Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

M20 - Cork to Limerick [preferred route chosen; in design - phase 3]

Options
1267268270272273276

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 7,108 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Penny pinching as usual, they need to just build the **** thing. So what if motorway is a bit over spec in places, its called future proofing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,733 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    All of the N18 is not motorway, there are house driveways coming straight onto part of it. I doubt that section will ever get to motorway standard.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,855 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    No, but that section was built many, many many years ago when doing that wasn't a big deal. Replacing that section would be nice, but would end up being very expensive for what you get, unfortunately.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,844 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    Who's penny pinching? No decision has been made and I'd be shocked if its not all Type 1 DC/motorway.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,844 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    It's two wide driving lanes and a hard shoulder though. It'll never be motorway, but it's better than 2+2.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,351 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Said section was constructed when the country was a comparatively poor backwater. Such low standard DCs were the only realistic option back then. It was that or nothing. As you know, same as the earlier sections of the N25 in east Cork

    I’d wager that, at the time, if you explained the current situation with the complete dunce of a Minister for Transport obstructing the construction of proper roads between our cities for the reasons he provides, you’d see quite a considerable amount of head scratching around this part of the country.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,108 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Hope so, just needs to built to a high standard. Benefit of motorway status, keeps animals, cyclists, pedestrians and slow agri vehicles off it.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 4,967 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    2027 isn't really delayed. That has been the guide start year for some time. This is just confirmation of that. The Prospects 2022 document they put out last year also said 2027-2031 for this scheme, so it's good at least that there's been no slippage.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 4,967 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    The article says that 30-40% of the existing road will be reused. In the UK or USA that usually means that the dualler would be created by slapping down a secondary carriageway beside the first, but that's not what's intended here - instead the existing road between Mallow and Blarney will have another single carriageway road build alongside, then the existing very wide single carriageway will be widened further into a narrow median dual carriageway.



  • Registered Users Posts: 56 ✭✭Norteño




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,351 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    The Croom bypass will also be reused I believe, and possibly some of a 2km corridor north of Buttevant at Velvetstowm which had land purchased for widening some time back (just south of the existing widened section between Ballyhea and Lisballyhea)



  • Registered Users Posts: 414 ✭✭BagofWeed


    There was a woman earlier tonight holding up an ambulance on the Mallow - Blarney stretch, she spent the journey doing 60-70 km. Couldn't believe what I was seeing. There was no one ahead of her. and she wouldn't even pull in. Now the lights weren't on but they were on when the ambulance pulled out onto the N20 from Mallow South as I was crossing the bridge at the time.

    Also there was a guy ahead of me from above Buttevant who braked everytime a car came against him. At one stage I was doing 50 km and he crawled through Newtwopothouse at roughly 40 km. Had to overtake at that stage as thankfully no one oncoming and it's a good ws2.

    You notice the crawlers much more on the good stretches of N20 as they pay no heed to road conditions and just dawdle along at the same speed. The Croom by pass has them too, big wide road but they drive to the centre line so you can't overtake. The extreme opposite has death defying overtaking manoeuvrers in which the oncoming lane driver must move in towards his hard shoulder to avoid a head on.

    Every journey on the N20 leaves a lasting memory, some scary ones too.

    It's not the worst of roads but is totally unsuitable for that volume of traffic and has very limited overtaking opportunities.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,844 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    The same was done on the Nenagh bypass on the M7. Although without the additional non motorway route as one already existed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,855 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    I'd rather they dawdle along the wider stretches TBH. The absolute worst are those who dawdle along the narrow bits holding everyone up, but then speed up to the limit on the wider stretches so no-one can get around them.... then slow down again.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,500 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    This. This really isn't complicated. Unfortunately it looks destined to be half assed at best based on the info we have so far. We know it's getting Eamon Ryaned.



  • Registered Users Posts: 56 ✭✭Norteño


    Eamon Ryan would struggle to pour water out of his own boot, even if the instructions were written on the sole...



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,070 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I was going to say this. People in powerful cars who can easily get up to speed on the wide stretches then slow to a crawl on the narrow stretches, braking for every oncoming vehicle. I often suspect it's an eyesight issue, that oncoming vehicles aren't clearly visible to them as being on their own side etc.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,108 ✭✭✭prunudo


    I find it ridiculous that some drivers can go 50 years without needing to get their eyes checked as a requirement to renew their licenese but thats for a different thread. Should be some form of medical check every 10 years too but again for a different thread.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,070 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I was going to say exactly the same thing. I don't know how long I've been driving now, and only needed to pass that one test. It's a bit mad. I should at minimum have an eyesight and theory test every few years.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,202 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    They have started the Foynes to Limerick railway line. It seems the original budget was 80 million but it is going to cost much more than that as the railway line has to be completely relaid.

    There seem to have been no analysis of the project before it began.......but then again it's a railway and the greens are all for that no matter how poor the business case is.

    As it will be commercial goods only will it every carry anything other than a few wind turbines up the country

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,844 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    What has any of that got to do with the M20?

    However to correct some of your post. The budget for phase one of the project is €65m. It was always intended to rip up the old tracks and track bed and relay new ones as part of phase one, along with vegetation clearance and renewal of crossings and bridges.

    It's got nothing to do with the Greens. It would have been done even if they weren't in government because it's an EU requirement to have the core ports connected to the core rail network.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,202 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    It just show the way probably the most important capital investment project transport wise is treated compared to the sacred railway infrastructure. Aside from the importance of it, before it is complete by probably about 2030 at the earliest another 30+ people will have lost there lives on the Cork/Limerick road. If the Greens and Eamon Ryan in particular had not put blockages in it way over the last 3+ years it would probably be started now

    My understanding is the initial budget proposals are completely out of date already. While its an EU requirement the only rush is to draw down minimal funding for it AFAIK they were not going to close the port if it was not done. My understanding is the original budget is out of line and the first part of the project will exceed 100 million.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,070 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Well yeah, but if the IMF and FG hadn't etc etc. Why always "the greens"? It's tedious and seems inaccurate in an awful lot of cases. Just because "Drive All the Time" radio says it, doesn't make it true.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,450 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    "Sacred"? I'd pick a different scapegoat if I were you. Rail investment in this country is shocking - the sum total spend on rail capital projects from 2011 to 2021 was approximately €0.00 give or take a cent. Yes, zero. Nothing. However bad the road network has been treated, it has at least had money spent on it.

    We all know N20 is a horrible road, but show me where you get your figure of 30 deaths over seven years - that's more than four people a year...

    Regarding Ryan, again, the case is weak. The project started from scratch in 2019 and is about a year behind where we'd expect it to be, but there's been a pandemic in that time, and the project received huge public feedback after the initial options report - processing that feedback takes time.

    Eamon Ryan's "meddling" on this scheme was to ask for EV charging, bus stopping areas, and rest facilities at each junction, and to task the consultants to recommend a complementary rail option on the corridor. Neither the rail study nor the junction facilities have affected the corridor or road design itself; and to be honest, when it comes to the junctions plan, we could do with a bit more of that that kind of "interference" - our current motorways are woefully short of places to safely stop up and rest (this is a big issue for lorry drivers, who are on strict driving-time limits)

    Your understandings in the second paragraph have already been contradicted. If you've got better sources, please provide that information.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,733 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Out of interest, has there been any mention of the apparent MSA regulation to which delays on the N11/N25 projects have been attributed? There will be a major port at either end of the N20 (although you'd have to use other roads to access them from the end of the N20).

    Given the length of this project, and the Adare - Foynes and M28 projects have both been granted planning approval with MSAs at the ports only, there'd have to be two MSAs on the N20.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,855 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    I'd really hope that that report was a tabloid run, it would make sense to just do MSAs seperately as a different contract, and not delay the main contract because they're not included.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,450 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    The M9 services opened a decade after the road did, so I suspect that these are always done separately.

    The only changes would be if an MSA was required to have its own junction (unlikely; N20 has no big gaps without a junction), or if adding full services to an already planned juction means upgrading that junction (due to more traffic), but these situations would not involve a huge delay on a project that is still in design.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,351 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Let me reiterate.

    There appears to be no evidence still that Eamon Ryan is obstructing this project. It's to go to ABP in the next 6 months by that Prospects document, and will commence construction in the next 4 years.

    Given the current roads environment, that's a timescale that is very respectable for the biggest roads project in the history of the state when you see much smaller projects taking even longer to progress.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,437 ✭✭✭cjpm


    That document must be bollix so.

    ABP in 6 months!!

    The first draft of the design hasn’t even been released to the public.

    Would be lucky to be 18 months.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement