What Are the best 3dmark 2003 scores on this forum????

gline

just wodering what are the best 3dmark 2003 scores on this forum????

gline

Post your scores here, I want to see how Ireland is doing in comparison with some of the other forums i have been on in england and europe etc, and get a comparison with the score i got.

Jammer

gline wrote:

Post your scores here, I want to see how Ireland is doing in comparison with some of the other forums i have been on in england and europe etc, and get a comparison with the score i got.

mines in my sig, pretty dismal

koneko

over 12,000 last time I ran it.
Athlon 64 2800+ atm (overclocked to roughly 2.4Ghz)
Galaxy Glacier 6800GT overclocked to over Ultra speeds

may run it one of these days and see what the exact score is

http://www.xtremesystems.org is a good place to look for 3dMark (high) scores.

BadCharlie

I dont do to well on this benchmark. Only get 5500 points the last time i tryed.

gline

My old score was 5398 with
Asus Fx5200 oc'd @ 290 , 460 (65.73 Drivers) with fx51 @ 2.78ghz

gline

Come to think of it that was only my 3dmark 2001 scorem, the 3dmark2003 was far worse, that graphics card really makes the difference

netman

I got 12686 with X800 Pro (softmodded to XT) and P4 3.2 GHz.

gline

netman wrote:

I got 12686 with X800 Pro (softmodded to XT) and P4 3.2 GHz.

Thats good, was that the VIVO flashed to XT?

StRiKeR

i got 10954 running my card at only 370 core 1ghz mem due to hight temp in my case! till i get a new case this has to remain

gline

Wow thats really gud, with better cooling , that will kick ass

netman

gline wrote:

Thats good, was that the VIVO flashed to XT?

Yeah, works like a charm. There's even some headroom for overclocking

StRiKeR

gline wrote:

Wow thats really gud, with better cooling , that will kick ass

yup I'm in search of a new case, new watercooling and new monitor, waiting to see if this guy still has the sony 19" TFT, if not I may take the samsung 19" TFT, if thats gone as well I get a 22" CRT!

my over all temp is over 60 idle so I have to do something to cool it down for better performance! having all those drives raid not really helping my temp! as i work with 4 drives at the same time! and cpu be also at 100% load! you can imagine how warm it is!

gline

StRiKeR wrote:

yup I'm in search of a new case, new watercooling and new monitor, waiting to see if this guy still has the sony 19" TFT, if not I may take the samsung 19" TFT, if thats gone as well I get a 22" CRT!

my over all temp is over 60 idle so I have to do something to cool it down for better performance! having all those drives raid not really helping my temp! as i work with 4 drives at the same time! and cpu be also at 100% load! you can imagine how warm it is!

my god thats very hot at 60 IDLE. Man u'd wana be careful wit dat, a few silent 120mm fans in d case and a decent watercooling set up will sort that out.

Man i'd love a tft capable of 1600x1200, with a decent response time.

ViperVenoM

*sobs at his 7360*..getting watercooling soon for my cpu..but thats not gonna boost my score...im not buying a new vid card yet...hell no....7360 sucks though :rolleyes:

Diabolus

3dMark2003 - 12,000 +
AquaMark - 51,000 +

I'll edit this later for the exact figure as im in work.

ViperVenoM

i thought aquamark was ..pretty dependant on the vid card (cpu as well but you know what i mean) ..you have double my 3dmark ..yet about the same aquamark

Col_Loki

i thought aquamark was ..pretty dependant on the vid card (cpu as well but you know what i mean) ..you have double my 3dmark ..yet about the same aquamark

3dmark'03 Is almost totally graphics card related. If you want to break 8k you will need a different card....... the X800's and 6800's are the cards of choice for this benchmark obviously, the CPU , Memory etc play a far smaller role.

3dmark'01 is a better indication of overall system gaming performance, but its getting old now.

TacT

3d03 - 12,211 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3071123
3d01 - 19,184 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8123904
Arc - 56,930 - http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_search.php?activeRunID=2094170167

I like those numbers

ViperVenoM

yeh my 03 is about done i reckon..wont get much more out of the card..head room on aquamark and 01 though

22500 on 01 and 50500 on aqua...

BloodBath

3dmark2001 = 21,026
3dmark2003 = 7,547
aquamark = 51,899

I'm modding my psu this week to increase my 12v rail. It's undervolting to 11.5v @ 3.6ghz and powers off when I go higher. Luckily my psu has adjustable pots inside so with a multi-meter I can open it up and raise it over 12v. Hoping to hit 3.8-4.0ghz this weekend on air. Should push my memory close to 550mhz as well.

Getting an x800pro vivo soon too and a thermalright xp-120 to cool that prescott down and reduce the noise. Winter is setting in fast so the colder ambient temps will help push it further as well.

Anyone know when 3dmark2005 is out? The early screenshots look sweet.


BloodBth

CombatCow

3DMK01

23,532

---

3DMK03

12,514

---

Aquamark
67,609

With spec in sig :cool:

CC


*gline check the last monitor on this page...http://www.overclockers.co.uk/acatalog/lcd18.html i highly recommend it.

BloodBath

Nice scores, did you have the 3800 or the ultra overclocked at all?


BloodBath

CombatCow

Nope, nothing is overclocked, i havent dabbled with that yet..


CC

BloodBath

Damn and you have water cooling. Get overclocking. You should be able to push 14k-15k in 2003 with that setup.


BloodBath

Azza

3D Mark 2001 22,660
3D Mark 2003 7,342
Aquamark 52,085

StRiKeR

gline wrote:

my god thats very hot at 60 IDLE. Man u'd wana be careful wit dat, a few silent 120mm fans in d case and a decent watercooling set up will sort that out.

Man i'd love a tft capable of 1600x1200, with a decent response time.

yea i know, thats why I'm only running my vid card at 370core and 1ghz mem, stock speed for the galaxy glacier, but even that it gets heats up! lower to 350core, completely stock speed, thats because almost all the heat are stuck under where the vid card is coz the vid card and the hdd almost join togther, air not moving much! like a heat storage, dont want to leave the case open tho!too many hdds, gonna get new case this weekend and watercooling but also thinking about something like the Prometeia Microfreezer!

StRiKeR

Col_Loki wrote:

3dmark'03 Is almost totally graphics card related. If you want to break 8k you will need a different card....... the X800's and 6800's are the cards of choice for this benchmark obviously, the CPU , Memory etc play a far smaller role.

3dmark'01 is a better indication of overall system gaming performance, but its getting old now.

thats right 2003 gives the cpu score seperately if you click on details you can see it there after benchmark finish, its not very much cpu related! 2001 does but it is getting old, its better to use 2003 as it support DX9 n as these 2 cards are made for!!!

by the way sorry for the nerd fight, I was just trying mess with bloodbath seens he didnt know who I was! but have to play along with you too or he figure out quicker! it was a lough!

gline

CombatCow wrote:

3DMK01

23,532

---

3DMK03

12,514

---

Aquamark
67,609

With spec in sig :cool:

CC


*gline check the last monitor on this page...http://www.overclockers.co.uk/acatalog/lcd18.html i highly recommend it.

Nice scores man, and a nice rig too, i checked out the tft, nice but very very pricey, can get it imported cheaper from the states,

Scores will be amazing when your card is OC'd

gline

StRiKeR wrote:

yea i know, thats why I'm only running my vid card at 370core and 1ghz mem, stock speed for the galaxy glacier, but even that it gets heats up! lower to 350core, completely stock speed, thats because almost all the heat are stuck under where the vid card is coz the vid card and the hdd almost join togther, air not moving much! like a heat storage, dont want to leave the case open tho!too many hdds, gonna get new case this weekend and watercooling but also thinking about something like the Prometeia Microfreezer!

I would definitly recommend the Mach II cooler in this season (nice ambient temps) the mach II reached -51 degrees celius. Though the cpu is only aroun -9, which is bad for a mach II, i dont have good contact between the cpu and cooling head. I just havnt bothered fiddling around wit much, it is a bit fiddley installing it , but well worth it.

StRiKeR

lets take a look at the Mach II, even -9 is fine for me, I'm not plaining on overclocking as such, just want a cool system! its crap when your system reboots in the middle of a game due to overheating! the system is so hot even my HDDs are overheating! lucky I just spot it when that happened! shut down and cool down, now leaving the case open, temp dropped to 52c and cpu drop to 33c and vid card drop to 52c also, not too bad for now!

koneko

If you're not going to be overclocking a Mach II isn't a good solution. It's for extreme overclocking, and can be a lot of hassle (really heavy, messy putting the sealstring around the block, etc). Not to mention the price of it.

gline

koneko is right, if your not going to be overclocking , dont bother getting a MACH II, its like buying a ferrari just to go to the shops and back

a decent watercooling system would be fine with some silent case fans and a bigger case.

Man those temps sound painful, id be careful with ur system , it would probably do some damage to hardware

airetam_storm

5300ish on my sig rig
not bad for a 550euro system

I no 3dm03 is a gfx based benchmark but the two cpu tests can really drag your score down if its not up to scratch

TacT

StRiKeR wrote:

lets take a look at the Mach II, even -9 is fine for me, I'm not plaining on overclocking as such, just want a cool system! its crap when your system reboots in the middle of a game due to overheating! the system is so hot even my HDDs are overheating! lucky I just spot it when that happened! shut down and cool down, now leaving the case open, temp dropped to 52c and cpu drop to 33c and vid card drop to 52c also, not too bad for now!

Surely you're capable of getting good airflow through a case with minimal noise without having to resort to a Mach II for cooling if you're not going to be overclocking? :eek:

BloodBath

I no 3dm03 is a gfx based benchmark but the two cpu tests can really drag your score down if its not up to scratch

The cpu tests have no effect on the overall score. You can press escape after the first 4 tests and still get a valid 03 score. The cpu does have an effect on the video card tests though but not much. Just a couple of hundred points between my system at 3.2 and 3.6 but the memory is clocked higher at 3.6 as well.


BloodBath

StRiKeR

TacT wrote:

Surely you're capable of getting good airflow through a case with minimal noise without having to resort to a Mach II for cooling if you're not going to be overclocking? :eek:

i know but wouldn't mind having one!

new score running the card at Ultra Stock speed
400MHz core 1.1Ghz Mem
3Dmark2003 11542 GPU at 64c after benchmark

410Mhz core 1.15Ghz mem
3Dmark2003 11847 GPU at 64c after benchmark


seems a little low!

TacT

seems about right to me. My card was running at 440/1.18Ghz for my 12.2K score

MickFarr

3DMark03 = 11061
First test using new Gainward 6800GT. No overclocking

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3076566

Why is no one putting in a link to there scores ??

StRiKeR

MickFarr wrote:

3DMark03 = 11061
First test using new Gainward 6800GT. No overclocking

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3076566

Why is no one putting in a link to there scores ??

everytime I click on online browser it fail, so I just leave it! :rolleyes:

TacT

was the orb down or is it a problem specific to your setup? Any error msgs?

M@lice

I score 5800.

Shuttle sn45g v2.0
2500+ xp clocked at 200*11
Saphire AIW Radeon 9800se softmodded to pro with omega drivers
512mb TwinMOS ddr400 cl2.5

Not huge or anything but i was going for value when i was building my pc.

airetam_storm

M@lice wrote:

I score 5800.

Shuttle sn45g v2.0
2500+ xp clocked at 200*11
Saphire AIW Radeon 9800se softmodded to pro with omega drivers
512mb TwinMOS ddr400 cl2.5

Not huge or anything but i was going for value when i was building my pc.

I prob should check but too lazy-does your mobo have an agp\pci lock?
That cpu ment to be real good for oclocking on one

OfflerCrocGod

airetam_storm wrote:

That cpu ment to be real good for oclocking on one

It is overclocked already but since it's a shuttle I'd wonder about the wisdom of pushing it any further, then again GO ON M@lice!!! Burn down the house, literally.

airetam_storm

I no ill prob get laughed outta here but is there any way to flash a 5200 to ultra? id be willing to go at it with a soldering iron if i thought i could get a half decent card

OfflerCrocGod

airetam_storm wrote:

I no ill prob get laughed outta here but is there any way to flash a 5200 to ultra? id be willing to go at it with a soldering iron if i thought i could get a half decent card

I'm not laughing I'm sh1ting myself instead Even if you were willing to go at your Gfx card with a nuclear bomb you still wont get anything decent out of a 5200. I just can't see the point in flashing it, it wont magically become a different core it will still be the same old hardware. If I were you I'd wait until the 6600GT and X700Pro are easily available and grab one of the two. 9800 Pro can be flashed to XT and is available right now if you don't want to wait.

dubdvd

im not sure but this might be the highest so far i think let me know if im wrong??????this is a x800xt pci express running on stock hsf will be running on water soon ..frist time to overclock it so id say ill get more out of it if i do ill keep you up to date

3dmark03 !!!....13605....

jesus_thats_gre

2.8E @ 3.5

Radeon 9800 Pro @ 450/378

512MB OCZ Pc4000 Gold Ram


3DMark 2002 - 18466

3DMark 2003 - 6191

****ing Prescotts!!

gline

Good Score Dub, Its the highest in this thread so far. What would u expect , its a xt pe pci expess good 1 man, keep it up

M@lice

It is overclocked already but since it's a shuttle I'd wonder about the wisdom of pushing it any further, then again GO ON M@lice!!! Burn down the house, literally.

Well i probably could push the fsb up more, I mean the voltage is set to 1.45 and its perfect.

Trouble is the ram is the cheaper Twinmos ddr 400 stuff. Upping the fsb much past 400 means the timeings have to be loosened alot so i reckon it would give more of a performance hit than a gain. I've yet to try it out tho.

AS for the agp/pci lock I think its good up until 200 fsb not sure about after that. I think there is an option of changing the agp frequency separate to the fbs in the bios tho.

gline

So far, this is what we have ,

3dmarks Score

1. dubdvd 13605
2. gline 12786
3. netman 12686
4. CombatCow 12514
5. TacT 12211
6. MickFarr 11061
7. StRiKeR 10954
8. Bloodbath 7547
9. ViperVenoM 7360
10. Azza 7342