Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Once you see people pleading you to do something

13»

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,896 ✭✭✭sabat


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    I strongly suggest reading the actual report instead of some hysterical Covid denial blog site

    The report:
    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting



    No. The blog twists the facts and context into something their audience wants to hear. The actual context is below.

    So they're using people as subjects in a trial of their new type of medication is what you're saying. That's grand so. Those 634 people would have spontaneously developed eye disorders too I presume.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,323 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    sabat wrote: »
    So they're using people as subjects in a trial of their new type of medication is what you're saying. That's grand so. Those 634 people would have spontaneously developed eye disorders too I presume.
    How do you know that this was due to the vaccine and not just with the vaccine?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,190 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    sabat wrote: »
    So they're using people as subjects in a trial of their new type of medication is what you're saying. That's grand so.

    Nope, not what I wrote at all. The report is very clear on what yellow cards are, and what the context is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,861 ✭✭✭✭mfceiling


    He clearly has no experience or qualifications in the area and on this basis I feel it is reasonable that people should questions his motives. The same applies to anyone who doesn't have medical qualifications.

    Maybe, just maybe he is a decent human being and is putting his money to better humankind.

    Or maybe he wants to control the entire world population. Not sure what he'll do with them myself personally. I have an 80 year old uncle who enjoys gardening....I wonder what plans big scary Bill has for him?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,941 ✭✭✭growleaves


    mfceiling wrote: »
    Maybe, just maybe he is a decent human being and is putting his money to better humankind.

    Or maybe he wants to control the entire world population. Not sure what he'll do with them myself personally. I have an 80 year old uncle who enjoys gardening....I wonder what plans big scary Bill has for him?

    He was a predatory capitalist when he was in the computer software business. More recently he's been buying up land all over the United States. Consolidating wealth in the form of property assets basically.

    I've no reason to believe the powerful and wealthy have my best interests at heart. You scoffing at the idea that they don't have my best interests at heart doesn't settle the matter. Please see basically any history book from any century for examples of bad, self-interested behaviour on the part of such people.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,190 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    growleaves wrote: »
    He was a predatory capitalist when he was in the computer software business. More recently he's been buying up land all over the United States. Consolidating wealth in the form of property assets basically.

    He's giving away over 99% of his wealth..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,190 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Once again note the predictable pattern in this thread

    "I don't trust vaccines"
    "I don't trust someone who is giving away all their wealth"
    "I don't trust information about Covid"
    "I don't trust anti-Covid measures"

    Always the same hallmarks. Anti-science, anti-expertise, general ignorance and paranoia of authority


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,323 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    growleaves wrote: »
    He was a predatory capitalist when he was in the computer software business. More recently he's been buying up land all over the United States. Consolidating wealth in the form of property assets basically.

    I've no reason to believe the powerful and wealthy have my best interests at heart. You scoffing at the idea that they don't have my best interests at heart doesn't settle the matter. Please see basically any history book from any century for examples of bad, self-interested behaviour on the part of such people.
    Ok. What do you believe Bill Gates is really up to?

    People here have been suggesting that it's a plot to turn everyone into cyborgs or a plot to depopulate the planet.
    These ideas are pretty silly and deserve to be scoffed at.
    Do you agree?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,374 ✭✭✭aido79


    King Mob wrote: »
    Ok. What do you believe Bill Gates is really up to?

    People here have been suggesting that it's a plot to turn everyone into cyborgs or a plot to depopulate the planet.
    These ideas are pretty silly and deserve to be scoffed at.
    Do you agree?

    The part I find funny is that the richest man in the world (depending on what week you look at it) is pumping huge amounts of money and research into actually putting implants in people's brains never gets a mention in any of these discussions.... possibly because he has made a few sceptical remarks about covid so they don't suspect him of any malice.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,323 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    aido79 wrote: »
    The part I find funny is that the richest man in the world (depending on what week you look at it) is pumping huge amounts of money and research into actually putting implants in people's brains never gets a mention in any of these discussions.... possibly because he has made a few sceptical remarks about covid so they don't suspect him of any malice.
    When the Bill Gates theories stop making as much revenue and traffic, I'm sure they'll get around to him and Musk as well.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,374 ✭✭✭aido79


    King Mob wrote: »
    When the Bill Gates theories stop making as much revenue and traffic, I'm sure they'll get around to him and Musk as well.

    It's actually Musk that is working on the brain implants through his Neuralink project.
    Bezos is following Bill's path and stepping down as CEO of Amazon so he can concentrate on his New World Order plans or world domination....depending on what you read or make up.
    They are definitely future targets for conspiracy theorists when they're finished with covid.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,688 ✭✭✭storker


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    Once again note the predictable pattern in this thread

    "I don't trust vaccines"
    "I don't trust someone who is giving away all their wealth"
    "I don't trust information about Covid"
    "I don't trust anti-Covid measures"

    Always the same hallmarks. Anti-science, anti-expertise, general ignorance and paranoia of authority

    "But..but...my ignorance is just as good as anyone else's expertise! And I researched my facts thoroughly - on Twitter and YouTube...so there!"


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,896 ✭✭✭sabat


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    Once again note the predictable pattern in this thread

    "I don't trust vaccines"
    "I don't trust someone who is giving away all their wealth"
    "I don't trust information about Covid"
    "I don't trust anti-Covid measures"

    Always the same hallmarks. Anti-science, anti-expertise, general ignorance and paranoia of authority

    Bill Gates's wealth has doubled since he made that pledge. He's now 65 and worth $140 billion and continues to hoover up assets-recently making himself the largest holder of arable land in the USA. Distributing money through foundations that follow your own personal agendas is not altruism.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,513 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    sabat wrote: »
    Bill Gates's wealth has doubled since he made that pledge. He's now 65 and worth $140 billion and continues to hoover up assets-recently making himself the largest holder of arable land in the USA. Distributing money through foundations that follow your own personal agendas is not altruism.

    the people who have benefited from that altruism might disagree with you. If it isn't altruism what is it? how has he personally benefited from financing the delivery of mosquito nets?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,323 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    sabat wrote: »
    Bill Gates's wealth has doubled since he made that pledge. He's now 65 and worth $140 billion and continues to hoover up assets-recently making himself the largest holder of arable land in the USA. Distributing money through foundations that follow your own personal agendas is not altruism.
    Again, no source for any of that.
    Why do you expect people to take you word for all of this when you have been abjectly dishonest about pretty much all of your beliefs?

    What has any of this to do with the vaccines and your false claims about them?

    What's Bill Gates' goal with the vaccines?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,374 ✭✭✭aido79


    sabat wrote: »
    Bill Gates's wealth has doubled since he made that pledge. He's now 65 and worth $140 billion and continues to hoover up assets-recently making himself the largest holder of arable land in the USA. Distributing money through foundations that follow your own personal agendas is not altruism.

    So he's giving away twice as much now than he was when he made the pledge? Fair play to him.

    What do you think he's going to do with the land? Helping to solve world hunger seems close to his and his wife's hearts but maybe he's using it to harvest a new organic pathogen for the next pandemic he has in his plans?

    What exactly do you think his personal agendas are?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,418 ✭✭✭silliussoddius


    King Mob wrote: »
    Again, no source for any of that.
    Why do you expect people to take you word for all of this when you have been abjectly dishonest about pretty much all of your beliefs?

    What has any of this to do with the vaccines and your false claims about them?

    What's Bill Gates' goal with the vaccines?

    He has bought a lot of land. The way it's made out above, you'd think he's walking around in wellies, with a mangy sheepdog with bailer twine for a belt building FEMA camps.
    https://www.forbes.com/sites/arielshapiro/2021/01/14/americas-biggest-owner-of-farmland-is-now-bill-gates-bezos-turner/?sh=944dceb6096f


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,323 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    He has bought a lot of land. The way it's made out above, you'd think he's walking around in wellies, with a mangy sheepdog with bailer twine for a belt building FEMA camps.
    https://www.forbes.com/sites/arielshapiro/2021/01/14/americas-biggest-owner-of-farmland-is-now-bill-gates-bezos-turner/?sh=944dceb6096f
    It is not entirely clear how Gates’ farmland is being used, or whether any of the land is being set aside for conservation. (Cascade did not return Forbes’ request for comment.) However, there is some indication that the land could be used in a way that aligns with the foundation’s values. Cottonwood Ag Management, a subsidiary of Cascade, is a member of Leading Harvest, a nonprofit that promotes sustainable agriculture standards that prioritize protections of crops, soil and water resources.
    The monster...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,513 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    King Mob wrote: »
    The monster...

    I knew he was a complete bastard, I just knew it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,941 ✭✭✭growleaves


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    He's giving away over 99% of his wealth..

    He's dumping his money into his own 'charity' foundation which then implements the initiatives he favours. That's not giving away wealth.
    Always the same hallmarks. Anti-science, anti-expertise, general ignorance and paranoia of authority

    He's not a scientist or expert. He's a billionaire who buys up real estate.

    We obviously differ about public figures and institutions. I don't feel that I owe them any sort of trust or benefit of the doubt. Who are they to me?
    King Mob wrote: »
    Ok. What do you believe Bill Gates is really up to?

    People here have been suggesting that it's a plot to turn everyone into cyborgs or a plot to depopulate the planet.
    These ideas are pretty silly and deserve to be scoffed at.
    Do you agree?

    I don't know what Bill Gates' "agenda" is. I don't feel beholden to him in any way. He has spoken about Malthus and population control before on record hence he is suspected by many people of wanting de-population.

    Transhumanism is something that many people support and place their hopes in as a way of overcoming death. I'm totally opposed to it for humanist and religious reasons.

    Now obviously if people such as Scwab and Gates do not regard it as evil but as good and try to promote it I am going to oppose them. The "conspiracy" angle is that they will use their wealth and power to try to make it a fait accompli and yes, impose it. I'm not saying that will happen but I am open it being possible.

    In any case their priorities are so different from mine I would be mad to go along with them. I would rather wealth and power were in the hands of someone else but that isn't happening.

    You may support or oppose transhumanism, I've no idea, but if you oppose it you would surely not be happy that globally influential people support it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,941 ✭✭✭growleaves


    Always the same hallmarks. Anti-science, anti-expertise, general ignorance and paranoia of authority

    Also Bill Gates is not a person in authority. Being rich does not make you an authority, not even in the United States but especially not in Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,513 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    growleaves wrote: »
    Also Bill Gates is not a person in authority. Being rich does not make you an authority, not even in the United States but especially not in Ireland.

    that is absolutely correct. Has he claimed to be an authority?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,256 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    Who decides what is and isn't "science"?

    I know i'm late to the thread and this is from page one, but my God it has to be one of the most brain-numbing questions i've ever read on the internet!

    How people can have all of the world's info at their finger tips and still ask questions like the above. Mother of God!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,896 ✭✭✭sabat


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    I know i'm late to the thread and this is from page one, but my God it has to be one of the most brain-numbing questions i've ever read on the internet!

    How people can have all of the world's info at their finger tips and still ask questions like the above. Mother of God!

    Here's a good example of who decides what is and isn't science these days:

    This tinfoil hat wearing imbecile who gets all his information from youtube videos has come out against the vaccine:
    Bhakdi studied at the Universities of Bonn, Gießen, Mainz and Copenhagen, and at the Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics in Freiburg.[3]

    He studied medicine at the University of Bonn from 1963 to 1970, during part of which (from 1966 to 1970) he was a scholarship holder of the German Academic Exchange Service.[6] Bhakdi worked for a while as a private assistant to the internal medicine specialist Walter Siegenthaler.[5] In February 1971 he received his doctorate in medicine. From 1972 to 1978, he studied at the Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology in Freiburg on scholarships from the Max Planck Society at the Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology in Freiburg and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.[3]

    He worked at the University of Copenhagen for a year before moving to the Institute of Medical Microbiology at the Justus Liebig University in Gießen, where he worked from 1977 to 1990. In July 1979 he habilitated.

    Bhakdi was appointed C2 professor at Gießen in 1982. He spent a further year in Copenhagen and became C3 professor of medical microbiology (at Gießen again) in 1987 before being appointed to the University of Mainz in 1990. From 1991 he headed the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene as a C4 professor.[3]

    Bhakdi retired on 1 April 2012.[7] Since 2016 he has been a visiting scholar at the University of Kiel.[8][9][10]

    Prior to his retirement, Bhakdi produced scientific work in fields such as bacteriology and atherosclerosis, and published multiple scientific articles in these areas.[11] Awards he received include the Order of Merit of Rhineland-Palatinate.[12]

    He has published 349 academic papers and been cited 18,000 times, including 500 "very influential citations."

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sucharit_Bhakdi
    https://www.semanticscholar.org/author/S.-Bhakdi/2899495

    Thankfully, per the wikipedia article, we have guardians to protect us against these covidiot 5g loons spreading dangerous disinformation-like this fine gentleman of the Council of Foreign Relations and formerly of CIA front Aspen Germany. In his article for prestigious medical journal Foreign Policy he notes sagely that Dr Bhakdi is a "so-called expert minting conspiracy theories and undermining fact-based information."

    Barker_Tyson.jpeg

    We are also lucky to have a huge number of independent, non-profit fact-checkers debunking his problematic claims like Correctiv who survive mainly through the benevolence of small donors like a founder of Ebay, the estate of the part owner of Europe's largest magazine, and a humble Hungarian by the name of George Soros. Their top science correspondent Kathrin Wesolowski who-get this- studied journalism and English / American studies in Dortmund and Monterrey , Mexico, and volunteered at the Hessischer Rundfunk, thoroughly put that crank in his place.

    https://dgap.org/en/user/267
    https://correctiv.org/en/about-us/
    https://correctiv.org/team/kathrin-wesolowski/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,688 ✭✭✭storker


    sabat wrote: »
    Here's a good example of who decides what is and isn't science these days:

    This tinfoil hat wearing imbecile who gets all his information from youtube videos has come out against the vaccine:

    He has published 349 academic papers and been cited 18,000 times, including 500 "very influential citations."

    Are you claiming that all medical experts who disagree with him are less qualified? Or are his claims the only qualifcation that you're really interested in?
    Thankfully, per the wikipedia article, we have guardians to protect us against these covidiot 5g loons spreading dangerous disinformation-like this fine gentleman of the Council of Foreign Relations and formerly of CIA front Aspen Germany. In his article for prestigious medical journal Foreign Policy he notes sagely that Dr Bhakdi is a "so-called expert minting conspiracy theories and undermining fact-based information."

    Quite.
    We are also lucky to have a huge number of independent, non-profit fact-checkers debunking his problematic claims like Correctiv who survive mainly through the benevolence of small donors like a founder of Ebay, the estate of the part owner of Europe's largest magazine, and a humble Hungarian by the name of George Soros.Their top science correspondent Kathrin Wesolowski who-get this- studied journalism and English / American studies in Dortmund and Monterrey , Mexico, and volunteered at the Hessischer Rundfunk, thoroughly put that crank in his place.

    You mean "problematic" claims like saying that COVID-19 is no more dangerous than influenza? No special knowledge needed to debunk that. Or to conclude that his credibility is shot. Except with the lunatic fringe, of course, where his stock goes up.

    If you have evidence that any fact-checking organisations are either having their strings pulled or are actually pursuing profits, why don't you post it? If their fact-checking results are wrong, why don't you point out where and how they are in error?

    Your post is just the usual collection of innuendo and appeal-to-incredulity. There is no coherent argument here. In essence:
    • A well-qualified doctor said something that disagreed with the vast majority of the medical profession, therefore he must be right and everyone else must be wrong
    • His claims were fact-checked, therefore the fact-checking organisations must have an agenda.
    • Rich people funding fact-checking organisations must be up to something


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,323 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    sabat wrote: »
    Here's a good example of who decides what is and isn't science these days:

    This tinfoil hat wearing imbecile who gets all his information from youtube videos has come out against the vaccine:



    He has published 349 academic papers and been cited 18,000 times, including 500 "very influential citations."
    Ok. What evidence has he produced that shows the vaccine is dangerous?

    What has this to do with Bill Gates and his agenda?

    Are you going to now also run away from the points being brought up about this guy?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,323 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    growleaves wrote: »
    I don't know what Bill Gates' "agenda" is. I don't feel beholden to him in any way. He has spoken about Malthus and population control before on record hence he is suspected by many people of wanting de-population.
    Well no, he hasn't spoken about "population control". That's at best a dishonest misrepresentation by conspiracy theorists who believe in silly depopulation conspiracies.
    This theorists suspect a great many things that aren't actually true, rational or sane.
    growleaves wrote: »
    Transhumanism is something that many people support and place their hopes in as a way of overcoming death. I'm totally opposed to it for humanist and religious reasons.
    What has this to do with the vaccines?

    Other conspiracy theorists, long since having slunk away have suggested that there is a plot to turn people into cyborgs with large antenna sticking out of their heads.

    Is this what you are suggesting is the agenda behind vaccines?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 140 ✭✭I regurgitate the news


    that is absolutely correct. Has he claimed to be an authority?

    Bill Gates: "Things Won't Get Back To Normal Until We Have Gotten A Vaccine Out To The Entire World"

    Are you saying he was just giving his opinion or was he laying it out for the entire world?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,513 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Bill Gates: "Things Won't Get Back To Normal Until We Have Gotten A Vaccine Out To The Entire World"

    Are you saying he was just giving his opinion or was he laying it out for the entire world?

    that certainly sounds like an opinion to me.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 140 ✭✭I regurgitate the news


    King Mob wrote: »
    Well no, he hasn't spoken about "population control". That's at best a dishonest misrepresentation by conspiracy theorists who believe in silly depopulation conspiracies.
    .........

    Is this what you are suggesting is the agenda behind vaccines?

    Bill Gates:

    First, we've got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 140 ✭✭I regurgitate the news


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    He's giving away over 99% of his wealth..

    Is that how he became the largest landowner in the US?

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/arielshapiro/2021/01/14/americas-biggest-owner-of-farmland-is-now-bill-gates-bezos-turner/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,688 ✭✭✭storker


    Bill Gates:

    First, we've got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent.

    In other words, contraception. Perfectly sensible.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,896 ✭✭✭sabat


    Good article about Gates' relationship with the WHO and the ethical issues and potential conflicts it generates:
    https://www.politico.eu/article/bill-gates-who-most-powerful-doctor/amp/


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 140 ✭✭I regurgitate the news


    storker wrote: »
    In other words, contraception. Perfectly sensible.

    Could be. Gates said vaccines are the best investment he's ever made. I would agree.

    I don't think he got sued for anything that happened in India where according to a study published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 491,000 children developed paralysis as a result of the oral polio vaccine which Gates supported.

    You could go online and search this and have the fact checkers report that it is false or you can go to the link for the report by the Indian doctors and researchers for the published article.

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30111741/

    Am I right in saying no matter what side effects, he cannot be sued?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,323 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Bill Gates:

    First, we've got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent.

    A quote with no source and no context...

    Regardless, that's not talking about population control.

    What do you think he means by this? How will vaccines lower the population?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,688 ✭✭✭storker


    sabat wrote: »
    Good article about Gates' relationship with the WHO and the ethical issues and potential conflicts it generates:
    https://www.politico.eu/article/bill-gates-who-most-powerful-doctor/amp/

    Certainly an interesting article that points out possible unintended consequences of the WHO accepting large donations from business, but there's nothing here that supports any conspiracy theory.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 140 ✭✭I regurgitate the news


    King Mob wrote: »
    A quote with no source and no context...

    Regardless, that's not talking about population control.

    What do you think he means by this? How will vaccines lower the population?

    The source is Bill Gates Ted talk.


    You don't dispute the study published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health where 491,000 children developed paralysis as a result of the oral polio vaccine which Gates supported?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,513 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    The source is Bill Gates Ted talk.


    You don't dispute the study published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health where 491,000 children developed paralysis as a result of the oral polio vaccine which Gates supported?

    correlation or causation? https://www.scidev.net/global/news/oral-polio-drops-linked-to-paralysis-in-india-1x/

    is this the article you refer to? https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/8/1755


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,323 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    The source is Bill Gates Ted talk.
    Ok. So provide the quote and it's context.

    I've seen the talk and he doesn't talk about population control.

    Again
    What do you think he means by this? How will vaccines lower the population?

    And no, if you're referring to the study ohnonotgmail post, I don't dispute it.
    Are you saying that this was done on purpose?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 140 ✭✭I regurgitate the news



    Did you read the article. The 491,000 cases of paralysis were extra (not the total) in what they would have considered correlation.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 140 ✭✭I regurgitate the news


    King Mob wrote: »
    Ok. So provide the quote and it's context.

    I've seen the talk and he doesn't talk about population control.

    Again
    What do you think he means by this? How will vaccines lower the population?

    And no, if you're referring to the study ohnonotgmail post, I don't dispute it.
    Are you saying that this was done on purpose?

    I don't know....You'll have to figure it out for yourself.

    Do some research on Gate's family and who they associated with and their opinions on the topic.

    I doubt you've seen Bill Gates's testimony in relation to the Microsoft Anti Trust trial. Very insightful into the mind of this guy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,323 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    I don't know....You'll have to figure it out for yourself.
    I'm trying to figure out what your position and beliefs are. The only way I can do this is if you tell me or answer my very simple questions.

    You claimed that Bill Gates talked about population control. Yet that's not what he talked about.
    Why do you claim he did?

    If you don't know how vaccines will result in population control, why do you claim that they will?

    If you watched the TED talk, why are you not able to provide the context for the quote and explains what Bill Gates meant?

    Personal I suspect that the answer to these questions is that you haven't actually seen the talk in question and you are just parroting conspiracy theory claims.

    And again could you please state your opinion about the vaccines in India since you brought it up.
    Do you believe those injuries were on purpose or not?


Advertisement