Banned By Thaedydal

pirelli

I was banned. So here it is Thaedydal, lets see that Child protection act. I wont be sorry if you find some dusty peice of legislation, Even if you do whip up some law or new act that just came out, your interpretation of it is erroneous. If there is NOT a child protection act in Ireland. You should be banned.

Marcus.Aurelius

The Child Act 2001 and Child Care Act 1991 are of use, but even within the context, having read back over the thread in question, I have to admit your banning seems harsh, although you did not phrase your disagreement in the form of a question, but you did throw a little personal abuse her way too.

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=56477731&postcount=75

Seem's she is just burning our little dears to crisp so she can confidentially say that she has never handled a child.

Nevyn

You want to argue about a topic in a thread here after you were banned from the forum it belongs in ?
Your daft.
You can't have the arguement in the appropiate forum cos you are banned from there so you want to have it here ?
Nope not playing that game try when your ban is up.

You were banned for adding to the train wreck which was that thread.

Oh and for the record I have children have been a guide asst capt, a scout leader founded and help run an foroige club.

pirelli

Marcus.Aurelius wrote: »

The Child Act 2001 and Child Care Act 1991 are of use, but even within the context, having read back over the thread in question, I have to admit your banning seems harsh, although you did not phrase your disagreement in the form of a question, but you did throw a little personal abuse her way too.

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=56477731&postcount=75

Thanks for that Marcus Aurelius. I felt Thaedydal issued an unduly harsh Ban.
Instead of dealing with the post; Thaedydal it seems has attacked the poster rather than admit how erroneous ( uneccessary) and offensive her opinions were to the general public.

As for the acts, they are more for district court guidlines and dont deal with
the topic in parenting forum.
They are mostly irrelevant and they are very general and couldn't be used on the issue we were discussing. You might be aware that there are a host of child protection guidlines being used by agencies that deal with children.

These guidlines are many and varied and the majority would not support Thaedydals views. The child protection acts focus on the childs personality and physical safety and would advocate protecting a child from sunburn. The child protection guidlines that people see in agencies are not enforced by law and are there as a result of reporting child abuse laws etc..

There is no Irish Child protection act that can be enforced.

corcaighcailin9

I don't know the full history here so feel free to tell me to fcuk off good and lively if you wish but speaking as a primary school teacher, I would never, ever apply suntan lotion to a child in my care. In warm weather, I advise each parent in writing that they may wish to apply suntan lotion every morning but that school policy dictates I can't apply suntan lotion to anyone. I have never had a complaint from a parent regarding this policy.
Sorry for hijacking.

pirelli

corcaighcailin9 wrote: »

I don't know the full history here so feel free to tell me to fcuk off good and lively if you wish but speaking as a primary school teacher, I would never, ever apply suntan lotion to a child in my care. In warm weather, I advise each parent in writing that they may wish to apply suntan lotion every morning but that school policy dictates I can't apply suntan lotion to anyone. I have never had a complaint from a parent regarding this policy.
Sorry for hijacking.

You want to argue about a topic in a thread here after you were banned from the forum it belongs in ?
Your daft.
You can't have the arguement in the appropiate forum cos you are banned from there so you want to have it here ?
Nope not playing that game try when your ban is up.

You were banned for adding to the train wreck which was that thread

Sorry corcaighcailin9 I have to agree with Thaedydal here. We are not discussing the merits of suncream. Each to their own and all that. As for Thaedydal and enforcing the child protection act...... That's corrupting opinions,considering there is no such act.

corcaighcailin9

OK fair enough sorry.

pirelli

Thaedydal wrote: »

Oh and for the record I have children have been a guide asst capt, a scout leader founded and help run an foroige club.

Oh have you, God help us. Show me Irelands child protection act , or get off that high horse Thaedydal. My respect for you is dissapating quickly and if people could see the Pm you sent they would suddenly see the stereotype that I see. The mental health act might be more appropiate for you Thaedydal. At least it exists anyway.

feylya

Posting private messages is frowned upon greatly.

pirelli

corcaighcailin9 wrote: »

OK fair enough sorry.

Teachers and suncream don't do it for me either.

Nevyn

Again it wasn't what you asked about it was the manner and lack of civility in your posting in a thread which was already a mess which got you banned for a week.

After the week is up I will discuss that topic with you in the appropriate forum which is the parenting forum and not this one.

orestes

pirelli wrote: »

Oh have you, God help us.

That's bang out of order imo.

OP I haven't read the thread in question but you're attitude in this thread is edging it in the lolcat direction and not going to do you any favours. Coming into feedback and demanding action or acting in a confrontational manner is going to make people less likely to take you seriously. /my 2c

pirelli

feylya wrote: »

Posting private messages is frowned upon greatly.

I had already have sent a PM to Thaedydal confirming I would post the PM in Feedback. Thaedydal hasn't objected.

Tar.Aldarion

Posting private messages is frowned upon greatly.

It relates to the topic at hand, I say let them frown.

corcaighcailin9

pirelli wrote: »

Teachers and suncream don't do it for me either.

Meaning....???

feylya

Fair enough.

Fight da powah and all that.

Tar.Aldarion

feylya wrote: »

Fair enough.

Fight da powah and all that.

That's the spirit.

pirelli

orestes wrote: »

That's bang out of order imo.

OP I haven't read the thread in question but you're attitude in this thread is edging it in the lolcat direction and not going to do you any favours. Coming into feedback and demanding action or acting in a confrontational manner is going to make people less likely to take you seriously. /my 2c

Please, Please, Read the thread. I dont care for thaedydals ban and I am not here begging for it to be removed and i am not a trying to adopt an attitude to get support for thaedydals ban or sympathy.

This thread is here to elicit from Thaedydal the fact that there is no Child protetcion act in ireland. Feedback isnt just contesting a Ban or garnering sympathy. I just want Thaedydal to admit that she profited from banning me and was biased and perverted the natural course of justice. This is what disgusts me.

If i was wrong about this Thaedydal would have explained her reasons...., but she has just enforced the view for me that she was biased.

Nevyn

pirelli wrote: »

I had already have sent a PM to Thaedydal confirming I would post the PM in Feedback. Thaedydal hasn't objected.

Lack of consent does not imply or confer consent you were not given permission to post any pms from me to you.

Nevyn

pirelli wrote: »

Please, Please, Read the thread. I dont care for thaedydals ban and I am not here begging for it to be removed and i am not a trying to adopt an attitude to get support for thaedydals ban or sympathy.

So you agree that you were posting in a manner which was not civil despite 2 warnings to do so already in the thread and that the ban for that is fair ?

pirelli wrote: »

This thread is here to elicit from Thaedydal the fact that there is no Child protetcion act in ireland.

I already told you that if you want to query that post of mine that sure I will enguage with you on that topic in the right forum for that which is the parenting forum alas you will have to wait until your ban is up.

pirelli wrote: »

Feedback isnt just contesting a Ban or garnering sympathy. I just want Thaedydal to admit that she profited from banning me and was biased and perverted the natural course of justice. This is what disgusts me.

If i was wrong about this Thaedydal would have explained her reasons...., but she has just enforced the view for me that she was biased.

I hate lawyer speak really I do esp in feedback threads.

IanCurtis

feylya wrote: »

Posting private messages is frowned upon greatly.

A mod did that to me the other night!!! :eek::eek::eek:

pirelli

Thaedydal wrote: »

Lack of consent does not imply or confer consent you were not given permission to post any pms from me to you.

Thaedydal, At least have the courtesy of replying to my PM rather than coming onto feedback and complaing about it. I haven't posted your PM yet.

QUOTE=Thaedydal;56479163]So you agree that you were posting in a manner which was not civil despite 2 warnings to do so already in the thread and that the ban for that is fair ?

Don't cross examine me Thaedydal and then whimper on about lawyer speak.

I don't agree with you and I could never agree there is a child protection act
in ireland because there isnt. As for your 2 warnings, There was some debate going on which I was not privy too. I did not see any warnings.

As for my response to your post, You ban in that respect was found to be unduly harsh.

I already told you that if you want to query that post of mine that sure I will enguage with you on that topic in the right forum for that which is the parenting forum alas you will have to wait until your ban is up.


I hate lawyer speak really I do esp in feedback threads.

Your the one quoting Acts of law and enforcing them on your forum. These laws don't exist. Better to be a lawyer than a FAKE.

Nevyn

pirelli wrote: »

Thaedydal, At least have the courtesy of replying to my PM rather than coming onto feedback and complaing about it. I haven't posted your PM yet.

As per your pm you asked me to reply here.

pirelli wrote: »

Don't cross examine me Thaedydal and then whimper on about lawyer speak.

Bored now.

pirelli wrote: »

I don't agree with you and I could never agree there is a child protection act
in ireland because there isnt.

We can have that chat when you are no longer banned.

pirelli wrote: »

As for your 2 warnings, There was some debate going on which I was not privy too. I did not see any warnings.

Not my fault you didn't' read the entire thread and missed the warnings and anyway you are expected to read and comply with the charter with out being warned.

pirelli wrote: »

As for my response to your post, You ban in that respect was found to be unduly harsh.

I disagree, it's been a case it seems of spare the banstick and spoil the forum.

pirelli wrote: »

Your the one quoting Acts of law and enforcing them on your forum. These laws don't exist. Better to be a lawyer than a FAKE.

My you are all worked up aren't you.

pirelli

As per your pm you asked me to reply here.

Bored now.

Nonsense! how do you get away with it.

We can have that chat when you are no longer banned.

I find that comment contains an element of discrimination based on my race and its laws.

Not my fault you didn't' read the entire thread and missed the warnings and anyway you are expected to read and comply with the charter with out being warned.

I did read the thread ( not the debate ) and charter and attacked your post and not you.

I disagree, it's been a case it seems of spare the banstick and spoil the forum.

May we agree to disagree.


My you are all worked up aren't you.

Can I post your PM because it would make you look very silly

[/QUOTE]

Well you have me in knots of laughter, and As a scout you would know all about knots. Knots of nothing from Thaedydal about Irelands supposed child protection act thats doesn't exist.

I find that your ban was based on foreign laws that you prescribe too and was therefore was racist due to your obvious bias and you have discriminated aginst me based on my race and my culture and my ethinic minority. I will make a complaint to the equality section of boards.ie that probably doesn't exist but since when did that matter.

They will be in contact with you via this Feedback thread Thaedydal. They will issue you with their findings and you will un ban me if they so decide.

tallaght01

Pirelli, I think there might still be a guy in rural Roscommon who isn't aware that there is no child protection act in irish law!

But, after this thread, he's the only one. :pac:

pirelli

tallaght01 wrote: »

Pirelli, I think there might still be a guy in rural Roscommon who isn't aware that there is no child protection act in irish law!

But, after this thread, he's the only one. :pac:

I just shanghighed him to the isle of Man, so technically he can rule in his own sovereignty. He will probably meet Thaedydal over there.

Marcus.Aurelius

I find that your ban was based on foreign laws that you prescribe too and was therefore was racist due to your obvious bias and you have discriminated aginst me based on my race and my culture and my ethinic minority. I will make a complaint to the equality section of boards.ie that probably doesn't exist but since when did that matter.

If you could qualify that statement for me please, I'm not sure what you mean there?

Wibbs

Race??? WTF. Eh any slim argument you had - and it was so slim, Bob Geldof as we speak is organising a gig - went out the nearest window when you started going on about "race" and "laws".

I'll put good money your definition of race and how it pertains to this will be uproarious.

Add in the childish tit for tat nonsense about PM's etc and the level of daftness is banging against the stops.

PS private site. There is no freedom of speech, just a loose bunch of largely like minded individuals who abide by rules most follow. I disagree with people all the time. I agree with them too. It's you know, debate, conversation, occasionally bullshít, it's not serious. at least not that serious that knickers should be bunching this much.

MagicMarker

Willies willies, i like willies.

It's i love willies.

What?

i love willies.

Sorry can you keep it down please?

Genghiz Cohen

ZOMG A CHILD NOT BEING PROTECKTD LOL

pirelli

Wibbs wrote: »

Race??? WTF. Eh any slim argument you had - and it was so slim, Bob Geldof as we speak is organising a gig - went out the nearest window when you started going on about "race" and "laws".

I'll put good money your definition of race and how it pertains to this will be uproarious.

Add in the childish tit for tat nonsense about PM's etc and the level of daftness is banging against the stops.

PS private site. There is no freedom of speech, just a loose bunch of largely like minded individuals who abide by rules most follow. I disagree with people all the time. I agree with them too. It's you know, debate, conversation, occasionally bullshít, it's not serious. at least not that serious that knickers should be bunching this much.

Wibbs: you might wear frilly knickers, but I don't, and please don't get thick about how slim an argument is when its not an argument but is an established scientific fact, that there is no such act in ireland.



I know boards.ie never sleeps but i am putting this thread away for the night. It's ( the thread ) intention was to get thaedydal to explain the child protection act. Thaedydal knows she is wrong and wont co-operate. If ya had read all the threads you'd see Taedydal asked me to open a thread only to in the end just basically to say feck all about it. I wasn't being sincere when I accussed thaedydal of racism, It was just light banter.

I'm not spending all week replying to anymore messages and either i imagine is thaedydal. She admits she is bored, and to be honest her covert evasion has worked. I can pretend there is a child protection act for a day or two, it's probably going to rain anyway. Although it is forecast for sunny spells.


Just running the ship ( thread ) into the sand and forgetting about it.
:P !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

pirelli

Marcus.Aurelius wrote: »

If you could qualify that statement for me please, I'm not sure what you mean there?

Just banter on my part, Marcus.

Wibbs wrote: »

Race??? WTF. Eh any slim argument you had - and it was so slim, Bob Geldof as we speak is organising a gig - went out the nearest window when you started going on about "race" and "laws".

I'll put good money your definition of race and how it pertains to this will be uproarious.

Add in the childish tit for tat nonsense about PM's etc and the level of daftness is banging against the stops.

PS private site. There is no freedom of speech, just a loose bunch of largely like minded individuals who abide by rules most follow. I disagree with people all the time. I agree with them too. It's you know, debate, conversation, occasionally bullshít, it's not serious. at least not that serious that knickers should be bunching this much.

Go away wibbs

MagicMarker wrote: »

Willies willies, i like willies.

It's i love willies.

What?

i love willies.

Sorry can you keep it down please?

You must love wibbly wobbly wonder then.
&
What can of worms did I open! It was just banter.

Genghiz Cohen wrote: »

ZOMG A CHILD NOT BEING PROTECKTD LOL

Just forget the racism bit.

Tar.Aldarion

pirelli wrote: »

Your all banned.

You're all banned.

kyp_durron

Tara Le d'Arion wrote: »

You're all banned.

Who is banned?

orestes

kyp_durron wrote: »

Who is banned?

You.

Tar.Aldarion

You're all banned. Is this a game?


...and winter is coming.

eVeNtInE

This post has been deleted.

pirelli

Tara Le d'Arion wrote: »

You're all banned.

kyp_durron wrote: »

Who is banned?

orestes wrote: »

You.

Tara Le d'Arion wrote: »

You're all banned. Is this a game?


...and winter is coming.

All of ya

AlmightyCushion

orestes wrote: »

You.

You're a you.

eVeNtInE

This post has been deleted.

orestes

AlmightyCushion wrote: »

You're a you.

I'll you're a you you.

AlmightyCushion

orestes wrote: »

I'll you're a you you.

I'll you're a you, your face.

Bob the Builder

orestes wrote: »

You.

No. YOU.


in all honesty pirelli, if you were sitting beside me and you said to me "you've got children, god help us", I would knock you right in the face, but thats just me...

i hate it when people make snipe remarks and then go looking for sympathy...

pirelli

corcaighcailin9 wrote: »

Meaning....???

I dont see the relevance.

orestes

AlmightyCushion wrote: »

I'll you're a you, your face.

I'll you're a you you yore mas face

eVeNtInE

This post has been deleted.

pirelli

nevf wrote: »

No. YOU.


in all honesty pirelli, if you were sitting beside me and you said to me "you've got children, god help us", I would knock you right in the face, but thats just me...

i hate it when people make snipe remarks and then go looking for sympathy...

True it is pathetic, but in all fairness you havent seen thaedydal's Pm and it does justify my snide remark . Thaedaydal wont let me post it. It wasn't directed towrd the fact that she has children. Just goes to show that you shouldn't randomly assault people without getting all the fact's.

Feelgood

Might I just add that Pirelli is a rubber tyre and your all a bunch of slaves.

orestes

Feelgood wrote: »

Might I just add that Pirelli is a rubber tyre and your all a bunch of slaves.

No, you might not. Now be on your way.

Tar.Aldarion

I googled pirelli, this came up first. This is she:

I know agree with all pirelli says.

Overheal

pirelli wrote: »

I just want Thaedydal to admit that she profited from banning me and was biased and perverted the natural course of justice. This is what disgusts me.

Do Mods get commission for banning people now?