Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Hard shoulder and fast drivers

  • 22-04-2004 11:20am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 653 ✭✭✭


    I realise this has been a problem fro a long time but since the penalty points have come in it's really getting to me. This morning driving into work i was travelling along nicely at about 60-65Mph and an @sshole comes up behind me, tailgates and flashes lights and expects me to move into the hard shoulder to let him go - i think not! I'm trying to be a good boy on the road since the penalty points and since then these @rsewipes seem to be everywhere. Whats worse is when they eventually overtake they don't seem to make any progress in front of me, they slow to the speed limit!! Anyone else encountering these f-ing monkeys on the road?


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,372 ✭✭✭silverside


    haha

    you are about to reopen the perennial debate on boards motors

    i'm staying out of it this time!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,473 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


    Originally posted by DukeDredd
    I realise this has been a problem fro a long time but since the penalty points have come in it's really getting to me. This morning driving into work i was travelling along nicely at about 60-65Mph and an @sshole comes up behind me, tailgates and flashes lights and expects me to move into the hard shoulder to let him go - i think not! I'm trying to be a good boy on the road since the penalty points and since then these @rsewipes seem to be everywhere. Whats worse is when they eventually overtake they don't seem to make any progress in front of me, they slow to the speed limit!! Anyone else encountering these f-ing monkeys on the road?

    May I remind you that the rules of the road state that you must move to the left to allow faster traffic to pass.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,825 ✭✭✭robo


    Have to agree with you also DukeDredd, I find the same, this doesn't just happen on the dual carriageways but yep on normal roads where you have to pull over to the grass almost!!! Bloody head wrecking.

    Bond 007 - yes that is what the rules say, but when someone is on your ass as you are driving at around 60mph or whatever the maximum speed is in an area, that is annoying, it happens a lot along roads that are 40mph in the country, that just makes my blood boil!!! :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Originally posted by Bond-007
    May I remind you that the rules of the road state that you must move to the left to allow faster traffic to pass.
    Only on two-lane carriageways.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 653 ✭✭✭DukeDredd


    May I remind you that the rules of the road state that you must move to the left to allow faster traffic to pass.

    Not so when it's a national route with only one lane in either direction. Hard Shoulders are completely different stories to Slow & Overtaking lanes.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 110 ✭✭Korg


    May I remind you that the rules of the road state that you must move to the left to allow faster traffic to pass.
    It also says in the rules of the road:

    "No vehicle other than exempted vehicles (fire brigades, ambulances, Garda cars) may exceed the maximum road speed limit at any time"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Originally posted by Korg
    It also says in the rules of the road:

    "No vehicle other than exempted vehicles (fire brigades, ambulances, Garda cars) may exceed the maximum road speed limit at any time"
    Here is the bone of contention. It is nobody's responsibility to police other drivers except the Gardai.
    The rules of the road, clearly state that on a two-lane carraigway, you must move to the left-hand lane if a vehicle approaching from behind wishes to overtake. That's it. All each driver should do is ensure that he is following the rules of the road, and leave everyone else to their own devices.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 110 ✭✭Korg


    The rules of the road, clearly state that on a two-lane carraigway, you must move to the left-hand lane if a vehicle approaching from behind wishes to overtake
    I agree there, if you're doing 60 in the overtaking lane on the m50 etc. However in this thread's context the original poster was being "forced" into the hard sholder, apparently on a single lane road.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 653 ✭✭✭DukeDredd


    Here is the bone of contention. It is nobody's responsibility to police other drivers except the Gardai.

    Agreed - but the original post here is not about motorways - should have made that clearer, sorry. I refuse always to pull into the hard shoulder when i am doing the legal speed limit and some muppet behind me wants to do 70-80mph and thinks he gets priority on the road so proceeds to flash lights, tailgate and make hand gestures to get me to move aside. I'm amazed at the amount of people that pull over into a hard shoulder doing 60mph, to leave some ignorant muppet pass which is a highly dangerous thing to do, even more so at night. Ever seen people in the hard shoulder doing around 60 and suddenly a tractor/moped/pedestrian appears up ahead - they're faced with the task of trying to get back into the flow of traffic before they hit something making they're driving experience alot more difficult while muppet doing 70-80 coasts home...


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 41,209 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Although I agree that you are not obliged to allow them past but if there is a straight stretch ahead with no oncoming traffic I would pull over just to see the back of them. I would rather pass by their crashed wreck rather than be a part of it!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Originally posted by Korg
    I agree there, if you're doing 60 in the overtaking lane on the m50 etc. However in this thread's context the original poster was being "forced" into the hard sholder, apparently on a single lane road.
    He doesn't have to move over, but he's still required to show the same consideration and submissiveness (i.e. not speed up, not drive on the white), even though this other guy was being a complete moron.

    I agree with DukeDredd, I'd never ever drive in the hard shoulder, unless I had some sort of vehicle fault, and then I'd drive very slowly (<30mph). The urge to be as unco-operative and annoying as you can to the ignorant muppet behind you is a hard one to deny. ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 345 ✭✭leonotron


    If they flash their lights just slow down a bit more. Wreck their heads a bit.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 568 ✭✭✭por


    DukeDredd
    The guy doing 70mph and flashing their light are @sshol*s as you say, the best way to get rid of them is to just touch your bake pedal enough to put the brake lights on (do not even slow down the car) and you should notice that 90% of the time they will back off, if that fails roll down the window and give them the finger. They will pass you out in their own good time. I don’t see why someone should move into the hard shoulder at 60-65mph cos some guy behind them doing 70 wants them to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,513 ✭✭✭Sleipnir


    yeah it's up to you if you want to pull over into the hard shoulder, you don't have to although I believe many people don't know this. it's not a slow lane and should only be used in an emergency.
    They're the ones doing the overtaking so let them take all the risks.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 5,529 Mod ✭✭✭✭spockety


    If you could buy a sign that fit across the bottom of your backwindow which lights up the words "BACK OFF MOTHER****ER", I'd buy one.

    J.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,922 ✭✭✭Dave


    Or "DIM YOUR LIGHTS YOU MUPPET" I hate when people are on fulls behind me and there's nothing I can do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Originally posted by Dave
    Or "DIM YOUR LIGHTS YOU MUPPET" I hate when people are on fulls behind me and there's nothing I can do.
    A guy I know who works as a car salesman was told by the rep for (insert huge German car manufacturer here) to drive around everywhere with full beams and full fogs. 'Gives the car more presence on the road' apparently.

    :mad:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,393 ✭✭✭Eurorunner


    It is nobody's responsibility to police other drivers except the Gardai.
    Too True. There are too many ppl setting themselves up as amateur enforcers...or is it just begrudgery?

    Yes, driving on the hard shoulder is against the laws of the land but there are occassions when on a straight stretch of road with good visibility, its clearly safe to let someone pass. So long as its safe to do so, i let them pass. Its not my concern if their speeding - thats their choice and good luck to them.

    Now what about the muppets who actually speed up when you overtake - making what was a safe overtaking manouevre deadly dangerous?
    And the white line merchants - sticking to the white line cos they know that you want to overtake and it seems will do all they can to keep you behind them?


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 41,209 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Originally posted by Eurorunner
    there are occassions when on a straight stretch of road with good visibility, its clearly safe to let someone pass.
    the hard shoulder can contain debris thrown from the road, like glass, nails, etc. so don't assume it is safe to drive on it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,029 ✭✭✭shoegirl


    Those who refuse to move into the hard shoulder are perfectly right not to.

    If somebody wants to overtake a vehicle thats already at or above the speed limit, hand signs, tailgating etc doesn't exonerate them. They have no right to do that.

    Having said that many of these hard shoulders are simply a waste of road space. The roads authority is planning to convert many of them into proper driving lanes. However this would be at the expense of more vulnerable road users - pedestians, cyclists, and slow vehicles. But at least it would give an extra lane.

    The fact is that speeding is against the law, and bullying other drivers while speeding is just plain arrogance and stupidity.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,473 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


    Originally posted by shoegirl
    Those who refuse to move into the hard shoulder are perfectly right not to.

    If somebody wants to overtake a vehicle thats already at or above the speed limit, hand signs, tailgating etc doesn't exonerate them. They have no right to do that.

    Having said that many of these hard shoulders are simply a waste of road space. The roads authority is planning to convert many of them into proper driving lanes. However this would be at the expense of more vulnerable road users - pedestians, cyclists, and slow vehicles. But at least it would give an extra lane.

    The fact is that speeding is against the law, and bullying other drivers while speeding is just plain arrogance and stupidity.

    So it's acceptable for a lorry to plod along at 45mph and hold up traffic rather than to move over to the hard shoulder to allow them to pass?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 294 ✭✭the evil belly


    i do a fair amount of driving between cork and dublin and one thing that pisses me off is people driving really slow right out on the white line who refuse to pull in a bit, i don't mean pulling onto a hard should even but just moving in a bit so i can see if there's an oncoming truck or something. i'll usually pull in to let someone pass, you never know the reason their in a rush, i couldn't make to to see someone before they died because i couldn't pass a car doing 35 in a 60 zone. also who am i to stop some fu(king idiot form killing himself by driving at some insane speed. i'd much prefer if he didn't take me out with him. it's also a pleasant surprise when someone pulls in to let you pass if their driving slow. i always make sure to give a flash of me hazard lights in acknowledgement


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,473 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


    Originally posted by the evil belly
    i do a fair amount of driving between cork and dublin and one thing that pisses me off is people driving really slow right out on the white line who refuse to pull in a bit, i don't mean pulling onto a hard should even but just moving in a bit so i can see if there's an oncoming truck or something. i'll usually pull in to let someone pass, you never know the reason their in a rush, i couldn't make to to see someone before they died because i couldn't pass a car doing 35 in a 60 zone. also who am i to stop some fu(king idiot form killing himself by driving at some insane speed. i'd much prefer if he didn't take me out with him. it's also a pleasant surprise when someone pulls in to let you pass if their driving slow. i always make sure to give a flash of me hazard lights in acknowledgement

    You sir are indeed one of the few gentlemen left on our roads.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 294 ✭✭the evil belly


    Originally posted by Bond-007
    You sir are indeed one of the few gentlemen left on our roads.

    cheers. it's on common courtesy though, don't cost me anything and is more likely to result in that person pulling in future when someone else wants to pass. makes perfect sense in my head at any rate


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,608 ✭✭✭✭sceptre


    Originally posted by Bond-007
    So it's acceptable for a lorry to plod along at 45mph and hold up traffic rather than to move over to the hard shoulder to allow them to pass?
    Legally yes. When I'm driving behind the truck and he pulls safely over on to the hard shoulder when I'm driving I'm thankful for it (and I acknowledge it). I never expect it.

    I don't throw my car into the hard shoulder every time there's some idiot behind me. Actually I rarely do it if I'm driving at the speed limit (if I feel like going slower I'll do what I can). I will tend to make sure I'm at the left side of the lane though. All I expect is that the guy in front doesn't try to hog the entire road and prevent anyone from passing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,513 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    I sometimes drive a slowish vehicle (jeep + big trailer) and if I'm driving on a national primary route and it's safe to pull into the hard shoulder to let someone past then I'll do so. I'd only be doing 50 mph so I think it's fair enough to let people past me who want to travel at 60.

    On the same road in my car, I'd be doing 60-65 mph (indicated) I always drive as close to the hard shoulder boundary line as possible anyway but I am reluctant to actually drive into the HS at 60 mph. Sometimes, I will do it but only if I think it's 100% safe and if the driver behind isn't being a prick about wanting to get by. There are many potential dangers in the hard shoulder - pedestrians, cyclists, debris, dead animals, people nosing out of side entrances etc. Why should I expose myself to these dangers just to facilitate the impatient idiot behind?

    BTW I never, EVER venture into the HS at night using dipped headlights. That's suicidal in my opinion because you just can't see far enough ahead and could slam into an unsuspecting pedestrian or broken down car.

    One thing I hate is: when you're doing 60 and someone (very often a Nordie reg) comes up behind you aggressively and sticks out their indicator as if to say "I want to get past, move over to the hard shoulder NOW" Even worse are those who flash headlights. On the other hand are people (very often elderly gits) who hog the white line doing 30 mph in a 60 and won't budge no matter how much traffic is building up behind them. So there is two sides to this.

    I find Irish drivers are poor at overtaking safely and effectively anyway. Poor road markings and road design don't help, still a good driver should be able to overtake safely on a national primary road without the person in front having to facilitate them by moving into the HS.

    Actually one thing which doesn't help when overtaking is the fear of being caught speeding by cops sitting on straight stretches of road. If you want to get by say a truck doing 50 mph, the safe way is to drop down a gear or two, floor it and get by him asap. You'd probably be doing 80 mph+ by the end of the maneouvre after which you can slow down to 60 or so. But if you're clocked during the overtake, they'll probably give you penalty poinst for speeding which IMO is just wrong as it's far more dangerous to overtake "slowly" in these situations.

    PS - AFAIK, driving in the hard shoulder is mentioned in the Irish Rules of the Road. Apparently, a slow moving vehicle is allowed (or is it obliged?) to pull into the hard shoulder momentarily to let following vehicles pass. In other countries such as the UK, driving in the hard shoulder is a major no-no and is strictly forbidden.

    BrianD3


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 540 ✭✭✭Andrew Duffy


    The rules of the road's lack of a definition of "slow" is the problem here - it is meant to describe tractors or oversized vehicles, since driving at a speed of more than 15-20 Mph in the shoulder is extremely dangerous for various reasons.

    <ot>Another point of confusion is undertaking - "when traffic is moving in queues" is harldy cut-and-dried. Personally, I think that undertaking at speed should be allowed when there is a lane gap between you and the car you are undertaking (thus you can pass someone hogging lane three of a three-lane carriageway), but since we have a grand total of zero high-speed three-lane carriageways in Ireland it's a moot point.</ot>


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 41,209 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Part of the M50 for example (Naas Rd to Ballymount junctions) is 3 lanes @ 70mph limit.
    I was going to say the M1 (M50 to the airport junctions) but I think all of those sections are [stupidly] 50mph limited.
    Im sure there are more - just cant think where.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,102 ✭✭✭Genghis


    I always drive pretty much on the yellow line of the hard shoulder, and pretty much at the national speed limit. I feel this is the safest place to drive - arseholes behind you can overtake if needs be, and you are in a better position to avoid arseholes doing the same thing in the opposite direction. Finally, you are the maximum possible distance from the biggest hazard on the road - cars travelling in the opposite direction - might be significant if you / other gets a blow out, etc.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,859 ✭✭✭Duckjob


    It's as much about manners as anything else.

    Nothing pisses me off than seeing someone tootling along on righthand lane(s) of a motorway when the left lanes are empty. To me it's just plain sloppy driving as well as inconsiderate. If I find myself behind them and I want to overtake, I'll expect them to move over, but initially I'll keep my distance and 'ask' them nicely with a quick flash. If they don't move over and there's no reason they can't, I can only assume they're being awkward and trying to 'regulate' my speed for me. This makes my blood boil as in trying to enforce road rules on me, they are themselves violating the rules, raising tempers, and therefore increasingly the likelihood of irrational bahaviour on the road.

    On a single lane road, it's a different story. I would never 'expect' somebody to move into the hard shoulder for me to get past. If they move over for me, great, and I'll flash my hazards in gratitude when I pass. If not, I'll keep my distance and wait for a safe opportunity. It's basic manners. If I'm the car in front, I expect the same manners from the car behind. If I know a car behind wants to get past, and it's safe, I'll move in for them. On the other hand, if some asshole comes flying up and drives up on my bumper flashing his lights and trying to heavy me into moving over, thats just plain rude. I'll just take my foot off the accelerator and let my speed wind down until he backs off. They usually get the message quick enough when they realise what they're doing is disrupting their own progress.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,659 ✭✭✭✭dahamsta


    Lord, we're all very "responsible" here aren't we? I usually drive at about 10mph over the speed limit if the road and driving conditions permit. And if someone pulls up behind me and gives me a flash, and the hard shoulder is drivable, I'll pull over for them. If I was driving a Lamborghini at 100mph and a Ferrari pulled up behind me I'd do the same. The law doesn't come into it, it's just common courtesy. Sitting in people's way is just plain hard-headedness.

    adam


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,473 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


    The problem is the lack of progress on National routes, like grandad doing 30mph in his Nissan Micra. Thats just bad manners too.

    A common failure on the driving test is failing to progress.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,859 ✭✭✭Duckjob


    If I was driving a Lamborghini at 100mph and a Ferrari pulled up behind me I'd do the same. The law doesn't come into it, it's just common courtesy.

    Firstly, it's also courtesy not to nearly drive into the back of another car flashing your lights demanding to be let past. Why should I should courtesy to someone who's showing none to me. When you walk down the street, common courtesy stops you from barging other people out of your way because you want to get to where you're going quicker. it should be no different when you are in a car.

    Secondly, the law will quickly come into it if you move into the hard shoulder and skull a cyclist or a pedestrian you didn't notice.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 131 ✭✭mudflapgirl


    Having a rather large commute everyday to work I experience the lot. Now, there is parts on this road where it is possible to do between 70 - 80mph safely but obviously illegally since the limit is 60mph. Most mornings, I can safely do 70mph on these roads and get away with it, I know my limitations. What annoys me is that most mornings, nearly without fail, I'll get some ar$ehole in a jeep on my bumper, flashing his lights and beeping for me to get out of the way before overtaking dangerously and giving me the finger as they pass. This morning being one of those days. I'm already speeding and yet I'm not going fast enough for these people.
    Most of the time I will indeed pull over a bit into the HS so as people can pass me but when they start flashing and beeping I nearly make a point of not doing it, let them go kill themselves while I can drive past their accident.

    I also find that, if you have them, putting on the back fog light can deter some of them, but other times it can the adverse effect of them flashing you constantly instead so you turn it off. The trick of tapping your brakes can backfire if they're not paying enough attention and they can rear end you, besides that rarely works outside major cities/towns anymore, they're wise to it.

    I could start ranting about the road-hogs, the slow people who insist on doing 25mph in a 60 and the ones who do about 40mph in the outside lane on the M50 and M7 but we'd be here all day :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 112 ✭✭KinSlayer


    When someone is close behind you and is looking like they want to pass, if its safe to do so, pull into hard sholder and let them pass.

    Safer for you to have let them go than have them behind getting impatient

    ever seen a car passing out a string of traffic up a blind hill?

    just because these drivers can be annoying why put yourself in danger?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,105 ✭✭✭Tommy Vercetti


    Originally posted by KinSlayer
    When someone is close behind you and is looking like they want to pass, if its safe to do so, pull into hard sholder and let them pass.

    Safer for you to have let them go than have them behind getting impatient

    ever seen a car passing out a string of traffic up a blind hill?

    just because these drivers can be annoying why put yourself in danger?

    yes, exactly, get them out of the way and let them crash into someone else

    If I can see that there is nothing in the HS, then I will move over to let someone pass when it is safe for me to do so, I could not care less what speed they want to do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,327 ✭✭✭kdevitt


    I drive close on 1000 miles a week, Cork - Limerick-Clare- Dublin, so am unfortunate enough to see most of the crap driving thats going on.

    Its amazing to see drivers every day who still haven't discovered their rear view mirror. They'll be doing 50 in the overtaking lane, a car will be flying along from well behind them and they're completely oblivious, happens to me a good bit (I generally refuse to break the speed limit on company time) and its so annoying, I don't flash the headlights or make any gestures etc, but it really stresses you out when these people don't have the consideration to use their mirrors, so I can understand where the flashing comes from on occasion - there are of course other times when you have drivers flashing the car in front for no good reason.
    Actually one thing which doesn't help when overtaking is the fear of being caught speeding by cops sitting on straight stretches of road.
    I thought I was alone in noticing this - a truck pulled into the hard shoulder (no flashing of headlights going on I might add) to allow me to overtake on my way home from cork a fortnight or so ago, and I overtook him, hitting 70 at the most - there was a squad car on the opposite side of the road, has really put me off overtaking even though its necessary at times because of the whole penalty points crap. I notice a lot more drivers overtaking at 60-65 miles an hour, which means its almost possible to exchange phone numbers with some of them by the time they get past you...


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 41,209 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Out of curiosity, has anyone [here] been done for speeding whilst overtaking?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,118 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Originally posted by KinSlayer
    When someone is close behind you and is looking like they want to pass, if its safe to do so, pull into hard sholder and let them pass.

    Exactly, nothing more nothing less. I always let anybody that wants to overtake me do so if it's safe. I couldn't care less if it's an arsehole or not
    Originally posted by mudflapgirl
    I also find that, if you have them, putting on the back fog light can deter some of them

    Appalling behaviour and also generating extra risks for both yourself and the arsehole behind you as well as other potential road users near you. Tapping the brake pedal is even worse imo :mad:

    What's your problem?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 540 ✭✭✭Andrew Duffy


    I'd like to caution anybody who may be tempted to follow the advice of several people on this board to pull into the hard shoulder of a national route while travelling at 60 Mph or higher not to. The impatience of the driver behind is no reason to endanger your own life by driving at high speed in a narrow, poorly surfaced lane covered in debris, parked cars and merging traffic. Just keep your speed constant, don't speed up when being overtaken, leave space between your car and a car you don't intend overtaking, and don't overtake queues of traffic under any circumstance and you will have a much higher chance of getting where you're going alive.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 131 ✭✭mudflapgirl


    Originally posted by unkel
    Appalling behaviour and also generating extra risks for both yourself and the arsehole behind you as well as other potential road users near you. Tapping the brake pedal is even worse imo :mad:

    Hmmmm....So, in your opinion, I should sit back and let him ride my bumper until he hits me? No, Thank you. I realise that Yes, if he does happen to hit me - I can claim off him, have him arrested for dangerous driving and dealt with accordling to the law. Nice dream, but in the harsh light of day, noone is going to do a dam thing about this type of behaviour on the roads, the Gardai least of all. I have as much right as anyone to be on the roads, I pay my road tax (extorionate as it is) If I come along a scooter doing the speed limit or lower, do I sit behind them beeping and flashing, no. I wait until the road is clear and safe, and overtake them like any sane person would. But when some one comes right up my bumper and starts flashing and beeping, if I am doing the speed limit, I am well within my rights to not pull into the HS. 9/10 I will pull in and let them pass. When they come flying up in a jeep, and jockey behind me trying to get me to pull in when it's not safe to do so and I'm doing the speed limit, I won't. Simple as that. Noone has the rights to do that to anyone on the road, it's a form of bullying and I wouldn't take it in any other situation, why should I on the roads?

    FYI I don't tap my brake pedal - I was using it as an example. I know it's not safe driving practise to do it - shame some road users seem to think otherwise. Using my back fog lights is the last resort for me, if they have not backed off any and I can't pull in to let them pass.

    What's your problem?

    I have no problem, do you?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 112 ✭✭KinSlayer


    Posted by Andrew Duffy:
    I'd like to caution anybody who may be tempted to follow the advice of several people on this board to pull into the hard shoulder of a national route while travelling at 60 Mph or higher not to. The impatience of the driver behind is no reason to endanger your own life by driving at high speed in a narrow, poorly surfaced lane covered in debris, parked cars and merging traffic.

    Sheeesh ... There seems to be traffic in the hard sholder than anywhere else.
    hard sholders vary from place to place. Here in the north west sometimes the hard sholder can be alot better than the main part of the road.

    If drivers use their eyes they will be able to see the state of the hard sholder and balance the safety of driving as normal with someone being agitated behind, against the safety of having no one behind and driving for a wee bit in the hard sholder.

    Alot of this is to do with politeness on the road. if ppl pull over then thank them (flash hazards), they often flash their lights for "your welcome" and everyone carries on happy. The faster driver because he wasnt being held and the slower driver for letting a curteous person past.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭bop1977


    Originally posted by DukeDredd
    Not so when it's a national route with only one lane in either direction. Hard Shoulders are completely different stories to Slow & Overtaking lanes.

    just a quick point.

    there is no such thing as a "slow lane" on dual carraige ways or motorways. you have a hard shoulder, a driving lane (or 2 driving lanes if there are 3 lane + hard shoulder) and an overtaking lane


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,574 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    Originally posted by bop1977
    just a quick point. there is no such thing as a "slow lane" on dual carraige ways or motorways. you have a hard shoulder, a driving lane (or 2 driving lanes if there are 3 lane + hard shoulder) and an overtaking lane
    I think he's referring to the ambiguous "climbing" lanes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭bop1977


    Originally posted by Bond-007
    So it's acceptable for a lorry to plod along at 45mph and hold up traffic rather than to move over to the hard shoulder to allow them to pass?

    usually i find truckers pull in when its safe for them to do so and allow u to pass. unlike most women drivers who will stick to the white line and drive at 10-20mph less than the speed limit


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 540 ✭✭✭Andrew Duffy


    Here in the north west sometimes the hard sholder can be alot better than the main part of the road.

    Thats pretty much irrelevant; it is still narrow, of restricted visibility and liable to contain parked cars, pedestrians and merging traffic.
    If drivers use their eyes

    There is a hell of a difference between the visibility (and braking capability) of a truck driver sitting 3 metres above the ground and travelling at 30Mph and that of a car driver sitting effectively on the ground and travelling at 60Mph. Here's a proposition: ask a Garda what he or she thinks of driving at full speed in the hard shoulder to allow yourself be overtaken.

    Hopefully when the rules of the road are rewritten soon this particular piece of bad advice will be removed from it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Originally posted by mudflapgirl
    But when some one comes right up my bumper and starts flashing and beeping, if I am doing the speed limit, I am well within my rights to not pull into the HS.
    You have no obligation to pull in under any circumstances. Common sense should rule. If you're doing 40mph+, then it would be dangerous. If you're a tractor plodding along at 15mph, it's only common courtesy to pull in because it's mostly safe.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 112 ✭✭KinSlayer


    ask a Garda what he or she thinks of driving at full speed in the hard shoulder to allow yourself be overtaken.

    I wouldnt go near a temple more trained obnoxious rude garda unless it was a matter of grave importance.

    Might ask a friend in the traffic police in england what he thinks.
    Hopefully when the rules of the road are rewritten soon this particular piece of bad advice will be removed from it.

    So this peace of curteous advice should be removed? to what effect? less people pulling over will increase impatience and probably lead to more erratic overtaking due to frustration.

    If it was seen to be a dangerous there would be reports on accidents occuring due to people driving on the hardshoulder. the government would then ban it.

    There are reports of dangerous overtaking causing accidents. And the government have introduced penelty point for careless driving.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Originally posted by KinSlayer
    I wouldnt go near a temple more trained obnoxious rude garda unless it was a matter of grave importance.

    Might ask a friend in the traffic police in england what he thinks.
    So your personal opinion makes his training and knowledge less valid? :rolleyes:
    So this peace of curteous advice should be removed? to what effect? less people pulling over will increase impatience and probably lead to more erratic overtaking due to frustration.
    I wouldn't have it removed, but certainly edit it to the effect:
    "Driving in the hard shoulder is not permitted and should not be done. However, if you are moving particularly slowly, it is acceptable to briefly cross the yellow line to allow some extra room for other drivers to overtake you if they wish. You should not treat the hard shoulder as an extra lane to be driven in under any circumstances"

    Sounds reasonable to me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,513 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    Might ask a friend in the traffic police in england what he thinks
    Ha! Of all people to ask to support your argument, he'd probably be the worst. In England, driving in the hard shoulder is strictly prohibited and a major no-no. It's completely illegal. The rules of the road are also properly enforced over there. Plus there is no "culture" of driving in the HS like there is over here.

    BrianD3


  • Advertisement
Advertisement