Premiership Gay Footballers Scandal Names Inside

Fighting Irish

The Premiership idols at the centre of a gay sex scandal are part of a gang of players who regularly take part in debauched romps, we can reveal today.'
More:

Last week the News of the World told how two stars—an England international and a multi-million-pound midfielder — used a vibrating mobile in an obscene sex game.

Now a nightclub insider who knows the players involved has come forward to reveal a SECOND orgy involving Player A from the first romp—and TWO more top-flight players.

"I went back to a player's house with two other stars after we'd been drinking one night," said our source. "The player whose house it was went to his bedroom and came back with five grand in cash, threw it on the table and said: ‘Who will suck my ****?'"

The star—who performed oral sex on Player B mentioned last week—was glad to oblige.

"He did it for just under a minute and everyone was cheering," said our source.

"All three players there that night are household names. Two have girlfriends."

Our source also revealed a third perverted session in which a player openly pleasured himself in front of another star in a hotel room—again after a booze-up. "He had to stop suddenly when room service arrived," said our source.

The source—a pal of a well-known DJ who we can confirm as the "third man" kissing and caressing the players in the orgy last week— insisted none of the stars were really gay.

"They see this as just messing around," he said.

"They are rich and untouchable and this sort of weird behaviour is just another way of getting their kicks." He described other sick games the gang plays—which include simulating oral sex without actually touching one another.

"Of course people outside of their world are going to think what the hell is going on?" said our source.

"But this happens all the time in football.

"I've been at parties where it happens. There is also a game where one person has to put their **** in another's mouth but without touching them.

"But they're not gay. It's normal for some of them to do this."

IN MY OPINION i think its Ashley Cole and Freddie Ljungberg and Sol Campbell or Jenas are rumoured to be the third person involved.
You heard it here first.

This might explain Sol Campbells mental problems




The reason i'm posting it in here is because:
http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=50883079&postcount=96

I could see it being freddy!Doubt it be sol though.

Terry

did all this happen before or after they went to see brokeback mountain?

Fighting Irish

julep wrote:

did all this happen before or after they went to see brokeback mountain?

during

impr0v

can you say 'libelous'?

Wertz

For a minute there I thought I'd opened the News of the World website by mistake...
Frankly, who gives a f*ck? The only scandal surrounding premiership players is the obscene amounts of money they get paid...

Optimus

Sol Campbell? Nah, the other two? Probably.

Terry

impr0v wrote:

can you say 'libelous'?

not really.
he covered himself by saying "apparently". he never said they were actually the ones involved. although the thread title may have insinuated that.
perhaps changing the title of the thread would solve this.

segadreamcast

julep wrote:

not really.
he covered himself by saying "apparently". he never said they were actually the ones involved. although the thread title may have insinuated that.
perhaps changing the title of the thread would solve this.

On a legal basis, saying "apparently" or "allegedly" counts for nothing. Especially on a website as, everytime someone opens it, the material is technically re-published. If I were a mod, I'd delete it fairly quickly.

P.S. Ljungberg is an open secret in the gay community.

P.P.S. Personally, I'm kinda glad, in a sense, to see this. Obviously there should be gay people in football - much like there are gay mechanics, chefs and various other things. People generally say "but they'd be laughed off the pitch, they're gay!". So? I'd bet that was the prevalent attitude towards black football players - and look how far we've come.

StupidLikeAFox

Um i thought Sol Campbell was actually gay??

ziggy

This post has been deleted.

Fighting Irish

impr0v wrote:

can you say 'libelous'?

can you say "The Internet"

segadreamcast

Fighting Irish wrote:

can you say "The Internet"

Doesn't matter. IIRC, people have been sued for what was said on the internet. It is still a publication in legal eyes.

EDIT: IF you're reading this in the future - you might as well skip on to page 3 and a bit. The rest is just a back and forth about how Fighting Irish is wrong.

Fighting Irish

haha if message boards got in trouble for **** like this, every message board on the internet would be ****ed.

Fighting Irish

NoelRock wrote:

Doesn't matter. IIRC, people have been sued for what was said on the internet. It is still a publication in legal eyes.

evidence of a message board ever getting in troule for something like this?

segadreamcast

There's always a first time. (Edit: Actually, this wouldn't be the first time. http://www.dba-oracle.com/internet_cyberlibel_usa_cases_message_boards_forums.htm)

"You heard it here first." - Heh, you even talk like The Sun.

Fighting Irish

NoelRock wrote:

There's always a first time. (Edit: Actually, this wouldn't be the first time. http://www.dba-oracle.com/internet_cyberlibel_usa_cases_message_boards_forums.htm)

"You heard it here first." - Heh, you even talk like The Sun.

You think i typed out all that

Fighting Irish

mods/admins on boards say they can get in trouble for **** like this just to make there jobs easier the chances of them getting in trouble are very very slim

segadreamcast

Fighting Irish wrote:

mods/admins on boards say they can get in trouble for **** like this just to make there jobs easier the chances of them getting in trouble are very very slim

So now it has changed from impossible to very, very slim?

Incidentally, the bit I quoted is at the bottom of your message... you know, the bit that you typed...

Fighting Irish

NoelRock wrote:

So now it has changed from impossible to very, very slim?

Incidentally, the bit I quoted is at the bottom of your message... you know, the bit that you copied and pasted...

fixed ^

Fighting Irish

NoelRock wrote:

So now it has changed from impossible to very, very slim?

Incidentally, the bit I quoted is at the bottom of your message... you know, the bit that you typed...

well it could happen in theory but it won't

segadreamcast

Then we wouldn't have really heard it here first now, would we? Oh you tabloid kiddies... using words that you don't know the meaning of. Dearie dear.

Amazotheamazing

You can definately be done for libel over the internet. Surprised this hasn't been locked already.

Terry

NoelRock wrote:

There's always a first time. (Edit: Actually, this wouldn't be the first time. http://www.dba-oracle.com/internet_cyberlibel_usa_cases_message_boards_forums.htm)

"You heard it here first." - Heh, you even talk like The Sun.

all american cases involving american people and americas crazy legal system.
find me an Irish case involving Irish people.

this is just an internet rumour. nobody said it was true and the story quoted actually stated that those involved were not gay.

also, as far as i know, boards.ie is not responsible for the content posted here.

shuushh

whats your source on it being those players fighting_irish ?

because the photographs with the blurred out faces in the paper looked like they had white skin

segadreamcast

julep wrote:

all american cases involving american people and americas crazy legal system.
find me an Irish case involving Irish people.

this is just an internet rumour. nobody said it was true and the story quoted actually stated that those involved were not gay.

also, as far as i know, boards.ie is not responsible for the content posted here.

American cases can be used for precedent (albeit, weak precedent). Of course I won't find an Irish trial - because nothing to this extent has happened yet here. Will it? No doubt about it. Boards.ie is partially responsible. Stop perpetuating ignorance. When you know little, say nothing.

LookingFor

Gotta love The News of the World. OMG, they're kissing! And caressing! "sick!" "perverted!" :eek: :rolleyes:

Terry

NoelRock wrote:

American cases can be used for precedent (albeit, weak precedent). Of course I won't find an Irish trial - because nothing to this extent has happened yet here. Will it? No doubt about it. Boards.ie is partially responsible. Stop perpetuating ignorance. When you know little, say nothing.

you're an expert on internet law then, yes?

segadreamcast

julep wrote:

you're an expert on internet law then, yes?

Yes. Any more intelligent questions?

YeatsCounty

The News of the World wrote:

"They are rich and untouchable and this sort of weird behaviour is just another way of getting their kicks."

Those bad rich men! :rolleyes:

Seriously though, if no-one is getting hurt by whatever may be going on, then let them. There's far more important news events out there that papers should be covering, not this crap.

(This is not directed at the OP)

Johnee

This *is* directed at the OP.

What's your problem? What's the big deal with people being gay, bisexual or whatever? Why is this a 'scandal'? And what interest is it of yours (or anyone elses) what people get up to in the privacy of their own homes/hotels/whatever.

This is muck-raking of the highest order. People have a right to privacy and the tabloids who feed off this type of rumour, innuendo and Victorian prurience are the lowest species of parasite. Why arent they publishing details of their private lives? Or of the OP's? No-one has a right to know this unless the individuals want, for whatever reason, to announce it to the world.

Fighting Irish

shuushh wrote:

whats your source on it being those players fighting_irish ?

because the photographs with the blurred out faces in the paper looked like they had white skin

i got it off another message board, OMG :eek: i better tell them they are libelous

Fighting Irish

Johnee wrote:

This *is* directed at the OP.

What's your problem? What's the big deal with people being gay, bisexual or whatever? Why is this a 'scandal'? And what interest is it of yours (or anyone elses) what people get up to in the privacy of their own homes/hotels/whatever.

This is muck-raking of the highest order. People have a right to privacy and the tabloids who feed off this type of rumour, innuendo and Victorian prurience are the lowest species of parasite. Why arent they publishing details of their private lives? Or of the OP's? No-one has a right to know this unless the individuals want, for whatever reason, to announce it to the world.

:rolleyes: O don't really care, its just news, i seen this thread posted in the soccer forum a while back and it got huge so i presumed people might want to know, I copied and pasted this thread straight from another forum.

Fighting Irish

Johnee wrote:

This *is* directed at the OP.

What's your problem? What's the big deal with people being gay, bisexual or whatever? Why is this a 'scandal'? And what interest is it of yours (or anyone elses) what people get up to in the privacy of their own homes/hotels/whatever.

This is muck-raking of the highest order. People have a right to privacy and the tabloids who feed off this type of rumour, innuendo and Victorian prurience are the lowest species of parasite. Why arent they publishing details of their private lives? Or of the OP's? No-one has a right to know this unless the individuals want, for whatever reason, to announce it to the world.

and also :v: i knew someone would make the "what problem have you got with gay people" thread :rolleyes:

Terry

julep wrote:

you're an expert on internet law then, yes?

just one.

would you like to tell us, in detail, exactly what laws are being broken here?
just so that we don't go and break them again.

Fighting Irish

julep wrote:

just one.

would you like to tell us, in detail, exactly what laws are being broken here?
just so that we don't go and break them again.

around here mods/admins are trying to brainwash people into thinking that certain stuff could get boards.ie into alot of trouble. i understand why they do this and i agree it has to be done, but people who believe that boards.ie can get in trouble :rolleyes:

segadreamcast

julep wrote:

just one.

would you like to tell us, in detail, exactly what laws are being broken here?
just so that we don't go and break them again.

Article 10 (2) of the ECHR and Article 40.3.2 of the Constitution, amongst others!

tintinr35

NoelRock wrote:

Article 10 (2) of the ECHR and Article 40.3.2 of the Constitution, amongst others!

none of them are citizens of ireland tho so its not in conflict with our constitution

Terry

article 10 (2) ECHR wrote:

The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or the rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.

i don't see anything there which would prevent the OP from posting their names, other than the highlighted part. but it was already in the public domain and not told to that person in confidence.

Article 40.3.2 of the Constitution says "the State shall, in particular, by its laws, protect as best it may from unjust attack (and, in the case of injustice done, vindicate) the life, person, good name and property rights of every citizen."

the people named are not Irish citizens.

Rb

I'm pretty sure NoelRock is right about the legal side of things here.

segadreamcast

tintinr35 wrote:

none of them are citizens of ireland tho so its not in conflict with our constitution

Noticed that, but it was cited in a judgement in a newspaper libel...so I'm not to judge!

LadyJ

Dammit! I always dreamed that Ljungberg would be mine some day!

*sigh*

However,although this article is without a doubt sensationalised rubbish,I wish some footballers would come out. People need to be woken up.

Terry

NoelRock wrote:

Noticed that, but it was cited in a judgement in a newspaper libel

that still has no bearing on what is posted on an internet forum.

...so I'm not to judge!

indeed.

jank

You better take the names off quick snap..... just because its the internet doesnt mean the same rule of law applies to it. The servers (hardware) are in the state of Ireland and the owners are Irish, so they would be under the duristiction of irish law. Doesnt matter if the people involved arent Irish. In their eyes an Irish Law may have been broken here so they have every right to sue (and would probably win...) using our courts.

Any mods about....??

Fighting Irish

jank wrote:

You better take the names off quick snap..... just because its the internet doesnt mean the same rule of law applies to it. The servers (hardware) are in the state of Ireland and the owners are Irish, so they would be under the duristiction of irish law. Doesnt matter if the people involved arent Irish. In their eyes an Irish Law may have been broken here so they have every right to sue (and would probably win...) using our courts.

Any mods about....??

:rolleyes: if it were united players would you be saying this?


and also if boards.ie did get in trouble for something like this. could they not get in trouble for someone in the soccer forum saying "ashley cole is a **** footballer"

Fighting Irish

orig post changed a little to stop the wineing

segadreamcast

julep wrote:

that still has no bearing on what is posted on an internet forum.


indeed.

Yawn. Yes it does. Internet is a publication, just like a newspaper. Honestly...for a 30 year old...

Amazotheamazing

Have studied this area and you're wrong Fighting Irish, I'm not going into a long post as to why you're wrong since NoelRock and Jank have already told you.

Fighting Irish

NoelRock wrote:

Yawn. Yes it does. Internet is a publication, just like a newspaper. Honestly...for a 30 year old...

so you think boards could get in trouble for this thread?

i think you'd have a better chance of winning the lotto two weeks in a row

Fighting Irish

Amazotheamazing wrote:

Have studied this area and you're wrong Fighting Irish, I'm not going into a long post as to why you're wrong since NoelRock and Jank have already told you.

:rolleyes:

i never said boards could not get in trouble i just know they wouldn't

Wertz

LadyJ wrote:

I wish some footballers would come out. People need to be woken up.

Once it's not Mr Ljungberg and co waking me up, eh? :v: