Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Growing Cannabis?

  • 08-05-2007 10:45AM
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 258 ✭✭


    Hello

    My question is a simple 1. Is it illegal to grow the cannabis/hemp plant as i am interested in making some hemp clothes and hats.

    ok im not really but could this be used as a defence in a court of law or is it cast iron law that states growin this plant is a crime FULL STOP

    could you be prosicuted if 1 or 2 of these plants were found on your land?

    Opinions?


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 315 ✭✭stifz


    illegal.

    followed by a full stop .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 258 ✭✭stewie01


    really, its that clear in the law books? do you have a link to this or is it just a guess/opinion? is there no grey area on the matter?

    Also wat if you had a few hundred of them mushrooms that were banned a while back growing on your land, would you be prosicuted for that?

    off topic but does any1 read legal discussions. i shudda posted in AH.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    I can move it to after hours if you like.

    It's specifically illegal to cultivate the plant. Along with other ones such as St. John's Wort. Bizarrely.

    As regards the mushrooms growing on your land - maybe. I guess it would have to be shown that you were aware that the mushrooms were growing there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,375 ✭✭✭padser


    stewie01 wrote:
    really, its that clear in the law books? do you have a link to this or is it just a guess/opinion? is there no grey area on the matter?

    No link cos I couldn't be assed looking for one but it is that clear. No there is no grey area. Legislators are not (completely) stupid.

    stewie01 wrote:
    Also wat if you had a few hundred of them mushrooms that were banned a while back growing on your land, would you be prosicuted for that?

    I'm not sure, was it a strict liability offence or was mens rea required?
    stewie01 wrote:
    off topic but does any1 read legal discussions. i shudda posted in AH.

    You got a comprehensive answer within 6 minutes of posting your question. What more do you want? The reason you didn't get any more answers was because the question you posted didn't require them - there was no grey area - nothing to be discussed etc.


  • Administrators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,785 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭hullaballoo


    stewie01 wrote:
    off topic but does any1 read legal discussions. i shudda posted in AH.
    Well, as padser points out, you got an answer within 6 minutes. You asked a "simple" question, and got a simple answer.

    Plenty of people read this forum, and this question gets asked on this website about once a week, so most people just aren't bothered answering it at this stage, except for those who wishfully think there are loopholes that will let them get away with it.

    There aren't any. Here's the law:
    (1) A person shall not cultivate opium poppy or any plant of the genus Cannabis except under and in accordance with a licence issued in that behalf by the Minister. (2) Every person who cultivates opium poppy or a plant of the genus Cannabis in contravention of subsection (1) of this section shall be guilty of an offence.

    Interestingly, the definition of cannabis expressly excludes "
        (
      a ) mature stalk of any such plant,
          (
        b ) fibre produced from such mature stalk, or ( c ) seed of any such plant"

        That just means you can grow the stalks etc., but not the flower (the useful bit from the point of view of drugs).


      • Advertisement
      • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,388 ✭✭✭✭rubadub


        It is illegal. Even if growing by accident, i.e. hemp seed can be got in any pet store as bird seed, you could innocently be growing it unawares outside. Argument might work for agnes the 70 year old nun, but not for Micko with his 10 plants under his 1000W HPS bulb with white widow plants dripping with resin, "eh I didnt know what they were your honour".

        Mushrooms are also illegal to grow and you could in theory be prosecuted for them growing on your land, but I cannot see that ever happening, again unless it is obvious they are being cultivated.
        Interestingly, the definition of cannabis expressly excludes "
            (
          a ) mature stalk of any such plant,
              (
            b ) fibre produced from such mature stalk, or ( c ) seed of any such plant"

            That just means you can grow the stalks etc., but not the flower (the useful bit from the point of view of drugs).

            That is so hemp products like clothes, seed & oil are exempt.

            The laws were updated recently about the mushrooms. Salvia divinorum has been made illegal in many countries recently too. There are 100's if not 1000's of hallucinogenic plants out there, many when grown will contain illegal substances. I am not sure if the laws speficially mention any other than cannabis, opium, or mushrooms.

            Is there a list of illegal drugs?


          • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,472 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


            So canabis plants are only illegal if they have buds on them?


          • Administrators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,785 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭hullaballoo


            More or less, yes. Basically the law is such that you can grow as many cannibis plants as you like once there's no possibility that you can get high from them.

            It's probably one of the few areas where the law gets it right (in terms of what it's trying to do - I'm not sure I fully agree with the fact that cannibis is illegal as a drug).


          • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,388 ✭✭✭✭rubadub


            Bond-007 wrote:
            So canabis plants are only illegal if they have buds on them?
            I still dont think it is. The law specifically says
            A person shall not cultivate opium poppy or any plant of the genus Cannabis

            The rest is a definition given to "cannabis" as a substance, i.e. it is a nickname, it could have been replaced by marijuana.

            It also says...
            1.—(1) In this Act—

            "cannabis" (except in "cannabis resin") means the flowering or fruiting tops of any plant of the genus Cannabis from which the resin has not been extracted, by whatever name they may be designated;

            "cannabis resin" means the separated resin, whether crude or purified, obtained from any plant of the genus Cannabis;

            The "genus cannabis" covers all 3 known varities and any future undiscovered ones. This is an important point, some states in the US specifically make cannabis sativa and/or cannabis indica illegal while the third strain could legally be grown. Some cases have been thrown out in the US because of incorrect botanical reports.


          • Administrators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,785 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭hullaballoo


            That's incorrect in terms of the definition of "cannibis" which was amended by the 1984 Misuse of Drugs act, s. 2: http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1984/en/act/pub/0018/sec0002.html#zza18y1984s2.
            2.—section 1 (1) of the Principal Act is hereby amended by—


            ( a ) the substitution of the following definition for the definition of "cannabis":


            "'cannabis' (except in 'cannabis resin') means any plant of the genus Cannabis or any part of any such plant (by whatever name designated) but includes neither cannabis resin nor any of the following products after separation from the rest of any such plant, namely—


            ( a ) mature stalk of any such plant,


            ( b ) fibre produced from such mature stalk, or


            ( c ) seed of any such plant;"


          • Advertisement
          • Closed Accounts Posts: 623 ✭✭✭hawker27


            so is it illegal or legal just to have some cannabis plants that only have leafs?.


          • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,676 ✭✭✭✭Victor


            hawker27 wrote:
            so is it illegal or legal just to have some cannabis plants that only have leafs?.
            Illegal.

            You can only have stalks. No leafs, no roots.


          • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,388 ✭✭✭✭rubadub


            That's incorrect in terms of the definition of "cannibis" which was amended by the 1984 Misuse of Drugs act, s. 2: http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1984/en/act/pub/0018/sec0002.html#zza18y1984s2.
            Right so the definition changed but it still appears to me to be illegal to grow any plant of the cannabis genus. If you had a mature stalk of the plant that is fine, but if some new subspecies within the cannabis genus was found that could be grown without leaves, roots or buds you would still be caught by
            A person shall not cultivate opium poppy or any plant of the genus Cannabis


          • Administrators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,785 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭hullaballoo


            rubadub wrote:
            Right so the definition changed but it still appears to me to be illegal to grow any plant of the cannabis genus. If you had a mature stalk of the plant that is fine, but if some new subspecies within the cannabis genus was found that could be grown without leaves, roots or buds you would still be caught by
            No, I don't think so.
            "'cannabis' (except in 'cannabis resin') means any plant of the genus Cannabis or any part of any such plant (by whatever name designated) but includes neither cannabis resin nor any of the following products after separation from the rest of any such plant, namely—


            ( a ) mature stalk of any such plant,


            ( b ) fibre produced from such mature stalk, or


            ( c ) seed of any such plant;"
            That seems to me to suggest that cultivating stalks would be ok.


          • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,565 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


            No, I don't think so.


            That seems to me to suggest that cultivating stalks would be ok.

            I tend to agree with rubadub. The definition refers to cannabis as it is defined in the act as prescribed for the purposes of section 3, 15 etc.

            However there is a separate offence of growing cannabis which says plants of the "genus cannabis". I think genus cannabis is different to the legal definition of cannabis in the act, and in the definition in section 1 it states
            'cannabis' (except in 'cannabis resin') means any plant of the genus Cannabis or any part of any such plant (by whatever name designated) but includes neither cannabis resin nor any of the following products after separation from the rest of any such plant, namely(empahsis added)
            .

            Therefore I think genus cannabis is a botanical term that is ordinarily understood (and when used in the act means the whole plant), whereas the definition of cannabis defines what parts of the plant are illegal to possess.

            In relation to whether wild mushrooms or cannabis growing on your land could be attributed to you, the courts are entitled to infer that you either knew of, or were reckless to, the existance of the plant on your property from the surrounding circumstances.


          • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,676 ✭✭✭✭Victor


            rubadub wrote:
            Right so the definition changed but it still appears to me to be illegal to grow any plant of the cannabis genus. If you had a mature stalk of the plant that is fine, but if some new subspecies within the cannabis genus was found that could be grown without leaves, roots or buds you would still be caught by
            I would love to know how one would grow such a plant without leaves roots or buds - biologicly difficult.


          • Closed Accounts Posts: 37 Goblin_insane


            Victor wrote:
            I would love to know how one would grow such a plant without leaves roots or buds - biologicly difficult.

            Can someone please make a joke about genetically modified cannabis :P

            ...I get my hat


          • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,388 ✭✭✭✭rubadub


            Victor wrote:
            I would love to know how one would grow such a plant without leaves roots or buds - biologicly difficult.
            Exactly, it is a bit of a moot point, thats why I was talking of a hypothetical sub species which didnt have any, but it still would be illegal to grow.

            Cannabis can be grafted onto the hops plant, dunno what would happen in that case (other than great beer)


          • Administrators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,785 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭hullaballoo


            rubadub wrote:
            Exactly, it is a bit of a moot point, thats why I was talking of a hypothetical sub species which didnt have any, but it still would be illegal to grow.

            Cannabis can be grafted onto the hops plant, dunno what would happen in that case (other than great beer)
            Lol.


          • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


            rubadub wrote:
            Exactly, it is a bit of a moot point, thats why I was talking of a hypothetical sub species which didnt have any, but it still would be illegal to grow.

            Cannabis can be grafted onto the hops plant, dunno what would happen in that case (other than great beer)

            Graft the stalk/the legal bit onto a legal system of roots and a legal system of leaves.


          • Advertisement
          • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 122 ✭✭Grass between the tracks


            What are the actual penalties for growing cannabis?


          • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,626 ✭✭✭amber2


            Verdicts depend on the specifics of the case and the judge on the day.

            http://www.corkman.ie/news/cannabis-grower-escapes-jail-time-2833627.html


          • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,157 ✭✭✭srsly78


            "subject to licence from the minister"

            If you want to grow hemp for research purposes you can get a special dispensation. Here is a a taxpayer funded Teagasc report on "The performance of Cannabis Sativa (hemp) as a Fiber": http://www.teagasc.ie/research/reports/crops/4487/eopr-4487.pdf

            Note: the minister will probably tell you to fsck off tho :)


          • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,562 ✭✭✭✭Sunnyisland


            What are the actual penalties for growing cannabis?


            There was also a polish lad who got 6/7 years last week in donegal, He had about 70 plants.


          • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,324 ✭✭✭source


            Section 17 Misuse of Drugs Act 1977
            17.—(1) A person shall not cultivate opium poppy or any plant of the genus Cannabis except under and in accordance with a licence issued in that behalf by the Minister.


            (2) Every person who cultivates opium poppy or a plant of the genus Cannabis in contravention of subsection (1) of this section shall be guilty of an offence.

            Penalty under Section 27(5) Misuse of Drugs Act 1977
            (5) Every person guilty of an offence under section 17 of this Act shall be liable—


            (a) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding two hundred and fifty pounds or, at the discretion of the court, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding twelve months, or to both the fine and the imprisonment, or


            (b) on conviction on indictment, to a fine not exceeding three thousand pounds or, at the discretion of the court, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years, or to both the fine and the imprisonment.

            So on summary conviction up to 12 months, on indictment up to 14 years.


          • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,700 ✭✭✭tricky D


            srsly78 wrote: »
            "subject to licence from the minister"
            ^This is the important bit.

            There's a lot of poor info elsewhere on this thread.

            It is legal to grow hemp with the correct licence both in the Republic and Northern Ireland.

            Hemp Ireland did this over a decade ago, but the markets didn't didn't latch onto it. The main outlet ended up being for horse bedding which was unsustainable so Hemp Ireland folded after a few years. I ran their website.

            Cannabis can also be grown usually for medical research under strict licence but that's very unlikely to be granted unless you're a university or similar.


          • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭paky


            stewie01 wrote: »
            Hello

            My question is a simple 1. Is it illegal to grow the cannabis/hemp plant as i am interested in making some hemp clothes and hats.

            ok im not really but could this be used as a defence in a court of law or is it cast iron law that states growin this plant is a crime FULL STOP

            could you be prosicuted if 1 or 2 of these plants were found on your land?

            Opinions?

            its not illegal if you dont get caught. i grew one in my window sill and it grew about four feet tall but turned out to be a male plant so no good. my neighbour across the street is ironicaly a detective in the drug squad and never noticed it


          • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭blueythebear


            paky wrote: »
            its not illegal if you dont get caught.

            On the contrary, it is very much illegal. Just because you weren't caught doesn't make it legal. What would be the point of having laws if that was everyones' attitude?


          • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭paky


            On the contrary, it is very much illegal. Just because you weren't caught doesn't make it legal. What would be the point of having laws if that was everyones' attitude?

            On the contrary, I disagree


          • Advertisement
          • Closed Accounts Posts: 870 ✭✭✭Jagle


            paky wrote: »
            On the contrary, I disagree

            if a cannabis plant grows and noone sees it, does it grow haha


          Advertisement