Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Has your job ever ruined a film

Options
13»

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Most office-based films for me, tbh. I wish I could yell "you're fired", stomp around like a massive bitch and face absolutely no repercussions for it, like in the movies! :-))

    Everyone in office work in films is dressed in dark suits, ties and looking smart. It's all glass, steel, high level tech.

    In real life people's desks are a mess, boxes of teabags and tissues, leftovers from lunch on the side.


  • Registered Users Posts: 779 ✭✭✭ChannelNo5


    Oh yes! The film Creep. Its a horror about a girl who falls asleep on the tube and gets 'locked in'. She's pursued around the tunnels by a killer. The LU literally never closes. After the tubes finish, the engineering work/maintenance work begins. a lot of London Underground staff would go missing on the regular if this lad was roaming around. It can be creepy if you find yourself in a quiet section but you're never alone really.


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 25,868 Mod ✭✭✭✭Doctor DooM


    I worked for about 12 years with a specific type of server called an As/400.


    old_as400_1.png

    Colloquially, an As/400 is referred to as a mainframe.

    I have never once hacked a mainframe, and never once said "I'm in" when logging on.

    I have never had a mainframe I was working on hacked into :D



    Edit: the newish Robocop reboot is probably the singular worst IT film I have ever seen. They effectively go live with the production version of Robocop on the morning they are showing him to the press: in enterprise IT this would have been done months in advance, and would have been done in a dev and test environment first.

    What this means is in the film they dump the entire cities DB of crime in his brain on the morning they're showing him off. Then they're all surprised when he goes mad. This'd totally cost the project manager his job :D


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    mariaalice wrote: »
    Plus how come they don't employ a civil engineer as a consultant to get the technical aspect correct.

    Sometimes they do. There was a lovely story about how Neil DeGrasse Tyson met James Cameron. Knowing that Careron had put a lot of work into making his movie as technically accurate as possible - Tyson gave him a good natured ribbing over how wrong the sky was. All the stars were completely wrong for that time and that location.

    Apparently when Cameron some time later was working on remastering an anniversary edition he remembered this and Tyson's secretary got a call and came into Tyson saying something like "James Camerson is on the phone - he says you have a sky for him??"

    Special shoutout to the film 2012 for the line "The neutrinos coming from the sun have mutated" though.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,541 ✭✭✭Padraig Mor


    I won't say what I do for a living, but let's just say the James Bond films have got being a spy and international man of mystery all wrong....:cool::pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,667 ✭✭✭Frynge


    This always drove me mad when watching the X Files.

    Like seriously, these things do not exist, never in my life, across 5 continents, have I ever, been able to find Morley ciggarettes.


  • Registered Users Posts: 130 ✭✭stuboy01


    What a great thread...
    I used to work in TV, producing, directing, and writing.
    I can't watch TV, in particular some Ads, Irish documentaries produced by our tv stations and News location inserts, without screaming at the TV. Drives my wife nuts.
    Fake typing, noddy's, and just college level production. Drives me round the bend. it's all done SOOOO poorly.

    anyway...heard a good interview with a navy seal going nuts about weapons in movies, grenades exploding etc. said he'd never seen a movie do it right.


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    The reality here is that storytellers will ignore realism when it slows down the story, or when it would remove suspense or conflict.

    People love John Wick but there's a scene where John and an assassin are walking through a busy subway station popping off shots at eachother from silenced guns while commuters walk around oblivious to the gun battle. The reality is that they still sound like gunshots. It would be pandemonium, but that's cliche. That's not a fun scene.

    It's annoying, but you can understand why it's done. I'm another IT person here. So many movies rely on, "Just pop this USB key into this ultra-secure mainframe there and copy the data/disable the system". These systems wouldn't have have USB ports and if they did, your USB key wouldn't work. But then you don't have a fun movie.

    Like Independence Day. They travel trillions of KM and the first thing they do is send ships packed with thousands of troops into our atmosphere, co-ordinating them with a simple countdown timer broadcast unencrypted over our own communications networks. And before they're even finished the initial wave they're preparing an invasion fleet?

    The reality is that they would send their own satellite network ahead to establish itself and disable ours. This would be shortly followed by a fleet of small bombs that would hit every city on earth over 50,000 people, in a wave of explosions that would occur in no more than an hour. There'd be no time to run and without our satellite network there'd be little warning.

    With all the major infrastructure gone and half of the population dead, 95% of the population will die from famine and disease in about a year, and then the aliens arrive to clean up and take over with very little effort.

    But that wouldn't make for a very good movie.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,962 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    The OP mentioned the movie Skyscraper: I work in IT, so the idea of having a single tablet computer controlling everything, which could be fully unlocked by the guy's face alone, is not going to happen in real life. Maybe a face AND a PIN code: this is called two-factor authentication, using something you have (face) and something you know (PIN). Yes, I know we use less security than that for convenience, such as unlocking phones on fingerprint alone, but not where security is that critical.

    From out there on the moon, international politics look so petty. You want to grab a politician by the scruff of the neck and drag him a quarter of a million miles out and say, ‘Look at that, you son of a bitch’.

    — Edgar Mitchell, Apollo 14 Astronaut



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,378 ✭✭✭Duffy the Vampire Slayer


    Historical knowledge ruins a lot of things for me. I know Hollywood films supposed to be a documentaries, but when most people form their knowledge of history from TV and films, it's hard not to get annoyed by these things.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,092 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    stuboy01 wrote: »
    anyway...heard a good interview with a navy seal going nuts about weapons in movies, grenades exploding etc. said he'd never seen a movie do it right.
    When Saving Private Ryan came out an elderly chap I knew who had been involved in WW2 fighting against the Japanese in the far east including one beach assault said that got a lot of things right. Not just with the D Day landing scenes, but with the rest of the flic showing soldering as mostly involving wandering around with little going on interspersed with moments of insanity and action. One criticism from guys who'd been there on D Day was that landing scene didn't have enough blood in the water. :D Oh and the scene with guys being killed by bullets underwater. Water is essentially "bulletproof", so if you were fully submerged the chances a round would have enough energy to kill you after passing through a foot of water would be slim indeed.
    Historical knowledge ruins a lot of things for me. I know Hollywood films supposed to be a documentaries, but when most people form their knowledge of history from TV and films, it's hard not to get annoyed by these things.
    Yeah, if you go down that rabbit hole you're screwed alright. :D The flic Pearl Harbor was a charm for it. Nobody smoked, yet back then even cats and dogs were on a pack a day. :D Then the Battle of Britain scenes with the wrong Spitfires with cannons doing way more damage than they would have. It got worse from there.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,467 ✭✭✭Badly Drunk Boy


    Wibbs wrote: »
    When Saving Private Ryan came out an elderly chap I knew who had been involved in WW2 fighting against the Japanese in the far east including one beach assault said that got a lot of things right. Not just with the D Day landing scenes, but with the rest of the flic showing soldering as mostly involving wandering around with little going on interspersed with moments of insanity and action. One criticism from guys who'd been there on D Day was that landing scene didn't have enough blood in the water. :DOh and the scene with guys being killed by bullets underwater. Water is essentially "bulletproof", so if you were fully submerged the chances a round would have enough energy to kill you after passing through a foot of water would be slim indeed.
    I was just looking at a documentary on TG4 on Saturday (Hollywood in Eirinn) and they spoken to the person in charge of filming the underwater scenes in Saving Private Ryan, who was Cian de Buitléar, son of the wildlife filmmaker Éamon de Buitléar. Obviously, he wouldn't have had a say on how bulletproof the water was. :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 33 Monkey arris


    Having spent many years working on Death Stars I found both Star Wars and Return of the Jedi laughable. Complete lack of high vis vests and no sign of a portable toilet. No union would stand for it, Empire or not.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,740 ✭✭✭Faolchu


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Scarlett Johansson in a skin tight catsuit(hello!) beating seven shades of ordure out of huge muscly blokes is a total nonsense, but it's great to watch. .


    yes yes it is


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,740 ✭✭✭Faolchu


    . This'd totally cost the project manager his job :D


    not at all, a good PM would have logged hat in the RAID Log and had the sponsor sign off on it months ago :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,615 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    ChannelNo5 wrote: »
    Oh yes! The film Creep. Its a horror about a girl who falls asleep on the tube and gets 'locked in'. She's pursued around the tunnels by a killer. The LU literally never closes. After the tubes finish, the engineering work/maintenance work begins. a lot of London Underground staff would go missing on the regular if this lad was roaming around. It can be creepy if you find yourself in a quiet section but you're never alone really.

    In real life there was an Irish serial killer called Kieran Kelly from Laois murdering people in the Tube tunnels for over 30 years. It started in the 50s when he was on a platform talking to his best mate and believed he was going to out him as gay. So he pushed him in front of a train and killed him. He stood trial but somehow got off despite witnesses seeing him do it. It was said he got an adreneline buzz from doing it so he kept pushing random strangers onto the tracks. Eventually he was arressted one night for shoplifting and while in a police cell he strangled to death his cell mate because he was snoring. In his delirium he confessed to 16 murders on the London tube over the previous 30 years and he was imprisoned for life until he died in prison in 2001.

    The extent of his serial killing in the Tube was never known by the public at the time because the London police covered it up- they were afraid if they let the public know there was a serial killer in the Tube pushing people in front of trains that there would be mass hysteria and no-one would use the Tube thus crippling the city transport system. His later murders didnt actually involve pushing people onto the tracks, by that point he was violently assaulting them, bringing them down the tunnels before strangling and mutilating them.


  • Registered Users Posts: 130 ✭✭stuboy01


    Wibbs wrote: »
    When Saving Private Ryan came out an elderly chap I knew who had been involved in WW2 fighting against the Japanese in the far east including one beach assault said that got a lot of things right. Not just with the D Day landing scenes, but with the rest of the flic showing soldering as mostly involving wandering around with little going on interspersed with moments of insanity and action.

    in fairness to him, the SEAL did name check SPR for realism, but was more talking about use of modern weapons that he was versed in.
    I also believe that Dunkirk was quite realistic in overall atmos, there was an interveiw with a veteran who was at the movie and was 'brought right back' watching it.

    on your note about soldiers just walking around, the book Band of Brothers covers that quite well...off topic tho.


  • Registered Users Posts: 937 ✭✭✭swimming in a sea


    I used to work in a EPOS till company and recently i saw a super value add where the girl is scanning the products but I could clearly see the till program was not logged in.
    My wife was delighted to hear that information:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,379 ✭✭✭cml387


    Have we got this far without the Full Monty:



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,404 ✭✭✭KevRossi


    Anything with cars from the 70's, 80's or early 90's. I can spot a mile off if that car/options was available that year or not. Same goes for a lot of the music playing, I'll tell you if that tune was out in that part of that year (especially 80's stuff). Not my job, just my hobby.

    I've lived abroad for 15 years, anything in films that has to do with Germany, France or Africa is so often totally wrong it's infuriating.

    My ex-GF and her colleague were kicked out of Jurassic Park in Germany for nearly wetting themselves laughing at how the dinosaurs were created from whatever it was (I've only seen it once and can't remember the details). She's a microbiologist with extensive experience in forensics and DNA. She was studying DNA and genes back in the early 90's when it was very niche. She described it as being similar to saying 'Abracadabra' over a petri dish.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 90,827 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Yeah, if you go down that rabbit hole you're screwed alright. :D The flic Pearl Harbor was a charm for it.
    Compared to Tora! Tora! Tora! and 30 Seconds Over Tokyo and the existing wartime footage , Pearl Harbor just gets so much wrong


    But U-571 takes some beating.
    "They did get one thing right: there were U-boats in the North Atlantic during the war."
    A former German U-boat commander's reaction to the film


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,997 ✭✭✭Adyx


    I adore this film but imagine how crazy you'd go if your monitor made noises like this whenever text appeared on the screen. I know there is a point to it in this film and it sounds great but I couldn't deal with this irl.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,717 ✭✭✭YFlyer


    Brian May must have.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,980 ✭✭✭minikin


    I run a struggling pub in county Kerry, as a sideline I escort foreign ladies, who arrive by trawler, up to Dublin by whatever means necessary via mad indirect routes... can take days, so involves stays in characterful B&B accommodation... have never seen a film that I found implausible.


Advertisement