Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Mods Q.

  • 26-04-2007 3:35am
    #1
    legs11
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,347 ✭✭✭


    how come mods keep deleting my sigs?

    i have seen several humungous sigs, eg: the minister (who is a mod, *cough)

    so is there a special rule here for some people or somethin?
    Post edited by Shield on


Comments

  • #2
    Ruu_Old
    Closed Accounts Posts: 36,634 ✭✭✭✭Ruu_Old


    The rules are here. Your signature had at least 10 lines of small text which interrupted the flow of the threads and looked awful.

    Post here to report signatures that don't follow the guidelines and the admins or smods will get around to fixing them. Your post belongs in Feedback (moving to there, hope thats okay AH mods).


  • #3
    RoundyMooney
    Closed Accounts Posts: 10,910 ✭✭✭✭RoundyMooney


    What Ruu said.

    I think you'll find that the sig rules are applicable to everyone. A long standing mod recently had theirs edited, despite a disclaimer in the sig, and a commendable reason for having it in the first place. It's the fairest way.

    No conspiracy here...


  • #4
    Hagar
    Closed Accounts Posts: 16,793 ✭✭✭✭Hagar


    Roundy, did you read the bit about centred sigs? :D


  • #5
    r3nu4l
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,399 ✭✭✭✭r3nu4l


    Legs11, only SMods and Admins can delete sigs, regular mods can't.

    Just so you know.


  • #6
    RoundyMooney
    Closed Accounts Posts: 10,910 ✭✭✭✭RoundyMooney


    Where's that, H?

    Left justified for now anyway, I think centred is neater, but there you go:)


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    legs11
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,347 ✭✭✭legs11


    ok then lads,

    thats fair nuff then......:D


  • #8
    x in the city
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,134 ✭✭✭x in the city


    why dont pics show up in my siggy?

    just get blank box.

    pah.


  • #9
    humbert
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,238 ✭✭✭humbert


    would the advertising something bit cover political parties. I expect it wouldn't but I don't like having to look at enda kenny's face or orga fianna fail slogans.


  • #10
    Hagar
    Closed Accounts Posts: 16,793 ✭✭✭✭Hagar


    There seems to be a problem with pictures hosted at rapidshare, try Imageshack.


  • #11
    Time Magazine
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,452 ✭✭✭Time Magazine


    humbert wrote:
    would the advertising something bit cover political parties.
    It's still under discussion afaik.


  • Advertisement
  • #12
    DeVore
    Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 32,387 Mod ✭✭✭✭DeVore


    I think we are going to come down on the side of allowing politcal party images but NOT politicians faces/endorsements/vote-for-me images.

    DeV.


  • #13
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 16,720 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    DeVore wrote:
    I think we are going to come down on the side of allowing politcal party images but NOT politicians faces/endorsements/vote-for-me images.

    DeV.

    Does that include images which are humourous?

    e.g. (I know it's beyond the signature rules)

    bertiepissmatchlesssmall.jpg


  • #14
    humbert
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,238 ✭✭✭humbert


    The endorsement bit is slightly abiguous. When the picture isn't mocking the party like the one above it's function is usually endorsement. Anyway I think I know what's meant. Bah, means I'm gonna have to look at crap like this :(

    ogra.jpg


  • #15
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 16,720 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    humbert wrote:
    The endorsement bit is slightly abiguous. When the picture isn't mocking the party like the one above it's function is usually endorsement. Anyway I think I know what's meant. Bah, means I'm gonna have to look at crap like this :(

    ogra.jpg

    You could just turn signatures off in your User CP?


  • #16
    humbert
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,238 ✭✭✭humbert


    I suppose, tbh I'm just being grumpy:o It's not that big a deal. Silly political party fanboys, mutter, mutter...


Advertisement