Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Green or Labour Coalition?

  • 25-05-2007 10:53pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,752 ✭✭✭


    I'm a betting man, and I've laid (backed that they will lose) the FF/Labour combo for a lot of bread... Starting to get worried now :o Will Rabbite do a deal? Hopefully not from my betfair balance point of view, but they are favourites now.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,492 ✭✭✭Sir Oxman


    Greens looking like 7 seats now (OCarlow/Kilkenny) so if FF 77/78 the Greens are now players...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 244 ✭✭pjbrady1


    with the complete collapse of the PDs in ten years. Won't Labour/Greens be afraid of touching FF.
    There is still a chance of FG/Labour/Green/Indos.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 612 ✭✭✭McSpud


    I think the Greens have more to gain than Labour by going into government, Greens get a chance to show they can delivery a bit like the PDs years ago.

    Labour would have to lose Rabitte although I think that would be no bad thing as he has clearly run a terrible campaign.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,614 ✭✭✭The Sparrow


    I predict FF/ Green coalition. That would be my 1,2 so happy days if it comes true... Although RTE just said Dan Boyle lost his Green seat so maybe that will be a big factor.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,752 ✭✭✭wb


    pjbrady1 wrote:
    with the complete collapse of the PDs in ten years. Won't Labour/Greens be afraid of touching FF.
    There is still a chance of FG/Labour/Green/Indos.

    lol. I admire your confidence.

    49/1 on betfair for Kenny to be Taoiseach.. that's if you really are that confident ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 612 ✭✭✭McSpud


    wb wrote:
    lol. I admire your confidence.

    49/1 on betfair for Kenny to be Taoiseach.. that's if you really are that confident ;)
    Mr Kenny said he was not prepared to concede the election until he sees the final outcome.
    The party is claiming that along with Labour and the Greens they could end up with 77 seats, against a possible 76 for Fianna Fáil.

    Hmmm don't get his logic here. Even if that is correct is he saying he would go in with SF. :eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 299 ✭✭7mountpleasant


    delah wrote:
    Greens looking like 7 seats now (OCarlow/Kilkenny) so if FF 77/78 the Greens are now players...
    Greens 6 (original post said 5) Fianna Fail 77 me thinks. After the vitiriol that Rabbitte threw at bertie it would be a hard one to stomach as a Fianna Fail supporter. However if Brendan Howlin were to replace Rabbitte then I would be far more enthusiastic (and I think that Howlin is a far more capable politician as well). However my tuppence would be on the greens,pd's and independants if needed going on what RTE are showing


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,956 ✭✭✭✭Villain


    I think we are look at Greens 6 and FF 77 so that is very doable


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,639 ✭✭✭PeakOutput


    labour wont go to ff im almost positive of it....if the greens decide to pull an upset fg/labour/greens could pull it off


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,614 ✭✭✭The Sparrow


    PeakOutput wrote:
    labour wont go to ff im almost positive of it....if the greens decide to pull an upset fg/labour/greens could pull it off

    I can`t see how fg/labour/greens could pull it off?? The numbers just don`t add up at the moment. It looks like at a maximum they would have 77 seats so they would still need six seats from somewhere and I`d be fairly confident that there is no hope of the rainbow inviting sinn fein in so they would be relying on independents... Two of which are jackie healy rae and (prob) beverly flynn who are unlikely to side with the rainbow. Plus if I was the greens and I had the choice to form a stable govt or join the rainbow with a rabble of independents my preference would definitely be for FF...

    Sorry Rainbow supporters, give it up... It ain`t happening!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 299 ✭✭7mountpleasant


    Wonder what odds paddy power will give on Pat Rabbite remaining as leader of lab after the party meeting on thurs


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,517 ✭✭✭axer


    I think the best possible result for this country would be a FF-GP coalition. Actually I would be delighted with that. Thank god the PDs have done so bad. Herr Goebbels McDougal is no more!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,189 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    It owuld be the kiss of death for any party to go in with FF.
    Can't see Lab going in, there are too many high ranking ones that will not want it.
    Rabitte, Quinn are two big names that would make ministers in any other scenario.
    Maybe eejits like Burton would jump at chance.
    Howlin is an interesiting one though?

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,730 ✭✭✭✭simu


    FF would run rings around the Green Party tbh. The Green's lack of experience v. the shrewdness of FF? No contest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,595 ✭✭✭johnnyrotten


    FF & Greens


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    The Greens ran as an independent entity and their numbers would be just good enough. Even if they walked FF could look at the PD/Independents to replace it and get through the term.


    I suspect that even if Labour might be a preferred option there are questions.

    1) Will it happen without Rabbitte-I'd expect him to go rather than do a deal.
    2) What would FF do if Labour walked?

    In their present state of mind labour might do better to be in opposition to do some serious reflection. If they went into government they might be inclined to look after themselves, and potentially suffer very badly at the next election.

    On balance the FF/Green would be better all round, given what we ended up with. I think the Greens stand for something that is bigger than the party, something I am not sure Labour could say at this moment.
    It would keep FF honest :rolleyes: and might help introduce some policies that would otherwise never be entertained.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,202 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    The responsibility for forming the next government lies with the biggest party, and failing that, the two biggest parties, so why not FF/FG?

    LP and or the GP would do well to remember what happened to Dick Spring's red tide after coalition with the "Teflon" party and what happened to the PDs after coalition with the "Teflon" party.

    Moral: Sh!t doesn't stick to Teflon, but it has to stick to something.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,683 ✭✭✭DeepBlue


    FF/Green is the most likely outcome. The Greens are making all the right noises at the moment.
    FF'ers would prefer it as it would mean far less ministries and junior ministries would have to be given to the Greens. Labour would demand more portfolios than the Greens would.

    John Gormley made the point last night that you can only do something if you are in power so maybe the temptation will be too great. The Mahon tribunal is around the corner though and there will be a lot of pressure on either coalition if bad news for Bertie/FF comes from the Tribunal.

    I wonder how those that normally frequent the FF Galway race tent will greet the news of an FF/Green Government :D .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,772 ✭✭✭Lennoxschips


    If Labour go in with FF again they will never receive as much as a preference from me again. They'd be mad to do it, it would be the end of them.

    Greens the same. You think FF, funded by the developers, are going to start building sustainable, less profitable, developments because the Greens tell them to? Of course not.

    It will probably be FF/PD/Ind minority government.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,517 ✭✭✭axer


    If Labour go in with FF again they will never receive as much as a preference from me again. They'd be mad to do it, it would be the end of them.

    Greens the same. You think FF, funded by the developers, are going to start building sustainable, less profitable, developments because the Greens tell them to? Of course not.

    It will probably be FF/PD/Ind minority government.
    Its interesting that Trevor Sargent said that banning corporate donations is one of their priorities if they were to go into government with FF.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,006 ✭✭✭✭The Muppet


    If the greens have the numbers Labour will be happy to step back and let them take the risks involved. If the Greens don't have the numbers Labour will have to bite the bullet and go into government, There will be no other viable option.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,809 ✭✭✭edanto


    I'd back the greens going in with FF. Enda for Ceann-Comhairle!

    Just heard that Eamonn Ryan told reporters that he'd make a govt with FF, it's just up to the members now.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,999 ✭✭✭solas


    SF for the buzz. I've set my heart on Gerry becoming minister for justice.

    Gadams.jpg

    it could work


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 990 ✭✭✭galactus


    If Labour go in with FF again they will never receive as much as a preference from me again. They'd be mad to do it, it would be the end of them.

    Greens the same. You think FF, funded by the developers, are going to start building sustainable, less profitable, developments because the Greens tell them to? Of course not.

    It will probably be FF/PD/Ind minority government.

    The whole point of running party candidates is to influence policy, can't see why FF/GP isn't a runner. "Keep your friends close and your enemies closer" etc. as far as the Greens are concerned (but I'd say Trevor Sergent will probaly step down if this happens though).

    Bertie has said he wants a stable government which indicates two parties. Then again, he says a lot of things...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,809 ✭✭✭edanto


    The numbers add up for the greens, the magic 84. I don't think there is any other option for Bertie, Labour would demand too many cabinet chairs. The greens have a strong negotiating position, I hope they're brave in the ministeries that they ask for. A Green finance minister - I'd love to see Fairness and Prosperity implemented.
    It's the most sensible finance policy that I've seen and could help soften the blow of the crash.
    http://www.danboyle.ie/documents/Fiscal%20programme.doc.pdf


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,517 ✭✭✭axer


    I cannot see FF going into government with Labour instead of the Greens. Labour will cost FF more cabinet seats and the Greens have enough seats to form a coalition with FF. I do think that Labour would definitely go into government with FF if asked but they will be a last resort of FF.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,151 ✭✭✭beanyb


    Bertie says he wants stability. Sure, Labour and the Greens offer stability in the numbers sense but are far more likely to walk out of government if something happens that they dont like. Which in reality, makes it a shakier base for a government than FF/PD with the support of independents. They made it 5 years like that from 97-02. FF/Labour didnt even make it close after the 92 election.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    If Labour go in with FF again they will never receive as much as a preference from me again. They'd be mad to do it, it would be the end of them.

    Greens the same. You think FF, funded by the developers, are going to start building sustainable, less profitable, developments because the Greens tell them to? Of course not.

    It will probably be FF/PD/Ind minority government.

    Lennox as a Labour supporter and ex party member I would be the same as you. I would never vote for them again if they went into Government with FF again. I left the party in 1992 because Spring jumped in with the developers party.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,809 ✭✭✭edanto


    I dunno mate. I'm a GP supporter and I'd much rather that they went into coalition with FF than sat out on the sidelines.

    I wouldn't hate them for sleeping with the enemy, as shonky as I think FF are, there's only one way to change the system and that's from the inside.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,698 ✭✭✭✭BlitzKrieg


    Berties thoughts:
    However, he said his coalition won't be Sinn Fein, as they had been ruled out early on in the campaign.
    Advertisement

    On his former coalition partners, the Progressive Democrats, Mr Ahern said it was regrettable that Michael McDowell wasn't re-elected.

    He also said that there are a number of Independents who are fairly close to the Fianna Fáil party, together with the two PDs who are options for partnership.

    He didn't rule out the Green Party either saying they are 'another consideration'.

    On the prospect of joining up with the Labour Party he said it was 'less likely' but he would give them 'some thought'.

    He added that Fianna Fáil had received 'an enormously strong mandate' from the electorate and it 'beholds' them to form a government.

    http://www.rte.ie/news/2007/0527/ahernb.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,189 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    As Ivan Yates said on The Panel, watch out for the National Interest.
    Looks like that GP is baying to get into power but will Bertie want the PDs plus 3 independents that are pro FF anyway.

    There is no way Labour will chance going in there.
    I believe that is reason lot of people did not vote for them.
    Bertie and the boys were convincing people that the Labour party would join FF after election.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,147 ✭✭✭E92


    Going into Government with Fianna Fáil is a poisoned chalice. Look at Labour, went from 33 seats to 21 after going in with them. The PDs from 8 to 2. Labour have a choice. They can either go slowly or quickly. If Labour go in with FF you can be sure that a lot of their voters will go and vote either FG and the Greens. They would also lose out on Fine Gael transfers. Fine Gael people myself included did not transfer to Labour on Thursday so that they could go into power with Fianna Fáil. Same goes for the Greens. If the Greens go in they will be wiped off the floor next time around, because they wont be getting transfers from Fine Gaerl and Labour people next time(as Enda reminded us yesterday it was Fine Gael transfers that helped them get some of their TDs in, in particular I'm thinking of Ciarán Cuffe in Dún Laoghaire where we had the votes to get back the second seat) and that will mean that there will only be 4 parties vying for your vote namely Sinn Féin, Fine Gael,Fianna Fáil and Labour. I say 4 because I'm hearing that the PDs will re-merge with Fianna Fáil though ironicly its Fine Gael that they have most in common with. They prefer FF yet they always took Fine Gael votes and seats.

    If Fianna Fáil want to get rid of the Greens for good then they should get the Greens to go in with them.

    As for what Enda is saying does anybody actually think its going to happen? I think it would damage Fine Gael, we are better off in opposition, one FF supporter said on this board that now was a good time for FF to be in opposition, therefore we would be handing FF a present. But Enda is dead right to remind everbody that FG+Lab+GP are JUST 3 seats behind FF+PD. The gap used to be 32 seats. The most likely outcome it seems if FF+PD+Independents though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,271 ✭✭✭irish_bob


    its going to be a very interesting few days or weeks ahead

    just on the mathematics of it , the greens and fianna fail would seem like the ideal choice for bertie , he would only have to give up at most 2 ministrys
    this would also be good for the greens too , they could become energised by being in power because even though thier has been an enviormental concern everywhere this past few yrs , the greens have done badly in this election so they may never get a better chanve to go into goverment than right now
    i believe the greens will jump at the chance if bertie does indeed make that call
    but i dont believe he will , thier are a few reasons , 1st of all , i was listening to jim glennon in newstalk yesterday and he said that bertie is a very cautious man , he likes what he knows and he doesnt know the greens
    glennon reckoned bertie will most certainly go for the pd,s and gene pool independant , jackie healy rae , beverly flynn and co
    the pd,s as theyve absolutly nothing to loose will gladly accept and it will be quite popular within the general public because most of the public would be happy to see mary harney continue in health , in fact many fianna fail voters have told me this , you see the pd,s done badly for one reason in this election , micheal mc dowell , mc dowell tried to kill a sacred cow , he tried to take on bertie and fianna fail voters didnt transfer to the pd,s as a result , while in other cricles the pd,s were unpopular , within fianna fail voters , it was simply mc dowells messing over bertiegate , as shown by the poor showing of sinn fein in this election , no one had a problem with mc dowell telling it like it is on ira criminality , it was bertie gate that sunk the pd,s due to fianna fail who because of thier great performance could have saved the pd,s and returned the same coalition with transfers

    thier is another reason why i believe bertie will choose the pd,s and independants from the ff gene pool and it is this
    thier is a place outside the pale called rural ireland and it is venemously anti green , it is called the farmers vote , fianna fail depend on the farmer vote and in a broad sense the rural ireland vote and i am telling everyone now that if fianna fail get into bed with the greens , rural ireland will not only wreak a terrible vengance on fianna fail ,they will vote for fine gael who also have a huge rural and farmer vote in the next election , which is why fine gale will be praying that bertie does a deal with the greens
    while the enviroment is an important issues , bertie aherne is a pragmatist and will not create a situation where he faces revolt from fianna fail backbenchers from rural constituencies who have mobs of farmers lynching them in thier home towns and villages , such a coalition would also destroy brian cowans chances of ever becoming taoiseach and brian who is too much of a bogger for those inside the pale , very much relys on his huge popularity within rural ireland

    the other option is of course labour , if i were pat rabbite i would consider the above example i have given of how if ff do a deal with the greens , not only will pat rabbite not have done a u turn and decided to go into goverment with fianna fail but he is likely to benefit as fine gaels partner the next time round as they are likely to gain from ff having done business with the greens , pat rabbite has run an excellent campaign and if he can keep labour even where they are , the fact that fine gael are sure to make gains next time around , bertie not being there will help endas chances , then i believe labour have a great chance of being in power the next time
    remember the greens are a niche party , they might not get a better chance again , labour,s clock even thier td,s are a little long in the tooth is not ticking as fast

    but that said , i still believe bertie will do as he always does , play it safe , do a deal with the pd,s and gene pool independants
    the greens are a very idealogical party and fianna fail and especially bertie aherne does not have an idealogical bone in his body


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,544 ✭✭✭redspider


    Clearly, the preferred FF option is FF+PD's+Independents. If FF can make up a majority with that, they will have more power in their negotiations with GP. I expect them to have parallel negotiations and to play one set off against each other.

    In terms of numbers, FF+GP is the more stable, but in terms of policy and agreement who knows. GP would be new to government and it would depend on how much they will stick to their principles, especially of there is a Bertiegate 3. FF know that the PD's have no principles and are FF lapdogs to some extent, although the lapdog was the tail that wagged the dog for quite a bit over the last 10 years.

    Having said that, from the soundings that Sargent has been making in the last couple of days, he has left the door open to FF, in fact, quite ajar. Also Gormley has been welcoming, at least on the urface. However, how they get on in the negotiations is anyone's guess as it will depend on how flexible each side is and how they can 'spin' any proposed resulting coalition towards each of their sets of supporters.

    I think that from a Green voter position, wasnt Sargent calling for politics to clean up its act and wasnt he vociferous against Bertie in Bertigate1 and 2? Wasnt he more or less calling for him to resign when speaking in the Dail? So, is all that forgotten now? I would find that strange and think that any party that flip-flops on its stated principles will be asking for trouble come the next election.

    I think the GP's could go into coalition with FF if Cowen was the leader, but that wont happen. FF would rather risk another election and a while in opposition.

    The odds are therefore that it will be an FF+PD+Inds government, unless the GP are risk takers. Then, if/when Beverly Flynn is chucked out, and tat could drag on, and if FG would win that Mayo by-election, which is highly likely, we could see another general election called. All it would take is Gregory or McGrath or both to switch allegiance on some point of principle.

    The situation is on a knife-edge really .....

    Ironically, the electorate didnt support many Independents this time, yet now its Independents that hold the balance of power. The Hospital Alliance people just got their timing wrong.

    Redspider


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,045 ✭✭✭Húrin


    Greens the same. You think FF, funded by the developers, are going to start building sustainable, less profitable, developments because the Greens tell them to? Of course not.
    In which case the Greens will be need to come up with ways to make sustainability more profitable, or at worst, have the guts to pull the plug on the government if they don't get what they want.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,045 ✭✭✭Húrin


    irish_bob wrote:
    thier is another reason why i believe bertie will choose the pd,s and independants from the ff gene pool and it is this
    thier is a place outside the pale called rural ireland and it is venemously anti green , it is called the farmers vote ,
    In my experience, it's called the ignorant vote. Most rural anti-Green voters are extremely misinformed about what Green policies are. They depend on stereotypes.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 986 ✭✭✭ateam


    Not a Green voter, but I think I wouldn't mind seeing them in government for an injection of new blood. Interesting to see how they would cope with power too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 986 ✭✭✭ateam


    The Greens and Fianna Fail will meet tomorrow to try to find the basis for the formation of the next Government:

    http://www.rte.ie/news/2007/0602/election.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,544 ✭✭✭redspider


    So, the Green's and FF are meeting for the 2nd day. Just a 2 hoursmeeting yesterday so a lot of work still to do no doubt. All the Green's soundings seem to indicate a willingness to bend on some principles perhaps. But what happens with the Sargent v Bertie spat? And the Gormley v Bertie vitriol over the last 5 years? Was that a bluster on their part? Notable that neither Bertie nor Sargent are involved in the negotiations.

    Cuffe was right of course, that doing a deal with FF from the Green Party's perspective is like doing a deal with the devil. Likewise, there is a lot of core people in FF who would not favour GP at all and see them as 'radicals'.

    I think tactically, FF are looking to get an FF+PD+several independents core + the GP, as insurance, such that FF aren't reliant on any single party or the independents. They will probably only have to 'give up' 3 ministeries, Health to PD's, Environment and something else to GP. It all depends on how flexible the Green Party is. This is unknown as it is their first time to compromise. And compromising on principles is likely to lose votes the next time perhaps, so it is a risky policy and a lot will depend on how the compromises are 'spun'. Also the role of watchdog and keeping FF in check and their usage of the 'we will walk' threat. If they use that card wisely and at the right time, they could in fact gain seats the next time. So, its all to play for, but it is dealing with 'fire'.

    The numbers would be:

    FF+PD+3 Ind's+GP = 78+2+3+6 = 89 and hence relatively stable ....

    although with Jim McDaid threatening a walk, an independent may threaten it at some stage and the GP also likely to threaten it, its not clear how stable is that particular 89. Only time would tell.

    A deal is still to be stuck but if both sides are willing to, then it is just about possible.

    What do Green Party people think about this prospect?

    Redspider


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,678 ✭✭✭jjbrien


    redspider wrote:

    The numbers would be:

    FF+PD+3 Ind's+GP = 78+2+3+6 = 89 and hence relatively stable ....

    although with Jim McDaid threatening a walk, an independent may threaten it at some stage and the GP also likely to threaten it, its not clear how stable is that particular 89. Only time would tell.



    Redspider
    Thats just as bad as Enda Kennys Rainbow idea. Its another patched together Goverment would not be very stable at all. :( It will be more than likly FF + Greens + PD's 78+6+2= 86 + Ceann Corhile). With the Ceann Corhile they dont even need the PD's they would have 85.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,311 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    jjbrien wrote:
    Thats just as bad as Enda Kennys Rainbow idea. Its another patched together Goverment would not be very stable at all. :( It will be more than likly FF + Greens + PD's 78+6+2= 86 + Ceann Corhile). With the Ceann Corhile they dont even need the PD's they would have 85.

    FF/Greens and some Independents would do to.

    I always thought the Greens should always have kept FF as a serious option as they where more likely to get more of their proposals enacted in a 2 party Govt rather than a 3/4 party Govt.

    On Sargent etc. hating FF in the last Dail, well thats politics. If FF could do a deal with the PD's in 89 they'll have no problem with the Greens now.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 598 ✭✭✭IronMan


    I wonder as to whether the Green party will insist on implementing some of their Dail reform proposals that they set forward in their manifesto for government:

    Reduce the number of TD's from 166 to 130.
    Ban corporate, institutional or foreign-based donations to any political party (a much smaller tent at the Galway races).
    Set up a joint Oireachtas committee to oversee appointments to public bodies (first they get rid of the health boards, now no soft touch state board appointments!)
    Stop any further relocation of staff under the current decentralisation programme until a genuine plan for decentralised decision-making is put in place.

    All potential sticking points.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,147 ✭✭✭E92


    Well with the way the Greens seem to have caved in already to FF, I wonder how much(or increasingly how little) of a problem this will be for them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,311 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    IronMan wrote:
    I wonder as to whether the Green party will insist on implementing some of their Dail reform proposals that they set forward in their manifesto for government:

    Reduce the number of TD's from 166 to 130.
    Ban corporate, institutional or foreign-based donations to any political party (a much smaller tent at the Galway races).
    Set up a joint Oireachtas committee to oversee appointments to public bodies (first they get rid of the health boards, now no soft touch state board appointments!)
    Stop any further relocation of staff under the current decentralisation programme until a genuine plan for decentralised decision-making is put in place.

    All potential sticking points.

    Seriously can't see them reducing the TD's. There was enough problems with under representation before the election plus it could well benefit FF & FG rather than the smaller parties.

    On political donations FF are in no position to object and on state board well it would be interesting to see what sort of teeth it would have.

    De-centralisation was a PD/McCreevy policy which even Parlon seemed to be loosing faith in.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,045 ✭✭✭Húrin


    IronMan wrote:
    Reduce the number of TD's from 166 to 130.
    The Green party was stupid to put such a self-destructive policy in their manifesto. I don't think most voters knew about it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    The Green party was stupid to put such a self-destructive policy in their manifesto. I don't think most voters knew about it.

    Not really when you think that the PD's want to have 1 minister and junior minister and 2 senitors. I mean with this attitude the Green can have 2 TD in a 130 Dail and still get 2 ministers.

    Also reducing the number of TD would reduce the spend on TDs.

    After 5 years they are on 101,000 euros and if they don't get back in they are paid for 3 months after they leave their seat plus a penison.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 363 ✭✭Ruen


    Oh read that wrong.
    I don't think the Greens are a good idea, any party can have environmentally friendly policies and they dont need to be a Green party


Advertisement