out of curiosity, why only Catholics?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,737 ✭✭✭Asiaprod


    Out of curiosity, why only Catholics?

    Eh, the Pope, Papal Infallibility?:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,408 ✭✭✭studiorat


    There was a double blind experiment done on a similar subject. The people who had prayers said for them and didn't know and the people who didn't have prayers said for them knew that fact came out equal.

    The people who had prayers said for them and did know about it actually did the worst. All subjects were heart patients and the 3rd group did worse off!

    It was suggested that the 3rd group had more stress 'cause they thought they were so sick they need praying for.

    Question is though how do you double blind the Almighty!!

    Can't get a citation right now, but if it's called for I'll oblige.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,783 ✭✭✭Puck


    I'm an Atheist, I don't believe in prayers
    My faith is in God, who hears my prayers but has also given us medicine. I don't only pray to God when I'm ****ting a brick over something, I pray to Him all the time so if I'm sick I'll mention it.

    Not a Catholic btw, so the whole Pope thing doesn't factor into this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,245 ✭✭✭✭Fanny Cradock


    I'm an Atheist, I don't believe in prayers
    Asiaprod wrote: »
    Eh, the Pope, Papal Infallibility?:D

    Asiaprod: Banned for 3 Weeks


    Anyway, I though it was a thread about prayer, not papal infallibility.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,353 ✭✭✭Goduznt Xzst


    Asiaprod: Banned for 3 Weeks


    Anyway, I though it was a thread about prayer, not papal infallibility.

    Well there are too many technicalities with throwing a blanket over all Christians groups, as I'm not aware if all of them have a higher human authority that is "closer" to God.

    That's whyI ended the original post with a question to Christians in general, in regards to what instances you believe God will answer prayers.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,408 ✭✭✭studiorat


    Puck wrote: »
    My faith is in God, who hears my prayers but has also given us medicine. I don't only pray to God when I'm ****ting a brick over something, I pray to Him all the time so if I'm sick I'll mention it.

    "to pray" : "to ask that the laws of the universe be annulled on behalf of a single petitioner, confessedly unworthy"Ambrose Bierce


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 817 ✭✭✭Burial


    I'm not Catholic, but I believe prayers help people
    Why is there no option for Christians who believe prayers don't work in curing people, but the medicine might? I would be of that category...

    *EDIT*

    I'm going to be honest. I never saw the doctor's medicine option...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,353 ✭✭✭Goduznt Xzst


    Burial wrote: »
    Why is there no option for Christians who believe prayers don't work? I would be of that category...

    So you believe in Christ but not in prayer? I don't see how that is possible. What do you believe was the purpose of Jesus and his disciples night in the garden of Gethsemane? Do you believe God was answering no ones prayers? Or was he answering only Jesus' prayers and making the disciples pray for no reason?

    EDIT: Ok so you changed your post. So in what sense do you believe God answers prayers then if not to cure people?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,245 ✭✭✭✭Fanny Cradock


    I'm an Atheist, I don't believe in prayers
    Medicine and prayers for me


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,783 ✭✭✭Puck


    I'm an Atheist, I don't believe in prayers
    studiorat wrote: »
    "to pray" : "to ask that the laws of the universe be annulled on behalf of a single petitioner, confessedly unworthy"Ambrose Bierce

    Yeah... funnily enough I don't agree with that definition. Even quotable people can talk out of their arse about things they know nothing about.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 817 ✭✭✭Burial


    I'm not Catholic, but I believe prayers help people
    So you believe in Christ but not in prayer? I don't see how that is possible. What do you believe was the purpose of Jesus and his disciples night in the garden of Gethsemane? Do you believe God was answering no ones prayers? Or was he answering only Jesus' prayers and making the disciples pray for no reason?

    EDIT: Ok so you changed your post. So in what sense do you believe God answers prayers then if not to cure people?


    I don't believe God answers prayers. Why would he? Why would my life suddenly take priority over anyone elses? Why doesn't he already KNOW that I'm dying and that I would like to be cured? If I've been praying to him all my life and I get this disease, I wouldn't say the prayers worked or will work. I don't see how this disease is a reward for my beliefs before.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,353 ✭✭✭Goduznt Xzst


    Medicine and prayers for me

    that's a bit of sitting on the fence isn't it?

    Can I ask you this. If you got sick and used medicine and prayers and got well what would you conclude?

    Reminds me of this comic strip:

    aspirin.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,245 ✭✭✭✭Fanny Cradock


    I'm an Atheist, I don't believe in prayers
    that's a bit of sitting on the fence isn't it?

    Can I ask you this. If you got sick and used medicine and prayers and got well what would you conclude?

    Reminds me of this comic strip:

    I don't see it as sitting on the fence. The issue isn't as black and white as your options suggest. But to answer your question, that's pretty much impossible to say given that the nature and severity of my hypothetical illness hasn't been quantified.

    I have no problem accepting that medicine can cure or believing that God can intercede to heal, albeit not often in dramatic fashion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,353 ✭✭✭Goduznt Xzst


    I have no problem accepting that medicine can cure or believing that God can intercede to heal, albeit not often in dramatic fashion.

    Do you imagine God has ever answered the prayers of an amputee then? If you believe there is a possibility that God, by prayer, can "intercede to heal" a person, then why has he never given an amputee back their limb? Would that be too dramatic?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,811 ✭✭✭CerebralCortex


    Do you imagine God has ever answered the prayers of an amputee then? If you believe there is a possibility that God, by prayer, can "intercede to heal" a person, then why has he never given an amputee back their limb? Would that be too dramatic?

    Ah come man thats breaking the rules.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,892 ✭✭✭ChocolateSauce


    I don't see it as sitting on the fence. The issue isn't as black and white as your options suggest. But to answer your question, that's pretty much impossible to say given that the nature and severity of my hypothetical illness hasn't been quantified.

    I have no problem accepting that medicine can cure or believing that God can intercede to heal, albeit not often in dramatic fashion.

    Well it can never hurt to take extra precautions!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,329 ✭✭✭Agonist


    studiorat wrote: »
    There was a double blind experiment done on a similar subject. The people who had prayers said for them and didn't know and the people who didn't have prayers said for them knew that fact came out equal.

    The people who had prayers said for them and did know about it actually did the worst. All subjects were heart patients and the 3rd group did worse off!

    It was suggested that the 3rd group had more stress 'cause they thought they were so sick they need praying for.

    Question is though how do you double blind the Almighty!!

    Can't get a citation right now, but if it's called for I'll oblige.

    I heard about this study and it piqued my curiosity. Wouldn't it be interesting to see the result of a similar study where the test subjects were cursed and sent evil wishes. Well, I can guess at the outcome.

    The really interesting thing would be the excuses made to stop the study going ahead. A sector of society would never allow it, despite the proof that intercessions don't work.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    I'm an Atheist, I don't believe in prayers
    Why should not being Roman Catholic mean that you believe prayer cannot help people? I don't understand that option in the poll.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,245 ✭✭✭✭Fanny Cradock


    I'm an Atheist, I don't believe in prayers
    Do you imagine God has ever answered the prayers of an amputee then?

    I'm sure that He has.
    If you believe there is a possibility that God, by prayer, can "intercede to heal" a person, then why has he never given an amputee back their limb? Would that be too dramatic?

    Well, given that I believe in the Christian God - an omnipotent being - why would I place limits on His abilities? Why limbs don't miraculously grow back I'm afraid I don't know the answer to that and probably never will.

    But if, for instance, somebody did grow back a lobbed-off extremity, we would remain on opposite sides of the divide. You would think that there is only a medical/ evolutionary explanation behind it, whereas I don't dismiss the possibility that it could have been a miracle. I've certainly heard a number of stories which suggest miraculous intervention. To you they would probably suggest change.

    Tomato/ tomato


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,353 ✭✭✭Goduznt Xzst


    I'm sure that He has.

    I was going to ask you how you can be sure, but I'm guessing its the kind of surety that you have that God exists. Being that you have no evidence to support your claim but you are sure of it nevertheless.
    Well, given that I believe in the Christian God - an omnipotent being - why would I place limits on His abilities? Why limbs don't miraculously grow back I'm afraid I don't know the answer to that and probably never will.

    You do place limits on his abilities though. You don't believe he is capable of evil or that he can lie.

    What I am asking though is do you think God answers the prayers of people who suffer internal infections and disease more than he cares about Amputees? I mean I have heard numerous religious accounts from people claiming that their relative was saved by a miracle (helped only slightly by medicine) but never have I heard of someone who had a limb amputated saying God had answered their prayers.

    Think about it yourself, how many sick people do you know that had their prayers answered? So why is God answering the prayers of all these people who suffer internal illnesses and not anyone who loses a part of their external body?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,811 ✭✭✭CerebralCortex


    Didn't you hear god has answered amputees? Here take a look. Oh wait a sec it turns out it was science oops silly me :p


    Forgive the cheap shot please.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,995 ✭✭✭Tim_Murphy


    God answers prayers some times
    http://www.theonion.com/content/node/28812


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 923 ✭✭✭sorella


    Please don't ask me for chapter and verse on this as it is long ago, but this and other dramatic heaings have and do happen.

    Look up the records for Lourdes and Medjugorje; and also some of Padre Pio's work....

    These are authenticated beyond all doubt.

    With padre Pio what often happened was a kind of remission for a couple of years so that the person could put their life in order.

    And we are talking major sicknesses here; cancers, leukaemia

    Also in the Free Church, a lady called Jennier Rees Larcome was suddenly and dramatically healed after many years in a wheelchair; her muscle tone etc came back immediately.

    See this site...

    http://www.broadcaster.org.uk/section2/transcript/healing.htm

    As the opening part of this site shows, it is perfectly Scriptural and of the church

    As to why some and not others? That is where our faith and trust come in, and our awareness that this life is only a part of life.

    Sometimes some Churches make those who are not healed feel guilty for lack of faith, but it is not that at all.

    Been there suffered that:)

    By the way, that OP hypothesis is just that; a hypothesis lacking in reality..
    Do you imagine God has ever answered the prayers of an amputee then? If you believe there is a possibility that God, by prayer, can "intercede to heal" a person, then why has he never given an amputee back their limb? Would that be too dramatic?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,353 ✭✭✭Goduznt Xzst


    sorella wrote: »
    Look up the records for Lourdes and Medjugorje; and also some of Padre Pio's work....

    did any of these "miracles" feature amputees getting their limbs back? I'd be very much interested to read about that. So far it seems God is biased against answering the prayers of amputees. I mean there's "evidence" he's cured cancer/leukaemia patients, heck hes even made a cripple walk again. But all these amputees prayers go unanswered.

    Seems slightly unfair don't you think?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 923 ✭✭✭sorella


    The tone of your reply makes response in vain:)

    did any of these "miracles" feature amputees getting their limbs back? I'd be very much interested to read about that. So far it seems God is biased against answering the prayers of amputees. I mean there's "evidence" he's cured cancer/leukaemia patients, heck hes even made a cripple walk again. But all these amputees prayers go unanswered.

    Seems slightly unfair don't you think?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,686 ✭✭✭✭PDN


    You do place limits on his abilities though. You don't believe he is capable of evil or that he can lie.
    That has to do with His moral qualities of holiness rather than to ability. All of us are physically capable of doing stuff that we would never choose to do. I am probably physically capable of eating 50 prunes - but I am confident that I will never be so inclined.
    I mean I have heard numerous religious accounts from people claiming that their relative was saved by a miracle (helped only slightly by medicine) but never have I heard of someone who had a limb amputated saying God had answered their prayers.
    I have met people who claim that God gave them new limbs in answer to prayer. They showed me photographs of themselves with missing limbs, but there was no way to ascertain if the photos were fakes or of twins or doppelgangers.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,408 ✭✭✭studiorat


    PDN wrote: »
    I am probably physically capable of eating 50 prunes


    Ohhh! Just too good to pass on! But I won't say anything, I'll be good:D

    But you need to tell us more about this limbs growing back business.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,353 ✭✭✭Goduznt Xzst


    sorella wrote: »
    The tone of your reply makes response in vain:)

    ah yes, the usually Christian response that roughly translates to "I don't know how to answer your question". I used to use them myself a lot as a Christian when given a question I had no clue about as the Bible didn't cover it. Responses like:

    "there is no point continuing this discussion with you as your demeanor is disagreeable"

    "discussing this topic further with you will yield no result"... etc
    PDN wrote: »
    I have met people who claim that God gave them new limbs in answer to prayer. They showed me photographs of themselves with missing limbs, but there was no way to ascertain if the photos were fakes or of twins or doppelgangers.

    Also PDN, I know a few people who have shown me photographs of UFO's flying over their backgarden? Would a logical individual assume from that that Aliens do infact exist and are visiting this planet?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,091 ✭✭✭Biro


    ah yes, the usually Christian response that roughly translates to "I don't know how to answer your question". I used to use them myself a lot as a Christian when given a question I had no clue about as the Bible didn't cover it. Responses like:

    "there is no point continuing this discussion with you as your demeanor is disagreeable"

    "discussing this topic further with you will yield no result"... etc
    That's because sometimes it's like trying to explain to a David Beckham fan that he isn't actually the best footballer in the world. They'll recite examples of scoring goals that the ball bent around a few 90 degree angles and blindly ignore your comparisons to anything that contradicts their belief that they're right and you're wrong. It works both ways you know, there are Christians too ignorant to argue successfully any point that they're trying to make, and also athiests too ignorant. There are unanswerable questions no matter what camp you reside in.
    Some people like yourself though seem to dedicate a portion of their lives specifically to argue with Christians. Looking at your username, it seems you joined boards.ie - which coveres nearly all topics and all walks of life - just to proclaim that you're right and we're wrong. Why dedicate so much energy trying to prove there's nothing there?
    Also PDN, I know a few people who have shown me photographs of UFO's flying over their backgarden? Would a logical individual assume from that that Aliens do infact exist and are visiting this planet?

    Bad analogy. A UFO is an unidentified flying object. It doesn't mean "Alien space ship" or "Definately not from Earth craft". It's putting 2 and 2 together and getting 5.
    Shaking someone's hand with my right hand and then showing them a picture of me a year earlier with no right arm is very different to showing them a picture of a UFO and telling them it's proof that aliens exist. Neither might be real, but they're not the same.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,353 ✭✭✭Goduznt Xzst


    Biro wrote: »
    That's because sometimes it's like trying to explain to a David Beckham fan that he isn't actually the best footballer in the world. They'll recite examples of scoring goals that the ball bent around a few 90 degree angles and blindly ignore your comparisons to anything that contradicts their belief that they're right and you're wrong. It works both ways you know, there are Christians too ignorant to argue successfully any point that they're trying to make, and also athiests too ignorant. There are unanswerable questions no matter what camp you reside in.
    Some people like yourself though seem to dedicate a portion of their lives specifically to argue with Christians. Looking at your username, it seems you joined boards.ie - which coveres nearly all topics and all walks of life - just to proclaim that you're right and we're wrong. Why dedicate so much energy trying to prove there's nothing there?

    My request was simple. I was asking Sorella whether or not god ignoring the plight of amputees was fair or not seeing as he is more than capable of curing numerous other afflications.

    Also the difference between our "camps" is that i'm in one that accepts it is impossible to have all the answers and predict the future. You're in the opposite.

    Also I'm not trying to prove "there's nothing there", that would be impossible. I'm merely asking questions to get Christians to elaborate on the facts they know to be true.
    Biro wrote: »
    Bad analogy. A UFO is an unidentified flying object. It doesn't mean "Alien space ship" or "Definately not from Earth craft". It's putting 2 and 2 together and getting 5.
    Shaking someone's hand with my right hand and then showing them a picture of me a year earlier with no right arm is very different to showing them a picture of a UFO and telling them it's proof that aliens exist. Neither might be real, but they're not the same.

    In common human interaction and exposure to media how often have you heard the term "UFO" used when NOT refering to Aliens. Regardless of its meaning, it is commonly accepted as a term used for alien spacecraft.

    Regardless, you've proven my point with the portion of your post i've made bold. You accept that neither can be known to be real by mere photographic evidence alone.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭MrPudding


    sorella wrote: »
    Please don't ask me for chapter and verse on this as it is long ago, but this and other dramatic heaings have and do happen.

    Look up the records for Lourdes and Medjugorje; and also some of Padre Pio's work....

    These are authenticated beyond all doubt.
    Authenticated beyond all doubt by who? And while we are at it, beyond who's doubt?

    MrP


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 923 ✭✭✭sorella


    The tone of your response to mine vindicates mine.

    Because that is how you thought does not mean others think also that way.

    Courtesy is a beautiful work of the Holy Spirit.

    and no one need respond when there is discourtesy. Doormats get walked on.

    It is obvious from your demeanour that you refuse to listen. so why ask then?

    ah yes, the usually Christian response that roughly translates to "I don't know how to answer your question". I used to use them myself a lot as a Christian when given a question I had no clue about as the Bible didn't cover it. Responses like:

    "there is no point continuing this discussion with you as your demeanor is disagreeable"

    "discussing this topic further with you will yield no result"... etc



    Also PDN, I know a few people who have shown me photographs of UFO's flying over their backgarden? Would a logical individual assume from that that Aliens do infact exist and are visiting this planet?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 923 ✭✭✭sorella


    I am not going to spoon feed you.

    You have google the same as we do

    Ask google re authenticated healings at Lourdes, and the stringent assessments.

    MrPudding wrote: »
    Authenticated beyond all doubt by who? And while we are at it, beyond who's doubt?

    MrP


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,353 ✭✭✭Goduznt Xzst


    sorella wrote: »
    The tone of your response to mine vindicates mine.

    subjective
    sorella wrote: »
    Because that is how you thought does not mean others think also that way.

    Clearly, otherwise why would I ask the question
    sorella wrote: »
    Courtesy is a beautiful work of the Holy Spirit.

    subjective
    sorella wrote: »
    and no one need respond when there is discourtesy. Doormats get walked on.

    No one need respond regardless, and I find it ironic that you then end your statement with a discourteous simile
    sorella wrote: »
    It is obvious from your demeanour that you refuse to listen. so why ask then?

    Obvious? subjective! I am not refusing to listen, I listened and then rebutted with a question to yourself which you have yet to answer. Whether it be because you can't answer it or you feel any answer you would give would be insufficient.

    I also really wasn't asking it expecting much of an answer, as the evidence to support prayer usually resides in anecdotes and third party information.

    I just find it funny, when previously a believer I remember my parents praying for friends and relatives to get better or get cured when they fell ill, but then a friends Son lost his arm in a car accident, and instead of prayers for him to get his arm back we where praying for him to "get through this ordeal and be able to cope"... it was like subconsciously everyone knew that once you lose a limb, the best God is ever going to do for you is give you solace. It was this disparity that initially got me thinking further, as the fact that God would help you if you got a minor internal affliction but if you where to lose your arms and legs the best God would give you was solace.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 923 ✭✭✭sorella


    Maybe if you had explained all this at the start; it would have ben easier to respond then.

    That was a terrible thing to happen; so sorry.

    Only God is God. No one else.

    How He answers prayer is for Him to decide and for Him only. All are, "If it be Thy will."

    That is not an excuse. All of us have known and know folk with terrible illness, accidents etc; do you not think we as Nuns do not hear these things every day from people who seek Prayer and comfort?

    And it is hard and hard and hard often.

    And at the end of the day, it is God Who is God.

    If you can get a copy of the Ruffin bio of Padre Pio... the healings that came through him were often unusual and might help you more than anyone here can.

    Bless your troubled journey.



    Obvious? subjective! I am not refusing to listen, I listened and then rebutted with a question to yourself which you have yet to answer. Whether it be because you can't answer it or you feel any answer you would give would be insufficient.

    I also really wasn't asking it expecting much of an answer, as the evidence to support prayer usually resides in anecdotes and third party information.

    I just find it funny, when previously a believer I remember my parents praying for friends and relatives to get better or get cured when they fell ill, but then a friends Son lost his arm in a car accident, and instead of prayers for him to get his arm back we where praying for him to "get through this ordeal and be able to cope"... it was like subconsciously everyone knew that once you lose a limb, the best God is ever going to do for you is give you solace. It was this disparity that initially got me thinking further, as the fact that God would help you if you got a minor internal affliction but if you where to lose your arms and legs the best God would give you was solace.[/quote]


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,091 ✭✭✭Biro


    Also the difference between our "camps" is that i'm in one that accepts it is impossible to have all the answers and predict the future. You're in the opposite.
    Your username suggested to me that you have a very arrogant personality, and that comment confirms that to my mind. Telling me what camp I'm in? Telling me that I don't accept that it's impossible to have all the answers and predict the future? What a moranic statement. How could I say I have all the answers or predict the future? I must have, cause you told me I'm in "that camp", therefore I'm off to do the lotto! Great!
    Also I'm not trying to prove "there's nothing there", that would be impossible.
    Good.
    In common human interaction and exposure to media how often have you heard the term "UFO" used when NOT refering to Aliens. Regardless of its meaning, it is commonly accepted as a term used for alien spacecraft.
    Commonly, yes. But unidentified means just that. Unidentified. Imagine the sight of the SR71 in test flights back in the late 50's early 60's? Someone saying "it must be aliens" doesn't mean it never existed cause they think aliens don't exist.
    Regardless, you've proven my point with the portion of your post i've made bold. You accept that neither can be known to be real by mere photographic evidence alone.

    Of coarse I accept that neither can be known to be real by photographic evidence alone, but that doesn't mean there was nothing in the photo to begin with.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,353 ✭✭✭Goduznt Xzst


    sorella wrote: »
    Only God is God. No one else.

    How He answers prayer is for Him to decide and for Him only. All are, "If it be Thy will."

    That is not an excuse. All of us have known and know folk with terrible illness, accidents etc; do you not think we as Nuns do not hear these things every day from people who seek Prayer and comfort?

    And it is hard and hard and hard often.

    And at the end of the day, it is God Who is God.

    tautology? really?

    You still haven't answered my initial question though which is whether or not you think it is fair how God picks and chooses whos prayers he answers. I am fully aware that it is up to God whos prayers he answers but is it fair how and when he chooses to do so?

    It just seems God always answers prayers where there is a good chance that if he didn't it would of worked out the same anyway.


Advertisement