Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Bio-Ethanol Conversion

  • 16-04-2008 8:54pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,366 ✭✭✭


    So I finally did it after all the humming and hawning. Not the most technically minded, so I got a proper job done on it in a local garage. Was €570 all in.

    So why some of you may ask (I know some of you aren't asking) did I do this?

    The other week I passed a garage with prices up that looked like last January's $US exchange rate and had been thinking about this for a while anyway.

    The promotional material was shiny:pac::pac: (I can send the pdf for anyone interested) and the price on that quoting last May's bio-ethanol price is the price I paid lastnight when I topped up the tank.

    95.9c...still a bit steep considering there's consumption going to be lost on it, but I reckon it'll probably pay off in 18 months to 2 years.

    There's a bit of a performance bonus included too, which can't hurt. And I get the green glow of environmentalism.... I know I know there are envirocons to it too, but overall it's probably better for the environment.

    Now the cons...it'll take a while to turnover with 3/4 of a tank of petrol in it as the combustion ratios are different, bit it will still run perfectly with petrol only, so I'm not gonna get stranded in Bally-go-wegotsno-biofuel.


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    Would be interested in seeing the pdf alright. Why don't you attach it to a post, I reckon there'd be a lot of other ppl interested too.

    Have you access to E85 over there? Thought it was only available in a couple of Maxols in Dublin.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,366 ✭✭✭ninty9er


    Attached.

    Also a list of Maxol stations providing E85.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 990 ✭✭✭rosboy


    I'd definitely be interested in seeing the PDF too.

    Did you say there was a performance increase in the car?

    Edit: Sorry, you posted the pdf while i was senting my post. Thanks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    Very good, thanks for that.

    I was looking at buying in a Full Flex Gold kit from the US and fitting it myself a while back. I'll ask you again in a while how you're getting on.

    Do you notice much of a difference on E85 performance wise?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,147 ✭✭✭E92


    This article is rather defensive of bio ethanol.

    One of the more interesting things they say for the bio ethanol doubters is "Second-generation biofuels are being made from waste green matter, such as the by-products of the food processing and timber industries. Volkswagen, for example, has a shareholding in Iogen, a Canadian biotechnology company that
    is developing a process that uses enzymes to turn timber waste and fast-growing grasses into ethanol."

    If we could get bio ethanol to work, we would practically have solved the emissions problem overnight from cars.

    And bio ethanol works of course in suitably adapted petrol engines too:)!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,036 ✭✭✭colly10


    What parts did they replace, did they do the fuel tank and fuel lines, injectors?
    What else?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,366 ✭✭✭ninty9er


    I only had it done yesterday, so the performance difference will tell when all the unleaded is out of the system. I'm going to Dundalk tomorrow, so the return trip should tell as there are apparently 2 E85 pumps there.

    Actually now that I look at the pdf....prices have come down to 95.9c. that's 75.5p....from my vague recollection of petrol prices it was around 1996?? the last time we saw those type of figures:eek::eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,366 ✭✭✭ninty9er


    colly10 wrote: »
    What parts did they replace, did they do the fuel tank and fuel lines, injectors?
    What else?

    They just do a mod on the cylinders and put an engine management unit in AFAIK. no new tank or lines or mechanical parts required.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    colly10 wrote: »
    What parts did they replace, did they do the fuel tank and fuel lines, injectors?
    What else?
    It's a unit that is wired inline with the injectors. A requirement for running on ethanol is that the injectors stay open for longer to all more fuel in.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,244 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    In the pdf it says that it is recommended to have 10% of th etank of unleaded. Is there any damage that could be doen running on 100% E85 all the time?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    Stekelly wrote: »
    In the pdf it says that it is recommended to have 10% of th etank of unleaded. Is there any damage that could be doen running on 100% E85 all the time?
    That's kinda curious as E85 is 15% unleaded, so they're suggesting 25% unleaded. There can be a gunk build up in the fuel tank (esp in older cars) that E85 will "loosen" quite quickly.
    If you think you are a likely candidate for this issue, we recommend using your first few tanks and then changing the fuel filter as a preventative maintenance item rather than experiencing a problem when you are in a remote area.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,036 ✭✭✭colly10


    JHMEG wrote: »
    It's a unit that is wired inline with the injectors. A requirement for running on ethanol is that the injectors stay open for longer to all more fuel in.

    But say if I put the boot to the floor, even if it is leaving them open longer it's still not going to be able to get the required amount of fuel in on time causing the car to run lean for a short period which will cause detonation.
    Maybe thats not the case on all cars but thats the impression I got. €570 is cheap but are you getting a cheap job.
    I've definitely read of bioethanol eating fuel lines/tanks before.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,718 ✭✭✭Matt Simis


    Ive had my finger on the button to buy the Full Flex kit on eBay and install it myself. The only thing holding me back is the possible 25% hit to MPG. E85 at 0.95c a litre multiplied by 1.25 is about EUR1.18 which means it works out the same as regular petrol. Thats not including the advised 10% per tank of vanilla unleaded you are recommended to have in there too.

    With a high compression engine (turbos etc) you could get a custom ECU remap to take advantage of the 100+ Octane you would be running, but this is again increased cost. Hmmm...

    Good link with info: http://e85vehicles.com/e85/


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    colly10 wrote: »
    But say if I put the boot to the floor, even if it is leaving them open longer it's still not going to be able to get the required
    Injectors stay open for a fixed period anyway. With ethanol it's a bit longer than petrol, but nonetheless it's a fixed period. When you put the foot to the floor more air is let in allowing the engine to spin faster and the injectors to inject fuel more frequently.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,036 ✭✭✭colly10


    JHMEG wrote: »
    Injectors stay open for a fixed period anyway. With ethanol it's a bit longer than petrol, but nonetheless it's a fixed period. When you put the foot to the floor more air is let in allowing the engine to spin faster and the injectors to inject fuel more frequently.

    It lets more air in and fuel to match ye? Say if you were previously seeing injector duty of 85% when you put the foot down and now since you changed to E85 you need to consume 25% more to get the AFR correct, then now even if the injector duty was 100% you would still not be getting enough fuel into the engine (as you'd need around 106%) so you would be running lean (unless you get bigger injectors)

    Or have I totally got the wrong idea?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,366 ✭✭✭ninty9er


    JHMEG wrote: »
    That's kinda curious as E85 is 15% unleaded, so they're suggesting 25% unleaded. There can be a gunk build up in the fuel tank (esp in older cars) that E85 will "loosen" quite quickly.


    While it's an E85 leaflet, it's a bio-ethanol conversion so E100 I assume, meaning the petrol is already taken care of. There ain't too many miles on my car but it was idle for a good while (18 months +) so I'll probably change the filter after 1500 miles or so.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    colly10 wrote: »
    It lets more air in and fuel to match ye?
    Putting your foot to the floor does not increase injector duty. The Full Flex yoke does increase injector duty by a small amount when on ethanol, but I'm not sure how much. It doesn't seem to be a problem in typical engines... maybe at say 12,000rpm it would tho.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,036 ✭✭✭colly10


    JHMEG wrote: »
    Putting your foot to the floor does not increase injector duty. The Full Flex yoke does increase injector duty by a small amount when on ethanol, but I'm not sure how much. It doesn't seem to be a problem in typical engines... maybe at say 12,000rpm it would tho.

    If you need 25% more fuel (when running E85) then I assume that the duty would need to be 25% more than it would be on petrol. If the duty before hit 85% when using standard petrol then your standard injectors would not be up to the job?

    Sorry bout the questions, not arguing, just like learning bout this stuff, trying to get the head around it


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    ninty9er wrote: »
    While it's an E85 leaflet, it's a bio-ethanol conversion so E100 I assume, meaning the petrol is already taken care of. There ain't too many miles on my car but it was idle for a good while (18 months +) so I'll probably change the filter after 1500 miles or so.
    I think it's nearly taken for granted these days that "bioethanol" = E85. The only reason we don't have E100 is that it can be consumed and is quite cheap relatively speaking. Eg 8 litres of Coke and E100 = ~ €9 (and what a party!). Compare that to €11 euro in DUTY alone on a bottle of Whisky (VAT is extra) (someone has to pay for all that children's allowance:D).

    Not a bad idea tho to change the fuel filter. It's a fairly simple job. Just open the filler cap first (relieves pressure in the tank from gasses and you don't get fuel p1ssing everywhere). A flick of the wrist undoes the banjo bolts on the filter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,584 ✭✭✭✭Steve


    ninty9er wrote: »
    They just do a mod on the cylinders and put an engine management unit in AFAIK. no new tank or lines or mechanical parts required.

    I thought the issue with bio-ethanol was that it corroded gaskets and seals in the fuel system:confused:

    Were these replaced or was what I heard bullshit?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    colly10 wrote: »
    If you need 25% more fuel (when running E85) then I assume that the duty would need to be 25% more than it would be on petrol.
    Have you stoichiometric mixes into account?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,366 ✭✭✭ninty9er


    stevec wrote: »
    I thought the issue with bio-ethanol was that it corroded gaskets and seals in the fuel system:confused:

    Were these replaced or was what I heard bullshit?

    I believe this was an issue with older cars alright.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,886 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    What about the valve seats? Ithought these needed to be hardened to run long term on E85?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,366 ✭✭✭ninty9er


    What about the valve seats? Ithought these needed to be hardened to run long term on E85?

    Unsure on that one....must check.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    What about the valve seats? Ithought these needed to be hardened to run long term on E85?
    From what I've read, that seems to be one of the myths about an E85 conversion. I think you're more likely (tho not very) to have your fuel lines eaten.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,584 ✭✭✭✭Steve


    ninty9er wrote: »
    I believe this was an issue with older cars alright.

    Hope it goes better for you than when Clarkson tried it for the silverstone 24hr race and it dissolved the fuel pump:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    stevec wrote: »
    Hope it goes better for you than when Clarkson tried it for the silverstone 24hr race and it dissolved the fuel pump:D
    Diesel pump, not fuel pump. They ran bio diesel. Nothing remotely close to bioethanol.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,584 ✭✭✭✭Steve


    JHMEG wrote: »
    Diesel pump, not fuel pump. They ran bio diesel. Nothing remotely close to bioethanol.

    Ah, didn't cop that

    /feels silly:o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,366 ✭✭✭ninty9er


    I'm liking the optimistic attitude round here. My parents told me I was wasting my money (which btw I should have mentioned was another reason I got it done....the nice lads at Revenue repaid the loan I overpaid them last year:D:D:D).

    All my mam's workmates told her it was a waste of money and one is a taxi driver so he must be right:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

    It'll ruin my car apparently. We'll see who's laughing out the other side of their arse when the dollar hits 2 for one and oil skyrockets:p:p


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    ninty9er wrote: »
    It'll ruin my car apparently.
    And you deserve nothing less, ya feckin Fianna Failer.

    But on a more serious note, if it all goes well for you, which I hope it does, I'll probably do the same conversion. (Gareth Fitzgerald rocks)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,366 ✭✭✭ninty9er


    JHMEG wrote: »
    And you deserve nothing less, ya feckin Fianna Failer.

    But on a more serious note, if it all goes well for you, which I hope it does, I'll probably do the same conversion. (Gareth Fitzgerald rocks)

    I believe it's Garrett....and so he does. That's an old breed unlike some others....but I'll stop before Gandalf comes in and I get banned again:D:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,294 ✭✭✭Ferris


    Anyone know if you can claim a VRT rebate on a car modified to use Biofuel.

    More specifically can you claim it on an imported car that has been modified to run bio-ethanol. Im thinking of importing a large petrol engined car from the UK and if I fit the bio-ethanol kit will I only have to pay half of the VRT due?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,718 ✭✭✭Matt Simis


    Ferris wrote: »
    Anyone know if you can claim a VRT rebate on a car modified to use Biofuel.

    More specifically can you claim it on an imported car that has been modified to run bio-ethanol. Im thinking of importing a large petrol engined car from the UK and if I fit the bio-ethanol kit will I only have to pay half of the VRT due?


    I checked this for both BioDiesel and BioEthanol.

    They declined BioDiesel as it can be run in any diesel with no mods, so if they gave a discount there really would be no pressure to actually run on BD. There also is no nationwide availability.

    They declined the BioEthanol rebate as the E85 conversion has to be performed at the factory level, aftermarket kits arent supported. Also the "rebate" is not actually a rebate, its built into the VRT price of certain preselected FFVs.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,886 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    JHMEG wrote: »
    From what I've read, that (valve seal hardening) seems to be one of the myths about an E85 conversion. I think you're more likely (tho not very) to have your fuel lines eaten.

    From the Ford.ie site...

    Technically, the Ford FFV differs
    from a conventional car only
    in that valves and other
    components receive a special
    coating and that its engine
    management system optimises
    performance according to what fuel
    it is running on.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    From the Ford.ie site...

    Technically, the Ford FFV differs
    from a conventional car only
    in that valves and other
    components receive a special
    coating and that its engine
    management system optimises
    performance according to what fuel
    it is running on.

    That may be the case alright, but that doesn't prove that E85 will do damage to a modern car. Most of the stuff I'm reading says that it'll actually clean your engine.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,338 ✭✭✭the drifter


    what MPG change are you seeing if any?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    Any update on this 99er? How is the car running? More or less power/mpg?
    ninty9er wrote: »
    I believe it's Garrett....and so he does. That's an old breed unlike some others...

    How relevant! Garrett "twin turbo" Fitzgerald!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,366 ✭✭✭ninty9er


    Bit more Motorway poke in 5th, MPG not massively different considering most of the driving I did on Friday was motorway at 4.5k RPM or Dublin city centre in stop-go-traffic.

    There's a bit more power, but nothing that petrol couldn't achieve with a few hundred more revs.

    Only other difference I have noticed is that the car is slower to start, but I can live with that. That and the fact that to fill the tank has dropped from €63 to €50:D:D:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,726 ✭✭✭maidhc


    I really like the idea of coverting my Capri to run on E85. I might even go to the Ford main dealer after and get one of those "flexifuel" logos for the back. I'm slightly giddy at the thought.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    maidhc wrote: »
    I really like the idea of coverting my Capri to run on E85. I might even go to the Ford main dealer after and get one of those "flexifuel" logos for the back. I'm slightly giddy at the thought.
    maidhc, I don't think the Capri would survive it. Seriously. I think you'd have to get a modern car (well, 1990+). How about a petrol focus to replace the diesel?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,726 ✭✭✭maidhc


    JHMEG wrote: »
    maidhc, I don't think the Capri would survive it. Seriously. I think you'd have to get a modern car (well, 1990+). How about a petrol focus to replace the diesel?

    The TDCI is staying! Banish the thought!

    I could replace the Capri with a MB w123 300D... and burn what ever burns though, they run on household waste by all accounts :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,366 ✭✭✭ninty9er


    maidhc wrote: »
    I might even go to the Ford main dealer after and get one of those "flexifuel" logos for the back. I'm slightly giddy at the thought.
    :D:D:D:D

    I'm after one of the Saab BioPower ones!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    maidhc wrote: »
    I could replace the Capri with a MB w123 300D... and burn what ever burns though, they run on household waste by all accounts :D
    I prefer dead cats myself!


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,886 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    JHMEG wrote: »
    That may be the case alright, but that doesn't prove that E85 will do damage to a modern car. Most of the stuff I'm reading says that it'll actually clean your engine.

    True, but no manufacturer would undertake any process that wasn't necessary surely?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,378 ✭✭✭alias no.9


    True, but no manufacturer would undertake any process that wasn't necessary surely?

    You're assuming that there is a substantial difference between the flexifuel and the normal car. You could be talking about marginally different nominal process settings.
    Fear, uncertainty and doubt, or FUD to use the correct marketing term, are used to differentiate products that are the same for all intents and purposes but the which the manufacturer/supplier wants customers to perceive as being different.
    Ford get a substantial PR benefit from their flexifuel Focus, if it became apparent that the only difference was a software change in the ECU to allow it to adjust the fuel / air ratio and ignition timing, then the question arises why don't they enable every focus to be flexifuel? The answer of course is that then the cars would just be ordinary focii, not some super extra special green machines, they'd just blend into the background. Any 'Green' PR benefit is lost straight away. There would certainly not have been an opportunity to negotiate a VRT discount like Ford did on the introduction of the flexifuel focus, a further PR blow.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,980 ✭✭✭limklad


    ninty9er wrote: »
    Bit more Motorway poke in 5th, MPG not massively different considering most of the driving I did on Friday was motorway at 4.5k RPM or Dublin city centre in stop-go-traffic.

    There's a bit more power, but nothing that petrol couldn't achieve with a few hundred more revs.

    Only other difference I have noticed is that the car is slower to start, but I can live with that. That and the fact that to fill the tank has dropped from €63 to €50:D:D:D
    I am interested in getting my car changed too.



    How are you getting on with the flex-Fuel? Any problems with it?


    I wonder can you get some road tax reductions because you change fuel types?
    and What did the Insurance company say about the conversion?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,366 ✭✭✭ninty9er


    IT's still running fine, but will need to go for a second adjustment regarding the starter.

    As the power is negligible, it's an engine conversion rather than modification (though I take your point) and I couldn't be arsed spending an hour trying to explain it to some imbecile at Hibernian
    . Basically it's still just a 1.6 Astra.

    Otherwise all is going well and I'm happy I did it (other members of the household remain unconvinced). Happy overall, but I'm thinking I could have wiped 6 months payments off my loan with the cost of it. Time will tell.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,980 ✭✭✭limklad


    ninty9er wrote: »
    IT's still running fine, but will need to go for a second adjustment regarding the starter.

    As the power is negligible, it's an engine conversion rather than modification (though I take your point) and I couldn't be arsed spending an hour trying to explain it to some imbecile at Hibernian
    . Basically it's still just a 1.6 Astra.
    I may be wrong, but it is best to check out with Hibernian as you may invalidate your insurance by not telling them about the change.

    I will ring my own insurance FBD to see what they have to say about it.
    ninty9er wrote: »
    Otherwise all is going well and I'm happy I did it (other members of the household remain unconvinced). Happy overall, but I'm thinking I could have wiped 6 months payments off my loan with the cost of it. Time will tell.
    They might be more convinced when the price of Petrol/Diesel keep going up at a fast rate and E85 price increasing at modest rates. Take that in to account, your car loan might be paid off faster as a result provided that you miles per litres are still the same as before the conversion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,127 ✭✭✭STaN


    Hi All,

    Where can I get a conversion completed in Dublin? I am driving a turbo charged car so I hopefully won't see fuel economy drop that much.

    I am keen to get this done within a month.

    Thanks in advance.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,380 ✭✭✭derry


    I am going the chance it and just put E85 into the tank not using convertion kit

    So far have reached a ratio of E40 fuel about ~50% E85 and ~50% E5 fuel

    A lot of the blurb online at convertion to E85 sites suggests lots of run of the mill non high performance cars can often run E85 without any convertion kits

    Turbo and supercharged types can have more issues and more likely to need suitable convertion kits

    Issues that can happen with E85 fuel not using convertion kits are slow starting especially in cold weather and soggy acceleration

    Hotter spark plugs can solve the slow starting in cold weather

    Advancing timing can solve soggy acceleration effects

    Soggy acceleration can be lack of fuel due to it requires 30% more E85 to equal Petrol

    Increasing the size of the jets in asperated engines can solve soggy acceleration effects
    Increasing the time injectors in direct inject engines can let fuel in can solve soggy acceleration effects
    Increasing the size of the fuel pumps can increase the amount of fuel to engine


    My solution is every fill increase the amount of E85 mix buy 5% increments

    So far no issues and engine seems to love the E85

    So far the MPG seem similar within a few % the same running on E40 mix

    My car is a 1000cc 3 cylider non flex fuel petrol engine for a 98 Suziki Swift
    I suspect that when I get to full E85 mix the MPG could drop
    Fuel figure are ~70MPG high way at ~50MPH and ~50 MPG city with fuels

    E5 E10 E15 ....E40 mixxes

    With fuel costs in Dublin at E1.00 euro for E85 and E1.25 for for E5 it makes sense to keep running at least E40 mix as the saving seem to be about 15%

    better than a kick in the teeth and hopefully the cleaner fuel will help keep engine cleaner than normal petrol fuels

    Engine might act up before reaching E85 at mayby E75 ratios which seems to be where most engines start to stumble

    Should know in a few weeks what the limit is

    I have no plans to do any changes of any sort to the engine and will just back off the amount the amount of E85 I use if engine shows sign of issues

    Derry


  • Advertisement
Advertisement