BroadBand download rates - screen shots. WHO IS THE BEST?

n0tsane · 15-01-2006 4:00pm #1

Here an idea lets find the best download rate from all the isp's out there.

DOWNLOAD A BIG FILE(20Mb) OFF A FTP SITE AND TAKE A SCREEN SHOT OF THE DOWNLOAD SPEED AND A PING TEST TO GOOGLE . THEN POST THEN HERE.

It's sunday afternoon and most of the business users are not working so the speeds should only have res customers on. This should be a good way to find the best.

No p2p programe screen shots just straight downloads.

And turn off every thing in the msconfig startup.

This will put everybody on the same level.

Post the isp, connection , contention rate where you are connected.
IBB, 2Mb connection 24:1 Northside shopping center high site

ping to jolt

Ping statistics for 82.133.85.65:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 35ms, Maximum = 41ms, Average = 38ms

ping to boards

Ping statistics for 82.195.136.250:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% los
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 11ms, Maximum = 17ms, Average = 13ms

Tracing route to www.boards.ie [82.195.136.250]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 6 ms 16 ms 18 ms DN21-fe-0-0-1-160-nssc.irishbroadband.ie [83.141
.75.129]
3 9 ms 31 ms 6 ms DN19-fe-0-0-0-10-odlums.irishbroadband.ie [83.14
1.117.170]
4 14 ms 9 ms 10 ms DN05-fe-1-3-0-17-esb.irishbroadband.ie [87.192.2
33.89]
5 8 ms 10 ms 13 ms DN01-as1-0-rte.irishbroadband.ie [83.141.117.22]

6 8 ms 9 ms 12 ms DN42-ge-0-1-0-0-ibis-access.irishbroadband.ie [8
7.192.233.165]
7 * 13 ms 10 ms DN42-ge-0-2-0-50-ibis-gw.irishbroadband.ie [62.2
31.52.157]
8 16 ms 14 ms 15 ms panama-inex.hosting365.ie [193.242.111.87]
9 15 ms 15 ms 20 ms corerouter1.hosting365.ie [82.195.128.7]
10 13 ms 18 ms 12 ms boards.ie [82.195.136.250]

Trace complete.

screenfrom heanet.JPG

CyberGhost · 15-01-2006 4:08pm

lol k fine

but

1. all people should download from the same place, let's say here, and wait like 30 secs or so, until your speed stabilizes.
http://ftp.heanet.ie/pub/knoppix/KNOPPIX_V3.8.2-2005-05-05-DE.iso

2. I think pinging jolt.co.uk and boards.ie makes more sense than to ping google google.

3. Use imageshack hosting, so pictures can be displayed with img tags.

anyone disagree?

Eircom HOME Plus / 24:1 ( I think )

Pinging boards.ie [82.195.136.250] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=58

Ping statistics for 82.195.136.250:

Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

Minimum = 13ms, Maximum = 26ms, Average = 18ms

Pinging jolt.co.uk [82.133.85.65] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 82.133.85.65:

Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

Minimum = 17ms, Maximum = 44ms, Average = 31ms

Umiq88 · 15-01-2006 4:10pm

im on bt ireland 512kb/s connection and im getting download speeds of 60k from they're servers but thats nothing depending on where im downloadin it ranges from 40-120 which isnt bad for the connection speed

Edit just tried that download it started @ 250 and then after a bit leveled out at 130 everything in kilobites/sec

Irishpimpdude · 15-01-2006 4:13pm

um what is the point in this??? anywhooo here ya go...

2Mb IBB 24:1

Pinging boards.ie [82.195.136.250] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=55
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=55
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=55
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=55

Ping statistics for 82.195.136.250:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 9ms, Maximum = 12ms, Average = 9ms

LoGiE · 15-01-2006 4:15pm

Eircom, 3mb Down 384kbps Up 24:1

On Malahide exchange which was upgraded in December.

Irishpimpdude · 15-01-2006 4:19pm

Did they upgrade speeds yet???

CyberGhost · 15-01-2006 4:27pm

I think they upgraded some areas, Logie, was one of the first lucky ones.

Irishpimpdude wrote:

um what is the point in this???

Don't you know that internet speed is a measure of menhood for cyber geeks?

Irishpimpdude · 15-01-2006 4:34pm

lol yeah wait till you see ibb upgrading ;-)

vinks · 15-01-2006 5:10pm

ibb 2mbit 24:1, line is symmetric like every other ibb breeze user...

ping google.com
PING google.com (64.233.187.99): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=0 ttl=243 time=155.607 ms
64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=2 ttl=243 time=123.177 ms
64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=3 ttl=243 time=123.903 ms
64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=4 ttl=243 time=139.153 ms
64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=5 ttl=243 time=129.357 ms
64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=6 ttl=243 time=112.364 ms
64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=7 ttl=243 time=116.686 ms
64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=8 ttl=243 time=108.748 ms
64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=9 ttl=243 time=122.860 ms
64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=10 ttl=243 time=126.159 ms
64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=11 ttl=243 time=111.352 ms
64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=13 ttl=243 time=127.890 ms
64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=14 ttl=243 time=126.281 ms
^C
--- google.com ping statistics ---
15 packets transmitted, 13 packets received, 13% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 108.748/124.887/155.607/11.947 ms

ping boards.ie
PING boards.ie (82.195.136.250): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 82.195.136.250: icmp_seq=0 ttl=57 time=10.434 ms
64 bytes from 82.195.136.250: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=12.776 ms
64 bytes from 82.195.136.250: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=20.418 ms
64 bytes from 82.195.136.250: icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=13.752 ms
64 bytes from 82.195.136.250: icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=16.579 ms
64 bytes from 82.195.136.250: icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=13713.496 ms
64 bytes from 82.195.136.250: icmp_seq=6 ttl=57 time=12715.016 ms
64 bytes from 82.195.136.250: icmp_seq=7 ttl=57 time=11715.828 ms
64 bytes from 82.195.136.250: icmp_seq=8 ttl=57 time=10716.180 ms
64 bytes from 82.195.136.250: icmp_seq=9 ttl=57 time=9716.222 ms
64 bytes from 82.195.136.250: icmp_seq=10 ttl=57 time=8716.769 ms
64 bytes from 82.195.136.250: icmp_seq=11 ttl=57 time=7717.027 ms
64 bytes from 82.195.136.250: icmp_seq=12 ttl=57 time=6716.963 ms
64 bytes from 82.195.136.250: icmp_seq=13 ttl=57 time=5717.231 ms
64 bytes from 82.195.136.250: icmp_seq=14 ttl=57 time=4717.242 ms
64 bytes from 82.195.136.250: icmp_seq=15 ttl=57 time=3717.488 ms
64 bytes from 82.195.136.250: icmp_seq=19 ttl=57 time=10.006 ms
64 bytes from 82.195.136.250: icmp_seq=20 ttl=57 time=9.670 ms
64 bytes from 82.195.136.250: icmp_seq=21 ttl=57 time=10.238 ms
64 bytes from 82.195.136.250: icmp_seq=22 ttl=57 time=24.242 ms
64 bytes from 82.195.136.250: icmp_seq=23 ttl=57 time=8.746 ms
64 bytes from 82.195.136.250: icmp_seq=24 ttl=57 time=9.518 ms
^C
--- boards.ie ping statistics ---
26 packets transmitted, 22 packets received, 15% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 8.746/4364.811/13713.496/4892.073 ms

GarfieldConnoll · 15-01-2006 5:13pm

Smart Telecom 6Mb Promotion

CyberGhost · 15-01-2006 5:32pm

shouldn't you be getting something like 600KB/s on 6meg line Garfield?

Irishpimpdude · 15-01-2006 5:42pm

look like he is on a 20mb line there

GarfieldConnoll · 15-01-2006 5:44pm

Irishpimpdude wrote:

look like he is on a 20mb line there

Yeah, could be right there. I assumed I was on the 6Mb line profile over Christmas, like everyone else. Maybe not.

Garfield.

peterk19 · 15-01-2006 5:46pm

GarfieldConnoll wrote:

Yeah, could be right there. I assumed I was on the 6Mb line profile over Christmas, like everyone else. Maybe not.

Garfield.

So how do us mere mortals get this 20Mb line from Smart;)

elvis2002 · 15-01-2006 5:55pm

but sure its not DSL if its 20Mb downstream. Only Magnet give these speeds with ADSL2+.

Shamo · 15-01-2006 6:01pm

Smart use ADSL2+

20Mb *drool*

CyberGhost · 15-01-2006 6:26pm

Confess Garfield, you gave yourself away!

When will we have 20 megs speeds?

And when WHEN! are you going to enable Clondalkin(I know Smart is available on Nangar road) but what about NEWLANDS Cross exchange? *Sniff*

Praetorian · 15-01-2006 6:32pm

Garfield,

Why are you showing off a product you have not released? :eek:

Any luck on my uncles broadband? (Cara) All seems to be quite on the western front...

Sparky · 15-01-2006 6:46pm

Digiweb Metro Plus 4m/1m 24:1 contension.

Target Name: www.boards.ie
IP: 82.195.136.250
Date/Time: 15/01/2006 18:41:33

1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms [192.168.1.1]
2 45 ms 28 ms 43 ms 52 ms 42 ms 30 ms 32 ms 43 ms 39 ms 161 ms [83.147.165.1]
3 46 ms 198 ms 56 ms 24 ms 73 ms 85 ms 27 ms 57 ms 89 ms 135 ms gi-0-0-61.dub-deg-br2.net.digiweb.ie [83.147.163.161]
4 56 ms 168 ms 230 ms 37 ms 56 ms 57 ms 40 ms 31 ms 92 ms 108 ms gi-0-2-45.dub-deg-br1.net.digiweb.ie [83.147.163.38]
5 41 ms 125 ms 213 ms 22 ms 28 ms 34 ms 171 ms 61 ms 65 ms 94 ms panama-inex.hosting365.ie [193.242.111.87]
6 68 ms 119 ms 219 ms 72 ms 94 ms 79 ms 143 ms 77 ms 36 ms 67 ms corerouter1.hosting365.ie [82.195.128.7]
7 379 ms 89 ms 188 ms 47 ms 65 ms 51 ms 113 ms 49 ms 48 ms 37 ms boards.ie [82.195.136.250]

Giblet · 15-01-2006 7:58pm

:v:

Asok · 15-01-2006 8:28pm

Pinging www.boards.ie [82.195.136.250] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=62
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=62
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=62
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=62

Ping statistics for 82.195.136.250:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms

C:\Documents and Settings\xxxxxx>ping www.jolt.co.uk

Pinging www.jolt.co.uk [82.133.85.65] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=57

Ping statistics for 82.133.85.65:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 12ms, Maximum = 16ms, Average = 13ms

Chong · 15-01-2006 8:36pm

Holy hell what connection have you asok.

Asok · 15-01-2006 8:40pm

Fibre ....lots of fibre

Karoma · 15-01-2006 8:41pm

WDK wrote:

Holy hell what connection have you asok.

Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=62

...in fairnes...

Irishpimpdude · 15-01-2006 8:50pm

Jaysus i would kill for that connection!!

Anarchist · 15-01-2006 9:34pm

Asok wrote:

Fibre ....lots of fibre

Don't be such a smartarse and answer the question or else some will think its paintshop :rolleyes:

CyberGhost · 15-01-2006 9:46pm

Irishpimpdude wrote:

Jaysus i would kill for that connection!!

I would too.

Seriously, for that connection + life time support/supply of apache pizzas, I'd kill anyone but a member of my family and my best friend, eh heck, I'd kill him too lol

Anarchist · 15-01-2006 9:47pm

I am d/l at the moment so can't do majority of the test but as we all know you never get max speed on Bittorrent but this is not bad eh?

I'm a moron
pinged to boards at 22
pinged to jolt also 22

Smart 6mb test line 512 up

<Moriarty edit> Removed large pics and pics of copyrighted material being downloaded </Moriarty edit>

Geff · 15-01-2006 9:51pm

I can get a solid 200k with some servers and torrents (as high as 250k sometimes) with EsatBT and Imagine Internet.

CyberGhost · 15-01-2006 9:58pm

omg that BT speed is the most impressive so far!

and lol at your pic.

Fionn_McCool · 15-01-2006 10:32pm

Cannot do the ping part due to a proxy (i think)

Getting this from my apartment, CIT have a fibre running from the college to our apartments for no fee at all, and not too much is blocked

At the weekend i will post my speed and ping from my cablesurf connection 10mb/600kb 17:1

Fionn_McCool · 15-01-2006 10:34pm

oops

dlofnep · 15-01-2006 11:53pm

NTL 3meg.

Anarchist · 16-01-2006 12:14am

dlofnep wrote:

NTL 3meg.

That is incorrect, you havn't gave your speed time to settle down, thats why u are showing such a fast speed.
Post the test/pic again when d/l is 1/2 way

You would'nt get that speed with a 3 meg line anyhow, about 350 at best etc

CivilServant · 16-01-2006 12:17am

Anarchist wrote:

That is incorrect, you havn't gave your speed time to settle down, thats why u are showing such a fast speed.
Post the test/pic again when d/l is 1/2 way

You would'nt get that speed with a 3 meg line anyhow, about 350 at best etc

It says 344kb/s that's about right.

Anarchist · 16-01-2006 12:20am

Yes, why the fck did I reply with the previous reply for

Sparky · 16-01-2006 12:27am

jesus christ, some of you lads have some kick ass connections.

I am not worthy,
/bows many times

@asok
best ping ever there

Asok wrote:

Pinging www.boards.ie [82.195.136.250] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=62
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=62
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=62
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=62

Ping statistics for 82.195.136.250:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms

dlofnep · 16-01-2006 12:53am

Anarchist wrote:

That is incorrect

No it is not incorrect. I'm not downloading half of this file just to show you my connection - I've better things to waste my bandwidth on. Ive downloaded about 70megs however for ya, it's settled and not budged from 349.

Btw, If I wanted to try make my connection look better, this is what it looks like when I start the download

Creamy Goodness · 16-01-2006 12:55am

well considering Asok was probably within kicking distance of the boards.ie server his ping should be lower

Steffano2002 · 16-01-2006 1:16am

IBB 2MB/2MB 24:1

Screenshot of download speed here

Pinging www.boards.ie [82.195.136.250] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=57

Ping statistics for 82.195.136.250:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 8ms, Maximum = 11ms, Average = 9ms

Pinging www.jolt.co.uk [82.133.85.65] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=54
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=54
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=54
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=54

Ping statistics for 82.133.85.65:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 22ms, Maximum = 31ms, Average = 27ms

But up to a few minutes ago I had 70% packet loss... Pity IBB is so unrealable. Works great (when it works...)

Anarchist · 16-01-2006 1:17am

dlofnep wrote:

No it is not incorrect. I'm not downloading half of this file just to show you my connection - I've better things to waste my bandwidth on. Ive downloaded about 70megs however for ya, it's settled and not budged from 349.

Btw, If I wanted to try make my connection look better, this is what it looks like when I start the download

I admitted in a later reply I had double vision lol, look up

dlofnep · 16-01-2006 1:23am

Anarchist wrote:

I admitted in a later reply I had double vision lol, look up

Willymuncher · 16-01-2006 3:55am

BT 2mb...pretty standard really compared to what has been posted.

Pinging boards.ie [82.195.136.250] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 82.195.136.250:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 25ms, Maximum = 28ms, Average = 26ms

Pinging jolt.co.uk [82.133.85.65] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=57

Ping statistics for 82.133.85.65:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 35ms, Maximum = 38ms, Average = 36ms

djmarkus · 16-01-2006 6:27am

ne ripwave users?

Steffano2002 · 16-01-2006 8:38am

djmarkus wrote:

ne ripwave users?

Ah now that's just cruel...

jesus_thats_gre · 16-01-2006 2:25pm

IBB's 2meg Breeze service in Leopardstown:

C:\Documents and Settings>ping www.boards.ie -n 10

Pinging www.boards.ie [82.195.136.250] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.195.136.250: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 82.195.136.250:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 7ms, Maximum = 10ms, Average = 7ms

Irishpimpdude · 16-01-2006 6:35pm

Alot of people that have Ibb seem to be getting better speeds now... am i right? lol

Gigiwagga · 16-01-2006 8:27pm

My willy is bigger than yours, Jesus what is this all about, all that's missing now are the cock shots. This thread serves NO purpose at all ie giving some interested party some insight into what's available here. Who ever started it go suck your thumb or what ever you can reach !!!!!:)

:v:

ro2 · 16-01-2006 8:48pm

Where would we be without a bit of dick waving...

dlofnep · 16-01-2006 9:09pm

info@williamrua wrote:

My willy is bigger than yours, Jesus what is this all about, all that's missing now are the cock shots. This thread serves NO purpose at all ie giving some interested party some insight into what's available here. Who ever started it go suck your thumb or what ever you can reach !!!!!:) :v:

Please, everybody knows the faster your internet connection is, the more respected you are. Get with the program Lurch!

Gigiwagga · 16-01-2006 10:35pm

:rolleyes: Huh? What ? kind of like a big car thing.

Nice one Ro2

BroadBand download rates - screen shots. WHO IS THE BEST?

Comments