Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

strategies for tournament players re next week, help !!

  • 02-02-2008 4:22pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭


    with the 50,000 starting stack and loads superior cash players playing were going to have to come up with a bit more then our usual push bot mode.

    I'll get the ball rolling

    don't play a single hand, even AA or KK until the blinds reach 500/1000 we will then have 30 BBs left so wont find a difficult decision.


    when in a pot with a cash player always raise their river bets because they always bet/fold the river.


«13

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,433 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,698 ✭✭✭semibluff


    i probably shouldnt post this as im giving away my strategy, but as nic says we need all the help we can get, so here's something that i worked out instead of doing the sudoku in the paper

    This should see me to the final day

    ALL YOU NEED TO WIN A DONKAMENT - PRE FLOP PLAY

    The implemented pre-flop betting strategy is preliminary and makes use of expert information. It is sophisticated enough to not hamper overall performance so that the focus can be put on post-flop play (the more interesting portion of the game). Loki examines several variables, uses the expert knowledge to determine thresholds for various betting actions, and chooses a strategy:

    Make0: fold if it costs more than zero to continue playing, otherwise check.
    Call1: fold if it costs two or more bets to continue (and we have not already voluntarily put money in the pot this round), otherwise check/call.
    Make1: like Call1 except bet if there has not been a bet this round (with the big blind this cannot happen in the pre-flop).
    Call2: always call/check (despite what the name of this strategy suggests, even more than 2 bets).
    Make2: bet/raise if less than two bet/raises have been made this round, otherwise call.
    Make4: bet/raise until the betting is capped, otherwise call.
    Except for the small blind, which is given special treatment, Call1 and Call2 are effectively not used, so there are really only 4 different strategies. Once a strategy is selected it is fixed for all subsequent actions in the pre-flop. The small blind is a special case due to only having to call one half of a bet (so Call1 is really Call0.5 and Call2 is really Call1.5), and has fixed thresholds for these two strategies.
    Call1 (and hence Make1) has a special case folding requirement, that ``we have not already voluntarily put money in the pot this round." This is a feature added after testing with human opponents on IRC. Many players were very aggressive and would raise frequently. This meant that often when Loki called the blind with a decent hand (but not Call2 or better), two or more players would then raise, causing Loki to fold. Due to this commonly exploited weakness, the kludge is necessary until some amount of opponent of modeling is implemented into the pre-flop.

    The thresholds for selecting a betting strategy are determined from a set of linear formulas of the form



    threshold(strategy) = base + increment * position (6.1)




    where strategy is the betting strategy ( e.g. Make1), base and increment are defined by a human expert (see Appendix B), and position is the number of players to act before it is the small blind's turn again (so, if is the number of players still in the pot, the small blind is position , the big blind is position , the first player to act is position and so on, until the button (dealer) who is position 0).
    For example, if Loki is playing tight against 3-4 players, the [ base, increment] values used for Make2 are [200,50] (based on Table B.1) so the formula used is







    based on Equation 6.1. That is, the coefficients used for the linear formula depend on both the variable (group) and the parameter (tightness).
    The variable group is based on the expected number of players ( ), which is


    = (6.2)





    There are three cases of interest for the expected number of players. We round to the nearest integer and determine the appropriate group based on what range that value falls in: ``2 players", ``3-4 players" and ``5 or more players" (see Appendix B). The state variable is the number of players who have already put money in the pot (and have presumably committed to playing). This includes the blinds as well as ourselves (we assume we will play). is an expert-defined value for the average playing percentage of players (by default 0.60). Appropriate opponent modeling would provide much better estimates for this value, based on the observation of the current session .
    The parameter tightness is a setting which affects the percentage of hands that Loki will play (indirectly, by selecting a different set of thresholds). The three settings are tight, moderate, and loose (the default). With ten players these roughly translate into playing 18%, 21% and 24% of all hands (the distinction is not large so the terms are a misnomer - all levels are relatively conservative).

    There is one [base, increment] pair per set of group, strategy and tightness values (Table B.1) so there are 27 pairs total (since Make0 is the default strategy only three thresholds are needed for determining the strategy). Once the thresholds are determined, the actual strategy selected is dependent on the pre-calculated income rate (IR) of the hole cards. Figure 6.1 describes the algorithm for selecting a strategy.

    For example, consider a six player game. We hold A-T and are playing tight. The first two players put in blinds, the next two fold, and it is Loki's turn. There is still one player, the button, who has not yet acted. So position = 1, and (including Loki). We then calculate







    and use this to determine group = ``3-4 players". Then, using Table B.1 we calculate





    Finally, we find the value of our hand is IR = 491 and select the appropriate strategy. Since , we select the Make2 strategy, and raise.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭nicnicnic


    semibluff wrote: »
    i probably shouldnt post this as im giving away my strategy, but as nic says we need all the help we can get

    This should see me to the final day

    ALL YOU NEED TO WIN A DONKAMENT - PRE FLOP PLAY

    The implemented pre-flop betting strategy is preliminary and makes use of expert information. It is sophisticated enough to not hamper overall performance so that the focus can be put on post-flop play (the more interesting portion of the game). Loki examines several variables, uses the expert knowledge to determine thresholds for various betting actions, and chooses a strategy:

    Make0: fold if it costs more than zero to continue playing, otherwise check.
    Call1: fold if it costs two or more bets to continue (and we have not already voluntarily put money in the pot this round), otherwise check/call.
    Make1: like Call1 except bet if there has not been a bet this round (with the big blind this cannot happen in the pre-flop).
    Call2: always call/check (despite what the name of this strategy suggests, even more than 2 bets).
    Make2: bet/raise if less than two bet/raises have been made this round, otherwise call.
    Make4: bet/raise until the betting is capped, otherwise call.
    Except for the small blind, which is given special treatment, Call1 and Call2 are effectively not used, so there are really only 4 different strategies. Once a strategy is selected it is fixed for all subsequent actions in the pre-flop. The small blind is a special case due to only having to call one half of a bet (so Call1 is really Call0.5 and Call2 is really Call1.5), and has fixed thresholds for these two strategies.
    Call1 (and hence Make1) has a special case folding requirement, that ``we have not already voluntarily put money in the pot this round." This is a feature added after testing with human opponents on IRC. Many players were very aggressive and would raise frequently. This meant that often when Loki called the blind with a decent hand (but not Call2 or better), two or more players would then raise, causing Loki to fold. Due to this commonly exploited weakness, the kludge is necessary until some amount of opponent of modeling is implemented into the pre-flop.

    The thresholds for selecting a betting strategy are determined from a set of linear formulas of the form



    threshold(strategy) = base + increment * position (6.1)




    where strategy is the betting strategy ( e.g. Make1), base and increment are defined by a human expert (see Appendix B), and position is the number of players to act before it is the small blind's turn again (so, if is the number of players still in the pot, the small blind is position , the big blind is position , the first player to act is position and so on, until the button (dealer) who is position 0).
    For example, if Loki is playing tight against 3-4 players, the [ base, increment] values used for Make2 are [200,50] (based on Table B.1) so the formula used is







    based on Equation 6.1. That is, the coefficients used for the linear formula depend on both the variable (group) and the parameter (tightness).
    The variable group is based on the expected number of players ( ), which is


    = (6.2)





    There are three cases of interest for the expected number of players. We round to the nearest integer and determine the appropriate group based on what range that value falls in: ``2 players", ``3-4 players" and ``5 or more players" (see Appendix B). The state variable is the number of players who have already put money in the pot (and have presumably committed to playing). This includes the blinds as well as ourselves (we assume we will play). is an expert-defined value for the average playing percentage of players (by default 0.60). Appropriate opponent modeling would provide much better estimates for this value, based on the observation of the current session .
    The parameter tightness is a setting which affects the percentage of hands that Loki will play (indirectly, by selecting a different set of thresholds). The three settings are tight, moderate, and loose (the default). With ten players these roughly translate into playing 18%, 21% and 24% of all hands (the distinction is not large so the terms are a misnomer - all levels are relatively conservative).

    There is one [base, increment] pair per set of group, strategy and tightness values (Table B.1) so there are 27 pairs total (since Make0 is the default strategy only three thresholds are needed for determining the strategy). Once the thresholds are determined, the actual strategy selected is dependent on the pre-calculated income rate (IR) of the hole cards. Figure 6.1 describes the algorithm for selecting a strategy.

    For example, consider a six player game. We hold A-T and are playing tight. The first two players put in blinds, the next two fold, and it is Loki's turn. There is still one player, the button, who has not yet acted. So position = 1, and (including Loki). We then calculate







    and use this to determine group = ``3-4 players". Then, using Table B.1 we calculate





    Finally, we find the value of our hand is IR = 491 and select the appropriate strategy. Since , we select the Make2 strategy, and raise.

    ah bollix to that, I'm gonna just go with my Feel and reads


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,698 ✭✭✭semibluff


    here's a link to the code, anyone looking to make their own bot

    http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/~jonathan/Grad/papp/node44.html


    feels ftw


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,793 ✭✭✭bops


    i've never had 50k chips so i can't help you tbh


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭nicnicnic


    bops wrote: »
    i've never had 50k chips so i can't help you tbh


    We know

    Tourney's 1 cash'ys 0 Valor "the kid cant cash but wins more each month then the GDP of a small country" Kelly crashes and burns level two, the run continues. I'd still swap%s with him in the ME though


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,646 ✭✭✭cooker3


    nicnicnic wrote: »
    We know

    Tourney's 1 cash'ys 0 Valor "the kid cant cash" Kelly crashes and burns level two, the run continues. I'd still swap%s with him in the ME though

    It gets better

    Danial "ROONEY_DIVES" Bolton was responsible for eliminating both Gavin Kelly and Vinny MacNamee and now has 65k


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 183 ✭✭aarymark


    dont even sit in till second day 2 avoid any of them post flop decisions to much thinkings bad for u


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭nicnicnic


    cooker3 wrote: »
    It gets better

    Danial "ROONEY_DIVES" Bolton was responsible for eliminating both Gavin Kelly and Vinny MacNamee and now has 65k


    did you really have to mention that bit now


  • Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 32,387 Mod ✭✭✭✭DeVore


    4 bet all small connectors and suited ace-rags because your implied odds cover the minute chances of flopping the nuts but don't raise aces because you will pinpoint your hand if you do.

    If facing cashyrs, immediately bet all your chips as that will immediately price them out of any draw where they are not holding the nuts.

    DeV.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,404 ✭✭✭Goodluck2me


    cooker3 wrote: »
    It gets better

    Danial "ROONEY_DIVES" Bolton was responsible for eliminating both Gavin Kelly and Vinny MacNamee and now has 65k

    the best part was that most of the money went in on those magical mythical creatures the "turn" and "river", i thought cash players knew how to play them?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,538 ✭✭✭Requiem4adream


    the best part was that most of the money went in on those magical mythical creatures the "turn" and "river", i thought cash players knew how to play them?

    :D

    I also thought Ireland knew how to play expansive flowing rugby, learn something new everyday!! Eddie out!! God that was a long day.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭The_Chopper


    :D

    I also thought Ireland knew how to play expansive flowing rugby, learn something new everyday!! Eddie out!! God that was a long day.

    Details on hands how you knocked out the cash donks please


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,116 ✭✭✭✭RasTa


    *nevermind...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,435 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I think the tourney players have to come up with some sort of thing like a +/-dv combined with a +/-tlv and a +/-dvcv

    So to combine it all we'd have to give it a name like +/-dlv which would stand for a donkaments life value and then +/-dvcv which would stand for a donkament versus cash value.

    Or i suppose we could just called it the +/-r4advshjv with the vs=versus and the second v standing for value.

    I know these things are supposed to be run by the book, but shorstack you have to get these two guys on the same table, just get the first one whose next big blind and move him to the other ones table.
    Unfortunately i cannot be there myself, but i would look forward to reading all the entertaining gossip which will arise from a faceoff of such proportions in this tournament.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,538 ✭✭✭Requiem4adream


    Details on hands how you knocked out the cash donks please

    valor (didnt know it was him) - QQ on a 10 10 x Q 8 board. not sure what he mucked. he raises button, i reraise from bb he calls. i check call flop, check-raise turn and get all in on river. He had 10 something all i saw was the 10. 25/50 blinds, pot escalated pretty quick (if im him i bet slightly less on 1st 2 streets, but just personal preference i prefer pot control early on in deep stacked mtt).

    Other guy - made a good call. board J 4 9 8 checked to him he shoves for 4k at 75/150 i thought about it and put him on straight draw and called with A8. he had 6 7o and missed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭Hectorjelly


    Normally one wouldn't exercise "pot control" with trips in a reraised pot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,754 ✭✭✭ianmc38


    Normally one wouldn't exercise "pot control" with trips in a reraised pot.

    lol


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,179 ✭✭✭White Knight


    Normally one wouldn't exercise "pot control" with trips in a reraised pot.

    normally one would not exit in a 20k deepstack tournament within 30 minutes on the 25/50 first level


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,646 ✭✭✭cooker3


    normally one would not exit in a 20k deepstack tournament within 30 minutes on the 25/50 first level

    Yeah sure, you have to have the nuts to put all your chips in


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,179 ✭✭✭White Knight


    cooker3 wrote: »
    Yeah sure, you have to have the nuts to put all your chips in

    to call an all in against an unknown who already had amassed 9k in the previous 30 mins .. yeah maybe so


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,252 ✭✭✭The Al Lad


    Normally one wouldn't exercise "pot control" with trips in a reraised pot.

    Where's that popcorn picture ??? :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,286 ✭✭✭✭mdwexford


    0653_homer-eating-popcorn-small-c7873.JPG


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,538 ✭✭✭Requiem4adream


    Normally one wouldn't exercise "pot control" with trips in a reraised pot.

    lol ok.

    blinds 25/50. he raised to 150, i made it 400. he calls. pot 825. I'm 600 bb's deep, he is 400. I thought you cash players were experts in these situations? :D I can say with certainty i wouldnt have been getting knocked out holding his hand,each to his own.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,860 ✭✭✭ditpoker


    mdwexford wrote: »
    0653_homer-eating-popcorn-small-c7873.JPG

    i love this picture, everytime i see it!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 970 ✭✭✭thechamp87


    As far as I know Gav flopped tens full. I'm not sure pot control was his primary objective in the hand. As far as I know R4aD turned Queens full with QQ.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,538 ✭✭✭Requiem4adream


    thechamp87 wrote: »
    As far as I know Gav flopped tens full. I'm not sure pot control was his primary objective in the hand. As far as I know R4aD turned Queens full with QQ.

    He flopped tens full? He called my reraise with 10 3?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,793 ✭✭✭bops


    there was lots of 10's and 3's comming out on the flops and he has pot value


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 970 ✭✭✭thechamp87


    He flopped tens full? He called my reraise with 10 3?

    apologies, i heard he had 10 9 and the flop was 10 10 9.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,538 ✭✭✭Requiem4adream


    thechamp87 wrote: »
    apologies, i heard he had 10 9 and the flop was 10 10 9.

    Nope.

    Board 10 10 x Q 8. Plus nobody dwells for that long with a boat on that board, it's a snap call.

    Sick turn obv but that deep it didnt have to be fatal. Bet too much on turn imo. I c/r to 8k after he Bet 3500 into 3100 pot.

    Anyway it's not a criticism, sick hand. I just play it differently if i was in his spot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 220 ✭✭TomPich


    Decent Players will last a good few hours in a deepstack tourney bar a huge outdraw!

    No need to put your stack at risk at any stage early on!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 970 ✭✭✭thechamp87


    Nope.

    Board 10 10 x Q 8. Plus nobody dwells for that long with a boat on that board, it's a snap call.

    Sick turn obv but that deep it didnt have to be fatal. Bet too much on turn imo. I c/r to 8k after he Bet 3500 into 3100 pot.

    Anyway it's not a criticism, sick hand. I just play it differently if i was in his spot.

    Ok cool mixed up at my end. wp anyway and ul not to cash.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,538 ✭✭✭Requiem4adream


    thechamp87 wrote: »
    Ok cool mixed up at my end. wp anyway and ul not to cash.

    Thx man. Any links with pics of you? I hear you're very good just want to know who to look out for/respect in main event this week. tyty :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,079 ✭✭✭smurph


    I think the Cash game players will be at a huuuuuggggeeee disadavantage, because they'll spend a couple of hours, working on a "Cunning plan for the players at their table, setting them up for a "Play" so to speak, then


    DOHHomer.jpg





    Their table gets broken....:D:D:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,751 ✭✭✭BigCityBanker


    Thx man. Any links with pics of you? I hear you're very good just want to know who to look out for/respect in main event this week. tyty :)

    somebody has been telling you lies - adam is a known donkey who will stack off with KK preflop against other peoples (my) QQ.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 970 ✭✭✭thechamp87


    Thx man. Any links with pics of you? I hear you're very good just want to know who to look out for/respect in main event this week. tyty :)

    lol you must have very unreliable sources:rolleyes:! i'm sure I'll bump into you over the weekend. I'm playing on Thursday.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭nicnicnic


    normally one would not exit in a 20k deepstack tournament within 30 minutes on the 25/50 first level

    why? if you think your ahead you get your chips in at any stage of a tournament.

    who already had amassed 9k in the previous 30 mins ..
    what relevance has this ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,538 ✭✭✭Requiem4adream


    nicnicnic wrote: »
    why? if you think your ahead you get your chips in at any stage of a tournament.


    within reason yeah! Flop Ah Qh 10h holding A2cc you think you're ahead so you get it in v Kh Qc? Or do you see a turn 400 bb's deep :p

    But yeah it doesnt matter if its the 1st hand or 200th hand, if you think your ahead the chippies go in, simple as. His bet sizing was too big imo though, stand by that. No need to bet 3500 into 3100.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,433 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 909 ✭✭✭AKQJ10


    Thx man. Any links with pics of you? I hear you're very good just want to know who to look out for/respect in main event this week. tyty :)

    Chump is the steamer on the left:D:eek::D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 970 ✭✭✭thechamp87


    AKQJ10 wrote: »
    Chump is the steamer on the left:D:eek::D

    I have no regrets with regards anything that happened in Tijuana.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,296 ✭✭✭valor


    I'm not getting into the hand, But I bet 3k into 4.1k, we each put in 550 preflop and 1.5k on the flop


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 970 ✭✭✭thechamp87


    AKQJ10 wrote: »
    Chump is the steamer on the left:D:eek::D

    Mods, how do I report a post?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 909 ✭✭✭AKQJ10


    marc says:
    hahahaha
    Adam says:
    ur such a ****!!!!!!
    marc says:
    lol
    Adam says:
    im gona destroy u!!!
    marc says:
    tried to say it wasnt u then, makes it even better


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 970 ✭✭✭thechamp87


    AKQJ10 wrote: »
    marc says:
    hahahaha
    Adam says:
    ur such a ****!!!!!!
    marc says:
    lol
    Adam says:
    im gona destroy u!!!
    marc says:
    tried to say it wasnt u then, makes it even better

    oh my god u absolute fcuk. i will end you.
    Mods, I would like to report AKQJ10s 2 most recent posts in this thread asap.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,537 ✭✭✭Ste05


    thechamp87 wrote: »
    Mods, I would like to report AKQJ10s 2 most recent posts in this thread asap.
    Do you want the links nuked??

    Also, the little red and white triangle over there <- is how you report a post. (looks like a warning sign)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,404 ✭✭✭Goodluck2me


    thechamp87 wrote: »
    oh my god u absolute fcuk. i will end you.
    Mods, I would like to report AKQJ10s 2 most recent posts in this thread asap.

    i think you should be banned for those "shorts". ewwww thats hidious.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 970 ✭✭✭thechamp87


    Ste05 wrote: »
    Do you want the links nuked??

    Also, the little red and white triangle over there <- is how you report a post. (looks like a warning sign)

    Yes I'd like the links removed. I find it wholly unacceptable that AKQJ10 has done this. I have only met him once or twice and think this is out of line. I understand it was a joke so I'm not going to report the posts but I think he should receive a warning.
    Thanks,
    Adam


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,537 ✭✭✭Ste05


    thechamp87 wrote: »
    Yes I'd like the links removed. I find it wholly unacceptable that AKQJ10 has done this. I have only met him once or twice and think this is out of line. I understand it was a joke so I'm not going to report the posts but I think he should receive a warning.
    Thanks,
    Adam
    Well posting personal info such as these pictures without permission is certainly against forum rules. But I can't tell if you are messing and you 2 are actually mates or not. So I'll just go ahead and give AKQJ10 a formal warning for breach of forum rules and etiquette.

    Ste05

    EDIT: Also links removed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,433 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    This post has been deleted.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement