Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

I'm Taking Eircom to Court

  • 17-06-2003 6:29pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,549 ✭✭✭


    Well guys I am about to take Eircom to court over their DSL service. I won't go into details here I'm afraid. However can anyone recommend a Solicitor in Dublin who would deal with this sort of issue?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 76 ✭✭Krouc


    I am about to take Eircom to court

    No need to take them, they're already there. They never seem to leave the courts.

    And whats sadder is that they have all the money that is supposed to be used for upkeep and new technology etc.. to buy the best solicitors. And when a state body has trouble getting them to comply, I wonder what the man on the street can do.

    Dont know any solicitors I could recommend to you, sorry. But in saying that, it shouldnt be any big deal to prove they are inept.

    Best of luck.

    Krouc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,468 ✭✭✭Lex_Diamonds


    Johnny Cocrain!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,817 ✭✭✭antoinolachtnai


    are you serious? you don't really give enough information for anyone to make an appropriate suggestion for a solicitor. It depends on what you're planning. If it's a small matter to do with billing, you could take it through the local district or circuit court, and someone local to you is your best bet. If you plan on going to the High Court and are prepared to spend a lot of money(maybe 20k-200k), you'd do well to talk to a number of the large firms in Dublin City Centre.

    There's not a bad list at http://www.ucc.ie/ucc/depts/law/irishlaw/practitioners/ which might be a starting point.

    But like I say, it's likely to be expensive, and it's a lot of hassle, so you'd better be pretty sure of yourself.

    a.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,659 ✭✭✭✭dahamsta


    Bill Holohan is CorkWAN's solicitor - he also has an office in Dublin. He's litigated against Eircom in the past, and seemed to enjoy it a little more than he should.

    adam


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,188 ✭✭✭Serbian


    Originally posted by Lex_Diamonds
    Johnny Cocrain!!!

    I was going to suggest Kenneth Starr!

    Anyway Arthur Cox is one of the top Law firms in Ireland. They even have a telecommunications practice group!

    Obviously, one of the top = one of the most expensive.

    You could also try Brian O'Donnel's firm


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,006 ✭✭✭theciscokid


    KPMG


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,549 ✭✭✭The Brigadier


    I'm only taking a personal claim against them. Claiming for loss of earnings and inconvenience caused by Eircom. After cancelling my DSL line, it took them 8 weeks to release my line for another provider!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,512 ✭✭✭Sundy


    is it a small claims court jobbie then?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,549 ✭✭✭The Brigadier


    No, the small claims court will only deal with goods and services, for which you are asking for your money back.

    I went down to them, they said I had to go through the district court


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,817 ✭✭✭antoinolachtnai


    Well, if that's what you want to litigate over, you can save yourself some money by looking at the 1983 act, section 88

    http://193.120.124.98/ZZA24Y1983S88.html

    88.—(1) Subject to subsection (3), the company shall be immune from all liability in respect of any loss or damage suffered by a person in the use of a service referred to in paragraph (a), (b) or (c) by reason of—

    ( a ) failure or delay in providing, operating or maintaining a telecommunications service,
    ( b ) failure, interruption, suspension or restriction of a telecommunications service,
    ( c ) any error or omission in a directory published by the company or any telegrams or telex messages transmitted by the company.
    (2) The members of the staff of the company shall be immune from civil liability except at the suit of the company in respect of any loss or damage referred to in subsection (1).

    ( 3 ) ( a ) Section 39 of the Sale of Goods and Supply of Services Act, 1980, shall not apply to the provision of international services by the company.

    ( b ) The said section 39 shall not apply to the provision of telecommunications services within the State until such date as the Minister for Trade, Commerce and Tourism, after consultation with the Minister, by order provides, whether in relation to such services generally or in relation to services of a class defined in the order in such manner and by reference to such matters as the Minister for Trade, Commerce and Tourism, after such consultation, thinks proper.

    So I don't think you're going to have much luck, unless you can show malice.

    I believe, but am not certain, that Cox's act for eircom. They certainly used to, before the buyout. Therefore, it is extremely unlikely that they would be willing to act.

    KPMG is an accounting firm, not a firm of solicitors.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,143 ✭✭✭spongebob


    Comreg did not exist back in 1983 and there was no Consumer Law pertaining to Telecoms for which enforcememt Comreg has responsibility and not the ODCA

    The legal position has moved on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,817 ✭✭✭antoinolachtnai


    Muck, what substantial change has their been on the key point? Eircom have almost no liability for damages. This situation has not changed.

    As far as I can tell, the 1983 act is still the key legislation governing telecommunications in Ireland. A great deal of the stuff comreg does is still done pursuant to the 1983 Act.

    The 1996 act (http://193.120.124.98/ZZA34Y1996.html) merely transfers the duties of the minister under the 1983 Act (and a few other acts, such as earlier acts and the wireless acts). The whole point of this was to allow for a degree of competition and the sale of eircom.

    As far as I know, there is little or no 'consumer law' pertaining to telecomms. Perhaps someone else knows differently.

    Comreg does not have much of a role in consumer law. It is basically a regulator, not a complaints board. The Director of Consumer Affairs still has a role in telecommunications disputes. For example, if you believe a term of your contract with your telco is unfair, you have recourse to the ODCA (see http://www.odtr.ie/about_us/default.asp?S=2&NavID=19&ctype=3&NID=100004 , third question). However, as far as I know, the Sale of Goods and Supply of Services Act still does not apply to eircom, though I could be wrong.)

    Of course anyone who believes they might have a claim should consult a solicitor with specialised knowledge of the area.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,549 ✭✭✭The Brigadier


    The point is not that by provision of a service eircom have caused a grievance. The issue is that they have with malice prevented any other company from providing me with a service.

    I have strong documentary evidence of this.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,718 ✭✭✭SkepticOne


    Originally posted by James Melody
    The point is not that by provision of a service eircom have caused a grievance. The issue is that they have with malice prevented any other company from providing me with a service.

    I have strong documentary evidence of this.
    In addition to what was suggested by Antoin, you might consider approaching the competition authority with this. A long shot but it won't cost you anything. It might constitute 'abuse of a dominant position' under the competition act, 2000.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,817 ✭✭✭antoinolachtnai


    You might consider approaching the competition authority with this.

    Well, if he have the strong evidence, and it definitely isn't a mistake, James should certainly complain to comreg and TCA.

    However, Comreg and TCA can't rule on damages, and probably won't enter into correspondence on the progress of the case, so he would probably have to go to court as well.

    a.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,718 ✭✭✭SkepticOne


    Originally posted by antoinolachtnai
    However, Comreg and TCA can't rule on damages, and probably won't enter into correspondence on the progress of the case, so he would probably have to go to court as well.
    Yes. Of course, Eircom would be more likely to settle out of court after a finding of abuse from the competition authority.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,143 ✭✭✭spongebob


    Comreg (primarily) and The Competition Authority=TCA (secondarily) are collectively (by protocol in 01/2003) responsible for Competition in telecommunciations.

    James is seking a remedy where Eircom acted in restraint of trade and where cComreg did not stop them. I would first seek a judicial review where eircom and comreg are injuncted from doing so further, this establishes the case.

    I would further ask that Comreg and TCA be directed to investigate and ensure that this will not happen again and to put a system in place to protect others.

    The written report of their investigation(s) will form the basis of the second court case where damages are sought for this illegal activity. Hopefully Comreg will also slap a fine on Eircom to focus them as well.

    my 1.2c


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,006 ✭✭✭theciscokid


    i figure if your stuck for funds we all chip in a bit ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,817 ✭✭✭antoinolachtnai


    Do TCA publish the results of investigations? Not very often, I wouldn't think.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,143 ✭✭✭spongebob


    they will if directed to by a court at injunction time. :D

    BTW James, tell the mods here by PM when the papers are due to be served, they don't want to get done for Contempt as well. The thread must be locked at that point. Not deleted but locked.

    M


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,817 ✭✭✭antoinolachtnai


    The courts can't use state agencies as an investigative arm. That's not the way our legal system works. It's an adversarial system, not an inquisitorial one.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,143 ✭✭✭spongebob


    dereliction of duty by a Regulator who won;t Regulate is called " Institutional Failure"

    the court can direct that this " Institutional Failure" be remediated by the institution, I did say that Comreg was the primary competition authority in Telecoms , did I not ? Read the protocol on the Comreg website from the beginning of this year. It appears that Comreg may clearly act 'in loco' TCA in this issue.

    M


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,817 ✭✭✭antoinolachtnai


    Has an Irish court ever done this before?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,143 ✭✭✭spongebob


    Institutional Failure is a regular in the courts. Say where a child is not being assesed for dyslexia or a dole claim is not processed in time. The courts then direct that due process is followed by the failing institution.

    The institutional failure here is 2 fold.

    1. Eircom blocked a competitor from access to James' line, contrary to regulations.
    2. The Regulator did not enforce the regulations that should have guaranteed access to James' line at James' discretion.

    That is your case James?

    M


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,817 ✭✭✭antoinolachtnai


    Institutional Failure is a regular in the courts. Say where a child is not being assesed for dyslexia or a dole claim is not processed in time. The courts then direct that due process is followed by the failing institution.

    The case about dyslexia was a constitutional issue. There wasn't any failure, just differing opinions.

    I don't know what sort of dole claim case you are talking about. However I assume you are talking about getting a judicial review if you refused your dole.

    Neither of these seem comparable to me. There's no constitutional issue and there's nothing to judicially review.

    Nobody is stopping James from seeking to be vindicated by the courts and seeking damages directly.

    Antoin.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,143 ✭✭✭spongebob


    Originally posted by antoinolachtnai
    Muck, what substantial change has their been on the key point? Eircom have almost no liability for damages. This situation has not changed.

    Of course anyone who believes they might have a claim should consult a solicitor with specialised knowledge of the area.

    ?!????*!?

    If you hadn't stated what you did in the first paragraph there then I wouldn't have suggested a different approach to a 'pure' damages claim.:confused:

    I agree with your final point , off with you James and good luck.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,549 ✭✭✭The Brigadier


    I have registered a complaint with comreg.. I have to wait for up to 10 working days however for a reply...

    when I have that I will take my next step.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,393 ✭✭✭Eurorunner


    best of luck in your rat slaying:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 59 ✭✭FirA_Fascio


    honestly i hope you win your case. in my view eircom should be sued by everyone in the country. eircom lie to us, they deceive us, they rip us off and deprive us of our badly-needed broadband services. at this point, ADSL is out of date, and eircom STILL havent let allowed the majority even access it, as most non-dublin eircom lines are only operating at 14.4K. even some dublin lines are only going at 28.8K because of the nationwide eircom line-splitter scam.

    sue them good!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 35 FirA_Serjio


    Oh plz tell us all what happens if u actually do bring em to court, and what can u do? get sumthin foxed or are u actually getting money off them? omg eircom suck YEAH U HEARD ME U DAMNED SUCKERS


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,143 ✭✭✭spongebob


    OMFG its the FIRA-ngee


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3 mad4chel


    Not sure what the original issue was exactly but My company was going to install ISDN for me and it took 8 weeks for me to find out that my exchange is not capable of providing it, despite being told during the install(admittedly only by the engineer) that it was available. ISDN is at least a generation of technology behind. They still haven't the decency to inform us I had to chase them down for the info. Needless to say I had bought the modem the new phones the whole 9 yards. I was wondering how to be absolutley certain where the nearest exchange was that could provide ISDN?

    I use another billing service for my landline and Eircom telesales rings every other week looking to know if we will be switching back - we keep saying send us on the pricing details - the pricing details never arrive only an application form.

    They really need a serious competitor to shake them UP!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 270 ✭✭gombín


    Quote:
    I was wondering how to be absolutley certain where the nearest exchange was that could provide ISDN?

    What area are you in?

    Regards.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,188 ✭✭✭Serbian


    Originally posted by James Melody
    I have registered a complaint with comreg.. I have to wait for up to 10 working days however for a reply...

    when I have that I will take my next step.
    That was posted on the 29th June. Hear anything back?

    Serb


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3 mad4chel


    The exchange is in BallyCondon which is near glendine just inside the Waterford side of the Cork/Waterford Border. Near Youghal/Tallow Road.

    It seems EsatBT can provide ISDN if you are near a railway line which I am not. They can also provide a concotted wireless to Eircom ISDn exchange and do the billing but sure I am goosed there aswell cos the exchange still won't handle it.

    I was looking at comreg and interesting that some of the surveys 50% were happy to think of Ireland as a centre for ecommerce?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,463 ✭✭✭shinzon


    My friend on the cork road in waterford applied for broadband in june, his line passed the pre-qual test and he went ahead and ordered it online, only to be told that the Tycor Exchange had not been upgraded, he says fair enough hed wait tilll it was, flash forward to last Friday when i told him the tycor exchange was upgraded, he happily went off to ring eircom to reactivate his order

    Guess what

    Sorry sir your line no longer passes the pre-qual test for broadband we cannot offer you broaband at this time, would you be interested in HI-SPEED instead

    ****ers

    Shin


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3 mad4chel


    Which kinda brings me back to the scenario of how I could know for certain.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,549 ✭✭✭The Brigadier


    Ohhhh...Eircom are so incompetant....

    I heard back from them TODAY in regard to Comreg.

    I told them of all the difficulties, they asked when I had disconnected. I told them the 7th of May. They then told me I had not been without service as I had been making voice calls on the line?? Arggghhh...

    Do Eircom even know what DSL is??? This is from one of the senior people in their customer care department,....


Advertisement