why get rid of the good ones??

itchy&scratchy

ok so im not saying jenifer is all that interesting, but what are you gonna watch if ye keep evicting the ones who bitch, stirr sh1te, are involved in love triangles...etc
why evict the ones who are interesting to watch.
which few would you watch
jen,dale,slivia,rebecca,alex,steph.(BITCHING)

or

mario,lisa,mohamed,rex,rachel,kat.(BORING)


seriously? why get rid off the ones who mke the show 'slightly watchable'.
its the same every year. the good ones always get evicted.

Charlie

People said the same when Alex was nominated. Life goes on.

And tbh, I would rather watch something 'dull', then give these morons air time. Some of their actions have been morally repulsive, and there is no way I could justify inflicting them on other housemates for any longer, solely for my entertainment.

Call Me Jimmy

Are you taking the piss charlie? That's incredible!

itchy&scratchy

rather watch something dull then give them air time??
alex was thrown out by bb, not nominated and evicted.


OOOOOOOhhh k..................

and tbh the only one i could say did anything morally repulsive is alex and dennis, and ya they should be gone.
but evicting steph ahead of lisa or mario,or silvia ahead of mohammed??? i dont think so.
now jen ahead of rex??

why keep the boring ones? it doesnt make sense. not for viewing purposes anyway

Sabertooth

these people get evicted because they deserve it....why would u want someone who u dont like win because they were bitchy and spiteful....jen gone this week...bex the fat cow gone next week...i wonder how smug they will be when they realise they are hated...and as for jen (cheryl cole lookalike my arse) i cant wait until shes booted and booed on friday its only what she deserves

Call Me Jimmy

Well if we all watch paint dry all day long then nobody gets hurt anywhere in the world!

Sabertooth

imagine the scenario....jennifer somehow wins...now u have to listen to her in interviews...read in the paper about what z list celeb shes dating...ect ect...these people only desire fame..crush them before they get the chance

Call Me Jimmy

How do you have to listen/read interviews? I've never read/listened to a single big brother interview in my life!

Sabertooth

im going with chantelle from last years big bro as my example here....

itchy&scratchy

no obviously these people arent goin to win, but if this series is going to be in anyway interesting at all to watch then keep jen in and get rid of rex.
i really cant understand how you want to watch a bunch of boring people sit around a garden. the bb producers would have a tough time coming up with an hour footage every nite if wer left with the likes of mario,rex,mohammed,lisa,rachel.
bring on the paint.

Sir Digby Chicken Caesar

charlie mchugh wrote: »

People said the same when Alex was nominated. Life goes on.

Charlie

Call Me Jimmy wrote: »

Are you taking the piss charlie? That's incredible!

No i'm not taking the piss. What part of my post indictaed that I was? The bit which you didn't want to hear?

itchy&scratchy wrote: »

rather watch something dull then give them air time??
alex was thrown out by bb, not nominated and evicted.


OOOOOOOhhh k..................

Wrong. Alex was nominated for eviction by fellow housemates. The general consensus on most BB forums was that she was a goner. However, there was the same tabloid obsessed people like yourself, who claimed that people shouldn't vote her out as BB would be 'boring' without her. Her removal only brought the inevitable forward by two days, and spared her the wrath of a live audience.

itchy&scratchy wrote: »

and tbh the only one i could say did anything morally repulsive is alex and dennis, and ya they should be gone.

The likes of Jen and Sylvia kicked up a massive fuss, and balled there heads off when Dennis was kicked out, as well as wishing eviction upon Mo in the aftermath. Considering the man had been spat on for no apparent reason, I would call their blind worship of Dennis after his disgusting behaviour morally repulsive and incredibly offensive towards Mo.

Same goes for Dale with his blind following of Jen, irrespective of how badly he treats other housemates in the process, all because he wants to 'nail some fanny'.

itchy&scratchy wrote: »

why keep the boring ones? it doesnt make sense. not for viewing purposes anyway

Viewing figures for BB have been tumbling for the last 3 years. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that it's novelty is wearing thin, but alot of people are sick of seeing the same stereotypical sycophants year in year out.

These people do more damage than good with their bullying. The biggest thing to affect Big Brother's ratings, and reputation, was the horrific treatment of Shilpa Shetty. This years BB has skated close to the ice with similar behaviour, and if BB is taken of the air, it will be because of incidents such as these, and not because 'fun and real' house mates have been evicted.

Call Me Jimmy wrote: »

Well if we all watch paint dry all day long then nobody gets hurt anywhere in the world!

No one is forcing you to watch it. The public will decide what it wants. It just sounds like sour grapes on your behalf. If you're that hard up if car crash tv, try 2girls1cup.

Call Me Jimmy wrote: »

How do you have to listen/read interviews?

Does the same not apply to you watching BB?? No one will force you to watch it.

nicolaonfire

charlie mchugh wrote: »

And tbh, I would rather watch something 'dull', then give these morons air time. Some of their actions have been morally repulsive, and there is no way I could justify inflicting them on other housemates for any longer, solely for my entertainment.

Yeah i totally agree here.
If these people are kept in, they start to think that they are actually liked by the public and that annoys me.
It's shocking this early into BB how much bad behaviour has gone on.
So what if the dull housemates are left in? Big Brother will always have something up his sleeve to stir it up again!

I hope Jen goes this week. She's nasty.
But who will Dale and Stuart compete over then? Cat?!!

Sharpshooter

charlie mchugh wrote: »

People said the same when Alex was nominated. Life goes on.

And tbh, I would rather watch something 'dull', then give these morons air time. Some of their actions have been morally repulsive, and there is no way I could justify inflicting them on other housemates for any longer, solely for my entertainment.

+1:D
BB knows exactly what they are doing when they pick
the contestants for this programme,
Who will get on who's nerves ect and who will most likely be nominated early on.
So just sit back and enjoy.
The one's that are already gone will sink into oblivion very quickly.
15 seconds of fame.:D

Naos

Erm, are you kidding?

I hate bitching and I hate watching it even more. I find it so boring and mind numblingly frustrating. Honestly, when they start their bull****ting I just take out the guitar and play away until it's over.

How anyone can find that interesting is beyond me.

LolaDub

charlie mchugh wrote: »

People said the same when Alex was nominated. Life goes on.

And tbh, I would rather watch something 'dull', then give these morons air time. Some of their actions have been morally repulsive, and there is no way I could justify inflicting them on other housemates for any longer, solely for my entertainment.

+1

itchy&scratchy

so ye would rather watch them all sit around the garden chattting about the weather?! what would you have to discuss on here so, if ye evict all the interesting ones.
every thread started here is mainly on each one ye love to hate.
im just saying watch every show on ch4. see the footage they get of lisa,rachel,mario,mohamed,rex.
its so boring its unbelievable.

for example, the first week....why keep mario ahead of steph??? doesnt make sense imo. surely she would have brought more to the show then him or lisa for that matter, and dont go on about the people and their 5 secs of fame bcoz they are ALL in it for that.

Sharpshooter

Steph??????.
Oh yeah l'd forgotten about her already
Mario is far more interesting than she ever would have been in there.
Mabey you just don't get him.:)

zuroph

jens footage is unbelievably dull, no1 cares that dale and stu are fawning over her, its intensely boring, so yes, id love to get rid of her.

itchy&scratchy

sharpshooterH wrote: »

Mario is far more interesting than she ever would have been in there.

AAAAAAH HA HA HA! ARE YOU ACTUALLY SERIOUS.:eek:

itchy&scratchy

zuroph wrote: »

jens footage is unbelievably dull, no1 cares that dale and stu are fawning over her, its intensely boring, so yes, id love to get rid of her.

ya coz rex is the funniest/most interesting character ever, telling bex she shouldnt be eating cookies(ie. shes fat, surely girls should be rageing over that)
id rather watch jen then him.

Charlie

itchy&scratchy wrote: »

ya coz rex is the funniest/most interesting character ever, telling bex she shouldnt be eating cookies(ie. shes fat, surely girls should be rageing over that)
id rather watch jen then him.

Why can't you just accept that everyone has an opinion, and rightfully entitled to one, and sometimes opinons differ. You've asked your question, and gotten you're response. Move along and stop trolling.

Mods, may I suggest the thread be locked as it's only going around in roundabouts now.

Sharpshooter

itchy&scratchy wrote: »

ya coz rex is the funniest/most interesting character ever, telling bex she shouldnt be eating cookies(ie. shes fat, surely girls should be rageing over that)
id rather watch jen then him.

Us girls as you put it can see bex for what she is,
We don't see her weight when we are considering
who we like.
l would rather watch paint dry than watch Bex.:p

itchy&scratchy

so your gonna keep him in ,even tho he was abuseing an overweight girl about her size......
well when ya keep getting rid of the good ones ya mite aswell be watching paint dry.

itchy&scratchy

charlie mchugh wrote: »

Why can't you just accept that everyone has an opinion, and rightfully entitled to one, and sometimes opinons differ. You've asked your question, and gotten you're response. Move along and stop trolling.

Mods, may I suggest the thread be locked as it's only going around in roundabouts now.

im allowed argue my points as much as you. if your gonna quote me, im gonna answer.

Mr.Nice Guy

itchy&scratchy wrote:

so your gonna keep him in ,even tho he was abuseing an overweight girl about her size......

How did he abuse her? And you've just said she's overweight yourself. I'd say it's far worse for her to be making out that people had been calling him names.

Jen is nothing but this year's Saskia. A 'will she, won't she' thing going on which no one cares about. She'll be in magazines in a few weeks or months posing naked and we all know it.

Sharpshooter

charlie mchugh wrote: »

Why can't you just accept that everyone has an opinion, and rightfully entitled to one, and sometimes opinons differ. You've asked your question, and gotten you're response. Move along and stop trolling.

Mods, may I suggest the thread be locked as it's only going around in roundabouts now.

Mods, l agree,this person is more concerned with Becca's
weight than anything that is related to this Thread.

Charlie

itchy&scratchy wrote: »

im allowed argue my points as much as you. if your gonna quote me, im gonna answer.

Yes but you don't add anything new in your posts. You just rehash the same old 'jen is interesting, everyone else is boring' argument.

I'm leaving this thread until something new and insightful is posted to it, and I ask others:

Sharpshooter

charlie mchugh wrote: »

Yes but you don't add anything new in your posts. You just rehash the same old 'jen is interesting, everyone else is boring' argument.

I'm leaving this thread until something new and insightful is posted to it, and I ask others:

Agree .
As the issue seems to be about Weight,we should put this Troll on a Diet.:mad:

itchy&scratchy

Mr.Nice Guy wrote: »

How did he abuse her? And you've just said she's overweight yourself. I'd say it's far worse for her to be making out that people had been calling him names.

Jen is nothing but this year's Saskia. A 'will she, won't she' thing going on which no one cares about. She'll be in magazines in a few weeks or months posing naked and we all know it.

il give an example,last year seany got evicted before, the rich entreprenure guy(cant remember his name). even tho he brought nothing to the show.i could give loads more examples.... throughout the bb series, they always evict the ones that make the show watchable,and leave the boring ones in. thats all im saying.

saying someone is overweight isnt abuseing them.
she was going for a biscuit, and he said, i dont think you need them. implying she was fat or watever, just a sly dig.

and how is this trolling?wat am i doing that implys that? just becoz not everyone agrees with eachother, jesus,cant ya have an argument on this?

Sharpshooter

The guy you are refering to was'nt evicted.
As far as l can remember someone close to him died,
( someone correct me if l am wrong here).
And l do remember feeling sorry for the guy.
Sly dig's are everywhere, you learn to deal with them.:rolleyes:

itchy&scratchy

ok im gonna try and end this thread but before i do i want people answer on this.il go back to my original post.

Q: If there was 5 remaining housemates that you had to watch for 2 weeks in the Big B house..... which group would it be.(i know yer gonna disagree with me anyway,but remember,this show is supposed to be for entertainment purposes.)

GROUP1:jen,dale,slivia,rebecca,steph?

or

GROUP 2:mario,lisa,mohamed,rex,rachel?

itchy&scratchy

sharpshooterH wrote: »

The guy you are refering to was'nt evicted.
As far as l can remember someone close to him died,
( someone correct me if l am wrong here).
And l do remember feeling sorry for the guy.
Sly dig's are everywhere, you learn to deal with them.:rolleyes:

yes but he was up for eviction before he left,along with seany and carole i think. the public evicted seany.

Sharpshooter

itchy&scratchy wrote: »

ok im gonna try and end this thread but before i do i want people answer on this.il go back to my original post.

Q: If there was 5 remaining housemates that you had to watch for 2 weeks in the Big B house..... which group would it be.(i know yer gonna disagree with me anyway,but remember,this show is supposed to be for entertainment purposes.)

GROUP1:jen,dale,slivia,rebecca,steph?

or

GROUP 2:mario,lisa,mohamed,rex,rachel?

WHY include Sylvia,????????????????
KEEP UP.

Sharpshooter

itchy&scratchy wrote: »

yes but he was up for eviction before he left,along with seany and carole i think. the public evicted seany.

And the public spoke.
Which is what this programme is all about.:)

itchy&scratchy

sharpshooterH wrote: »

WHY include Sylvia,????????????????
KEEP UP.

because she was evicted ahead of mohammed, like steph (included aswell )was evicted ahead of mario and lisa.
believe me i am keeping up.

Sharpshooter

itchy&scratchy wrote: »

because she was evicted ahead of mohammed, like steph (included aswell )was evicted ahead of mario and lisa.
believe me i am keeping up.

Are you for real??????
Because she was evicted ahead of Mo?
And Mario and Lisa ???????
AGAIN "THE Public HAVE Spoken.:rolleyes:

itchy&scratchy

ya so group 1 or 2?

well thats the point im making....the public always evict the good ones.

Sharpshooter

itchy&scratchy wrote: »

ya so group 1 or 2?

well thats the point im making....the public always evict the good ones.

SO NOT GETTING THE POINT.:rolleyes:

itchy&scratchy

ah watever you know well what i mean. u never answered the question anyway, so il presume wat i think anyway!!! nite nite:cool:

Sharpshooter

itchy&scratchy wrote: »

ah watever you know well what i mean. u never answered the question anyway, so il presume wat i think anyway!!! nite nite:cool:

Of course you will and we are all entitled to our opinion.
But there is a long way to go yet and l am not putting all
my chickens in one basket as the saying goes.
l don't think BB is finished putting Housemates in,which
is why l didn't answer your Question.
Let's wait and see cause l am sure we have not seen
ALL the Housemates yet.:)

itchy&scratchy

oh i bet my house there will be someone new,next week. when jen leaves on fri, it will be a woman.to spice things up.

if you kept the entertaining ones in tho, there might not be a need for new housemates.

and i know well why you didnt answer my question. you know im right.;)

Sharpshooter

itchy&scratchy wrote: »

oh i bet my house there will be someone new,next week. when jen leaves on fri, it will be a woman.to spice things up.

if you kept the entertaining ones in tho, there might not be a need for new housemates.

and i know well why you didnt answer my question. you know im right.;)

l am all for chatting about BB here,
BUT l did answer your question.:rolleyes:

ArmaniJeanss

itchy&scratchy wrote: »

if you kept the entertaining ones in tho, there might not be a need for new housemates.

You seem to think that everyones agrees who the 'entertaining ones' are. But theres a sizeable amount of us who fast forward through the bits where Jen is talking about the Dale/Stuart/Jen triangle cause it bores us silly and will be thrilled when she goes on Friday.
Rex entertains me far more to be honest, he can use actual words and logic in an argument rather than just screaming his head off like Rebecca or Sylvia etc.

However I agree with you that in general terms the Alexandra/Charley/Saskia type characters are important for the program -I'm sure BB have a few replacement airheads ready to come in.

itchy&scratchy

im trying to think of one point when rex mohamed mario lisa rachel, actually made me laugh or i thought that was really good or anything...ya know?
they bore the crap outta me to watch. thats my opinion anyway.

and by the way, when i was asking which group you would prefer to watch, i wasnt talking about Alexandra/Charley/Saskia .......

im talking about the ones who got evicted/or will get evicted ahead of the other group.