Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Live Yoghurt v' Standard Yoghurts

  • 20-08-2008 10:44am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,684 ✭✭✭


    I’m trying to figure out why live yoghurts are usually advised as a substitute for the cheaper alternatives such as Muller Fruit Corners. In my supermarket (after counting the cost of fruit to add to the natural yoghurt) it works out about 50% more expensive for the natural yoghurt option. However, I'm prepared to pay this if the advantages are there.

    I’ve got one of each here now and the following are the nutritional values for each:

    Onken Live Natural Set Yoghurt
    http://www.onken.co.uk/product_details.aspx?catId=onkenNaturalBiopots&productId=biopotNaturalWholemilkset

    71 Calories
    3.9g Protein
    5.7g Carbohydrates (all sugars)
    3.7g Fat
    2.6g Saturates
    - Fibre
    .07g Sodium
    132mg Calcium


    Muller Fruit Corner Yoghurt

    108 Calories
    3.8g Protein
    13.7g Carbohydrates (all sugars)
    3.9g Fat
    2.4g Saturates
    0.3g Fibre
    .1g Sodium
    124mg Calcium


    The main difference appears to be in the sugar levels where there is an 8g difference (after adding, for example, 50g of blueberries which contains 3.3g sugars, the difference is about 4.7g sugars). Therefore, the Onken option (with added blueberries) contains 34% less sugars.

    Is the reduction in sugars the only advantage of the Onken option or is there an advantage in the fact that it contains Bio Cultures inside (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium longum & Streptococcus thermophilus).

    Finally, from a nutritional standpoint, what are the main advantages of adding the Onken (or similar) option to your diet.


Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 6,376 Mod ✭✭✭✭Macha


    If you look at the live yoghurt, it's lower in:

    calories
    carbs (sugars)
    fat
    sodium

    It's higher in
    protein
    saturated fat
    calcium.

    I think that speaks for itself. Also, the Muller is more processed & a consistent piece of advice for healthy eating is try to get back to the basic foodstuffs & away from things that your great grandparents would never have eaten (general rule with obvious exceptions like protein shakes). I think the live cultures can do you no harm but only do a considerable amount of good if you have indigestion problems.

    You said that it's 50% more expensive but we're not really talking about an expensive item here; in real terms, is the difference around €1? Also, I just checked out the Tesco website & the Muller yogurts are only 175g (€4.92/kg), while the Onken pots are 500g (3.16/kg). so in reality, the Onken pots are cheaper.

    I would personally recommend the Glenisk 500g natural yogurt pots. They're €1.92 each (€3.84/kg) but Irish, organic & oh so yummmmmmy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 451 ✭✭mack1


    Natural yoghurts contain bacteria that help your digestive system, immune system etc etc


Advertisement