Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Youth Defence write the Observer

124»

Comments

  • #92
    fish-head
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,896 ✭✭✭fish-head


    Bacik said she couldn't be arsed dealing with them in the Tribune this week..


  • #93
    panda100
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,551 ✭✭✭panda100


    fish-head wrote:
    Bacik said she couldn't be arsed dealing with them in the Tribune this week..

    Quite rightly so.Giving them attention is exactly what they want.Ignore them and they'll go away.
    Excuse me for asking a stupid question but what does Ivanna Bacik have to do with this anyway??


  • #94
    Blush_01
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,016 ✭✭✭Blush_01


    You obviously never saw the "publication".


  • #95
    panda100
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,551 ✭✭✭panda100


    Blush_01 wrote:
    You obviously never saw the "publication".

    Ah was there some sort of joke about her init or something?


  • #96
    The_Minister
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    panda100 wrote:
    Ah was there some sort of joke about her init or something?
    It said that she had given up her pro-death ways, and seen the light.


  • Advertisement
  • #97
    panda100
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,551 ✭✭✭panda100


    The_Minister wrote:
    It said that she had given up her pro-death ways, and seen the light.

    A bit like what the guy said in the real observer this week. Though he didnt use the term 'pro death' he complained about the term 'pro choice'. I am inclined to agree with him.Anyways another debate for another day!


  • #98
    Spectator#1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 310 ✭✭Spectator#1


    UCD Paper to Sue 'Pro-Lifers' Over Fake Newsletter

    An article in the Sunday Times yesterday. Apparently the SU are considering it as well since their views are in part represented by the paper.


  • #99
    Stabshauptmann
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,885 ✭✭✭Stabshauptmann


    According to the President last night, they're not


  • #100
    Red Alert
    Hosted Moderators Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭Red Alert


    I would rather the SU wouldn't waste student's money on a silly lawsuit against YD. Even if we won, i doubt YD would have the dosh to pay up, and to be honest the Observer/SU's ego isn't worth gambling big bucks on.


  • #101
    boneless
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,487 ✭✭✭boneless


    I hope they do!


  • Advertisement
  • #102
    Dontico
    Closed Accounts Posts: 429 ✭✭Dontico


    i thought the whole thing was hilarious.
    but i wouldnt be surprised if youth defense actually had writers for the observer. the obsserver is writen by a shower of ***** anyway. they make up news cause they are crap at finding anything really to write about.


Advertisement