Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Mr. Creed

  • 25-01-2000 06:46PM
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 394 ✭✭


    faeg?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 488 ✭✭Sonic


    WAN D!!!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 59 ✭✭Emperor


    Now don't start this again......

    smile.gif


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 488 ✭✭Sonic


    sounds a bit like the rambus debacle today


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,660 ✭✭✭Baz_


    Gandalf, that's what I said in my first post.
    The 'late' MMX boards (Gman/Lawman-Tx chipset) used 66Mhz Sdram, of which there was no decent standard at the time. A LOT of manufacturers ran into the same issues.
    The first P-II board (Portland-440fx) used 60 ns np EDO SIMMS, this covered Klamath 233's and 266 CPU's. No compatibility problems - and since this would seem to be what BAZ has he should be fine.
    The 2nd P-II board, Astoria-LX used 66Mhz Sdram and the Deschutes cpu (266+), same problem as the TX boards.
    The astoria is an OEM intel board, the first LX, so any OEM using it had the same problems.

    Baz difinitely has 168 pin sdram memory. DEFINITELY, no doubt about it at all and as per usual I'm more confused each and every time I reread that damn post.
    I repeat I do not have EDO ram simms.
    OKAY.

    Now I'm sure every one is getting sick of reading this in the quake board, so I don't mind if you reply through the tech board, and anyway the stuff in there is getting old, freshen it up.

    bye for now
    Baz


Advertisement